Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 202 references

Motion can be transferred across subjects of any shape at inference by injecting pixel motion flows into a video diffusion model, without skeletons or training.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Training-free motion transfer across species works by extracting source motion flows, matching semantic points, and injecting them into DiT self-attention via TransPE positional padding.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-14 challenge →

load-bearing objection Clean training-free TransPE recipe that actually moves the needle on cross-species video motion transfer; the matching step is the real soft underbelly. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11644 v1 pith:6UFDSBR2 submitted 2026-07-13 cs.CV

Motion4Motion: Motion Transfer Across Subjects at Inference

Ling-Hao Chen , Zixin Yin , Duomin Wang , Xianfang Zeng , Gang Yu This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords motion transfervideo diffusionattention controltraining-freecross-species animationmotion flowTransPEDiffusion Transformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that motion transfer between videos does not need human skeletons or large-scale retraining. Extract dense motion flows from a source video, match a few semantic points to a target subject, and inject those trajectories into the self-attention of a pretrained diffusion transformer so the target inherits the source motion. The training-free system, Motion4Motion, works for animals of different species and even for inanimate objects such as a walking table. Animation has long been locked to fixed body structures; removing that lock would let creators drive arbitrary characters from ordinary reference videos while keeping identity and texture intact.

Core claim

Motion4Motion is a training-free framework that achieves high-fidelity motion transfer across general subjects, including different species and non-human morphologies, by representing motion as dense pixel-level flows rather than skeletons and injecting those flows into a diffusion transformer’s self-attention via Transferring Positional Encoding (TransPE), with no model fine-tuning required.

What carries the argument

TransPE (Transferring Positional Encoding): during denoising the query stays unchanged while key and value tensors are concatenated with the target subject’s appearance features, re-embedded by rotary positional encoding along the source motion trajectories; this places the target’s look at the coordinates dictated by the source flow.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes automatic point matching and tracking reliably link corresponding body parts across very different shapes, so the injected trajectories land on the right places of the target.

What would settle it

On a held-out set of cross-species pairs with ground-truth part labels (e.g., dog legs to giraffe legs), if matched points systematically land on wrong parts and the generated videos show limbs moving out of semantic correspondence while skeleton-based methods do not, the claim that skeleton-free flow injection is sufficient would fail.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Creators can animate non-human or non-animal subjects from ordinary reference videos without building new skeletons.
  • Cross-morphology concept composition (for example a desk that walks) becomes practical by binding semantic parts with masks.
  • Existing video diffusion models can be used for motion control without collecting topology-specific paired data.
  • Per-video optimization and skeleton detectors are unnecessary for many retargeting tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If point matching remains the bottleneck, combining sparse learned correspondences with TransPE could bridge larger morphological gaps.
  • The same attention-padding pattern could move other attributes (style, lighting) by choosing which features are re-positioned.
  • Systematic failure cases on heavy occlusion or extreme articulation would map the practical limits of training-free diffusion control more clearly than current animal/human benchmarks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Motion4Motion, a training-free inference-time method for transferring motion from a source video to a target subject (including cross-species and non-human morphologies) without skeletal priors. It extracts dense motion flows via SAM-2 anchors, DIFT-based cross-image matching, and point tracking, then injects the resulting target trajectories into a WAN DiT’s self-attention through a TransPE module that concatenates RoPE-repositioned appearance keys/values (Eqs. 2–3, Alg. 1). Experiments on human/animal splits, a new 50-pair pose-similarity set, a 10-rater user study, and a table-walking application report gains over FlexiAct, MotionClone, RoPECraft, and MotionDirector on TS/MF/TC/AC/PS.

Significance. Removing the shared-skeleton assumption for video motion transfer is a practically important step for animation and digital creation with diverse characters. A training-free DiT attention intervention that can retarget motion across species and, with care, to inanimate objects would be a useful tool for the community. Strengths include a clear algorithmic pipeline (Alg. 1), quantitative tables plus a blind pairwise user study, and an explicit novel-composition application. The contribution is primarily engineering and empirical rather than theoretical; its lasting value hinges on whether the correspondence stage is reliable enough to support the “general subjects” claim.

