Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The paper claims every in-in observable in a pair-creating background equals an in-out expectation value with one non-local insertion, and that N-pair creation probabilities reduce to a single propertime contour integral of the worldline ke

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:46 UTC pith:6T64D7QD

load-bearing objection The Δ-insertion construction and its two independent derivations are the real contribution; the 'any background field' P_N claim is a stretch, but the paper deserves a serious referee. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19264 v2 pith:6T64D7QD submitted 2025-12-22 hep-th

In-in worldline formalism in pair creating fields

Patrick Copinger , Shi Pu This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 12.20.-m03.70.+k
keywords in-in formalismSchwinger pair productionworldline formalismSchwinger-Keldysh closed-time pathvacuum non-persistenceN-pair creation probabilitypropertime contourstrong-field QED
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the in-in (real-time) formalism for QED in a pair-creating background field can be rewritten exactly as an in-out (S-matrix) expectation value with a single non-local insertion. If true, this would let the worldline formalism—which is naturally in-out—compute real-time expectation values, and it would produce an exact first-quantized formula for the probability of creating any number N of pairs. The authors derive the insertion both from Bogoliubov coefficients and from the closed-time-path construction, and resum the in-in partition function to express P_N using one contour integral of the Schwinger propertime kernel. This matters because it offers a non-perturbative, parameter-free route to pair production beyond the few exactly solvable backgrounds.

Core claim

In a background field that can create pairs, the difference between an in-in expectation value and an in-out one is entirely captured by inserting the non-local operator exp(i∫d³x d³y ψ̄(x)Δ(x,y)ψ(y)) into the in-out time-ordered product, with Δ(x,y)=γ⁰[ S̄_c(x,y)+sgn(x⁰−y⁰)G(x,y) ]γ⁰. The same insertion emerges from the Bogoliubov-coefficient representation of the in vacuum and from the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path after integrating out the lower branch. Resumming the resulting in-in partition function gives |c_v|² Det[1−S_cΔ], whose Bell-polynomial expansion yields the exact N-pair creation probability P_N in terms of p_n=(Λ²/2)L^{(1)}_{n−1}(−Λ²∂_{m²}) tr∫d⁴x ∮_h ds g(x,x,s). The pap

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-local insertion kernel Δ(x,y)=γ⁰[S̄_c(x,y)+sgn(x⁰−y⁰)G(x,y)]γ⁰, which encodes the vacuum instability: the sgn·G term is what distinguishes in-in from in-out, and in Schwinger propertime it becomes a closed h-contour around the singularities of the propertime kernel g(x,y,s). That closed contour is what extracts pair-production poles, in direct analogy to the imaginary part of the effective action. The resummation then runs on traces of S_cΔ, reorganized by complete exponential Bell polynomials into determinants whose arguments reduce, via the mass-derivative identity and Laguerre polynomials, to a single contour integral of the diagonal kernel g(x,x,s).

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the closed h-contour extracts every pair-production singularity for any background rests on the propertime kernel having no branch cuts or essential singularities that would forbid closing the contour around the whole imaginary complex s-plane.

