Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

TextSleuth: Towards Explainable Tampered Text Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.14816 v3 pith:6MBVS5OX submitted 2024-12-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords tamperedtextdetectionanomalydatasetproposeannotationsgpt4o
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, tampered text detection has attracted increasing attention due to its essential role in information security. Although existing methods can detect the tampered text region, the interpretation of such detection remains unclear, making the prediction unreliable. To address this problem, we propose to explain the basis of tampered text detection with natural language via large multimodal models. To fill the data gap for this task, we propose a large-scale, comprehensive dataset, ETTD, which contains both pixel-level annotations for tampered text region and natural language annotations describing the anomaly of the tampered text. Multiple methods are employed to improve the quality of the proposed data. For example, elaborate queries are introduced to generate high-quality anomaly descriptions with GPT4o. A fused mask prompt is proposed to reduce confusion when querying GPT4o to generate anomaly descriptions. To automatically filter out low-quality annotations, we also propose to prompt GPT4o to recognize tampered texts before describing the anomaly, and to filter out the responses with low OCR accuracy. To further improve explainable tampered text detection, we propose a simple yet effective model called TextSleuth, which achieves improved fine-grained perception and cross-domain generalization by focusing on the suspected region, with a two-stage analysis paradigm and an auxiliary grounding prompt. Extensive experiments on both the ETTD dataset and the public dataset have verified the effectiveness of the proposed methods. In-depth analysis is also provided to inspire further research. Our dataset and code will be open-source.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ReAlign: Generalizable Image Forgery Detection via Reasoning-Aligned Representation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ReAlign distills LLM-generated reasoning texts into a lightweight AIGI forgery detector via contrastive image-text alignment to improve generalization on complex forgeries.

  2. DocShield: Towards AI Document Safety via Evidence-Grounded Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DocShield presents a new agentic reasoning framework using Cross-Cues-aware Chain of Thought to detect, localize, and explain text-centric forgeries in documents, with reported F1 gains of 41.4% over specialized metho...

  3. Venus-DeFakerOne: Unified Fake Image Detection & Localization

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeFakerOne integrates InternVL2 and SAM2 into a single model that achieves state-of-the-art results on 39 detection and 9 localization benchmarks for unified fake image detection and localization.

  4. DocShield: Towards AI Document Safety via Evidence-Grounded Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 7B multimodal model jointly detects, localizes, and explains text-image forgeries by cross-validating visual and logical cues, reporting large gains over GPT-4o and specialized detectors.

  5. Venus-DeFakerOne: Unified Fake Image Detection & Localization

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeFakerOne is a unified foundation model for joint image-level fake image detection and pixel-level localization that reports SOTA results on 39 detection and 9 localization benchmarks.

Pith tools