Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 34 references

Initial-State Charge Density Predicts Final-State Net Charge Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Final net-proton elliptic flow is, at leading order, a linear response to a charge-odd cumulant of the initial baryon density, with correlation above 0.9 in simulated gold-gold collisions.

desk verdict Novel C-odd net-flow estimator with a clean cumulant derivation, but the >0.9 correlation is one model-chain consistency check, not decisive evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16038 v1 pith:6NGXS3I5 submitted 2025-05-21 nucl-th hep-ph

Jefferson Sousa , Matthew D. Sievert , Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler , Patrick Carzon , Matthew Luzum This is my paper
classification nucl-thhep-ph
keywords netflowobservablescharge-conjugationsymmetryinitial-stateestimatorsbaryondensityellipticevent-by-eventfluctuationsrelativisticheavy-ioncollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a new family of flow observables that are antisymmetric under charge conjugation—net flow vectors—and matching initial-state estimators built from the density of a conserved charge such as baryon number. The central claim is that the final event-by-event net-proton elliptic flow is, at leading order, a linear response to a charge-odd cumulant of the initial baryon density, with a correlation coefficient above 0.9 in central and mid-central gold-gold collisions at 19.6 GeV per nucleon pair. This matters because it extends the successful initial-state-geometry paradigm from energy and momentum to conserved charges, opening new charge-dependent probes of the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The central object is the charge-conjugation-odd net flow vector $V_n^{\text{net}}$ and its leading-order estimator $\mathcal{E}_n^{\text{net}}(\gamma_B)$, constructed from a generating function that adds a charge-density term to the energy density. The cumulants $W_{n,m}^{\text{net}}$ are obtained by a Fourier-Taylor expansion of the logarithm of the generating function's transform, and $\mathcal{E}_n^{\text{net}}$ is the ratio of the lowest rotational net cumulant to a symmetrized cumulant that sets the system size. The paper also introduces a response coefficient $\gamma_B$ that controls the relative weight of the initial baryon density; it is small, of order 10%, and is fixed by maximizing the estimator's correlation with the simulated net flow.

What would settle it

Run the same estimator with an independent initial-condition model that deposits baryon number differently (for example, a saturation-based picture), keeping all other simulation steps fixed; if the correlation $Q_2\{V_2^{\text{net}}, \mathcal{E}_2^{\text{net}}\}$ drops well below 0.9, the prediction is an artifact of the specific charge deposition. A second check is to increase the baryon diffusion coefficient in the hydrodynamic stage and see whether the correlation collapses, which would signal that the linear response is not generic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the single-event net flow vector $V_n^{\text{net}}$, defined as the difference between the flow coefficients of particles and antiparticles of a given species, can be estimated at leading order by $V_n^{\text{est}} = \kappa_n \mathcal{E}_n^{\text{net}}(\gamma_B)$, where $\mathcal{E}_n^{\text{net}}$ is a ratio of an antisymmetrized charge-odd cumulant to a symmetrized size-normalization cumulant, built from the generating function $\rho = \varepsilon - E_\perp \gamma_B n_B$. In simulations with fluctuating initial baryon density, this estimator correlates with the net-proton elliptic flow vector $V_2^{\text{net}}$ at $Q_2 > 0.9$ for central and mid-central events, whereas the conventional eccentricity $\mathcal{E}_2$ has almost no correlation. The paper reads this as evidence that the initial baryon density distribution is a faithful predictor of net-baryon flow, with the relative importance of the charge density growing in peripheral collisions.