major comments (4)
  1. Sec. 3.2–3.3 and the composite mapping M = I ∘ C⁻¹: the central claim of morphology-agnostic transfer rests on DIFT semantic matching of SAM-2 anchors plus DIFT tracking. The manuscript never reports matching precision, failure rate, or correspondence error as a function of morphological distance (dog↔lion, fox↔giraffe, human legs↔table). Without this, the large PS gain in Table 1 (0.543) and the “general subjects” claim cannot be attributed cleanly to TransPE rather than to favorable matches on the chosen pairs.
  2. Sec. 5 (table-walking application): the paper explicitly resorts to manual SAM-2 “bone binding” masks to make the human→table case tractable, stating that pure matching is insufficient under large structural disparity. This is a load-bearing admission: the flagship cross-morphology result is not fully automatic. The abstract and contribution bullets should state the degree of manual correspondence required, and automatic vs. bound results should be separated in evaluation.
  3. Sec. 4.1.2 vs. Table 1: the text claims comparison with training-required trajectory methods Diffusion-As-Shader and WAN-Move, yet Table 1 reports only MotionDirector, RoPECraft, MotionClone, and FlexiAct. Either add those numbers under a fair protocol (or explain why they are inapplicable) or remove the claim of outperforming them; otherwise the “outperform baselines impressively” statement is incomplete.
  4. Sec. 4.1.1 free parameters (manipulation step range [0,35], layer range [0,40], number of anchors N): Fig. 7 ablates only the step cutoff. There is no sensitivity analysis for N or layer range, nor any failure-mode analysis when matching is noisy. Because these knobs directly control where appearance is injected (Eqs. 2–3), a short ablation or default-robustness check is needed to support reproducibility of the Table 1 gains.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: training-free attention construction evaluated on external benchmarks, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

Motion4Motion presents an engineering pipeline (DIFT/SAM-2 correspondence + motion-flow extraction + TransPE key/value padding inside WAN DiT self-attention, Eqs. 2–3 and Alg. 1) that is applied at inference and scored against external video pairs, Co-tracker trajectories, CLIP metrics, a pose detector, and human raters (Table 1, Sec. 4). No parameter is fitted to a subset of the evaluation data and then re-presented as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors’ prior work to force the numerical scores; the composite mapping M = I ∘ C⁻¹ is an operational definition of the control signal, not a claimed first-principles derivation that reduces to its own inputs. Self-citations (e.g., Motion2Motion, HumanMAC) appear only as background related work and do not underwrite the central empirical claims. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits zero circularity of the kinds enumerated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

As an empirical systems paper the load-bearing items are implementation choices and modeling assumptions rather than free physical constants. The free parameters are the hand-chosen ranges for attention intervention; the axioms are the standard diffusion and correspondence assumptions; TransPE is the sole invented module.

free parameters (3)
  • attention-manipulation step range = steps 0–35
    Default [0,35] out of 50 denoising steps; chosen by ablation (Fig. 7) and directly affects motion-vs-appearance trade-off.
  • attention-manipulation layer range = layers 0–40
    Default layers [0,40]; hand-selected and not derived from first principles.
  • number of anchor points N
    Number of sampled points for matching/tracking; affects density of motion control but is not fixed by theory.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption 3D RoPE makes self-attention locally position-sensitive, so re-encoding keys with new trajectories relocates appearance features.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1–3.3 and Fig. 2; standard for RoPE-based DiTs but not proven for arbitrary morphology gaps.
  • domain assumption Diffusion features (DIFT) plus SAM-2 yield sufficiently accurate semantic correspondences across species.
    Core of Sec. 3.2; if false the composite mapping M fails.
  • domain assumption Deterministic inversion of a generated or I2V video recovers a usable noise latent for subsequent editing.
    Sec. 3.2 and 4.1; relies on UniEdit-Flow-style inversion quality.
invented entities (1)
  • TransPE (Transferring Positional Encoding) no independent evidence
    purpose: Pads key/value tensors with target appearance features whose RoPE coordinates follow the source motion flow, thereby relocating the subject without training.
    Defined in Sec. 3.3 and Eq. (2)–(3); the sole novel algorithmic primitive. Independent evidence is only the empirical tables and figures of this paper.

reviewed 2026-07-14 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Motion4Motion: Motion Transfer Across Subjects at Inference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6UFDSBR2

