Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Auxiliary task discovery through generate-and-test

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14361 v2 pith:6TSTEHSL submitted 2022-10-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords auxiliarytasktasksdiscoverylearningapproachexploremain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore an approach to auxiliary task discovery in reinforcement learning based on ideas from representation learning. Auxiliary tasks tend to improve data efficiency by forcing the agent to learn auxiliary prediction and control objectives in addition to the main task of maximizing reward, and thus producing better representations. Typically these tasks are designed by people. Meta-learning offers a promising avenue for automatic task discovery; however, these methods are computationally expensive and challenging to tune in practice. In this paper, we explore a complementary approach to the auxiliary task discovery: continually generating new auxiliary tasks and preserving only those with high utility. We also introduce a new measure of auxiliary tasks' usefulness based on how useful the features induced by them are for the main task. Our discovery algorithm significantly outperforms random tasks and learning without auxiliary tasks across a suite of environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools