Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Imaging the Meissner Effect and Flux Trapping of Superconductors under High Pressure using N-V Centers

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Widefield N-V magnetometry maps the Meissner effect and flux trapping of Hg-1223 inside a diamond anvil cell at 4 GPa with micrometer resolution.

desk verdict A believable proof-of-principle for widefield NV Meissner mapping in a DAC, but the spectral-moment calibration needs tightening before the quantitative claims fully land. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14504 v1 pith:6OQDO2UI submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.supr-con quant-ph

Cassandra Dailledouze , Antoine Hilberer , Martin Schmidt , Marie-Pierre Adam , Loïc Toraille , Kin On Ho , Anne Forget , Dorothée Colson
show 2 more authors
Paul Loubeyre Jean-François Roch
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersdiamondanvilcellMeissnereffectfluxtrappingwidefieldmagnetometryhighpressurecupratesuperconductorcriticaltemperaturemapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that nitrogen-vacancy (N-V) centers embedded in a diamond anvil can map the Meissner effect and flux trapping of a superconductor under high pressure with micrometer resolution. The authors apply the technique to a microcrystal of HgBa$_2$Ca$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{8+\delta}$ (Hg-1223) at 4 GPa inside a diamond anvil cell, mapping local critical temperature and magnetic field expulsion across the sample. To avoid the difficult full reconstruction of the stray field, they introduce spectral-moment parameters—mean splitting $\nu_s$ and spread $\nu_d$—that trace the local field's magnitude and orientation. The maps show expulsion over the whole sample, a spatial spread in $T_c$ of only about 4 K, and flux-pinning zones that correlate with sample defects. If correct, the method gives a non-invasive, spatially resolved probe of superconductivity under extreme pressure, with direct relevance to heterogeneous high-pressure phases such as superhydrides.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the widefield N-V optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) imaging setup integrated into a diamond anvil cell, combined with a spectral-moment analysis of each pixel's ODMR spectrum. The averaged frequency $\nu_a$ records the local pressure; the mean splitting $\nu_s$ measures the average Zeeman splitting and thus the local field magnitude; the spread $\nu_d$ measures the variance of the half-spectrum and thus how much the field direction deviates from the DAC axis across the four N-V families. A correlation coefficient $\rho(T)$ between the spectrum at a high reference temperature and the spectrum at temperature $T$ provides a reliable, fit-free way to locate $T_c$ locally. These parameters let the authors visualize Meissner expulsion and flux trapping as spatial maps without full vector-field reconstruction.