What would settle it

Compute p_1 from Eq. (4.26) for a spatially inhomogeneous electric-field profile whose worldline kernel has a branch cut in complex propertime, then compare the resulting P_1 with an exact Bogoliubov-coefficient calculation for the same field; a mismatch would show the closed-contour extraction misses or over-counts singularities.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • All in-in observables in pair-creating backgrounds can be written as in-out expectation values with the non-local insertion, so first-quantized worldline methods apply to real-time physics.
  • The N-pair creation probability P_N is expressible exactly as (|c_v|²/N!) times a Bell polynomial in p_n, where each p_n is one closed propertime integration of the worldline kernel.
  • For any background whose kernel has only simple poles in complex propertime, computing the pole locations gives all P_N at once, not just the total vacuum-persistence probability.
  • Summing the P_N over N reproduces the imaginary part of the effective action, so the formula is consistent with vacuum non-persistence and the Schwinger pair-production rate.
  • The in-in causal propagator admits a geometric-series representation in S_cΔ, giving a worldline Dyson series valid at least through single-pair order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper demonstrates the closed-contour extraction only for the homogeneous electric/magnetic field; an implied test is to apply Eqs. (4.26)-(4.27) to an inhomogeneous field with known worldline instantons and compare P_1 with exact or semiclassical results.
  • The same insertion structure should reorganize real-time observables such as the induced current or chiral condensate; the paper gives the propagator form but leaves full resummation open, so a natural next step is a worldline Dyson series for those expectation values.
  • Because the derivation relies only on in/out mode completeness and propertime kernels, the scalar-field, non-Abelian, and curved-spacetime extensions the paper sketches could be checked by repeating the same Bogoliubov-to-contour argument in those settings.
  • If the contour-closure assumption fails only through branch cuts, the formalism might be repairable by deforming h around the cuts; locating a physical background with such cuts would tell whether the 'any background' claim needs a qualification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an in-in (Schwinger-Keldysh) worldline formalism for QED in pair-creating background fields. It derives, from both Bogoliubov coefficients and the closed-time-path construction, an exact representation of in-in expectation values in terms of the in-out propagator supplemented by the non-local insertion exp(i∫ψ̄Δψ), with Δ(x,y)=γ⁰[S̄_c(x,y)+sgn(x⁰−y⁰)G(x,y)]γ⁰ (Eqs. 3.19, 3.21, 3.34). The authors then resum the in-in partition function and express the N-pair production probability as a Bell polynomial whose arguments are worldline contour integrals of the propertime kernel (Eqs. 4.26–4.27). For constant parallel electric and magnetic fields, P₁ is shown to reproduce the known Bogoliubov-coefficient result, and the sum over all P_N is claimed to reproduce the imaginary part of the effective action. The paper states that the final formula holds for any background field in QED.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a substantial advance: it gives a first-quantized, all-orders-in-the-background expression for N-pair production in strong-field QED, connecting in-in observables to the well-developed in-out/worldline machinery. The two independent derivations (Bogoliubov and SK) that agree are a real strength, as is the nontrivial test against the known constant-field P₁ result. The resummation structure and the sum-rule check (modulo the sign issue noted below) are also valuable. However, the advertised generality to 'any background field' is not established by the derivations, and the paper's own stated assumptions conflict with that claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.16)] The replacement of the fixed-time spatial insertion ∫d³xd³y ψ̄Δψ by the 4D spacetime integral Λ²∫d⁴xd⁴y ψ̄Δψ is not an operator identity; it is a new definition involving an undetermined scale Λ. This step is load-bearing because it is what converts the 3D determinant Det₃ into Det₄ and defines the p_n that enter the Bell-polynomial formula (4.26)–(4.27). No argument is given that averaging over time with a single constant Λ leaves the in-in partition function unchanged, nor that this averaging commutes with the all-orders resummation. For non-constant backgrounds a time-dependent or field-dependent Λ would generally be needed. The constant-field check tests only P₁; it does not validate Eq. (4.16) for the higher p_n in arbitrary fields.