Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Ultrafast Nonthermal Lattice Destabilization and Suppression of Polar Optical Scattering in Electronically Excited $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ from First-Principles and Deep Neural Network Potential Modeling

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in electronically excited α-quartz, raising the electronic temperature to ~2 eV suppresses long-range polar optical-phonon scattering by more than two orders of magnitude, even though the lattice itself is not yet ther

desk verdict The qualitative lattice-destabilization story is solid and the Te-dependent DNNPs are a useful resource, but the quantitative Fröhlich-suppression numbers at Te>2 eV rest on harmonic inputs in an unstable structure and should not be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28838 v1 pith:6N34ENGK submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Iyyappa Rajan Panneerselvam , Mark Yeung , Charlotte Palmer , Brendan Dromey , Lorenzo Stella This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph
keywords α-quartzsilicondioxideelectronictemperaturedeepneuralnetworkpotentialFröhlichcouplingpolaropticalphononscatteringnonthermalmeltingtwo-temperaturemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At high electronic temperature, α-quartz (SiO2) stops behaving like a polar insulator. Training deep neural network potentials on finite-electronic-temperature DFT molecular dynamics lets the authors follow a 3087-atom quartz cell through the first picoseconds after a sudden electronic excitation. They find that the crystal loses mechanical rigidity between 2.1 and 2.2 eV electronic temperature, the bulk modulus drops from 68 to about 2 GPa, and the Fröhlich coupling constant collapses from 1.36 to 0.007 by 2.2 eV. A similar drop in Bader charges indicates a crossover to a nearly nonpolar phase, so polar optical phonon scattering should be strongly suppressed above Te ≈ 2 eV. At the same time, distinct Si and O kinetic temperatures show the lattice does not reach a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium within the first few hundred femtoseconds.

What carries the argument

The central device is a set of deep neural network potentials trained separately at several fixed electronic temperatures (Mermin-DFT finite-temperature AIMD on 72-atom cells) that reproduce energies, forces, and virials well enough to yield converged phonon band structures and MD on a 3087-atom supercell. The physical identity that carries the argument is the Fröhlich formula α = e²/(4πε0ħ) √(m*/(2ħωLO)) (1/ε∞ − 1/εs), evaluated at each Te: although ωLO softens, the inverse-dielectric difference collapses as εs→ε∞, so α drops. Elastic stability criteria for trigonal crystals provide the instability threshold, while pCOHP and Bader analysis identify antibonding occupation and ionicity loss a

What would settle it

Compute the dynamic dielectric and LO phonon spectral function at Te = 2.2 and 2.6 eV directly from a 3087-atom DNNP-MD trajectory (e.g., from the dipole time-correlation function) instead of from harmonic force constants. If the LO peak in the dielectric loss spectrum remains strong and well defined with a large εs − ε∞ splitting, then the claim that polar optical scattering collapses by more than two orders of magnitude is wrong; alternatively, a THz or infrared pump-probe measurement of the LO phonon reflectivity in laser-excited quartz that shows no loss of oscillator strength near 34 THz

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under an instantaneous rise of the electronic temperature Te, α-quartz undergoes a nonthermal destabilization: at Te between 2.1 and 2.2 eV the trigonal structure violates elastic stability criteria, the equilibrium volume expands substantially, and the bulk modulus falls from 68.1 to roughly 2.0 GPa. The mechanism is electronic: conduction-band antibonding states become occupied, weakening Si–O bonds (integrated pCOHP falls from 4.0 to 0.6 eV/bond at 2.6 eV) and reducing Bader charges. Using the electronic- and phonon-band-structure data, the authors estimate the Fröhlich constant α, which drops by more than two orders of magnitude by Te ≈ 2 eV because the dielectric contrast εs/ε∞ approach

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premises are that harmonic LO-phonon and dielectric parameters remain well defined in structures that are already mechanically unstable at Te ≥ 2.2 eV, and that DNNPs trained on 72-atom molecular dynamics faithfully transfer to a 3087-atom cell across the incipient melting regime; if either fails, the quantitative magnitude and threshold of the Fröhlich suppression are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At Te ≳ 2 eV, polar optical phonon scattering in quartz is so strongly suppressed that electron-lattice energy exchange and carrier mobility are dominated by nonpolar, deformation-potential channels.
  • The failure of lattice Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibration within the first few hundred fs means that single-lattice-temperature two-temperature models can misestimate transient energy transfer after ultrafast excitation.
  • The elastic/shear instability threshold between Te = 2.1 and 2.2 eV gives a quantitative nonthermal melting or amorphization criterion for ion-track and laser-damage modeling.
  • The predicted crossover to a nearly nonpolar, low-ionic-charge state implies measurable changes in infrared and LO-TO properties that could be seen in transient optical or x-ray experiments.
  • DNNP-MD at this scale shows that incipient-melting regimes of a 3087-atom cell are accessible with near-DFT accuracy, so similar electronic-temperature-dependent potentials can be built for other radiation-tolerant dielectrics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Fröhlich collapse is real, it suggests the electron-phonon coupling parameter used in thermal-spike models is not constant: it should drop sharply once Te passes ~2 eV, softening the predicted track radii—an extension the paper does not quantify.
  • The species-separated thermalization could be probed directly by time-resolved, element-specific electron or x-ray diffraction; a Debye-Waller measurement distinguishing O and Si sublattice disorder within the first 100 fs would test the DNNP prediction.
  • Because the α values at Te ≥ 2.2 eV are computed for structures with imaginary harmonic phonons, the 'nonpolar crossover' may actually be a loss of well-defined polar phonons; if so, the suppression is robust, but the threshold value of α may be an artifact of treating a saddle point as a crystal.
  • A non-adiabatic extension, allowing Te to decrease as the lattice heats, could show whether the nonthermal suppression survives electron cooling; without that, the long-time outcome remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper combines finite-electronic-temperature DFT, AIMD, and electronic-temperature-dependent deep neural network potentials (DNNPs) to study the response of α-quartz to sudden electronic excitation. It reports that raising the electronic temperature T_e weakens Si–O bonding, expands the lattice, lowers the bulk modulus, and eventually makes the trigonal crystal elastically and dynamically unstable, with an instability threshold between T_e=2.1 and 2.2 eV. It further estimates the Fröhlich coupling constant from band-structure and phonon inputs, concluding that polar optical scattering is strongly suppressed for T_e>2 eV, and uses large-cell DNNP-MD to show that the lattice does not reach a Maxwell–Boltzmann equilibrium in the first few hundred femtoseconds, with Si and O atoms initially equilibrating at different kinetic temperatures.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a valuable multiscale framework for nonthermal lattice destabilization and provides one of the more complete pictures of electronically excited SiO2, connecting elastic, dynamical, bonding, and transport-related indicators. The main strengths are the triangulation of destabilization from multiple independent probes (elastic constants, EOS, pCOHP, Bader charges, DFT/DNNP phonons, and AIMD/DNNP MD), the explicit reporting of DNNP validation errors, and the honest acknowledgment of several limitations (NAC omission, extrapolated EOS at T_e=2.2 eV, and the saddle-point nature of the high-T_e structure). The qualitative destabilization story is well supported; however, the quantitative Fröhlich-suppression claim is partly based on harmonic quantities evaluated at structures the paper itself identifies as unstable, and this overreach needs to be corrected before the quantitative conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III E, Eq. (3), Table I] Table I reports α=0.0070 (2.2 eV) and positive f_LO values for structures that the paper itself identifies as unstable. Sec. III A/Table S1 show that at 2.2 eV elastic conditions (iii) and (iv) fail (λ_min=-10.10 GPa); at 2.6 eV conditions (i) and (iv) fail. Sec. III D states that at 2.2 eV the symmetry-constrained trigonal structure is a saddle point and that at 2.6 eV several branches are imaginary. In such structures the harmonic ω_LO and macroscopic ε_s are not well-defined, and the near-cancellation ε_s/ε_∞=1.0819 that produces the small α may be an artifact. The EOS volume at 2.2 eV is also an extrapolation beyond the sampled V (Fig. 1, Table S2). Because T_e=2.0 and 2.1 eV are stable and already give α=0.0115 and 0.0098, roughly two orders below the ground state, the qualitative suppression conclusion can be retained; but the quantitative 'T_e>2 eV' threshold and the 2.2/2.6 eV en
  2. [§II B, Eq. (2)] The volume-independent HSE correction ΔF_HSE(V_GS0,T_e) is applied to PBE free energies at all volumes. The fitted equilibrium volumes expand from 120.7 Å^3/cell (ground state) to 151.3 Å^3/cell (2.0 eV) and 164.0 Å^3/cell (2.1 eV), and to an extrapolated 231.5 Å^3/cell (2.2 eV). A correction fixed at the ground-state volume is not obviously representative over this range. This directly affects the EOS-derived B_0 (68.1→2.0 GPa), which is a central destabilization metric, and the volumes used for phonon and dielectric inputs. Please quantify the volume dependence of the HSE correction, for example by computing HSE at the expanded volume for T_e=2.0 eV, or soften the quantitative EOS claims.
  3. [§III F, SM Table S3] The DNNP validation reports force MAEs of 0.014–0.028 eV/Å on validation frames drawn from the same 72-atom NVE trajectories used for training; no independent test set from a separate trajectory or from a different thermodynamic state is described. The 3087-atom DNNP-MD at T_e=2.2 and 2.6 eV explores strongly expanded and disordered/fluid-like states (Secs. III F and III G) that lie far from the original training distribution. The non-equilibration and separate T_Si/T_O conclusions are nonetheless corroborated by direct 72-atom AIMD (Fig. 5a), so this is not fatal, but the paper should report an ensemble or uncertainty estimate for the large-cell runs, or explicitly discuss the extrapolation risk.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section I] Typo: 'over a range of electronic temperature relevant relevant for experiments' contains a duplicated word; later 'election-ion relaxation' should read 'electron-ion relaxation'.
  2. [§III C] The text states that at T_e=2.6 eV the −IpCOHP drops to 0.6 eV, but Fig. 2 only shows pCOHP up to 2.2 eV. Add the 2.6 eV panel or refer explicitly to a supplementary figure.
  3. [Table I] No details are given for how m* is extracted from the band structure, nor are uncertainties provided. State the fitting procedure and estimate errors, especially at elevated T_e where the band structure is strongly renormalized.
  4. [§III F] The sentence 'we find that T_O > T_Si, as expected since m_Si > m_O' is ambiguous: if both species had the same kinetic temperature, equipartition would give T_O=T_Si. Clarify that the observation reflects different kinetic energies per atom in the transient regime.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fröhlich α values are assembled from independently computed HSE06 effective masses/dielectric tensors and DNNP-derived LO frequencies; the DNNPs are surrogate models benchmarked against DFT phonons.