What would settle it

Run the identical pressure, field, and warm-up protocols on a non-superconducting sample and compare the $\nu_s$ maps: if the same low-temperature drop appears, the claimed Meissner signal is an artifact. Alternatively, perform a full vector-field reconstruction of the same ODMR data and check whether the reconstructed field actually shows expulsion at the sample center.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that widefield N-V magnetometry can map superconductivity inside a diamond anvil cell with micrometer resolution, demonstrated on Hg-1223 at 4 GPa. Using the spectral-moment parameters $\nu_s$ and $\nu_d$ to track the local magnetic field without reconstructing the full vector field, the authors observe a reduction of $\nu_s$ across the entire sample below $T_c$, indicating Meissner expulsion, and an enhancement at the sample edges. They obtain extended $T_c$ maps from a correlation parameter $\rho(T)$, finding $T_c = 139.8 \pm 0.7$ K at a reference point and a spatial variation of only about 4 K across the crystal, which they attribute to sample inhomogeneities after ruling out heating artifacts. Field-cooled maps show local flux penetration at impurities, and flux-trapping maps locate pinning centers that match the sample's crack and the regions of flux penetration seen in the field-cooled warm-up protocol. The authors therefore claim this establishes a robust, spatially resolved determination of $T_c$ and a direct imaging of flux pinning under pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The maps are only valid if the spectral-moment parameters—the mean splitting $\nu_s$ and spread $\nu_d$ of the ODMR lines—faithfully track the local magnetic field's magnitude and orientation, so that a drop below $T_c$ is Meissner expulsion rather than a stress or alignment artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spatially resolved $T_c$ maps under pressure can be obtained with a few-Kelvin precision, allowing sample inhomogeneities to be imaged rather than averaged over.
  • The method detects Meissner expulsion and flux trapping in micrometer-sized samples inside diamond anvil cells without reconstructing the full stray field, simplifying high-pressure magnetic imaging.
  • Comparing zero-field-cooled and field-cooled warm-up protocols yields a local view of type-II behavior, distinguishing bulk field expulsion from flux penetration at defects.
  • The same protocols could be pushed to higher pressures to study multiphase high-pressure superconductors such as superhydrides, where stoichiometric heterogeneities matter.
  • Flux-trapping maps can identify individual pinning centers and correlate them with topographic features like cracks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spectral-moment parameters are qualitative proxies; an independent reconstruction of the full vector field from the same datasets would test whether the apparent Meissner signal and the ~4 K $T_c$ spread are truly magnetic rather than stress- or temperature-gradient artifacts.
  • The authors' own suggestion that $H_{c1}$ and $H_{c2}$ maps could be produced by sweeping the applied field implies the method could become a local probe of the London penetration depth and coherence length under pressure.
  • A control experiment on a non-superconducting sample under identical protocols would isolate the magnetic signature from pressure and temperature effects, sharpening the method's specificity for Meissner detection.
  • The $T_c$ variation could be cross-checked with the N-V averaged frequency $\nu_a$ as a local thermometer to separate genuine inhomogeneity from thermal gradients across the anvil.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports widefield nitrogen-vacancy (NV) magnetometry inside a diamond anvil cell to image the Meissner effect and flux trapping in a microcrystal of HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ at 4 GPa. Instead of reconstructing the full stray field vector, the authors introduce spectral-moment parameters ν_s (mean splitting) and ν_d (frequency spread) of the ODMR spectra, together with a Pearson-correlation order parameter ρ(T), to locate the superconducting transition and map local critical temperatures. They apply zero-field-cooled warming, field-cooled warming, and flux-trapping protocols, obtaining extended Tc maps, spatial maps of ν_s and ν_d, and maps of the remnant trapped field B_FT. The raw ODMR data show a clear transition near 140 K, consistent with the expected Tc of Hg-1223 at 4 GPa, and the ZFC/FC comparison provides a standard Meissner signature.

Significance. If the method is quantitatively validated, this would be a valuable advance: spatially resolved Meissner and flux-trapping imaging under high pressure with micrometer resolution is directly relevant to inhomogeneous high-pressure superconductors such as superhydrides. The use of spectral moments avoids difficult full-vector field reconstruction and is computationally fast. The paper presents raw data with an obvious transition, and the correlation between the flux-pinning zone and the visible crack is a credible physical observation. However, the quantitative claims — in particular the 4 K spatial variation of Tc and the interpretation of the ν_s maps as magnetic-field expulsion — rely on uncalibrated spectral moments and on statistical details that are not fully provided, so the current manuscript establishes a promising proof-of-concept rather than a complete quantitative method.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The parameters ν_s and ν_d are uncalibrated spectral moments, not direct measurements of the local magnetic field magnitude or orientation. As the authors themselves note, non-hydrostatic stress splits the NV manifolds (Refs. 33-35), and a rotation of B away from the [100] axis changes the number and width of ODMR peaks. A reduction in ν_s below Tc therefore does not uniquely signify Meissner expulsion. The Introduction calls the approach a 'qualitative visualization', but the title and abstract claim micrometer-resolution mapping of superconductivity. Please add a validation step, for example a comparison of the measured ν_s and ν_d maps against a forward model of the expected field distribution for a known superconductor geometry, or a calibration measurement with a controlled local field source, and provide per-pixel uncertainties for these maps.
  2. [Section IV.A, Fig. 3(d,e)] The extended Tc maps are presented without per-pixel error bars or a noise floor. The paper claims that Tc 'spatially vary by only approximately 4 K', but without knowing the pixel-to-pixel uncertainty in the ρ(T)-based Tc determination, this spread could be dominated by fitting noise rather than by genuine sample inhomogeneity. Please provide Tc uncertainty maps, a histogram of Tc values with error bars, and state explicitly how the 0.7 K uncertainty quoted for the central pixel is derived.
  3. [Section IV.A] The statement 'We confirmed that this difference of ∼ 4 K cannot be explained purely by heating artifacts (see the SM)' is load-bearing for the conclusion that the Tc variation is intrinsic sample inhomogeneity, but the supporting heating analysis is only in the Supplemental Material, which is not available to the reviewer. Please include the essential heating estimate in the main text or provide the Supplemental Material with the manuscript so that this claim can be checked.
  4. [Section IV.A, Fig. 3(c)] The definition of Tc from ρ(T) depends on several procedural choices: the reference-spectrum temperature range (145–155 K), the renormalization by the median values at both ends of the temperature range, and the cumulative-Gaussian tangent construction. The sensitivity of the extracted Tc to these choices is not reported. Please quantify how Tc and its uncertainty vary with reasonable changes in these analysis parameters, so that the central quantitative claim is not tied to an arbitrary convention.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence 'it has been demonstrate that N-V optical magnetometry...' contains a grammatical error: 'demonstrate' should be 'demonstrated'.
  2. [Throughout] The notation for the nitrogen-vacancy center is inconsistent ('N-V', 'N- V', 'NV'); please standardize the spelling.
  3. [Fig. 5(a)] The caption states that the brown ODMR spectra were multiplied by a factor of 5, but in a grayscale print it is not clear which curves are brown; please use distinct line styles as well.
  4. [Eq. (4)] In the definition of B_FT, the symbols Δ and Δσ are not explicitly defined in the main text; please state that Δ is the measured frequency splitting between the two ODMR peaks and Δσ is the anisotropic stress splitting obtained above Tc.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'The method is capable to detect' should be 'The method is capable of detecting'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental maps and Tc values are derived from measured ODMR spectra and benchmarked against independent literature, not from the conclusions.