@misc{pith2026260711644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Motion4Motion: Motion Transfer Across Subjects at Inference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6UFDSBR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11644}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work explores the motion transfer from one video to another, which is crucial in animation for diverse characters. Previously, video motion transfer has been largely explored between human and human-like characters, enabling a lot of applications in digital creation. However, these approaches encounter a main limitation. Specifically, related technical pipelines heavily rely on a predefined human skeleton structure and accordingly require skeleton-conditional model training. On the one hand, these methods are difficult to generalize to diverse characters, such as animals from different species, while preserving their unique motion styles. On the other hand, labeled data in diverse skeletons is limited, which additionally restricts the large-scale training for the task. In this paper, we jump out of the skeleton-based motion transfer framework and propose a training-free motion transfer framework, named Motion4Motion. Motion4Motionmodels the motion flow of the character in a video instead of skeletons, which makes motion transfer across species easier. Extensive experimental results and novel applications show our methods outperform baselines impressively. Project page is available at https://lhchen.top/Motion4Motion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11644 by Duomin Wang, Gang Yu, Ling-Hao Chen, Xianfang Zeng, Zixin Yin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Introducing Motion4Motion, a framework transferring motion from one subject to another. Motion4Motion achieves cross-species (e.g., human → panda, or human → goose) motion transfer without a uniform skeleton at inference. This work explores the motion transfer from one video to another, which is crucial in animation for diverse characters. Previously, video motion trans￾fer has been largely explored betwee… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Position awareness in self-attention. We sample two frames from a video. The source point in (A) is marked by a point ★. We found the attention weight (overlaid on (C)) of this point ★ is more aware of the spatial-temporal neighbors ★, but not semantically similar ones ▲. Matching [Lipman et al. 2023]. For efficient processing, an input video is first compressed into a latent space z ∈ R (1+⌊ 𝐹 4 ⌋ )× 𝐻 8 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Building correspondences across images and video. (A) Cross￾image correspondence: Anchor points P 1 𝑠𝑟𝑐 sampled within the source mask are semantically matched to the target subject P𝑡𝑔𝑡 via point matching. (B) Motion flow extraction: The motion flow M𝑠𝑟𝑐 is constructed by tracking the trajectories of these points across the temporal axis of the source video. encoding plays in video generation. Such a rela… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: System overview of Motion4Motion. (A) Overall Framework. Our system adds standard self-attention with the TransPE module within DiT blocks to achieve training-free motion transfer. (B) Mechanism of TransPE. The original Query Q (•) keeps unchanged. Key K (♦) is padded with the appearance key features of the target subject, marked as light blue key tokens ♦. Additionally, padded keys are also applied to pos… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of Motion4Motion with baselines. We focus on the preservation of pose details across individual frames. Most baseline methods exhibit varying degrees of visual artifacts or appearance drifting. In contrast, our method maintains high-fidelity pose alignment and appearance consistency. 4.2.3 Real-image/video evaluation. To further evaluate the robust￾ness and generalization capabilities of Motion4… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation on manipulation steps. (A) Without manipulation (Step 0), the model fails to relocate target features along the intended trajectories. (B) Our default strategy (Step 35) achieves an optimal balance between motion fidelity and visual realism. (C) Full-step manipulation (Step 50) causes semantic confusion, resulting in texture stretching and artifacts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Application of Motion4Motion in Cross-domain Motion Synthesis. We empower a vanilla T2V model with the capability to animate inanimate objects using biological motion trajectories. Given a reference video of a walking person (A) and a target static image of a table (B), our method extracts the motion semantics (G) and applies them to the target. While baseline approaches (WAN-I2V-14B, WAN-T2V-14B) without … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of the motion transfer results bt Motion4Motion. SIGGRAPH Conference Papers ’26, July 19–23, 2026, Los Angeles, CA, USA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abril and Robert Plant

    Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. The patent holder's dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll?. Communications of the ACM. doi:10.1145/1188913.1188915

    doi:10.1145/1188913.1188915

  2. [2]

    Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries

    Sarah Cohen and Werner Nutt and Yehoshua Sagic. Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries. doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093

    doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093

  3. [3]

    Special issue: Digital Libraries. 1996

    1996

  4. [4]

    Understanding Policy-Based Networking

    David Kosiur. Understanding Policy-Based Networking

  5. [7]

    doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

    The title of book two. doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

    doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

  6. [8]

    Asad Z. Spector. Achieving application requirements. Distributed Systems. doi:10.1145/90417.90738

    doi:10.1145/90417.90738

  7. [9]

    Douglass and David Harel and Mark B

    Bruce P. Douglass and David Harel and Mark B. Trakhtenbrot. Statecarts in use: structured analysis and object-orientation. Lectures on Embedded Systems. doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

    doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

  8. [10]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd. ed.)