full rationale

No load-bearing step in the derivation reduces to its own input by construction. The central quantitative claim—the suppression of polar optical scattering—rests on Eq. (3), whose inputs (m*, ω_LO, ε_s, ε_∞) are obtained from separate DFT and DNNP calculations: effective masses and dielectric constants from HSE06, and LO frequencies from DNNP phonon band structures. Table I reports α values assembled from these independently computed quantities; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation is defined in terms of the claimed result. The DNNPs are supervised surrogates trained on AIMD energies/forces at each electronic temperature; using them to compute phonons is a standard emulator application. The ground-state DNNP phonons are explicitly benchmarked against DFT phonons (RMSE 0.44 THz) and against universal ML potentials, and the electronic-temperature-induced softening and instabilities agree with prior AIMD/DFT literature. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [1] and [14]) provide experimental and modeling context but are not load-bearing for the Fröhlich or lattice-destabilization claims. Concerns about evaluating harmonic LO frequencies and dielectric response at a saddle-point structure for Te = 2.2–2.6 eV, and about the extrapolated EoS minimum at Te = 2.2 eV, are genuine robustness/correctness limitations, but they are not circularity: those α values are not used as inputs to any fit, and the qualitative softening trend is additionally supported by elastic constants, EOS, pCOHP, Bader charges, and AIMD/DNNP-MD dynamics. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not rely on a self-citation chain or an imported ansatz to force its conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper imports the Mermin finite-T DFT framework, the Fröhlich polaron model, the harmonic phonon framework, and standard elastic-stability theory. The genuinely fitted components are the DNNP weights and the EOS parameters; no new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • DNNP trainable weights and hyperparameters = Six independent models, weights not released; cutoff 6.0 Å, smoothing 0.5 Å, embedding 25/50/100, fitting 3×240
    Fitted to AIMD energies, forces and virials; these potentials produce the phonons, VDOS, and MD trajectories that support the main claims.
  • Birch-Murnaghan EOS parameters (F0, V0, B0, B0') per T_e = Ground: V0=120.74 Å3/cell, B0=68.08 GPa, B0'=-1.90; T_e=2.2 eV: V0=231.48 Å3/cell, B0=2.03 GPa, B0'=5.35
    Fitted to Mermin free-energy vs volume curves; used to support volume expansion and bulk-modulus reduction claims. The 2.2 eV fit is extrapolated beyond sampled volumes.
  • Per-species Maxwell-Boltzmann temperature fits (T_Si, T_O) = Not tabulated; shown in SM Fig. S6 for frames every 10 fs
    Fit to Si and O speed histograms to support the claim that the lattice does not reach a single Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium and that species temperatures differ.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Mermin finite-T DFT provides the correct electronic free energy and forces for photo-excited SiO2
    The entire simulation protocol is built on fixed-T_e Mermin DFT (Sec. II A); nonadiabatic electron-ion relaxation is explicitly out of scope.
  • domain assumption After sudden excitation, the lattice evolves on the constant-T_e Born-Oppenheimer surface
    The method raises T_e instantaneously and runs NVE on the T_e-dependent free-energy surface (Secs. II C, III F); no explicit electron-hole dynamics or recombination is included.
  • ad hoc to paper The HSE06 correction is volume-independent (Eq. 2)
    A rigid shift ΔF_HSE(V0^GS,T_e) is applied to PBE free energies over the whole volume range; the paper states this is expected to be accurate for isochoric excitation, but it is an approximation.
  • domain assumption The Fröhlich formula (Eq. 3) with scalar effective mass and a single LO phonon frequency captures the polar electron-phonon interaction
    Used in Sec. III E to compute α from ε_s, ε_∞, m*, and f_LO; a single LO mode is taken even though the structure is unstable and NAC is omitted.
  • domain assumption Harmonic phonon approximation remains meaningful up to T_e = 2.2 eV
    Phonons are computed by finite displacements with phonopy/phonolammps even where elastic criteria fail and imaginary branches appear (Sec. III D); the quasiharmonic picture breaks down at high T_e.
  • domain assumption DNNPs trained on 72-atom NVE runs transfer to 3087-atom MD across the incipient-melting regime