full rationale

The paper derives the Meissner-effect maps from measured ODMR spectra via newly defined moment parameters νs, νd and a correlation parameter ρ(T). These parameters are defined by explicit formulas (Eqs. 1–3) in terms of spectral intensities and frequencies; the physical interpretation that a reduced νs indicates field expulsion is a hypothesis, not an identity built into the definition. The Tc value is obtained by fitting the temperature dependence of ρ(T) and is then compared with independent prior measurements of Hg-1223 at 4 GPa (Refs. [7,45–48]), which is an external benchmark rather than a circular input. The stress correction Δσ in Eq. (4) is measured above Tc when no trapped flux remains, serving as a baseline calibration rather than as a fitted prediction. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [10], [27], [14]) describe prior technical developments in NV-in-DAC magnetometry and pressure calibration; these are supporting tools, not load-bearing arguments that reduce the present claim to a re-statement of those citations. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives. The main weaknesses—uncalibrated spectral moments, potential stress/broadening artifacts, and reliance on the Supplemental Material for heating analysis—are concerns about validity or correctness, not circularity. Under the stated rules, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the experimental data and external calibrations.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central claim rests on a set of data-reduction choices and standard NV physics; the main burden is the uncalibrated mapping from spectral moments to magnetic field and the reliance on unavailable Supplemental Material for artifact rejection.

free parameters (5)
  • rho_tilde reference temperature range = 145 to 155 K
    Spectra averaged over this range define the normal-state reference for the correlation parameter; changing this range shifts the Tc threshold.
  • rho_tilde renormalization medians = plateau medians at low and high temperature ends
    The correlation is normalized using median values of the whole temperature range, a data-dependent choice that affects the shape of rho_tilde and the extracted Tc.
  • Tc definition threshold = intersection of tangent at rho_tilde=0.5 with rho_tilde=1
    This arbitrary but reproducible definition, combined with a cumulative Gaussian fit, sets the reported Tc=139.8 K; a different threshold would give a different apparent Tc.
  • stress splitting correction Delta_sigma = measured at T > Tc
    Used in Eq. (4) to convert ODMR splitting to trapped field; obtained from the same dataset at normal state, so the B_FT scale inherits its uncertainty.
  • map averaging windows = [142-160 K] for T>Tc and [90-110 K] for T<Tc
    Hand-picked temperature windows for averaging nu_s and nu_d maps; results depend on window choice and noise floor.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Zeeman splitting of the four NV families is linearly proportional to the local magnetic field projection on each NV axis.
    Used implicitly in interpreting nu_s as a field measure; standard NV physics, cited from [15].
  • ad hoc to paper The spectral moment parameters nu_s and nu_d are faithful proxies for the magnitude and orientation of the local magnetic field.
    Introduced in Section III without quantitative calibration against a known vector field; the entire Meissner map interpretation rests on this.
  • domain assumption Changes in the ODMR spectrum below Tc are dominated by the superconducting sample's magnetic response, not by stress or temperature artifacts.
    The paper claims heating artifacts were excluded in the Supplemental Material [37], which is not available; pressure and stress effects are assumed controlled by argon and prior calibration [27].
  • ad hoc to paper The step in the correlation parameter rho_tilde marks the superconducting critical temperature.
    The Tc extraction method in Section IV.A identifies Tc from the tangent intersection; its equivalence to the thermodynamic Tc is validated only at one point against literature.
  • domain assumption Hg-1223 behaves as a type-II superconductor whose flux penetration and trapping are governed by defects.
    Used to interpret FC-w penetration zones and FT maps in Sections IV.B-IV.C; standard for cuprates but not directly measured in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Imaging the Meissner Effect and Flux Trapping of Superconductors under High Pressure using N-V Centers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OQDO2UI

