Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 142 references

Black hole solutions in theories of supergravity

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that supergravity supplied the guiding principle and the techniques that produced most of modern black-hole physics, from exact extremal solutions to microscopic entropy counting.

desk verdict An honest, expert memoir of supergravity black holes: no new results, but a technically sound attractor section and a candid insider's map of the literature. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12020 v2 pith:6UZNN7YW submitted 2024-12-16 hep-th gr-qcphysics.hist-ph

Tomás Ortín This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcphysics.hist-ph MSC 83C5783E50 PACS 04.65.+e04.70.-s11.25.-w
keywords supergravityblackholesattractormechanismsupersymmetricsolutionsKillingspinorsextremaldualitystringtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This invited review argues that supergravity, not general relativity alone, supplied the guiding principle and the technical toolkit behind most of what is known about black-hole solutions. Local supersymmetry constrains which matter fields and couplings are allowed, turning the search for exact solutions into a tractable programme based on Killing spinors, first-order flow equations, and duality. The review traces the arc from early no-superhair theorems to supersymmetric multi-black-hole solutions, the attractor mechanism, microscopic entropy counting, and the first complete first-order corrections to stringy black-hole geometries. A sympathetic reader is meant to conclude that supergravity is the natural language in which black-hole physics, including its string-theory and quantum aspects, has advanced.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is local supersymmetry as an organizing principle, concretized in the Killing spinor equations, whose solutions preserve a fraction of the supersymmetry and reduce the equations of motion to first-order flow equations. For extremal black holes the central object is the black-hole potential $V_{bh}(\varphi)$, a charge-dependent function of the scalar fields; its critical points fix the horizon values of the scalars, and its value there gives the entropy through $S/\pi = -V_{bh}(\varphi_h,Q)$. The Killing spinor identities eliminate the independent equations that remain after supersymmetry is imposed, while duality invariance forces mass, temperature, and entropy to be built from charges in invariant combinations. These elements together carry the narrative from the construction of supersymmetric solutions to entropy computations and beyond.

What would settle it

Find an extremal, asymptotically-flat black hole in an ungauged supergravity whose horizon scalar values depend on the asymptotic moduli even though the black-hole potential has no flat directions; the attractor mechanism predicts this cannot happen, so such a solution would refute the paper's central physical claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that supergravity has played an indispensable historical and conceptual role in black-hole physics: it provided a guiding principle for choosing theories and a set of techniques, including Killing spinor equations, supersymmetry bounds, Killing spinor identities, the black-hole potential, and duality invariance, that made exact constructions possible. It asserts that all stringy black-hole solutions known and studied so far are supergravity solutions, so the spacetime face of string-theory black-hole physics is supergravity. The attractor mechanism shows that horizon values of scalars are fixed by charges rather than by their values at infinity, making the entropy of extremal black holes a function of quantized charges alone. The review also describes how first-order corrections in the string scale require a gauge-invariant entropy formula that satisfies the thermodynamic relation $\partial S/\partial M = 1/T$, and it argues that the deepest open problems in black-hole physics are best attacked within supergravity.

Load-bearing premise

The historical narrative rests on the author's personal recollection and chosen references, which he himself calls possibly 'unfairly limited', so omitted or misremembered work could make the story incomplete or biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the review's history is correct, the classical uniqueness theorems are too narrow: genuinely new black-hole solutions came from supergravity matter couplings, and the search for exact solutions should continue within supergravity.
  • The attractor mechanism implies that the entropy of extremal black holes can be computed from charges alone without constructing the full metric, whenever the black-hole potential has no flat directions, which underpins microscopic state-counting interpretations.
  • Supersymmetric solutions are first-order and therefore easier to construct, while non-supersymmetric extremal solutions can often be obtained by flipping a charge sign and are governed by fake central charges, so extremal black holes organize into duality-invariant families.
  • First-order corrections to complete black-hole geometries require a gauge-invariant definition of entropy, and in every non-extremal case tested so far that corrected entropy satisfies the thermodynamic relation.
  • Non-extremal black holes remain largely unexplored, and the review's structural observation that the building-block functions transform under duality suggests the same solution-generating methods should extend to them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the historical dependence runs both ways, since the review notes that the attractor mechanism could have been derived by classical relativists; had supergravity not existed, some of these results might have appeared later in a different language.
  • My inference: the charge-sign-flip route to non-supersymmetric extremal black holes invites a concrete census: for any supergravity theory, classify the duality orbits of extremal solutions by how much supersymmetry they preserve, and check that every orbit contains a solution obtainable from a generating solution.
  • My inference: the reported ambiguity in earlier α′ entropy calculations suggests that agreement with microscopic entropy is not by itself a test of the macroscopic result; recomputing both sides for the same non-extremal black holes with the gauge-invariant formula is the direct next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This invited contribution to 'Half a Century of Supergravity' is a historical review written from a personal perspective by Tomás Ortín, a leading researcher in the field. The paper surveys the development of black hole solutions in supergravity theories, covering the early no-superhair theorems, the construction and classification of supersymmetric black holes, the attractor mechanism and the FGK formalism, the interpretation of stringy black holes in terms of D-brane microstates, and higher-derivative (α') corrections to black hole solutions and their thermodynamics. The author explicitly restricts the discussion to asymptotically-flat solutions and states that the account is based on his personal recollections, which he acknowledges may be 'unfairly limited'. The only substantial technical section is the derivation of the attractor mechanism and the black-hole potential in Section 3, which is presented in standard form and correctly cited.

Significance. The paper makes no new technical claims; its value lies in the authoritative personal account of a major research direction by one of its principal contributors. The historical narrative supports the abstract's claim that supergravity has played an important role in black hole physics, and it usefully collects references to both the original papers and more complete reviews. The technical portions, especially the FGK effective action and the attractor equations (Eqs. (7)–(22)), appear standard and correctly presented. The author's explicit disclaimer about the personal and incomplete nature of the account, together with pointers to comprehensive reviews [10]–[15], appropriately calibrates the scope. The main risk is historical balance, not mathematical correctness, and this is acceptable for a memoir of this kind.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 3] In the sentence preceding Eq. (14), 'and the of value of Vbh' should read 'and the value of Vbh'.
  2. [Section 3] In the sentence before Eq. (13), 'it is possible to proof that' should read 'it is possible to prove that'.
  3. [Section 3] The word 'poarticular' in the paragraph following Eq. (15) should be 'particular'.
  4. [Footnote 19] The phrase 'dimmed invalid' should read 'deemed invalid'.
  5. [Footnote 6] The phrase 'which is a particular case of of the BMPV black hole' contains a duplicated 'of'.
  6. [Footnote 6] The phrase 'and a and a Gödel-type solution' contains a duplicated article sequence; it should read 'and a Gödel-type solution'.
  7. [Section 4] The phrase 'with an strength controlled by the parameter, a' should read 'with a strength controlled by the parameter a'.
  8. [Reference list] The entry for Kolanowski, Marolf, Rakic, Rangamani, and Turiaci (Ref. [117]) lacks the article title; it should be supplied for consistency with the other references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review's historical thesis is backed by an external, independently checkable literature, and its self-citations are records of prior work rather than inputs to a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

This is an invited historical review, not a derivation paper: it makes no prediction and derives no new result from its own assumptions. The load-bearing claim is that supergravity has shaped black-hole physics, and it is supported by a published literature of peer-reviewed constructions and theorems, several of which are due to the author but are independently checkable and are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives. The introduction explicitly scopes the account: 'restricting myself to the asymptotically-flat ones and to my personal recollections which could well be unfairly limited, for which I apologize to all those concerned,' and it defers to the more complete reviews [10]–[15]; the narrative is thus presented as a memoir rather than a closed derivation. Section 5 even flags the danger of confirmation bias in entropy comparisons: 'Finding agreement with the microscopic entropy does not guarantee that the value found for the macroscopic entropy is correct,' and it uses the thermodynamic identity ∂S/∂M = 1/T as an independent check. The displayed FGK and attractor equations are standard reproduced material, not inputs to a self-referential prediction. The self-citations in Sections 2–5 are substantive records of prior research, and no circular step can be quoted and reduced to the paper's own claims. Accordingly, the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only assumption the review rests on is the reliability of the author's reading of the cited literature and his personal recollections. There are no free parameters or invented entities since the paper introduces no new models.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The cited literature is accurately represented and the personal recollections are reliable enough for the historical narrative.
    The entire review consists of summarizing and interpreting earlier published work; if the author misreads or omits key contributions, the review would be misleading. The author explicitly acknowledges this limitation in the introduction: 'my personal recollections which could well be unfairly limited.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black hole solutions in theories of supergravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6UZNN7YW