    The 7×7×7 supercell MD (Sec. II D) assumes the learned potential generalizes beyond the training cell size and phase-space region; AIMD/DNNP agreement is shown for temperatures, but not for all structural regimes.
  • standard math Elastic stability criteria for trigonal crystals are necessary/sufficient for mechanical stability
    Standard Born criteria from Mouhat and Coudert (Ref. 67), applied in Sec. III A.
  • domain assumption Species-resolved Maxwell-Boltzmann fits and equipartition provide meaningful instantaneous temperatures
    Used in Sec. III F and SM to define T_Si and T_O; this assumes each species' velocity distribution is near a MB shape, which is exactly what the paper questions globally.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast Nonthermal Lattice Destabilization and Suppression of Polar Optical Scattering in Electronically Excited $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ from First-Principles and Deep Neural Network Potential Modeling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6N34ENGK

@misc{pith2026260728838,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast Nonthermal Lattice Destabilization and Suppression of Polar Optical Scattering in Electronically Excited $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ from First-Principles and Deep Neural Network Potential Modeling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6N34ENGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28838}
}
abstract

We present a multiscale first-principles-to-machine-learning approach to investigate ultrafast lattice dynamics in electronically excited $\alpha$-SiO$_2$. Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) based on electronic-temperature-dependent density functional theory (DFT) are used to train electronic-temperature-dependent deep neural network potentials (DNNPs). The use of DNNPs enables atomistic modeling at near-DFT accuracy of large $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ cells with thousands of atoms. In particular, DNNPs allowed us to obtain accurate phonon band structures and molecular dynamics (MD) of $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ excited by a sudden increase in electronic temperature. With increasing electronic temperature, $T_e$, pronounced lattice destabilization of $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ is found, as evidenced by violations of elastic stability criteria, substantial volumetric expansion, a sharp reduction of the bulk modulus, and progressive weakening of Si-O bonding due to antibonding-state occupation. From the electronic and phonon band structures, we estimated the Frohlich coupling constant, which decreases as $T_e$ increases, suggesting a crossover to a nonpolar phase of $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ at elevated electronic temperature. This is corroborated by the Bader charge analysis. We also suggest that polar optical phonon scattering should be strongly suppressed at $T_e > 2$ eV. From large-cell DNNP-MD simulations, we show that a well-defined thermal equilibrium, as defined by the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, is not achieved over the first few hundred femtoseconds. This behavior explains the non-monotonic equilibration of the kinetic temperature after a sudden rise of $T_e$. After $T_e$ is raised to 2.6 eV, Si and O atoms first equilibrate separately at two different temperatures, suggesting an atomic fluid phase, in agreement with recent experimental and theoretical findings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28838 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Calculated electronic free energy-volume curves of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: PBE-based projected Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Comparison of phonon band dispersions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Phonon dispersion relations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Lattice temperature evolution in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Vibrational density of states (VDOS) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. P. Kennedy, M. Coughlan, C. R. J. Fitzpatrick, H. M. Huddleston, J. Smyth, N. Breslin, H. Donnelly, B. Villagomez-Bernabe, O. N. Rosmej, F. Currell, L. Stella, D. Riley, M. Zepf, M. Yeung, C. L. S. Lewis, and B. Dromey, Real-time observation of frustrated ultrafast re- covery from ionization in nanostructured sio2 using laser-driven accelerators, Phys....

    2024

  2. [2]

    Coughlan, H

    M. Coughlan, H. Donnelly, N. Breslin, C. Arthur, G. Nersisyan, M. Yeung, B. Villagomez- Bernabe, M. Afshari, F. Currell, M. Zepf, and B. Dromey, Ultrafast dynamics and evolution of ion-induced opacity in transparent dielectrics, New J. Phys.22, 103023 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W. Shore, and M. D. Perry, Nanosecond-to-femtosecond laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. B53, 1749 (1996)

    1996

  4. [4]

    Meftah, F

    A. Meftah, F. Brisard, J. M. Costantini, E. Dooryhee, M. Hage-Ali, M. Hervieu, J. P. Sto- quert, F. Studer, and M. Toulemonde, Track formation in sio 2 quartz and the thermal-spike mechanism, Phys. Rev. B49, 12457 (1994)

    1994

  5. [5]

    Kishimoto, N

    N. Kishimoto, N. Okubo, O. A. Plaksin, and Y. Takeda, Electronic excitation effects on radiation damage in insulators under ion irradiation, J. Nucl. Mater.329–333, 1048 (2004). 27

    2004

  6. [6]

    Tsaturyan, E

    A. Tsaturyan, E. Kachan, R. Stoian, and J.-P. Colombier, Ultrafast bandgap narrowing and cohesion loss of photoexcited fused silica, J. Chem. Phys.156, 224301 (2022), published: 14 June 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Kachan, A

    E. Kachan, A. Tsaturyan, R. Stoian, and J.-P. Colombier, First-principles study of ultrafast bandgap dynamics in laser-excitedα-quartz, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics232, 2241 (2023), published online: 11 January 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    M. Ono, S. Kasamatsu, and H. Gonome, First-principles study of instantaneous driving force on a lattice system by electronic excitation, Journal of Applied Physics138, 073103 (2025)

    2025

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    M. Ono, H. Gonome, and A. Komiya, First-principles investigation of the relationship between laser irradiation intensity and non-thermal melting ofα-quartz, J. Appl. Phys.138, 105103 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    A. M. Stoneham, Radiation effects in insulators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B91, 1 (1994)

    1994

  3. [11]

    A. J. Corso, M. Padovani, G. Santi, R. H¨ ubner, U. Kentsch, M. Bazzan, and M. G. Pelizzo, Optical thin films in space environment: Investigation of proton irradiation damage, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces16, 38645 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Kaganov, E

    M. Kaganov, E. Lifshitz, and L. Tanatarov, Relaxation between electrons and the crystalline lattice, Sov. Phys. JETP4, 173 (1957)

    1957

  5. [13]

    Anisimov, B

    S. Anisimov, B. Kapeliovich, T. Perelman,et al., Electron emission from metal surfaces ex- posed to ultrashort laser pulses, Sov. Phys. JETP39, 375 (1974)

    1974

  6. [14]

    Stella, J

    L. Stella, J. Smyth, B. Dromey, and J. Kohanoff, An excitonic model for the electron–hole plasma relaxation in proton-irradiated insulators, Eur. Phys. J. D75, 203 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Waldecker, R

    L. Waldecker, R. Bertoni, R. Ernstorfer, and J. Vorberger, Electron-phonon coupling and energy flow in a simple metal beyond the two-temperature approximation, Phys. Rev. X6, 021003 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Ono, Modeling the nonthermal relaxation processes of photoexcited solids: A short review, Transactions of the Materials Research Society of Japan44, 51 (2019)

    S. Ono, Modeling the nonthermal relaxation processes of photoexcited solids: A short review, Transactions of the Materials Research Society of Japan44, 51 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Caruso and D

    F. Caruso and D. Novko, Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two- temperature model to the time-dependent boltzmann equation, Advances in Physics: X7, 2095925 (2022). 28