@misc{pith2026250114504,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Imaging the Meissner Effect and Flux Trapping of Superconductors under High Pressure using N-V Centers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OQDO2UI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14504}
}
abstract

Pressure is a key parameter for tuning or revealing superconductivity in materials and compounds. Many measurements of superconducting phase transition temperatures have been conducted using diamond anvil cells (DACs), which provide a wide pressure range and enable concomitant microscopic structural characterization of the sample. However, the inherently small sample volumes in DACs complicate the unambiguous detection of the Meissner effect, the hallmark of superconductivity. Recently, the Meissner effect in superconductors within a DAC was successfully demonstrated using diamond nitrogen-vacancy (N-V) widefield magnetometry, a non-invasive optical technique. In this work, we show that N-V magnetometry can also map superconductivity with micrometer resolution. We apply this technique to a microcrystal of HgBa$_2$Ca$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{8+\delta}$ (Hg-1223) mercury-based cuprate superconductor under 4 GPa of pressure. The method is capable to detect the magnetic field expulsion and heterogeneities in the sample, visible in a set of characteristic parameters as the local critical temperature $T_{c}$. Flux pinning zones are identified through flux trapping maps. This approach could enable detailed investigations of superconductivity of a broad range of materials under high-pressure conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14504 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Experimental setup: Widefield N- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Bright field image of the Hg-1223 sample used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (b) where the signal-to-noise ratio is significantly degraded at temperatures below Tc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Left column a-c) Maps of the mean splitting param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Selected ODMR spectra recorded in the FT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum noise spectroscopy of superconducting dynamics in thin film Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+\delta}$

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NV-center noise spectroscopy on a thin-film cuprate superconductor reveals d-wave quasiparticle noise, a stronger-than-mean-field critical divergence near Tc, and MHz-scale vortex dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Meissner and R

    W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld, Ein neuer effekt bei ein- tritt der supraleitf¨ ahigkeit, Naturwissenschaften21, 787 (1933)

    work page 1933

  2. [2]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Metallic hydrogen: A high-temperature superconductor?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1748 (1968)

    1968

  3. [3]

    C. J. Pickard, I. Errea, and M. I. Eremets, Supercon- ducting hydrides under pressure, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 11, 57 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Boeri, R

    L. Boeri, R. Hennig, P. Hirschfeld, G. Profeta, A. Sanna, E. Zurek, W. E. Pickett, M. Amsler, R. Dias, M. I. Eremets, C. Heil, R. J. Hemley, H. Liu, Y. Ma, C. Pier- leoni, A. N. Kolmogorov, N. Rybin, D. Novoselov, V. Anisimov, A. R. Oganov, C. J. Pickard, T. Bi, R. Arita, I. Errea, C. Pellegrini, R. Requist, E. K. U. Gross, E. R. Margine, S. R. Xie, Y. Qu...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Mao, X.-J

    H.-K. Mao, X.-J. Chen, Y. Ding, B. Li, and L. Wang, Solids, liquids, and gases under high pressure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015007 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    J. C. C. Alexander C. Mark and R. J. Hemley, Progress and prospects for cuprate high temperature supercon- ductors under pressure, High Pressure Research 42, 137 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Loveday, High-pressure physics (CRC Press, 2012)

    J. Loveday, High-pressure physics (CRC Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    J. E. Hirsch, Faulty evidence for superconductivity in ac magnetic susceptibility of sulfur hydride under pressure, National Science Review 9, nwac086 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Lesik, T

    M. Lesik, T. Plisson, L. Toraille, J. Renaud, F. Occelli, M. Schmidt, O. Salord, A. Delobbe, T. Debuisschert, L. Rondin, P. Loubeyre, and J.-F. Roch, Magnetic mea- surements on micrometer-sized samples under high pres- sure using designed nv centers, Science 366, 1359 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    K. Y. Yip, K. O. Ho, K. Y. Yu, Y. Chen, W. Zhang, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, S. K. Goh, and S. Yang, Measuring magnetic field texture in correlated electron systems under extreme conditions, Science 366, 1355 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Hsieh, P

