REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved uncertainty quantification for Gaussian process regression based interatomic potentials
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The error estimation capability of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) based on probabilistic learning methods such as Gaussian process regression (GPR) is currently under-exploited, because of the tendancy of the predicted errors to overestimate the true error. We present approaches based on maximising either the marginal likelihood or an alternative likelihood constructed using leave-one-out cross validation to provide improved error estimates for interatomic potentials based on GPR. We benchmarked these approaches on models representing the Ar trimer, showing significant improvements in the robustness of the predicted error estimates.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Uncertainty Quantification for Free Energy Calculations by Generalized Hierarchical Bayesian Inference
Hierarchical GP inference with Monte-Carlo-sampled hyperparameters yields free-energy uncertainty estimates that track reconstruction error across data-ablation tests, unlike fixed-hyperparameter GP and umbrella integ...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.