Load-bearing premise

The validation assumes that the simulated initial baryon density from the Monte Carlo deposition matches the true conserved-charge density, and that baryon diffusion during hydrodynamic evolution is weak enough to preserve that mapping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Net flow observables can be constructed for any conserved charge (baryon number, strangeness, electric charge) and any harmonic order by the same symmetry recipe, giving a large set of new charge-dependent measurements.
  • The same initial-state estimator applies in high-energy collisions where the average net charge is zero but local charge fluctuations exist, such as from gluon splitting into quark-antiquark pairs.
  • The framework supplies a baseline for charge transport in relativistic hydrodynamics, which is needed before critical-point fluctuations are added to simulations.
  • A single value of $\gamma$ is expected to describe all harmonics, analogous to the role of initial momentum degrees of freedom in small-system flow.
  • Estimator performance degrades in peripheral collisions, which the paper attributes to nonlinear corrections and to the small number of antiprotons causing large statistical uncertainty.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear mapping holds in data, net-charge flow measurements could become a way to infer the initial baryon-stopping distribution, which is not directly observable.
  • The same estimator logic could be applied to strangeness and electric charge; because their initial densities are harder to model, a drop in correlation there would localize which charge currents are actually conserved through the hydrodynamic stage.
  • A straightforward extension is to vary the baryon diffusion coefficient in the simulations; the estimator's predictive power should degrade once diffusion is strong enough to erase initial charge patterns, and that degradation curve would constrain the transport coefficient.
  • The observable $v_n^{\text{net}}\{2\}$ defined in the paper could be measured in existing low-energy heavy-ion data; a centrality-dependent hierarchy mirroring the simulations would confirm the framework outside the model chain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new class of charge-conjugation-odd flow observables, the net flow vectors V_n^net, together with initial-state estimators E_n^net built from antisymmetrized cumulants of a generalized generating function rho(x_perp) = epsilon(x_perp) - E_perp gamma_B n_B(x_perp). The leading-order estimator for n=2 is validated in superMC+MUSIC+UrQMD simulations of 19.6 GeV Au+Au collisions, where the Pearson correlation Q2{V_2^net, E_2^net} is reported to exceed 0.9 for central and mid-central events, whereas the ordinary eccentricity has much lower correlation with the net flow. The authors conclude that the initial baryon density predicts the final net-proton elliptic flow, and they suggest that the estimator framework can be systematically improved and extended to other conserved charges.

Significance. The symmetry-based cumulant construction is a natural and potentially valuable extension of the successful eccentricity-response paradigm to conserved-charge currents. The analytic derivation in the End Matter is explicit, covers harmonics n=1,2,3, and is systematically improvable in principle. If the claimed correlation is robust, the framework would open a new class of charge-dependent flow probes for the beam energy scan and for small systems. However, as presented, the validation rests on a single simulation chain, a single beam energy, and a single proxy observable; no independent initial-condition model or transport-parameter variation is shown. The strength of the claim therefore currently exceeds the evidence. I also note that the fitting of kappa_2 and gamma_B in Eqs. (24)-(25) is not circular in the narrow sense, because E_net is proportional to gamma_B and the Pearson coefficient is invariant under rescaling of the estimator.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III and End Matter B] The central validation uses a single event generator (superMC) and a single hydro+cascade chain, and the baryon-diffusion coefficient used in the DNMR equations is never reported or varied. This is load-bearing because baryon diffusion is precisely the transport mechanism that can decorrelate the final baryon distribution from the initial n_B, and the Introduction itself cites Refs. [8,11] for the importance of baryon diffusion in proton/antiproton differences. Without a statement of the diffusion coefficient and a sensitivity scan, or at least a comparison of n_B(x_perp) with an independent initial-charge model, the >0.9 correlation in Fig. 1 cannot be attributed to the initial baryon density as a general prediction; it may be a property of this one simulation chain.
  2. [§III, Eqs. (24)-(25), Fig. 1] I do not regard the fitting of kappa_2 and gamma_B as circular in the narrow sense: E_net is proportional to gamma_B through Eq. (8), and Q2 is invariant under rescaling of the estimator, so Eqs. (24)-(25) cannot manufacture the reported value. The load-bearing weakness is instead that the framework is validated only in-sample and only against the same model that generates the initial conditions. No comparison to any measured net-proton flow is made (Fig. 2 checks multiplicities only), and no out-of-sample test with a second initial-condition model is shown. Since the title and conclusions make a general predictive claim, the authors should either add such a test or explicitly restrict the claim to a consistency check of the superMC+MUSIC+UrQMD chain.
  3. [End Matter, Eq. (21) and Fig. 3] The first-order cumulant expansion assumes gamma_B much less than 1 and drops O(gamma^3) terms; the paper states gamma ~ O(10%), but Fig. 3 shows gamma_2 reaching roughly 0.25-0.30 in peripheral bins. The authors should quantify the size of the neglected terms in the peripheral centralities where Q2 begins to drop, or restrict the leading-order estimator claim to the range where the truncation is controlled.
minor comments (6)
  1. [End Matter, Section B] The text says '19.6 TeV Au+Au identified particle yields' but the collision energy is 19.6 GeV; this should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 3] The axis label uses gamma_2 while the text consistently uses gamma_B; the notation should be aligned.
  3. [Eq. (24)] The regression coefficient should be written with a complex conjugate, Re< V_2 E_2^* > / < |E_2|^2 >, to make the real-valued fit explicit.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The phrase 'net elliptical flow' should read 'net elliptic flow'.
  5. [Fig. 1 and Fig. 3] No statistical uncertainties or event-number information are given for the Q2 values or the response coefficients; with 2250 hydrodynamic events this is likely small but should be stated.
  6. [Table I] The parameters eta_nB, sigma_eta,+, and sigma_eta,- are not defined in the text; a one-sentence definition would help the reader assess the baryon deposition model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the leading-order estimator is proportional to γ_B, so the reported Pearson correlation is invariant under the fitted response coefficients and cannot be manufactured by Eqs. (24)-(25).

