Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.07403 v1 pith:6TBRINZV submitted 2021-03-12 cs.RO cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords scenariosdrivingmetricstestingautonomouscharacterizecomplexitydata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Extracting interesting scenarios from real-world data as well as generating failure cases is important for the development and testing of autonomous systems. We propose efficient mechanisms to both characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. For any scenario, our method generates a set of possible driving paths and identifies all the possible safe driving trajectories that can be taken starting at different times, to compute metrics that quantify the complexity of the scenario. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project, as well as adversarial scenarios generated in simulation. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident. We demonstrate a strong correlation between the proposed metrics and human intuition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Confidential Guardian: Cryptographically Prohibiting the Abuse of Model Abstention

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Model owners can covertly suppress confidence in targeted groups via Mirage, and Confidential Guardian audits calibration with zero-knowledge proofs to catch such tampering.

  2. Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-dynamics abstention method matches deep ensembles at a fraction of the training cost, and a five-term error budget explains why selective classifiers still fall short of the oracle.

Pith tools