@misc{pith2026241212020,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black hole solutions in theories of supergravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6UZNN7YW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12020}
}
read the original abstract

Supergravity has played a very important role in many advances and developments in black hole physics. Here I will review the history of some of them.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    D’Auria and P

    R. D’Auria and P . Fré, Contribution to the 8th Graduate School in Contempory Relativity and Gravitational Physics: The Physics of Black Holes (SIGRA V 98), 137-272 [hep-th/9812160 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  2. [15]

    Ortín and P

    T. Ortín and P . F. Ramírez, Springer Proc. Phys. 176 (2016), 1-40

    2016

  3. [1]

    Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber

    K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber. deutsch. Akad. Wiss. Berl in, Kl. Math. Phys. Tech- nik ( 1916) 189– 196. English translation by S. Antoci and A. Loinger available i n http://arXiv .org/pdf/physics/9905030. J. Droste, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 19 (1) (1916) 197-215

    arXiv 1916

  4. [2]

    Reissner, Ann

    H. Reissner, Ann. Phys. 50 (1916) 106. G. Nordström, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 20 (1918) 1238

    1916

  5. [3]

    F. R. Tangherlini, Nuovo Cim. 27 (1963), 636-651

    1963

  6. [4]

    R. P . Kerr, Phys. Rev . Lett. 11 (1963), 237-238 E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 915-917 E. T. Newman, R. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash and R. Torrence, J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 918-919

    1963

  7. [5]

    S. D. Majumdar, Phys. Rev . 72 (1947), 390-398 A. Papapetrou, Proc. Roy . Irish Acad. A51 (1947) 191. JSTOR:20488481

    1947

  8. [6]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 26 (1972), 87-101

    1972

Show all 142 references
  1. [7]

    M. J. Duff, B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rept. 130 (1986), 1-142

    1986

  2. [8]

    Ortín, Cambridge University Press, 2015

    T. Ortín, Cambridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  3. [9]

    Ferrara, G

    S. Ferrara, G. W. Gibbons and R. Kallosh, Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997), 75-93 [hep-th/9702103 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Mohaupt, Fortsch

    T. Mohaupt, Fortsch. Phys. 49 (2001), 3-161 [hep-th/0007195 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Andrianopoli, R

    L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara and M. Trigiante, L ect. Notes Phys. 737 (2008), 661-727 [hep-th/0611345 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Ferrara, K

    S. Ferrara, K. Hayakawa and A. Marrani, Fortsch. Phys. 56 (2008) no.10, 993-1046 [arXiv:0805.2498 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Bellucci, S

    S. Bellucci, S. Ferrara, M. Gunaydin and A. Marrani, Spring er Proc. Phys. 134 (2010), 1-30 [arXiv:0905.3739 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    N. S. Baaklini, S. Ferrara and P . van Nieuwenhuizen, Lett. N uovo Cim. 20 (1977), 113 19

    1977

  9. [17]

    Cordero and C

    P . Cordero and C. Teitelboim, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978), 80-83

    1978

  10. [18]

    Gueven, Phys

    R. Gueven, Phys. Rev . D 22 (1980), 2327

    1980

  11. [19]

    P . C. Aichelburg and R. Gueven, Phys. Rev . D 24 (1981), 2066

    1981

  12. [20]

    Gueven, Phys

    R. Gueven, Phys. Rev . D 25 (1982), 3117

    1982

  13. [21]

    P . C. Aichelburg and R. Gueven, Phys. Rev . Lett. 51 (1983), 1613

    1983

  14. [22]

    Embacher, Gen

    F. Embacher, Gen. Rel. Grav . 16 (1984) 909. F. Embacher and P . C. Aichelburg, Phys. Rev . D 30 (1984), 2457-2461 P . C. Aichelburg and F. Embacher, Phys. Rev . D 34 (1986), 3006 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3006

