Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Compact Temporal Geometry and the $T^2$ Framework for Quantum Gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that physical time is a compact two-torus whose second direction, quantum coherence, is quantized at the string scale; the claim unifies collapse, entropy, and UV behavior in one geometry.

desk verdict The T^2 temporal compactification is a genuinely new synthesis, but the paper never actually defines the compactified coherence direction in a way that is dimensionally or causally consistent, so the headline claims—quantized time, UV regularization, black hole entropy—don't survive contact with the equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08165 v1 pith:6PVUFOGC submitted 2025-06-09 hep-th math-phmath.MP

James Hateley This is my paper
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T3083C4581P1583E30 PACS 04.60.-m11.25.-w03.65.Yz
keywords compacttimetwo-timeframeworktemporalT-dualitydecoherenceblackholeentropyUVregularizationnoncommutativequantumgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that time should be treated as a compact two-dimensional manifold $T^2=(t_1,t_2)$ rather than a one-dimensional external parameter: $t_1$ carries classical causal order and $t_2$ carries quantum coherence. The central move is to compactify $t_2$ at the string scale $\sqrt{\alpha'}$, which yields a minimal temporal resolution $\Delta t_2\sim\sqrt{\alpha'}$, quantized temporal modes, and a natural regulator for ultraviolet divergences in quantum field theory and gravity. On this geometry the paper formulates an extended Schr\"odinger equation and a two-time Lindblad equation, so that measurement collapse and decoherence become geometric projections and flows rather than additional axioms. If the proposal is right, one geometry would unify unitary evolution, decoherence, black hole entropy, and UV regularization, and would produce observable signatures at roughly $10^{-19}$ seconds and $10^{21}$ hertz.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the compactified coherence direction $t_2$ treated as a genuine string direction of radius $R_{t_2}$, so that the worldsheet coordinate obeys the winding periodicity of Eq. (30). Standard Kaluza-Klein spectra and T-duality, Eqs. (31)--(32), then convert $t_2$ into a pair of dual quantized sectors, momentum and winding, and set the minimal time step $\Delta t_2\sim\sqrt{\alpha'}$. The covariant structure that carries the argument is the para-Hermitian geometry of the generalized tangent bundle $TM\oplus T^*M$, defined by a product structure $K$ and neutral metric $\eta$ satisfying $K^2=I$ and $\eta(KX,KY)=-\eta(X,Y)$; this gives a two-time foliation and a covariant formulation of temporal T-duality. That machinery is what rewrites decoherence, measurement, and entropy as projections and flows on $T^2$.

What would settle it

A decisive check is high-precision timing of gamma-ray burst photons across energy bands: the framework predicts $\Delta t/t\sim E^2/(M_s^2c^4)$ with $M_s\gtrsim5\times10^{17}$ GeV, so a null result at that sensitivity in Fermi-LAT data would rule out the compact-coherence-time mechanism as formulated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that physical time is a compact complex surface, not a real line: the coordinate $\tau=t_1+it_2$ supports evolution along $t_1$ (causal propagation, unitary dynamics, thermodynamics) and along $t_2$ (coherence, interference, entanglement). Compactifying the coherence direction with the periodicity $X^{t_2}(\tau^1,\tau^2+2\pi R_{t_2})=X^{t_2}+2\pi w R_{t_2}$ produces quantized temporal momenta $p_{t_2}=n\hbar/R_{t_2}$ and winding energies $E_w=w^2R_{t_2}^2/\alpha'$, exchanged by the temporal T-duality $R_{t_2}\leftrightarrow\alpha'/R_{t_2}$, with minimal resolution $\Delta t_2\sim\sqrt{\alpha'}$. From this structure the paper derives a Gaussian UV regulator for propagators, a noncommutative time bracket $[t_1,t_2]=i\theta\alpha'$, a coherence-averaged Einstein equation, a quantized black hole area spectrum $A_n=4\pi\alpha'(2n+1)$, logarithmic entropy corrections, and a Page-curve radiation entropy, and it recasts wavefunction collapse as a boundary condition on a $T^2$ slice.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that $t_2$ is a genuine compact physical dimension obeying the periodicity of Eq. (30), with standard Kaluza-Klein and T-duality spectra applied to this time-like or coherence coordinate; if $t_2$ is only an auxiliary parameter, the quantized modes, entropy formulas, and experimental predictions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A minimal temporal resolution $\Delta t_2\sim\sqrt{\alpha'}\sim10^{-19}$ s acts as an intrinsic UV cutoff: propagators acquire the Gaussian factor $e^{-t_2^2/4\alpha'}$ and short-distance divergences are regularized.
  • Wavefunction collapse becomes a geometric operation: the von Neumann projection is replaced by embedding a Cauchy surface in $T^2$ and projecting across the coherence direction.
  • Black hole thermodynamics is quantized: the area spectrum is $A_n=4\pi\alpha'(2n+1)$, the entropy gains a logarithmic correction $-\frac{3}{2}k_B\ln(A/\ell_P^2)$, and the radiation entropy follows a Page-curve form that saturates at late times.
  • Temporal T-duality $R_{t_2}\leftrightarrow\alpha'/R_{t_2}$ implies small and large coherence periods are physically equivalent, as in spatial string dualities.
  • Compact time gives concrete experimental signatures: frequency sidebands near $\Delta\omega\sim10^{21}$ Hz, energy-dependent arrival-time dispersion $\Delta t/t\sim E^2/(M_s^2c^4)$ for gamma-ray bursts, and shifted GZK and neutrino thresholds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to look for periodicity or revivals in two-time interference experiments: the paper's phase factor $\exp(i\Delta E\,t_2/\hbar)$ predicts coherence visibility modulated by the compact cycle, whereas ordinary decoherence predicts monotone decay.
  • If the $t_2$ cycle is real, the temporal T-duality implies an operational equivalence between very short and very long coherence periods; searching for such a duality in decoherence rates across energy scales could distinguish the geometry from a mere regulator.
  • The framework suggests computing black hole entropy by counting temporal winding and momentum states directly; matching the subleading logarithmic coefficient of Eq. (48) in a near-extremal calculation would be a sharper test than the leading area term alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'T^2 framework' in which time is a compact two-dimensional manifold with a classical causal coordinate t_1 and a compact quantum-coherence coordinate t_2. It claims this structure yields an extended Schrödinger equation, a two-time Lindblad dynamics, decoherence and measurement as geometric projections, temporal T-duality, a minimal temporal resolution of order sqrt(alpha'), UV regularization in QFT and string theory, black hole entropy matching Bekenstein-Hawking, Hagedorn density softening, holographic entanglement, and specific experimental signatures in ultrafast optics, neutrino dispersion, and cosmic-ray thresholds. The exposition is largely formal, presenting equations with little derivation or physical justification.