Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DeepWriter: A Multi-Stream Deep CNN for Text-independent Writer Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.06472 v2 pith:6TBHKYQC submitted 2016-06-21 cs.CV

DeepWriter: A Multi-Stream Deep CNN for Text-independent Writer Identification

classification cs.CV
keywords writersidentificationdeepwriterinputwriterdeepdifferentenglish
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-independent writer identification is challenging due to the huge variation of written contents and the ambiguous written styles of different writers. This paper proposes DeepWriter, a deep multi-stream CNN to learn deep powerful representation for recognizing writers. DeepWriter takes local handwritten patches as input and is trained with softmax classification loss. The main contributions are: 1) we design and optimize multi-stream structure for writer identification task; 2) we introduce data augmentation learning to enhance the performance of DeepWriter; 3) we introduce a patch scanning strategy to handle text image with different lengths. In addition, we find that different languages such as English and Chinese may share common features for writer identification, and joint training can yield better performance. Experimental results on IAM and HWDB datasets show that our models achieve high identification accuracy: 99.01% on 301 writers and 97.03% on 657 writers with one English sentence input, 93.85% on 300 writers with one Chinese character input, which outperform previous methods with a large margin. Moreover, our models obtain accuracy of 98.01% on 301 writers with only 4 English alphabets as input.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. InkShield: Writing Style Protection Against Unauthorized Handwriting Mimicry

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Edge-confined, decoy-guided adversarial perturbations on handwriting references cut target-writer Top-1/Top-5 retrieval of One-DM generations from ~12%/37% to ~2%/9% while keeping LPIPS ≈ 0.008.

  2. InkShield: Writing Style Protection Against Unauthorized Handwriting Mimicry

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A stroke-edge-masked, decoy-guided perturbation added to released handwriting references reduces target-writer style mimicry by one-shot generators from ~12% to ~2% Top-1 retrieval while preserving readability.