REVIEW 2 cited by
Rule Learning as Machine Translation using the Atomic Knowledge Bank
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning models, and in particular language models, are being applied to various tasks that require reasoning. While such models are good at capturing patterns their ability to reason in a trustable and controlled manner is frequently questioned. On the other hand, logic-based rule systems allow for controlled inspection and already established verification methods. However it is well-known that creating such systems manually is time-consuming and prone to errors. We explore the capability of transformers to translate sentences expressing rules in natural language into logical rules. We see reasoners as the most reliable tools for performing logical reasoning and focus on translating language into the format expected by such tools. We perform experiments using the DKET dataset from the literature and create a dataset for language to logic translation based on the Atomic knowledge bank.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rule2Text: A Framework for Generating and Evaluating Natural Language Explanations of Knowledge Graph Rules
Rule2Text generates and evaluates natural language explanations of knowledge graph rules, finding that chain-of-thought prompting with entity types works best and that fine-tuning Zephyr on LLM-built ground truth shar...
-
Rule2Text: Natural Language Explanation of Logical Rules in Knowledge Graphs
LLMs generate mostly correct and clear explanations of knowledge-graph logical rules, and combining chain-of-thought prompting with entity type hints improves quality.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.