  9. [11]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming

  10. [12]

    Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol)

    Dan Geiger and Christopher Meek. Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol). Proceedings of Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, The Barbados

  11. [13]

    Stan W. Smith. An experiment in bibliographic mark-up: Parsing metadata for XML export. Proceedings of the 3rd. annual workshop on Librarians and Computers

  12. [14]

    Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms

    Matthew Van Gundy and Davide Balzarotti and Giovanni Vigna. Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms. Proceedings of the first USENIX workshop on Offensive Technologies

  13. [15]

    Predicate Path expressions

    Sten Andler. Predicate Path expressions. Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. doi:10.1145/567752.567774

    doi:10.1145/567752.567774

  14. [16]

    LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

    David Harel. LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

  15. [17]

    Anisi , title =

    David A. Anisi , title =

  16. [18]

    Clarkson

    Kenneth L. Clarkson. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry)

  17. [19]

    Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

    Harry Thornburg. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. 2001

    2001

  18. [20]

    CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11

    Rafal Ablamowicz and Bertfried Fauser. CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11. 2007

    2007

  19. [21]

    Stats and Analysis

    Poker-Edge.Com. Stats and Analysis. 2006

    2006

  20. [22]

    A more perfect union

    Barack Obama. A more perfect union

  21. [23]

    The fountain of youth

    Joseph Scientist. The fountain of youth

  22. [24]

    Solder man

    Dave Novak. Solder man. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Video Review on Animation theater Program: Part I - Vol. 145 (July 27--27, 2003). doi:10.945/woot07-S422

    2003

  23. [25]

    Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005

    Newton Lee. Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005. Comput. Entertain. doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278

    doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278 2005

  24. [26]

    The Enabling of Digital Libraries

    Bernard Rous. The Enabling of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries

  25. [28]

    (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =

    Werneck, Renato and Setubal, Jo\. (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =. doi:10.1145/351827.384253 , acmid = 384253, publisher =

    doi:10.1145/351827.384253

  26. [30]

    and Mei, Alessandro , title =

    Conti, Mauro and Di Pietro, Roberto and Mancini, Luigi V. and Mei, Alessandro , title =. Inf. Fusion , volume =. 2009 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 , acmid =

    doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 2009

  27. [31]

    and Hutchful, David K

    Li, Cheng-Lun and Buyuktur, Ayse G. and Hutchful, David K. and Sant, Natasha B. and Nainwal, Satyendra K. , title =. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946 , acmid =

    doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946

  28. [32]

    , title =

    Hollis, Billy S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  29. [33]

    Goossens, Michel and Rahtz, S. P. and Moore, Ross and Sutor, Robert S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  30. [34]

    and Rosenberg, Arnold L

    Buss, Jonathan F. and Rosenberg, Arnold L. and Knott, Judson D. , title =. 1987 , source =

    1987

  31. [35]

    CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

    , note =. CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

  32. [36]

    Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

    Clarkson, Kenneth Lee , advisor =. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

  33. [37]

    SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. , year =

  34. [38]

    2004 , isbn =

    IEEE TCSC Executive Committee , booktitle =. 2004 , isbn =. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2004.64 , acmid =

    doi:10.1109/icws.2004.64 2004

  35. [39]

    Distributed systems (2nd Ed.) , year =

  36. [40]

    , title =

    Petrie, Charles J. , title =. 1986 , source =

    1986

  37. [41]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1981

    1981

  38. [42]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , Title =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

  39. [43]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , type =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

  40. [44]

    Chapter 9 , booktitle =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. Chapter 9 , booktitle =

  41. [45]

    E-commerce and cultural values , editor =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , title =. E-commerce and cultural values , editor =. 2003 , isbn =

    2003

  42. [46]

    E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =. 2004 , address =

    2004

  43. [47]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =. 2005 , address =

    2005

  44. [48]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =. 2006 , address =

    2006

  45. [49]

    Microelectron

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi , title =. Microelectron. J. , volume =. 2010 , pages =