    S. Hsieh, P. Bhattacharyya, C. Zu, T. Mittiga, T. J. Smart, F. Machado, B. Kobrin, T. O. H¨ ohn, N. Z. Rui, M. Kamrani, S. Chatterjee, S. Choi, M. Zaletel, V. V. Struzhkin, J. E. Moore, V. I. Levitas, R. Jeanloz, and N. Y. Yao, Imaging stress and magnetism at high pres- sures ...

    2019

  5. [13]

    K. O. Ho, K. C. Wong, M. Y. Leung, Y. Y. Pang, W. K. Leung, K. Y. Yip, W. Zhang, J. Xie, S. K. Goh, and S. Yang, Recent developments of quantum sensing un- der pressurized environment using the nitrogen vacancy (NV) center in diamond, Journal of Applied Physics129, 241101 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Bhattacharyya, W

    P. Bhattacharyya, W. Chen, X. Huang, S. Chatter- jee, B. Huang, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, T. J. Smart, M. Block, E. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Wu, S. Hsieh, H. Ma, S. Mandyam, B. Chen, E. Davis, Z. M. Geballe, C. Zu, V. Struzhkin, R. Jeanloz, J. E. Moore, T. Cui, G. Galli, B. I. Halperin, C. ...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Rondin, J.-P

    L. Rondin, J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V. Jacques, Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond, Reports on 9 Progress in Physics 77, 056503 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    N. M. Nusran, K. R. Joshi, K. Cho, M. A. Tanatar, W. R. Meier, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, Y. Liu, T. A. Lo- grasso, and R. Prozorov, Spatially-resolved study of the meissner effect in superconductors using nv-centers-in- diamond optical magnetometry, New Journal of Physics ...

    2018

  9. [17]

    Joshi, N

    K. Joshi, N. Nusran, M. Tanatar, K. Cho, W. Meier, S. Bud’ko, P. Canfield, and R. Prozorov, Measuring the lower critical field of superconductors using nitrogen- vacancy centers in diamond optical magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014035 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    K. R. Joshi, N. M. Nusran, M. A. Tanatar, K. Cho, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, R. M. Fernandes, A. Levchenko, and R. Prozorov, Quantum phase transition inside the su- perconducting dome of ba(fe1-xcox)2as2 from diamond- based optical magnetometry, New Journal of Physics 22, 0...

    2020

  11. [19]

    Thiel, D

    L. Thiel, D. Rohner, M. Ganzhorn, P. Appel, E. Neu, B. M¨ uller, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, and P. Maletinsky, Quantitative nanoscale vortex imaging using a cryogenic quantum magnetometer, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 677 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Pelliccione, A

    M. Pelliccione, A. Jenkins, P. Ovartchaiyapong, C. Reetz, E. Emmanouilidou, N. Ni, and A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, Scanned probe imaging of nanoscale magnetism at cryo- genic temperatures with a single-spin quantum sensor, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 700 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Schlussel, T

    Y. Schlussel, T. Lenz, D. Rohner, Y. Bar-Haim, L. Bougas, D. Groswasser, M. Kieschnick, E. Rozenberg, L. Thiel, A. Waxman, J. Meijer, P. Maletinsky, D. Bud- ker, and R. Folman, Wide-field imaging of superconduc- tor vortices with electron spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10,...

    2018

  14. [22]

    V. M. Acosta, L. S. Bouchard, D. Budker, R. Folman, T. Lenz, P. Maletinsky, D. Rohner, Y. Schlussel, and L. Thiel, Color centers in diamond as novel probes of su- perconductivity, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 32, 85 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    S. E. Lillie, D. A. Broadway, N. Dontschuk, S. C. Scholten, B. C. Johnson, S. Wolf, S. Rachel, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and J.-P. Tetienne, Laser modulation of superconductivity in a cryogenic wide-field nitrogen- vacancy microscope, Nano Letters 20, 1855 (2020), pMID: 32017577

    2020

  16. [24]