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.28)] The matching condition Λ^{-2}=lim_{m²→∞}(∂_{m²}ImΓ)/ImΓ is stated without proof and appears to have a sign error. For a homogeneous electric field, ImΓ ∝ exp(-πm²/eE) at the leading pole, so (∂_{m²}ImΓ)/ImΓ = -π/(eE), whereas the text immediately after Eq. (4.28) asserts Λ²=eE/π. More importantly, the existence of the limit and the dominance of a single pole are assumed for generic fields; no example beyond constant fields is given. This is a central step in fixing Λ for the 'any background field' claim, and it needs either a derivation or an explicit restriction to fields for which the limit is well defined.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.28); Sec. 4, Eq. (4.33)] The sum-rule verification is internally inconsistent as printed. Since Γ=-i ln c_v, one has Γ-Γ*=2i ImΓ, not 2 ImΓ; Eq. (2.28) is therefore missing a factor of i on the right-hand side. Using Eq. (2.28) as written, Eq. (4.33) gives Σ_N P_N = |c_v|² exp(-2i ImΓ), which is not equal to 1 (or to the intended |c_v|² exp(2ImΓ)). If the missing i is inserted in Eq. (2.28), the exponent becomes 2ImΓ and the sum rule closes. This is a fixable typo, but it is load-bearing: the paper's claim that the resummation reproduces vacuum non-persistence rests on this check.
  4. [Sec. 4 after Eq. (4.27); Secs. 2 and 5] The statement that 'the above formulation holds for any background field in QED' is stronger than the derivation supports. The derivation assumes an in/out decomposition (footnote 1), contour closure only 'in the absence of branch cuts' (Sec. 2, Fig. 1b), and simple poles in complex propertime for the final evaluation ('One need only determine, for example for fields that only possess simple poles...'). The manuscript's own Sec. 5 admits that 'a more rigorous analysis of the asymptotic characteristics of the first-quantized in-out propagator—for arbitrary fields and to all orders—would be highly beneficial.' The central formalism may be correct, but the generality claim should be qualified to fields satisfying the stated pole/contour assumptions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4.33)] The subscript 'c_n' appears to be a typo for 'c_v'.
  2. [Page 2, Introduction] 'compliment existing studies' should be 'complement existing studies'.
  3. [Sec. 4, around Eq. (4.41)] 'may no be applied' should be 'may not be applied'.
  4. [Eq. (4.44)] The notation [I₃/(I₃-S_cΔ)Sc] is confusing; it should be written as (I₃-S_cΔ)^{-1} S_c, with the inverse acting in the 3D spatial/Dirac sense.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the in-in/Δ derivation is self-contained, and the N-pair formula, though it uses a matched scale Λ and a disclosed overlapping-author resummation reference, is not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The central in-in construction is not circular by construction. The insertion Δ is built from in-out propagators and the anti-commutation function (Eqs. 3.12–3.13), and the generating functional is derived in two independent ways: from Bogoliubov coefficients (Eqs. 3.14–3.21) and from the Schwinger–Keldysh closed-time path (Eqs. 3.23–3.34); neither reduces to the claimed output. The N-pair formula (4.27) is obtained by an explicit determinant/Bell-polynomial resummation (Eqs. 4.3–4.8 and 4.20–4.26), so the citation to Ref. [57] for the Bell-polynomial structure is not load-bearing: the expansion is re-derived in the text and the overlapping authorship is disclosed. The scale Λ is fixed by matching to the leading effective-action pole (Eq. 4.28), so P_1 for constant fields is partly a matched quantity; however, the P_N for N≥2 involve non-trivial Laguerre/derivative structure, and the constant-field P_1 is checked against the external exact result Ref. [26]. Thus this is a parametrization consistency condition, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The 'any background field' claim (Sec. 4 after Eq. 4.27) is broader than what is proven: it relies on contour closure 'in the absence of branch cuts...' (Sec. 2, Fig. 1b) and on the ad hoc averaging step Eq. (4.16), and the paper itself concedes in Sec. 5 that 'a more rigorous analysis of the asymptotic characteristics of the first-quantized in-out propagator—for arbitrary fields and to all orders—would be highly beneficial.' Those are support/correctness caveats, not circular reductions. Score 2 reflects the mild self-referential elements (an overlapping-author reference to the Bell-polynomial resummation and a matched scale Λ), but there is no exhibited equation reducing the claimed result to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