    2022

  10. [18]

    Singh, Hot electron relaxation: A review of the two temperature model for ultrafast non- equilibrium phenomena in metals, APL Quantum2, 021502 (2025)

    N. Singh, Hot electron relaxation: A review of the two temperature model for ultrafast non- equilibrium phenomena in metals, APL Quantum2, 021502 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Medvedev, R

    N. Medvedev, R. Voronkov, and A. Volkov, Nonthermal effects in solids after swift heavy ion impact, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms547, 165218 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Medvedev and A

    N. Medvedev and A. E. Volkov, Nonthermal acceleration of atoms as a mechanism of fast lattice heating in ion tracks, Journal of Applied Physics131, 225903 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Stampfli and K

    P. Stampfli and K. H. Bennemann, Theory for the instability of the diamond structure of si, ge, and c induced by a dense electron-hole plasma, Phys. Rev. B42, 7163 (1990)

    1990

  14. [22]

    Stampfli and K

    P. Stampfli and K. H. Bennemann, Time dependence of the laser-induced femtosecond lattice instability of si and gaas: Role of longitudinal optical distortions, Phys. Rev. B49, 7299 (1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    K. H. Bennemann, Ultrafast dynamics in solids, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, R995 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    P. Stampfli, Electronic excitation and structural stability of solids, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms107, 138 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    Schiwietz, K

    G. Schiwietz, K. Czerski, M. Roth, F. Staufenbiel, and P. Grande, Femtosecond dynamics – snapshots of the early ion-track evolution, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms225, 4 (2004), the Evolution of Ion Tra...

    2004

  18. [26]

    Toulemonde, C

    M. Toulemonde, C. Dufour, and E. Paumier, Transient thermal process after a high-energy heavy-ion irradiation of amorphous metals and semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B46, 14362 (1992)

    1992

  19. [27]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  20. [28]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.137, A1441 (1965)

    1965

  21. [29]

    Alavi, J

    A. Alavi, J. Kohanoff, M. Parrinello, and D. Frenkel, Ab initio molecular dynamics with excited electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 2599 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    P. L. Silvestrelli, A. Alavi, M. Parrinello, and D. Frenkel, Ab initio molecular dynamics sim- ulation of laser melting of silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3149 (1996). 29

    1996

  23. [31]

    P. L. Silvestrelli, A. Alavi, M. Parrinello, and D. Frenkel, Structural, dynamical, electronic, and bonding properties of laser-heated silicon: An ab initio molecular-dynamics study, Phys. Rev. B56, 3806 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Boero, A

    M. Boero, A. Oshiyama, P. L. Silvestrelli, and K. Murakami, Free energy molecular dynamics simulations of pulsed-laser-irradiated sio2: Si–si bond formation in a matrix of sio2, Applied Physics Letters86, 201910 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Boero, A

    M. Boero, A. Oshiyama, P. Luigi Silvestrelli, and K. Murakami, First-principle molecular dy- namics study of bond disruption and formation in sio2 upon irradiation, Physica B: Condensed Matter376-377, 945 (2006), proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Defects in S...

    2006

  26. [34]

    Tsaturyan, E

    A. Tsaturyan, E. Kachan, R. Stoian, and J.-P. Colombier, Unraveling the electronic proper- ties in SiO 2 under ultrafast laser irradiation, npj Computational Materials10, 200 (2024), published online: 31 August 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Laudernet, J

    Y. Laudernet, J. Cl´ erouin, and S. Mazevet, Ab initio simulations of the electrical and optical properties of shock-compressed sio 2, Phys. Rev. B70, 165108 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Denoeud, A

    A. Denoeud, A. Benuzzi-Mounaix, A. Ravasio, F. Dorchies, P. M. Leguay, J. Gaudin, F. Guyot, E. Brambrink, M. Koenig, S. Le Pape, and S. Mazevet, Metallization of warm dense sio 2 studied by xanes spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 116404 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Engelhorn, V

    K. Engelhorn, V. Recoules, B. I. Cho, B. Barbrel, S. Mazevet, D. M. Krol, R. W. Falcone, and P. A. Heimann, Electronic structure of warm dense silicon dioxide, Phys. Rev. B91, 214305 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    E. C. Green, E. Artacho, and J. A. Connolly, Bulk properties and near-critical behaviour of sio2 fluid, Earth and Planetary Science Letters491, 11 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Zhang, M