    Nishimura, T

    S. Nishimura, T. Kobayashi, D. Sasaki, T. Tsuji, T. Iwasaki, M. Hatano, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, Wide-field quantitative magnetic imaging of supercon- ducting vortices using perfectly aligned quantum sensors, Applied Physics Letters 123, 112603 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    L. Hou, S. Thakur, M. Bezard, A. Buzdin, P. Tamarat, and B. Lounis, Probing abrikosov vortices in niobium with single nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamonds, Applied Physics Letters 125 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Toraille, A

    L. Toraille, A. Hilberer, T. Plisson, M. Lesik, M. Chipaux, B. Vindolet, C. P´ epin, F. Occelli, M. Schmidt, T. Debuisschert, N. Guignot, J.-P. Iti´ e, P. Loubeyre, and J.-F. Roch, Combined synchrotron x- ray diffraction and nv diamond magnetic microscopy measurements at high ...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Hilberer, L

    A. Hilberer, L. Toraille, C. Dailledouze, M.-P. Adam, L. Hanlon, G. Weck, M. Schmidt, P. Loubeyre, and J.- F. m. c. Roch, Enabling quantum sensing under extreme pressure: Nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry up to 130 gpa, Phys. Rev. B 107, L220102 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Xu, B. Yang, P. Yu, H. Sun, X. Ye, J. Zhou, A. F. Goncharov, Y. Wang, and J. Du, Imaging magnetic transition of magnetite to megabar pressures using quantum sensors in diamond anvil cell, Nature Communications 15, 8843 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Chipaux, A

    M. Chipaux, A. Tallaire, J. Achard, S. Pezzagna, J. Mei- jer, V. Jacques, J.-F. Roch, and T. Debuisschert, Mag- netic imaging with an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in diamond, The European Physical Journal D 69, 166 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Gruber, A

    A. Gruber, A. Dr¨ abenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. v. Borczyskowski, Scanning confo- cal optical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers, Science 276, 2012 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    JFR acknowledges support from the Institut Universitaire de France

    and the SADAHPT program (grant number ANR- 19-CE30-0027-01). JFR acknowledges support from the Institut Universitaire de France

  24. [32]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013), the nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond

    2013

  25. [33]

    M. W. Doherty, V. V. Struzhkin, D. A. Simpson, L. P. McGuinness, Y. Meng, A. Stacey, T. J. Karle, R. J. Hem- ley, N. B. Manson, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and S. Prawer, Electronic properties and metrology applications of the diamond nv − center under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112,...

    2014

  26. [34]

    Teissier, A

    J. Teissier, A. Barfuss, P. Appel, E. Neu, and P. Maletinsky, Strain coupling of a nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter spin to a diamond mechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020503 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    M. S. J. Barson, P. Peddibhotla, P. Ovartchaiyapong, K. Ganesan, R. L. Taylor, M. Gebert, Z. Mielens, B. Koslowski, D. A. Simpson, L. P. McGuinness, J. Mc- Callum, S. Prawer, S. Onoda, T. Ohshima, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, F. Jelezko, N. B. Manson, and M. W. Doherty, Nanomechan...

    2017

  28. [36]

    D. A. Broadway, B. C. Johnson, M. S. J. Barson, S. E. Lillie, N. Dontschuk, D. J. McCloskey, A. Tsai, T. Teraji, D. A. Simpson, A. Stacey, J. C. McCallum, J. E. Bradby, M. W. Doherty, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and J.-P. Tetienne, Microscopic imaging of the stress tensor in diamond ...

    2019

  29. [37]

    Barfuss, M

    A. Barfuss, M. Kasperczyk, J. K¨ olbl, and P. Maletinsky, Spin-stress and spin-strain coupling in diamond-based hybrid spin oscillator systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174102 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    See Supplemental Material for the data analysis and ex- perimental details

  31. [39]

    Lesik, P

    M. Lesik, P. Spinicelli, S. Pezzagna, P. Happel, V. Jacques, O. Salord, B. Rasser, A. Delobbe, P. Su- draud, A. Tallaire, J. Meijer, and J.-F. Roch, Maskless and targeted creation of arrays of colour centres in dia- mond using focused ion beam technology, physica status solidi...