full rationale

The paper's central evidence is the event-by-event Pearson coefficient Q2{V_net_2, E_net_2} > 0.9 between the net-proton elliptic flow and the proposed initial-state estimator. The reader's concern that Eqs. (24)-(25) fit γ_B and κ_2 to the very observable being predicted does not constitute circularity here, because the leading-order estimator is proportional to γ_B: Eq. (8) gives W_net_2,2 ∝ γ_B, and Eqs. (2)-(3) then imply E_net_2 ∝ γ_B. A common multiplicative factor cancels in the Pearson coefficient defined in Eq. (13), so Q2{V_net_2, E_net_2} is independent of both κ_2 and γ_B (for nonzero values). Thus the reported high correlation is not an in-sample maximum produced by the fit; the fit only sets the overall scale of the linear response. Moreover, κ_2 is determined from charged-hadron elliptic flow, not from net-proton flow. The estimator itself is constructed from the initial energy density ε and baryon density n_B through cumulants; it is not defined in terms of V_net_2, so no self-definitional circularity is present. The paper does cite prior work by overlapping authors (e.g., Ref. [7]) for the general energy-momentum estimator framework and for the expectation that a single γ describes all harmonics, but that citation is used as background and analogy, not as an unverified load-bearing premise; the new net-charge estimator is derived self-contained in the End Matter. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in solely via citation. The main caveat is model dependence: the validation uses one initial-condition model (superMC) and does not vary the baryon diffusion strength or compare n_B to an independent initial-charge model. That is a physical robustness concern, not a circularity of the derivation. The derivation chain is self-contained against its stated assumptions, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework is a model-based extension of the initial-state estimator paradigm. It introduces new observables but no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The central demonstration relies on a simulation chain, a truncation hypothesis, and two response coefficients that are fitted on the same events used for validation.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma_B (baryon-charge coupling in the estimator) = per-centrality values extracted via Eq. (25), shown in Fig. 3
    This coupling determines how much initial baryon density contributes to the net eccentricity estimator. It is chosen to maximize the Pearson correlation with the target V_2^net on the same events, so the reported predictive power depends on a fitted value.
  • kappa_2 (linear response coefficient to initial energy eccentricity) = per-centrality values from Eq. (24), shown in Fig. 3
    The estimator for net flow is V_est = kappa_2 E_net; kappa_2 is fitted to maximize correlation with charged-hadron elliptic flow on the same simulation sample before the net-flow correlation is evaluated.
  • superMC Glauber initial-condition parameters (s0, tau0, eta_s,0, sigma_eta,s, eta_nB, sigma_eta,+, sigma_eta,-) = listed in Table I
    These parameters determine the initial energy and baryon density profiles used by the estimator. The baryon-specific parameters shape n_B(x_perp), and the validation never tests whether the results are robust to changing them.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Long-wavelength dominance: final observables are most sensitive to the lowest radial cumulants of the initial state.
    Invoked in End Matter A to justify truncating the estimator to leading order in m. If short-wavelength features matter, the leading-order estimator would miss important contributions.
  • domain assumption Linear response: final net flow is proportional to the estimator with event-independent coefficients kappa_n and gamma_B.
    Eq. (2) and the coefficient extraction in Eqs. (24)-(25) assume a single linear response coefficient per centrality. Nonlinear corrections are discussed but not included in the validation.
  • domain assumption Charge-conjugation parity decoupling: quantities odd under charge conjugation can be cleanly separated from the charge-even energy-momentum flow.
    Section II defines net flow by subtracting antiparticle flow coefficients and assumes these C-odd observables isolate conserved-charge dynamics from the dominant C-even bulk flow.
  • domain assumption The superMC+MUSIC+UrQMD simulation chain, with the NEoS-BQS equation of state and viscosity from Ref. [31], faithfully represents the dynamics of baryon density in heavy-ion collisions.
    End Matter B describes the simulation setup. The central validation lives entirely inside this model; if the model misses relevant physics such as strong baryon diffusion, the high correlation may not survive in data.
  • domain assumption The initial conserved-charge density is given by the superMC Glauber deposition rule.
    The estimator is evaluated using n_B from the Glauber initial condition. There is no independent measurement or alternative model used to check whether this n_B is the physically correct charge density.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Initial-State Charge Density Predicts Final-State Net Charge Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6NGXS3I5