Everything the central claim rests on beyond standard QFT: in/out completeness of modes, branch-cut-free closure of the h contour, the Ref. [60] propertime formula for G, the time-averaging/Λ identification, and the regularization/matching conditions. The two items that most affect the headline claims are Λ (matched, not derived) and the branch-cut assumption (qualifying the 'any background field' scope).

free parameters (1)
  • Λ (3d→4d time-scale / measure) = Λ² = eE/π for the constant E∥B example; field-dependent in general
    Introduced in Eq. (4.16) to promote the 3d spatial integrals of the partition-function insertion to 4d (∫d³xd³y ψ̄Δψ = Λ²∫d⁴xd⁴y ψ̄Δψ); fixed by the matching condition lim_{m²→∞} ln⟨in|in⟩ = 0, i.e., Λ⁻² = lim_{m²→∞}(1/ImΓ)∂_{m²}ImΓ (Eq. 4.28). This is a consistency/matching parameter, not a derived constant, and the N-pair probabilities depend on it.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Dirac solutions in the background admit a complete in/out decomposition (Eq. 2.1)
    Stated as a demand in footnote 1: 'we demand that solutions to the Dirac equation in a background field admit an in/out decomposition as given in Eq. (2.1).' The Bogoliubov-coefficient derivation (Sec. 3.1) collapses without it.
  • domain assumption The propertime kernel's singularities can be enclosed by closing the h contour in the absence of branch cuts
    Sec. 2, Fig. 1b discussion: 'In the absence of branch cuts that might otherwise forbid it, one may close the contour to encircle the entire imaginary complex plane.' Underwrites the general-field validity of ρ_h (Eq. 2.27) and of the P_N formulas (Eqs. 4.26–4.27).
  • domain assumption The anti-commutation function G has the propertime representation Eq. (2.25) with the Γ half-semicircle contour
    Imported from Ref. [60] (Gavrilov–Gitman); used to build Δ and to convert Wightman functions into propertime form (Eqs. 2.9–2.18).
  • ad hoc to paper The partition-function insertion can be averaged over time: ∫d³xd³y ψ̄Δψ = Λ²∫d⁴xd⁴y ψ̄Δψ (Eq. 4.16)
    'One may equally well average over all possible times such that...' (Sec. 4). This identification is exclusive to the partition function and introduces Λ; it is not derived from QFT identities.
  • domain assumption Free-field subtraction (or equivalent regularization) renders Det4 finite, making the 'I' terms in Eq. (4.23) drop out
    Footnote 3: 'a free-field subtraction, or other suitable regularization, is necessary to obtain meaningful results.' Required for Eq. (4.14) onward.
  • ad hoc to paper The matching condition lim_{m²→∞} ln⟨in|in⟩ = 0 determines Λ via the dominant pole (Eq. 4.28)
    'Fixing follows from the physical demand that a leading order contribution to the effective action match the leading order contribution to the probability of creating a single pair.' This is a chosen normalization condition, not a theorem.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22696 in / 26600 out tokens · 234646 ms · 2026-08-03T14:46:25.230068+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

An in-in framework under Schwinger pair creating fields in strong-field quantum electrodynamics is formulated using in-out propagators in coordinate space, that have first-quantized or worldline representation. The framework is derived to all orders in the background field coupling from both the Bogoliubov coefficient method and Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path formalism. In-out matrix elements in pair creating fields are readily handled using first-quantized methods, and the approach we develop serves to facilitate the evaluation of in-in observables in pair creating backgrounds. We find that in-in augmentations to the in-out partition function and or propagator amount to the insertion of a non-local interaction term that sandwiches a function that receives contributions from singularities and critical points in complex Schwinger propertime. Furthermore, we show the resummation of the in-in partition function leading to vacuum non-persistence that en-route gives an exact first-quantized definition of creating $N$-pairs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Vacuum photon emission and mean electromagnetic field in pair-creating external backgrounds

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives mean photon number density to order α² and mean EM field to order e³ in pair-producing backgrounds using the Keldysh-Schwinger-Fradkin nonequilibrium technique, expressed via exact Dirac solutions.

  2. Worldline Images for Yang-Mills Theory within Boundaries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A worldline image method is developed for the Yang-Mills effective action with boundaries, checked via the first three Seeley-DeWitt coefficients and applied to chromoelectric gluon production.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 41 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Sauter,Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,Z

    F. Sauter,Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,Z. Phys.69(1931) 742–764

    1931

  2. [2]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler,Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,Z. Phys.98(1936) 714–732, [physics/0605038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  3. [3]

    J. S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679

    1951

  4. [4]

    Gelis and N

    F. Gelis and N. Tanji,Schwinger mechanism revisited,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.87(2016) 1–49, [1510.05451]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran and H. J. Warringa,The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation ’,Nucl. Phys. A803(2008) 227–253, [0711.0950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev,Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 5925–5932, [0907.1396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Bzdak and V

    A. Bzdak and V. Skokov,Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions,Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 171–174, [1111.1949]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Voronyuk, V