    S. Zhang, M. A. Morales, R. Jeanloz, M. Millot, S. X. Hu, and E. Zurek, Nature of the bonded- to-atomic transition in liquid silica to tpa pressures, Journal of Applied Physics131, 071101 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    H. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Han, and W. E, Deepmd-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics, Computer Physics Communications 228, 178 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    J. Zeng, D. Zhang, D. Lu, P. Mo, Z. Li, Y. Chen, M. Rynik, L. Huang, Z. Li, S. Shi, Y. Wang, H. Ye, P. Tuo, J. Yang, Y. Ding, Y. Li, D. Tisi, Q. Zeng, H. Bao, Y. Xia, J. Huang, K. Muraoka, 30 Y. Wang, J. Chang, F. Yuan, S. L. Bore, C. Cai, Y. Lin, B. Wang, J. Xu, J.-X. Zhu, C....

    2023

  34. [42]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes forAb Initiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency ofAb Initiototal energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  37. [45]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner,Ab Initiomolecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  38. [46]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  39. [47]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  40. [48]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys.125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    K. A. Persson, Materials data on sio2 (sg:154) by materials project (2014), materials Project ID: mp-6930

    2014

  43. [51]

    W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling,Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing(Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986)

    1986

  44. [52]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Condens. Matter35, 353001 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Plettenberg, B

    P. Plettenberg, B. Bauerhenne, and M. E. Garcia, Neural network interatomic potential for laser-excited materials, Commun. Mater.4, 63 (2023). 31

    2023

  47. [55]

    Q. Zeng, B. Chen, S. Zhang, D. Kang, H. Wang, X. Yu, and J. Dai, Full-scale ab initio simulations of laser-driven atomistic dynamics, npj Comput. Mater.9, 213 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Corradini, G

    A. Corradini, G. Marini, and M. Calandra, Scalable machine learning approach to light- induced order–disorder phase transitions with ab initio accuracy, npj Comput. Mater.11, 151 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    J. Zeng, X. Peng, Y.-B. Zhuang, H. Wang, F. Yuan, D. Zhang, R. Liu, Y. Wang, P. Tuo, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Li, C. T. Nguyen, J. Huang, A. Peng, M. Rynik, W.-H. Xu, Z. Zhang, X.-Y. Zhou, T. Chen, J. Fan, W. Jiang, B. Li, D. Li, H. Li, W. Liang, R. Liao, L. Liu, C. Luo, L. Ward,...

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, Lammps: A flexible simulation tool for particle- based mater...

    2022

  51. [59]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, Vaspkit: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using the vasp code, Computer Physics Communications267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    A. M. Ganose, A. J. Jackson, and D. O. Scanlon, sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodicAb Initiocalculations, Journal of Open Source Software3, 717 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Dronskowski and P

    R. Dronskowski and P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Crystal orbital hamilton populations (cohp): Energy- resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations, J. Phys. Chem.97, 8617 (1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´ eeff, and R. Dronskowski, Crystal orbital hamilton population (cohp) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets, J. Phys. Chem. A115, 5461 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´ eeff, and R. Dronskowski, Analytic projection from plane-wave and paw wavefunctions and application to chemical-bonding analysis in solids, J. Comput. Chem.34, 2557 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´ eeff, and R. Dronskowski, Lobster: A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based density-functional theory, J. Comput. Chem.37, 32 1030 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Nelson, C

    R. Nelson, C. Ertural, J. George, V. L. Deringer, G. Hautier, and R. Dronskowski, Lob- ster: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector- augmented-wave-based density-functional theory, J. Comput. Chem.41, 1931 (2020)

    1931

  58. [66]

    W. Tang, E. Sanville, and G. Henkelman, A grid-based bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter21, 084204 (2009)

    2009

  59. [67]

    Mouhat and F.-X

    F. Mouhat and F.-X. Coudert, Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems, Phys. Rev. B90, 224104 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    Cabral, J

    L. Cabral, J. Andr´ es, T. R. Machado, A. Picinin, J. P. Rino, V. Lopez-Richard, E. Longo, A. F. Gouveia, G. E. Marques, E. Z. da Silva, and M. A. San-Miguel, Evidence for the formation of metallic in after laser irradiation of inp, J. Appl. Phys.126, 025902 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Choping, J

    E. Choping, J. Park, C. Wong, and A. Schleife, First-principles study of the elastic tensor of gap at high electronic temperature, MRS Adv.9, 689 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    J. Wang, J. Li, S. Yip, D. Wolf, and S. R. Phillpot, Elastic instability and melting of homo- geneous crystals: Unifying two criteria of born, Physica A240, 396 (1997)