@misc{pith2026250516038,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Initial-State Charge Density Predicts Final-State Net Charge Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6NGXS3I5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16038}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a new class of charge-conjugation-odd flow observables and use them to investigate the dynamics of conserved currents in simulations of relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Inspired by the success of the initial energy and momentum distributions at predicting final-state anisotropic flow, we construct systematically-improvable initial-state estimators for final net-charge flow observables, which we validate with numerical simulations. This opens the possibility of a multitude of new charge-dependent probes of heavy-ion collisions of different systems and energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.16038 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The dotted blue line represents the linear correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. TABLE I. Parameters used for constructing the superMC (Glauber) initial conditions for Au-Au Collisions at 19.6 GeV [26]. √ sNN (GeV) τ0 (fm) s0 η s 0 ση,s η nB B ση,+ ση,− 19.6 1.5 6.3 2.7 0.3 1.5 0.2 1.0 After hydrodynamic evolution, the fluid degrees of free￾dom are converted to hadronic distribution functions via the usual Cooper-Frye procedure. Then the hadrons and resonances are evolved according to the Boltzm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The dashed green line represents the response co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Teaney and L

    D. Teaney and L. Yan, Triangularity and Dipole Asym- metry in Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C83, 064904 (2011), arXiv:1010.1876 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    F. G. Gardim, F. Grassi, M. Luzum, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Mapping the hydrodynamic response to the initial ge- ometry in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C85, 024908 (2012), arXiv:1111.6538 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Noronha-Hostler, L

    J. Noronha-Hostler, L. Yan, F. G. Gardim, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Linear and cubic response to the initial eccen- tricity in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C93, 014909 (2016), arXiv:1511.03896 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    M. D. Sievert and J. Noronha-Hostler, CERN Large Hadron Collider system size scan predictions for PbPb, XeXe, ArAr, and OO with relativistic hydrodynam- ics, Phys. Rev. C100, 024904 (2019), arXiv:1901.01319 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    S. Rao, M. Sievert, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Baseline pre- dictions of elliptic flow and fluctuations for the RHIC BeamEnergyScanusingresponsecoefficients,Phys.Rev. C 103, 034910 (2021), arXiv:1910.03677 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Hybrid Color Glass Condensate and hydrodynamic description of the Rela- tivistic Heavy Ion Collider small system scan, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135322 (2020), arXiv:1908.06212 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Sousa, J

    J. Sousa, J. Noronha, and M. Luzum, Initial energy- momentum to final flow: A general framework for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 044909 (2024), arXiv:2405.13600 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    G. S. Denicol, C. Gale, S. Jeon, A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Net baryon diffusion in fluid dynamic sim- ulations of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 98, 034916 (2018), arXiv:1804.10557 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Inghirami and H

    G. Inghirami and H. Elfner, The applicability of hydro- dynamics in heavy ion collisions at√sNN = 2.4–7.7 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 796 (2022), arXiv:2201.05934 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Schäfer, I

    A. Schäfer, I. Karpenko, X.-Y. Wu, J. Hammelmann, and H. Elfner (SMASH), Particle production in a hybrid ap- proach for a beam energy scan of Au+Au/Pb+Pb colli- sions between √sNN = 4.3 GeV and√sNN = 200.0 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 230 (2022), arXiv:2112.08724 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Du, Multimessenger study of baryon-charged QCD matter in heavy-ion collisions, Phys

    L. Du, Multimessenger study of baryon-charged QCD matter in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B861, 139270 (2025), arXiv:2408.08501 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Monnai, S