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the paper would outline a dramatically unifying picture of time, decoherence, entropy, and UV structure. The manuscript does contain clear, falsifiable predictions (e.g., Eq. (67) sideband spacing, Eq. (70) temporal jitter, Eq. (75) threshold shifts, Eq. (68) dispersion), and it engages a wide literature on decoherence, string duality, holography, and noncommutative geometry. However, the load-bearing derivations are absent or internally inconsistent, and the paper's claimed 'reproduction' of black hole entropy is a calibration rather than a prediction. The dimensional error in Eq. (31) and the unspecified signature of t_2 undermine the quantized spectra that all later results depend on. In its current form, the manuscript does not meet the standard of a physically sound derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eq. (31)] Equation (31) is dimensionally inconsistent and the error is load-bearing. With alpha' of dimension length^2 and R_t2 of dimension length, the combination w^2 R_t2^2 / alpha' is dimensionless, not an energy. The standard closed-string winding energy is E_w ~ w R_t2 / alpha' (or with appropriate factors). This spectrum is the basis for the claimed minimal temporal resolution Delta t2 ~ sqrt(alpha'), the temporal T-duality in Eq. (32), and the subsequent UV regularization. Without a correct spectrum, the quantized temporal modes and the entropy and dispersion formulas in Sections 5-7 do not follow.
  2. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (49)-(50) and Sec. 8, Eqs. (77), (87)] The claimed reproduction of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is a calibration, not a derivation. Equation (49) introduces a duality-invariant form S = (pi^2 c/3)(R_t2/beta + beta/R_t2) and then 'identifies' R_t2 ~ 2GM/c^2, which is exactly the choice needed to convert a free parameter into A/(4G hbar). Similarly, Eq. (77) fixes beta = 2 pi Delta t2 / ln(1+sqrt(2)) with no derivation, and Eq. (87) sets Delta t2 = l_AdS exp(-pi c/(3 Delta)) by fiat. These are free parameters of the model being adjusted to match known results; they do not constitute a computation of black hole entropy from the T^2 geometry.
  3. [Secs. 5-6, Eqs. (48), (59), (61)] Several central formulas are asserted without derivation. The logarithmic correction to black hole entropy in Eq. (48) (and repeated as Eq. (62)), the Hagedorn density of states in Eq. (59), and the corrected Hawking temperature in Eq. (61) are each stated as a single formula with no connecting calculation from the T^2 action or the worldsheet path integral. These are not minor omissions: they are the quantitative predictions of the framework. Without a derivation, the agreement (or disagreement) of these expressions with known results cannot be assessed.
  4. [Secs. 2, 3, 5] The physical status and signature of the compact coordinate t_2 are never specified, and the paper oscillates among incompatible treatments. In Section 6, t_2 is treated as a Euclidean thermal circle (t_2 ~ i beta); in Eqs. (14)-(16) it is a real coordinate with exponential damping e^{-E t_2/hbar}; in Eq. (31) it is a Kaluza-Klein direction with momentum and winding. The paper never gives a mode expansion for X^{t_2} nor checks the oscillator norm. If the t_2 kinetic term is timelike, the oscillators are negative-norm ghosts and the theory is non-unitary; if spacelike, the identification of t_2 as 'quantum coherence' is unsupported and the decoherence in Eq. (14) is inserted by hand. This ambiguity affects every derived result that relies on the compactified spectrum, including the entropy formulas and the experimental predictions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title and Section 1] The title contains a typo: 'theT 2' should read 'the T^2'. Similar spacing issues appear throughout (e.g., 'at2' in Section 2, 'ont2' in Section 5).
  2. [Sec. 3] In the sentence 'This offers an unification of unitary dynamics...', 'an' should be 'a'. This is a small grammar issue but repeated in several places.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2)] Equation (2) is written as a single operator acting on Psi, but the notation is ambiguous: it is not clear whether the factor i applies only to the t2 derivative or to the sum. The subsequent free-particle solution in Eq. (3) suggests one interpretation, but the notation should be clarified.
  4. [Sec. 7, Eq. (75)] The GZK threshold formula contains a term n^2 hbar^2 c^2 / (R_t2^2 m_p^2 c^4) inside the parentheses; the dimensions of this term are not transparent as written, and the meaning of n (a temporal mode number) is never defined in that context. Please specify the mode number and dimensional conventions.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Decoherence is put into the defining equation and the black-hole entropy 'reproduction' is a two- or three-parameter calibration (R_t2, β, c) aimed at A/4Gℏ.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, Eq. (2); Section 3, Eq. (14)]
    "iℏ(∂/∂t1 + i∂/∂t2)Ψ = ĤΨ, where the term ∂t2 explicitly captures decoherence or amplification effects. ... This naturally yields solutions with exponential damping of coherence: Ψ(r⃗,t1,t2)=ψ(r⃗)e^{ik1t1}e^{−k2t2}, |Ψ|²∼e^{−2k2t2}."