    V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski and S. A. Voloshin,(Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C83 (2011) 054911, [1103.4239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang,Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 044907, [1201.5108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Roy and S

    V. Roy and S. Pu,Event-by-event distribution of magnetic field energy over initial fluid energy density in √sNN= 200 GeV Au-Au collisions,Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 064902, [1508.03761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    S. Pu, V. Roy, L. Rezzolla and D. H. Rischke,Bjorken flow in one-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics with magnetization,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 074022, [1602.04953]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    V. Roy, S. Pu, L. Rezzolla and D. Rischke,Analytic Bjorken flow in one-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 45–52, [1506.06620]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Siddique, R.-j

    I. Siddique, R.-j. Wang, S. Pu and Q. Wang,Anomalous magnetohydrodynamics with longitudinal boost invariance and chiral magnetic effect,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 114029, [1904.01807]. [14]STARcollaboration, J. Adam et al.,Low-p T e+e− pair production in Au+Au collisions at√sN N= 200 GeV and U+U collisions at √sN N= 193 GeV at STAR,Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 13...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [17]

    W. Zha, J. D. Brandenburg, Z. Tang and Z. Xu,Initial transverse-momentum broadening of Breit-Wheeler process in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135089, [1812.02820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [18]

    Klein, A

    S. Klein, A. H. Mueller, B.-W. Xiao and F. Yuan,Acoplanarity of a Lepton Pair to Probe the Electromagnetic Property of Quark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 132301, [1811.05519]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [19]

    C. Li, J. Zhou and Y.-J. Zhou,Probing the linear polarization of photons in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions,Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 576–580, [1903.10084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [20]

    R.-j. Wang, S. Pu and Q. Wang,Lepton pair production in ultraperipheral collisions,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 056011, [2106.05462]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [21]

    P. Shi, X. Bo-Wen, Z. Jian and Z. Ya-Jin,Coherent photons induced high energy reactions in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions,Acta Phys. Sin.72(2023) 072503

    2023

  19. [22]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa,Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. I, Journal of Mathematical Physics4(1963) 1–11

    1963

  20. [23]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa,Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. II, Journal of Mathematical Physics4(1963) 12–16

    1963

  21. [24]

    J. S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407–432. – 24 –

    1961

  22. [25]

    L. V. Keldysh,Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes,Sov. Phys. JETP20(1965) 1018–1026

    1965

  23. [26]

    Fradkin, D

    E. Fradkin, D. Guitman and S. Shvartsman,Quantum electrodynamics: with unstable vacuum. Springer series in nuclear and particle physics. Springer-Verlag, 1991

    1991

  24. [27]

    Tanji,Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields,Annals Phys

    N. Tanji,Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields,Annals Phys. 324(2009) 1691–1736, [0810.4429]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  25. [28]

    H. J. Warringa,Dynamics of the Chiral Magnetic Effect in a weak magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 085029, [1205.5679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [29]

    Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf

    J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3–62, [hep-ph/0409233]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  27. [30]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2008, 10.1017/CBO9780511535123

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535123 2008

  28. [31]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya et al.,Advances in QED with intense background fields,Phys. Rept.1010(2023) 1–138, [2203.00019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [32]

    R. P. Feynman,Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction, Phys. Rev.80(1950) 440–457

    1950

  30. [33]

    R. P. Feynman,An Operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.84(1951) 108–128

    1951

  31. [34]

    M. J. Strassler,Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions,Nucl. Phys. B385(1992) 145–184

    1992

  32. [35]

    Schubert,Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,Phys

    C. Schubert,Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,Phys. Rept. 355(2001) 73–234, [hep-th/0101036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [36]

    J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert,Quantum mechanical path integrals in the first quantised approach to quantum field theory, 12, 2019,1912.10004

    arXiv 2019

  34. [37]

    I. K. Affleck, O. Alvarez and N. S. Manton,Pair Production at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,Nucl. Phys. B197(1982) 509–519

    1982

  35. [38]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert,Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogeneous fields,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 105004, [hep-th/0507174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [39]