    2010

  46. [50]

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi and Zahra Sasanian , title =. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. , volume =

  47. [51]

    Kirschmer, Markus and Voight, John , title =. SIAM J. Comput. , issue_date =. 2010 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/080734467 , acmid =

    doi:10.1137/080734467 2010

  48. [52]

    Hoare, C. A. R. , title =. Structured programming (incoll) , editor =. 1972 , isbn =

    1972

  49. [53]

    History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =

    Lee, Jan , title =. History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =. 1981 , isbn =. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800025.1198348 , acmid =

    doi:10.1145/800025.1198348 1981

  50. [54]

    , title =

    Dijkstra, E. , title =. Classics in software engineering (incoll) , year =

  51. [55]

    , title =

    Wenzel, Elizabeth M. , title =. Multimedia interface design (incoll) , year =. doi:10.1145/146022.146089 , acmid =

    doi:10.1145/146022.146089

  52. [56]

    , title =

    Mumford, E. , title =. Critical issues in information systems research (incoll) , year =

  53. [57]

    and Golden, Donald G

    McCracken, Daniel D. and Golden, Donald G. , title =. 1990 , isbn =

    1990

  54. [58]

    The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    H. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. 1985 , PAGES =

    1985

  55. [59]

    IEEE", address =

    A. Adya and P. Bahl and J. Padhye and A.Wolman and L. Zhou , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Broadnets Networks (BroadNets'04) , publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

  56. [60]

    I. F. Akyildiz and W. Su and Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci , title =. Comm. ACM , volume = 38, number = "4", year =

  57. [61]

    I. F. Akyildiz and T. Melodia and K. R. Chowdhury , title =. Computer Netw. , volume = 51, number = "4", year =

  58. [62]

    ACM", address =

    P. Bahl and R. Chancre and J. Dungeon , title =. Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'04) , publisher = "ACM", address = "New York, NY", year =

  59. [63]

    8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)

    D. Culler and D. Estrin and M. Srivastava , title =. IEEE Comput. , volume = 37, number = "8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)", publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

  60. [64]

    Natarajan and M

    A. Natarajan and M. Motani and B. de Silva and K. Yap and K. C. Chua , title =. Network Architectures , editor =. 960935712

  61. [65]

    Tzamaloukas and J

    A. Tzamaloukas and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves , title =

  62. [66]

    Zhou and J

    G. Zhou and J. Lu and C.-Y. Wan and M. D. Yarvis and J. A. Stankovic , title =

  63. [67]

    Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes

    Jacob Kornerup. Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes. 1994

    1994

  64. [68]

    Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

    Michael Gerndt. Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

  65. [69]

    J. E. Archer, Jr. and R. Conway and F. B. Schneider. User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  66. [70]

    D. D. Dunlop and V. R. Basili. Generalizing specifications for uniformly implemented loops. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  67. [71]

    Heering and P

    J. Heering and P. Klint. Towards monolingual programming environments. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  68. [72]

    Donald E. Knuth. The book

  69. [73]

    Korach and D

    E. Korach and D. Rotem and N. Santoro. Distributed algorithms for finding centers and medians in networks. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  70. [74]

    : A Document Preparation System

    Leslie Lamport. : A Document Preparation System

  71. [75]

    F. Nielson. Program transformations in a denotational setting. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

  72. [76]

    Brian K. Reid. A high-level approach to computer document formatting. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

  73. [77]

    and Abdelzaher, Tarek F

    Zhou, Gang and Wu, Yafeng and Yan, Ting and He, Tian and Huang, Chengdu and Stankovic, John A. and Abdelzaher, Tarek F. , title =. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705 , acmid = 1721705, publisher =

    doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705

  74. [78]

    Institutional members of the Users Group

  75. [79]

    Boris Veytsman , title =

  76. [80]

    Robin Schneider , title =

  77. [81]

    and Peterson, Larry L

    Bowman, Mic and Debray, Saumya K. and Peterson, Larry L. , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  78. [82]

    TUGboat , volume =

    Braams, Johannes , title =. TUGboat , volume =

  79. [83]

    Post Congress Tristesse

    Malcolm Clark. Post Congress Tristesse. TeX90 Conference Proceedings

  80. [84]

    ACM Trans

    Herlihy, Maurice , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 14, 2026.