    Decoherence is not derived from the T² structure; it is installed in the defining evolution equation by the ∂/∂t2 term. The paper explicitly says that this term 'captures decoherence', and the later exponential damping is simply the ansatz restated as a consequence. Because t2 is defined as quantum coherence, 'coherence decays along t2' is a tautology, not a geometric explanation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 6, Eqs. (49)–(50)]
    "S = π²c/3 (Rt2/β + β/Rt2), which is symmetric under the exchange Rt2 ↔ β. Identifying the compactification radius with the Schwarzschild radius, Rt2 ∼ 2GM/c², reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy: S = A/4Gℏ."

    The claimed 'reproduction' is a parameter identification, not a computation. R_t2 is set equal to the Schwarzschild radius, injecting the black hole mass into the formula, while β remains a free thermal parameter and c is an unspecified central charge. With R_t2, β, and possibly c adjustable, matching the single number A/4Gℏ is calibration. The paper does not show that these identifications follow from the compactified temporal geometry.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Section 8, Eq. (77)]
    "β = 2π∆t2 / ln(1+√2), where ∆t2 represents the minimal coherence interval. Thermality is no longer an imposed boundary condition but an emergent feature from the temporal geometry."

    Inverse temperature β is defined by hand as a numerical multiple of Δt2, with the denominator ln(1+√2) chosen arbitrarily. Any thermal result that later contains β therefore already contains the input Δt2. Calling thermality 'emergent' inverts the logical order: the thermality is put into the model via this definition, not derived from the geometry.

full rationale

The paper's headline claims — a geometric account of decoherence, a reproduction of black hole entropy, and UV regularization from compact time — reduce in part to definitions and parameter choices rather than to derivations. The decoherence result is built into Eq. (2) by declaring ∂/∂t2 to represent decoherence; the black hole entropy result follows from setting R_t2 to the Schwarzschild radius while β and c are free or later defined by fiat (Eq. (77) and also Eq. (87) for Δt2 in terms of the AdS scale). These are the load-bearing links in the claimed derivation chain, and they are circular in the specific sense that the target quantities are inserted as inputs. I am not scoring as circularity the dimensional inconsistency of Eq. (31) or the unspecified signature of t2; those are correctness risks rather than reductions to inputs. Because the central 'unification' partially rests on such calibrated identifications, the circularity score is 7 rather than 0–2.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on several assigned scales and domain assumptions. The compactification radius R_t2 acts as a fitted parameter in reproducing black hole entropy, and most axioms are either ad hoc to the paper or unproven domain assumptions about applying string duality, BRST, and holography to a temporal compactification.

free parameters (6)
  • R_t2 (compactification radius of coherence time t2) = unspecified; later identified with 2GM/c^2 in Eqs. (49)-(50) and bounded by R_t2 < 0.7e-19 m in Sec 7
    Central length scale whose choice produces entropy and experimental predictions; no derivation of its value from first principles.
  • theta (noncommutativity parameter) = unspecified; theta alpha' in Eq. (34)
    Controls the modified uncertainty relation and UV/IR mixing; no derivation is given.
  • gamma0 and gamma1 (decoherence functional coefficients) = not specified
    Coefficients in Gamma[phi] in Eq. (13); their values are unconstrained and would affect the dynamics.
  • tau1 and tau2 (coherence timescales) = not specified
    Damping scales in the density matrix in Eq. (25); no relation to other parameters is given.
  • alpha (coupling to coherence curvature) = not specified
    Added to the Hamiltonian in Eq. (84) by hand; no value or constraint is provided.
  • xi (Lorentz-violating dispersion coefficient) = xi < 1e-3 (quoted bound)
    Appears in neutrino dispersion in Eq. (73) with no derivation; the bound is quoted from data not analyzed in the paper.
assumptions (7)
  • ad hoc to paper Time can be treated as a compact two-dimensional manifold with a periodic coherence direction t2.
    Introduced at Eq. (1) and Eq. (30); the physical existence and periodicity of t2 are assumed without derivation.
  • domain assumption The extended Schrodinger equation i.hbar(d/dt1 + i d/dt2)Psi = H Psi is the correct dynamics of quantum states on T^2.
    Eq. (2) is posited; no derivation from standard quantum mechanics is given.
  • domain assumption Compactifying t2 produces a minimal temporal resolution Delta t2 ~ sqrt(alpha') and noncommutativity [t1,t2]=i theta alpha'.
    Eqs. (32)-(35); the central regulator of the framework is assumed rather than derived.
  • domain assumption String T-duality extends to a compact time-like or coherence direction without generating closed timelike curves or unitarity violations.
    Eqs. (29)-(32) apply T-duality to t2; the paper does not address the consistency of temporal compactification in string theory.
  • domain assumption Para-Hermitian geometry on T M direct sum T* M correctly describes the temporal manifold and gauge symmetry via BRST.
    Section 2.1 introduces the para-Hermitian structure and Eq. (42) gives a BRST action; no proof of integrability or of the action being well-defined is supplied.
  • domain assumption Black hole entropy and replica wormhole results from AdS/CFT apply unchanged when a compact coherence direction is added.
    Eqs. (48)-(64) borrow known entropy and wormhole results; compatibility with t2 is asserted, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper The thermal relation beta = 2 pi Delta t2 / ln(1+sqrt(2)) in Eq. (77) and the relation Delta t2 = l_AdS exp(-pi c/(3 Delta)) in Eq. (87) hold.
    Dimensionless constants and exponential relations are introduced without derivation.
invented entities (1)
  • Compact coherence dimension t2 independent evidence
    purpose: A second temporal coordinate that stores quantum coherence, decoherence, entanglement, and modular flow; compactified at the string scale.
    Postulated at Eq. (1); the paper lists concrete but not yet observed signatures such as sidebands, dispersion delays, and threshold shifts, which are falsifiable handles outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact Temporal Geometry and the $T^2$ Framework for Quantum Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6PVUFOGC

@misc{pith2026250608165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact Temporal Geometry and the $T^2$ Framework for Quantum Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6PVUFOGC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08165}
}
abstract