    G. V. Dunne, Q.-h. Wang, H. Gies and C. Schubert,Worldline instantons. II. The Fluctuation prefactor,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 065028, [hep-th/0602176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [40]

    Copinger and P

    P. Copinger and P. Morales,Schwinger pair production in SL(2,C)topologically nontrivial fields via non-Abelian worldline instantons,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 036004, [2011.12526]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [41]

    Corradini, C

    O. Corradini, C. Schubert, J. P. Edwards and N. Ahmadiniaz,Spinning Particles in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, 12, 2015,1512.08694

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [42]

    Bastianelli, O

    F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, D. G. C. McKeon and C. Schubert,Unified worldline treatment of Yukawa and axial couplings,JHEP11(2024) 152, [2406.19988]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [43]

    A. A. Migdal,Momentum Loop Dynamics and Random Surfaces in QCD,Nucl. Phys. B265 (1986) 594–614. – 25 –

    1986

  41. [44]

    Copinger and S

    P. Copinger and S. Pu,Berry phase in the phase space worldline representation: The axial anomaly and classical kinetic theory,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 116014, [2203.00847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [45]

    Dittrich and H

    W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, vol. 166. 2000, 10.1007/3-540-45585-X

    doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x 2000

  43. [46]

    Copinger, K

    P. Copinger, K. Fukushima and S. Pu,Axial Ward identity and the Schwinger mechanism – Applications to the real-time chiral magnetic effect and condensates,Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 261602, [1807.04416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [47]

    Copinger and S

    P. Copinger and S. Pu,Chirality production with mass effects — Schwinger pair production and the axial Ward identity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(2020) 2030015, [2008.03635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [48]

    G. V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume set) (M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater, eds.), pp. 445–522. 2004.hep-th/0406216. DOI

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [49]

    Jalilian-Marian, S

    J. Jalilian-Marian, S. Jeon, R. Venugopalan and J. Wirstam,Minding one’s P’s and Q’s: From the one loop effective action in quantum field theory to classical transport theory,Phys. Rev. D 62(2000) 045020, [hep-ph/9910299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  47. [50]

    Mueller and R

    N. Mueller and R. Venugopalan,Constructing phase space distributions with internal symmetries,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 056003, [1901.10492]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [51]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,JHEP10(2022) 128, [2207.00569]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [52]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 101401, [2210.05541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [53]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity,JHEP09(2023) 059, [2306.11454]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [54]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 201103, [2101.12688]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [55]

    Gelis and R

    F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan,Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources,Nucl. Phys.A776(2006) 135–171, [hep-ph/0601209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  53. [56]

    Gelis and R

    F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan,Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources. II. Generating functions,Nucl. Phys.A779(2006) 177–196, [hep-ph/0605246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  54. [57]

    Copinger, J

    P. Copinger, J. P. Edwards, A. Ilderton and K. Rajeev,Pair creation, backreaction, and resummation in strong fields,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 036009, [2411.06203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [58]

    D. M. Gitman,Processes of Arbitrary Order in Quantum Electrodynamics with a Pair Creating External Field,J. Phys.A10(1977) 2007–2020

    1977

  56. [59]

    E. S. Fradkin and D. M. Gitman,Furry Picture for Quantum Electrodynamics With Pair Creating External Field,Fortsch. Phys.29(1981) 381–412

    1981

  57. [60]

    S. P. Gavrilov and D. M. Gitman,Proper time and path integral representations for the commutation function,J. Math. Phys.37(1996) 3118–3130, [hep-th/9603189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [61]

    R. D. Jordan,Effective field equations for expectation values,Phys. Rev. D33(Jan, 1986) 444–454. – 26 –

    1986

  59. [62]

    Degli Esposti and G

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson,Worldline instantons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair production in spacetime dependent fields,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 056019, [2212.11578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [63]

    Degli Esposti and G

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson,Nonlinear trident using WKB and worldline instantons, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 036005, [2412.19758]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [64]

    I. L. Buchbinder, D. M. Gitman and E. S. Fradkin,Quantum Electrodynamics in Curved Space-time,Fortsch. Phys.29(1981) 187–218. – 27 –

    1981