Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Rewards in Universal Learning for Contextual Bandits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.07186 v2 pith:6SAJZHIH submitted 2023-02-14 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords learninguniversalbanditscontextualadversarialrewardrewardsconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the fundamental limits of learning in contextual bandits, where a learner's rewards depend on their actions and a known context, which extends the canonical multi-armed bandit to the case where side-information is available. We are interested in universally consistent algorithms, which achieve sublinear regret compared to any measurable fixed policy, without any function class restriction. For stationary contextual bandits, when the underlying reward mechanism is time-invariant, Blanchard et. al (2022) characterized learnable context processes for which universal consistency is achievable; and further gave algorithms ensuring universal consistency whenever this is achievable, a property known as optimistic universal consistency. It is well understood, however, that reward mechanisms can evolve over time, possibly adversarially, and depending on the learner's actions. We show that optimistic universal learning for contextual bandits with adversarial rewards is impossible in general, contrary to all previously studied settings in online learning -- including standard supervised learning. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for universal learning under various adversarial reward models, and an exact characterization for online rewards. In particular, the set of learnable processes for these reward models is still extremely general -- larger than i.i.d., stationary or ergodic -- but in general strictly smaller than that for supervised learning or stationary contextual bandits, shedding light on new adversarial phenomena.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contextual bandits with entropy-based human feedback

    cs.AI 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    An entropy threshold decides when a contextual bandit asks an expert for action recommendations or reward penalties, with improved regret reported on three multi-label datasets.

Pith tools