Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.04907 v1 pith:6QJRWKHB submitted 2022-04-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords stylerepresentationssamecontentauthortrainingtasktrained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Linguistic style is an integral component of language. Recent advances in the development of style representations have increasingly used training objectives from authorship verification (AV): Do two texts have the same author? The assumption underlying the AV training task (same author approximates same writing style) enables self-supervised and, thus, extensive training. However, a good performance on the AV task does not ensure good "general-purpose" style representations. For example, as the same author might typically write about certain topics, representations trained on AV might also encode content information instead of style alone. We introduce a variation of the AV training task that controls for content using conversation or domain labels. We evaluate whether known style dimensions are represented and preferred over content information through an original variation to the recently proposed STEL framework. We find that representations trained by controlling for conversation are better than representations trained with domain or no content control at representing style independent from content.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors Retain Stylistic Fingerprints

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A style-aware paraphrasing attack evades all nine tested AI-text detectors at the single-document level, but multi-document analysis makes the attack detectable again.

  2. Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new style-discrimination benchmark for personalized text generation shows ensemble metrics give only a marginal, possibly test-fitted, edge over the best single judge.

  3. TalkLess: Blending Extractive and Abstractive Speech Summarization for Editing Speech to Preserve Content and Style

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TalkLess blends extractive and abstractive speech summarization through LLM candidate generation and a weighted scoring function, then converts transcript edits to audio with VoiceCraft, evaluating favorably against a...

Pith tools