    A. Monnai, S. Mukherjee, and Y. Yin, Phenomenologi- cal Consequences of Enhanced Bulk Viscosity Near the QCD Critical Point, Phys. Rev. C 95, 034902 (2017), arXiv:1606.00771 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Rajagopal, G

    K. Rajagopal, G. Ridgway, R. Weller, and Y. Yin, Under- standing the out-of-equilibrium dynamics near a critical point in the QCD phase diagram, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094025 (2020), arXiv:1908.08539 [hep-ph]. 5

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    T. Dore, J. Noronha-Hostler, and E. McLaughlin, Far- from-equilibrium search for the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074017 (2020), arXiv:2007.15083 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T. Dore, J. M. Karthein, I. Long, D. Mroczek, J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, C. Ratti, and Y. Ya- mauchi, Critical lensing and kurtosis near a critical point in the QCD phase diagram in and out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094024 (2022), arXiv:2207.04086 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    L. Du, X. An, and U. Heinz, Baryon transport and the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C 104, 064904 (2021), arXiv:2107.02302 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. S. Pradeep, N. Sogabe, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Nonmonotonic specific entropy on the transition line near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C109, 064905 (2024), arXiv:2402.09519 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, and V. V. Skokov, Critical fluid dynamics in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034026 (2025), arXiv:2411.15994 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Carzon, M

    P. Carzon, M. Martinez, M. D. Sievert, D. E. Wertepny, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Monte Carlo event generator for initial conditions of conserved charges in nuclear geome- try, Phys. Rev. C105, 034908 (2022), arXiv:1911.12454 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Martinez, M

    M. Martinez, M. D. Sievert, D. E. Wertepny, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Initial state fluctuations of QCD conserved charges in heavy-ion collisions, (2019), arXiv:1911.10272 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Plumberg et al

    C. Plumberg et al. , Conservation of B, S, and Q charges in relativistic viscous hydrodynamics solved with smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 111, 044905 (2025), arXiv:2405.09648 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    F. G. Gardim, D. Almaalol, J. Salinas San Martín, C. Plumberg, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Unlocking ”im- prints” of conserved charges in the initial state of heavy- ion collisions, (2024), arXiv:2411.00590 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Garcia-Montero, H

    O. Garcia-Montero, H. Elfner, and S. Schlichting, McDIPPER: A novel saturation-based 3+1D initial-state model for heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C109, 044916 (2024), arXiv:2308.11713 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Capellino, A

    F. Capellino, A. Beraudo, A. Dubla, S. Floerchinger, S. Masciocchi, J. Pawlowski, and I. Selyuzhenkov, Fluid-dynamic approach to heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D106, 034021 (2022), arXiv:2205.07692 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Capellino, A

    F. Capellino, A. Dubla, S. Floerchinger, E. Grossi, A. Kirchner, and S. Masciocchi, Fluid dynamics of charm quarks in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 108, 116011 (2023), arXiv:2307.14449 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Shen and S

    C. Shen and S. Alzhrani, Collision-geometry-based 3D initial condition for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 102, 014909 (2020), arXiv:2003.05852 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    It can be downloaded from https://github.com/chunshen1987/superMC

    The superMC code package generates event-by-event and event-averaged initial conditions based on the MC- Glauber and the MCKLN models. It can be downloaded from https://github.com/chunshen1987/superMC

  20. [28]

    C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass, and U. Heinz, The iEBE-VISHNU code package for relativis- tic heavy-ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.199, 61 (2016), arXiv:1409.8164 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Grönqvist, J.-P

    H. Grönqvist, J.-P. Blaizot, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Non- Gaussian eccentricity fluctuations, Phys. Rev. C 94, 034905 (2016), arXiv:1604.07230 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. E. Bernhard,Bayesian parameter estimation for rela- tivistic heavy-ion collisions,Ph.D.thesis,DukeU.(2018), arXiv:1804.06469 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Monnai, B

    A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Equation of state at finite densities for QCD matter in nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024907 (2019), arXiv:1902.05095 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C96, 044904 (2017), arXiv:1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bleicheret al., Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J

    M. Bleicheret al., Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J. Phys. G25, 1859 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9909407. 6 END MA TTER A. Initial-state estimator framework We begin with the notion that large-scale features that are i...

    1999 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.