    1997

  63. [71]

    O. L. Anderson, A simplified method for calculating the debye temperature from elastic con- stants, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids24, 909 (1963)

    1963

  64. [72]

    Recoules, J

    V. Recoules, J. Cl´ erouin, G. Z´ erah, P.-M. Anglade, and S. Mazevet, Effect of intense laser irradiation on the lattice stability of semiconductors and metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 055503 (2006), published 7 February 2006

    2006

  65. [73]

    B. Xiao, J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, J. Feng, R. Haunschild, G. E. Scuseria, and J. P. Perdew, Testing density functionals for structural phase transitions of solids under pressure: Si, SiO 2, and Zr, Phys. Rev. B88, 184103 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Otobe, High-harmonic generation inα-quartz by electron-hole recombination, Phys

    T. Otobe, High-harmonic generation inα-quartz by electron-hole recombination, Phys. Rev. B94, 235152 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    A. D. Becke and E. R. Johnson, A simple effective potential for exchange, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 221101 (2006)

    2006

  68. [76]

    Tran and P

    F. Tran and P. Blaha, Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 226401 (2009)

    2009

  69. [77]

    Mizokami, A

    K. Mizokami, A. Togo, and I. Tanaka, Lattice thermal conductivities of two SiO2 polymorphs by first-principles calculations and the phonon boltzmann transport equation, Phys. Rev. B 33 97, 224306 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    A. Loew, D. Sun, H.-C. Wang, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, Universal machine learning interatomic potentials are ready for phonons, npj Computational Materials11, 178 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    P. B. Allen, Theory of thermal relaxation of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1460 (1987)

    1987

  72. [80]

    Medvedev, Electron-phonon coupling in semiconductors at high electronic temperatures, Phys

    N. Medvedev, Electron-phonon coupling in semiconductors at high electronic temperatures, Phys. Rev. B108, 144305 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Brouwer and B

    N. Brouwer and B. Rethfeld, Excitation and relaxation dynamics in dielectrics irradiated by an intense ultrashort laser pulse, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B31, C28 (2014)

    2014

  74. [82]

    Brouwer and B

    N. Brouwer and B. Rethfeld, Transient electron excitation and nonthermal electron-phonon coupling in dielectrics irradiated by ultrashort laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B95, 245139 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics3, 325 (1954)

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics3, 325 (1954)

    1954

  76. [84]

    Porod and D

    W. Porod and D. K. Ferry, Monte carlo study of high-energy electrons in silicon dioxide, Physical Review Letters54, 1189 (1985)

    1985

  77. [85]

    Medvedev, Z

    N. Medvedev, Z. Li, and B. Ziaja, Thermal and nonthermal melting of silicon under femtosec- ond x-ray irradiation, Phys. Rev. B91, 054113 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    D. G. Hicks, T. R. Boehly, J. H. Eggert, J. E. Miller, P. M. Celliers, and G. W. Collins, Dissociation of liquid silica at high pressures and temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 025502 (2006)

    2006

  79. [87]

    C. Lian, S. B. Zhang, and S. Meng, Ab initio evidence for nonthermal characteristics in ultrafast laser melting, Phys. Rev. B94, 184310 (2016)

    2016

  80. [88]

    Ab Initio Evidence for Nonthermal Characteristics in Ultrafast Laser Melting

    T. Zier, M. E. Garcia, and P. L. Silvestrelli, Comment on “Ab Initio Evidence for Nonthermal Characteristics in Ultrafast Laser Melting”, Phys. Rev. B99, 066301 (2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    Comment on ‘Ab Initio Evidence for Nonthermal Characteristics in Ultrafast Laser Melting’

    C. Lian, S. B. Zhang, and S. Meng, Reply to “Comment on ‘Ab Initio Evidence for Nonthermal Characteristics in Ultrafast Laser Melting’ ”, Phys. Rev. B99, 066302 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    V. V. Brazhkin and K. Trachenko, What separates a liquid from a gas?, Physics Today65, 68 (2012)

    2012

  83. [91]

    Trachenko and V

    K. Trachenko and V. V. Brazhkin, Collective modes and thermodynamics of the liquid state, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 016502 (2015). 34 Supplemental Material Ultrafast Nonthermal Lattice Destabilization and Suppression of Polar Optical Scattering in Electronically Excite...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.