We introduce a two-dimensional temporal framework in which time is represented by a compact manifold $T^2 = (t_1, t_2)$, with $t_1$ encoding classical causal structure and $t_2$ representing quantum coherence. This construction unifies unitary evolution, decoherence, measurement collapse, and gravitational dynamics within a consistent geometric and algebraic formalism. Compactification of the coherence time $t_2$ yields a minimal temporal resolution $\Delta t_2 \sim \sqrt{\alpha'}$, leading to a discretized spectrum of temporal modes and regularized ultraviolet behavior in quantum field theory and string-theoretic gravity. We formulate an extended Schr\"odinger equation and generalized Lindblad dynamics on $T^2$, and demonstrate the compatibility of this structure with local gauge symmetry through a complexified BRST quantization procedure. Using para-Hermitian geometry and generalized complex structures, we derive a covariant formulation of temporal T-duality that accommodates both Lorentzian and Euclidean signatures. The $T^2$ framework provides new insights into modular thermodynamics, black hole entropy, and the emergence of classical time from quantum coherence, offering a compact and quantized model of temporal geometry rooted in string theory and quantum gravity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield. The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(12):63, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Ashtekar and P

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh. Loop quantum cosmology: a status report. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(21):213001, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    J. J. Atick and E. Witten. The hagedorn transition and the number of degrees of freedom of string theory. Nuclear Physics B, 310(2):291–334, 1988

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione. The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press, 2002. 19

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett. Path integral approach to quantum brownian motion. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 121(3):587–616, 1983

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    J. Cardy. Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics. Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    J. L. Cardy. Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories. Nuclear Physics B, 270(2):186–204, 1986

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    A. Connes. Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, San Diego, 1994

    1994

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    relative state

    H. Everett. “relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(3):454–462, 1957

    1957

  2. [10]

    Faulkner, R

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang. Modular hamiltonians for de- formed half-spaces and the averaged null energy condition. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(9):1–29, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon. The theory of the fermi interaction. Annals of Physics, 24(1):118–173, 1963

    1963

  4. [12]

    Gisin and I

    N. Gisin and I. C. Percival. Quantum measurements and stochastic processes. Physics Letters A, 167(4):315–323, 1992

    1992

  5. [13]

    Giveon, M

    A. Giveon, M. Porrati, and E. Rabinovici. Target space duality in string theory. Physics Reports, 244(2-3):77–202, 1994

    1994

  6. [14]

    Gualtieri

    M. Gualtieri. Generalized complex geometry. arXiv preprint math/0401221, 2004

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gualtieri

    M. Gualtieri. Generalized Complex Geometry. Ph.d. thesis, University of Oxford, 2004

    2004

  8. [16]

    Hull and B

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach. Double field theory. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009(09):099, 2009

    2009

  9. [17]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena, and S. J. Suh. Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(6):1–28, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. J. W. Giulini, J. Kupsch, and I. O. Stamatescu. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin, 2nd edition, 2003

    2003

  11. [19]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena. Generalized gravitational entropy. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013(8):1–21, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Lindblad

    G. Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, 48(2):119–130, 1976

    1976

  13. [21]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind. Cool horizons for entangled black holes. Fortschritte der Physik, 61(9):781–811, 2013. 20

    2013

  14. [22]

    J. M. Maldacena. The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2(2):231–252, 1998

    1998

  15. [23]

    D. N. Page. Information in black hole radiation. Physical Review Letters, 71(23):3743, 1993

    1993

  16. [24]

    Preskill

    J. Preskill. Do black holes destroy information? arXiv preprint hep-th/9209058, 1992

    1992 arXiv

  17. [25]

    C. Rovelli. Statistical mechanics of gravity and the thermodynamical origin of time. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 10(8):1549, 1993

    1993

  18. [26]

    C. Rovelli. Loop quantum gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 1(1):1–76, 1998

    1998

  19. [27]

    Schlosshauer

    M. Schlosshauer. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(4):1267–1305, 2005

    2005

  20. [28]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten. String theory and noncommutative geometry. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1999(09):032, 1999

    1999

  21. [29]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa. Microscopic origin of the bekenstein-hawking entropy. Physics Letters B, 379(1-4):99–104, 1996

    1996

  22. [30]

    D. Svoboda. Para-hermitian geometry and non-geometric fluxes. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(6):1–52, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    R. J. Szabo. Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces. Physics Reports, 378(4):207–299, 2003

    2003

  24. [32]

    E. Witten. Aps medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on black holes and quantum information. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4):045003, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    W. H. Zurek. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3):715, 2003. 21

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.