    2013

  32. [40]

    N. D. Lai, D. Zheng, F. Jelezko, F. Treussart, and J.-F. Roch, Influence of a static magnetic field on the photo- luminescence of an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in a diamond single-crystal, Applied Physics Let- ters 95, 133101 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    Klotz, J.-C

    S. Klotz, J.-C. Chervin, P. Munsch, and G. L. Marc- hand, Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting me- dia, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42, 075413 10 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Meier, N

    T. Meier, N. Wang, D. Mager, J. G. Korvink, S. Pe- titgirard, and L. Dubrovinsky, Magnetic flux tailoring through lenz lenses for ultrasmall samples: A new path- way to high-pressure nuclear magnetic resonance, Science Advances 3, eaao5242 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Dr´ eau, M

    A. Dr´ eau, M. Lesik, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, O. Arcizet, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Avoiding power broaden- ing in optically detected magnetic resonance of single nv defects for enhanced dc magnetic field sensitivity, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195204 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    S. C. Scholten, A. J. Healey, I. O. Robertson, G. J. Abra- hams, D. A. Broadway, and J.-P. Tetienne, Widefield quantum microscopy with nitrogen-vacancy centers in di- amond: Strengths, limitations, and prospects, Journal of Applied Physics 130, 150902 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Loret, A

    B. Loret, A. Forget, J.-B. Moussy, S. Poissonnet, P. Bon- naillie, G. Collin, P. Thu´ ery, A. Sacuto, and D. Colson, Crystal growth and characterization of hgba2ca2cu3o8+δ superconductors with the highest critical temperature at ambient pressure, Inorganic Chemistry 56, 9396 (...

    2017

  38. [46]

    Schilling, M

    A. Schilling, M. Cantoni, J. D. Guo, and H. R. Ott, Su- perconductivity above 130 k in the hg–ba–ca–cu–o sys- tem, Nature 363, 56 (1993)

    1993

  39. [47]

    Nu˜ nez-Regueiro, J

    M. Nu˜ nez-Regueiro, J. L. Tholence, E. V. Antipov, J. J. Capponi, and M. Marezio, Pressure-induced enhance- ment of tc above 150 k in hg-1223, Science262, 97 (1993)

    1993

  40. [48]

    C. W. Chu, L. Gao, F. Chen, Z. J. Huang, R. L. Meng, and Y. Y. Xue, Superconductivity above 150 k in hgba2ca2cu3o8+δ at high pressures, Nature 365, 323 (1993)

    1993

  41. [49]

    L. Gao, Y. Y. Xue, F. Chen, Q. Xiong, R. L. Meng, D. Ramirez, C. W. Chu, J. H. Eggert, and H. K. Mao, Su- perconductivity up to 164 k in hgba 2cam−1cum o2m+2+δ (m=1, 2, and 3) under quasihydrostatic pressures, Phys. Rev. B 50, 4260 (1994)

    1994

  42. [50]

    K. A. M¨ uller, M. Takashige, and J. G. Bednorz, Flux trapping and superconductive glass state in la2cuo4−y:ba, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1143 (1987)

    1987

  43. [51]

    Tetienne, L

    J.-P. Tetienne, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, M. Chipaux, T. Debuisschert, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Magnetic- field-dependent photodynamics of single nv defects in di- amond: an application to qualitative all-optical magnetic imaging, New Journal of Physics 14, 103033 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Pearson and O

    K. Pearson and O. M. F. E. Henrici, Vii. mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—iii. regression, heredity, and panmixia, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 187, 253 (1896)

  45. [53]

    O. J. Dunn and V. A. Clark, Applied statistics: analy- sis of variance and regression (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1986)

    1986

  46. [54]

    J. L. Rodgers and W. A. Nicewander, Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient, The American Statis- tician 42, 59 (1988)

    1988

  47. [55]

    K. O. Ho, M. Y. Leung, W. Wang, J. Xie, K. Y. Yip, J. Wu, S. K. Goh, A. Denisenko, J. Wrachtrup, and S. Yang, Spectroscopic study of n- v sensors in diamond- based high-pressure devices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 044091 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Osmond, O

    I. Osmond, O. Moulding, S. Cross, T. Muramatsu, A. Brooks, O. Lord, T. Fedotenko, J. Buhot, and S. Friedemann, Clean-limit superconductivity in im3mh3S synthesized from sulfur and hydrogen donor ammonia borane, Phys. Rev. B 105, L220502 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    K. O. Ho, W. K. Leung, Y. Y. Pang, K. Y. Yip, J. Xie, Y. M. Liu, A. S. Rotelli, M. Y. Leung, H. Y. Chow, K. T. Lai, A. Denisenko, B. Keimer, J. Wrachtrup, and S. Yang, Studying critical parameters of superconductor via diamond quantum sensors (2024), arXiv:2407.16848 [cond-mat...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.