    1984 doi

  15. [23]

    G. W. Gibbons, Nucl. Phys. B 207 (1982), 337-349

    1982

  16. [24]

    G. W. Gibbons and K. i. Maeda, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988), 741-775

    1988

  17. [25]

    Garfinkle, G

    D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev . D 43 (1991), 3140 [erratum: Phys. Rev . D 45 (1992), 3888]

    1991

  18. [26]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, T. Ortín, A. W. Peet and A. Van Proeye n, Phys. Rev . D 46 (1992), 5278-5302 [hep-th/9205027 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Witten, Commun

    E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981), 381. J. A. Nester, Phys. Lett. A 83 (1981), 241. W. Israel and J. A. Nester, Phys. Lett. A 85 (1981), 259,

    1981

  20. [28]

    C. M. Hull, Commun. Math. Phys. 90 (1983), 545

    1983

  21. [29]

    Deser and C

    S. Deser and C. Teitelboim, Phys. Rev . Lett. 39 (1977), 249. M. T. Grisaru, Phys. Lett. B 73 (1978), 207-208

    1977

  22. [30]

    E. B. Bogomolny , Sov . J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976), 449. M. K. Prasad and C. M. Som- merfield, Phys. Rev . Lett. 35 (1975), 760-762

    1976

  23. [31]

    G. W. Gibbons and C. M. Hull, Phys. Lett. B 109 (1982), 190-194

    1982

  24. [32]

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, Class. Quant. Grav . 16 (1999), 2043-2055 [hep-th/9902066 [hep-th]]. M. Blau, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. Hull and G. Papadopoulos, JHEP 01 (2002), 047 [hep-th/0110242 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    G. W. Gibbons, Print- 85-0061 (CAMBRIDGE). Contribution to the XV GIFT Semi- nar on Supersymmetry and Supergravity

  26. [34]

    Kallosh and T

    R. Kallosh and T. Ortín, [ hep-th/9306085 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bellorín and T

    J. Bellorín and T. Ortín, Phys. Lett. B 616 (2005), 118-124 [hep-th/0501246 [hep- th]]. 20

    2005 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Scherk, Phys

    J. Scherk, Phys. Lett. B 88 (1979), 265-267

    1979

  29. [37]

    Bellorín, P

    J. Bellorín, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 762 (2007), 229-255 [hep-th/0606201 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. P . Gauntlett, R. C. Myers and P . K. Townsend, Class. Quant . Grav .16 (1999), 1-21 [hep-th/9810204 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. D. Shapere, S. Trivedi and F. Wilczek, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991), 2677-2686

    1991

  32. [40]

    Ortín, Phys

    T. Ortín, Phys. Rev . D 47 (1993), 3136-3143 [hep-th/9208078 [hep-th]]

    1993 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bergshoeff, R

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996), 156-180 [hep-th/9605059 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Lozano-Tellechea and T

    E. Lozano-Tellechea and T. Ortín, black hole solutions of N =4, D = 4 supergravity ,” Nucl. Phys. B 569 (2000), 435-450 [hep-th/9910020 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Sen, Nucl

    A. Sen, Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995), 421-440 [hep-th/9411187 [hep-th]]. M. Cvetiˇ c and D. Youm, Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996), 249-267 [hep-th/9512127 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cvetiˇ c and C

    M. Cvetiˇ c and C. M. Hull, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996), 296-316 [hep-th/9606193 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bertolini, P

    M. Bertolini, P . Fré and M. Trigiante, Class. Quant. Grav . 16 (1999), 2987-3004 [hep-th/9905143 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ortín and C

    T. Ortín and C. S. Shahbazi, Phys. Rev . D 86 (2012), 061702 [arXiv:1206.3190 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    K. P . Tod, Phys. Lett. B 121 (1983), 241-244

    1983

  40. [48]

    Perjés, Phys

    Z. Perjés, Phys. Rev . Lett. 27 (1971), 1668. W. Israel and G. A. Wilson, J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972), 865-871

    1971

  41. [49]

    Denef, JHEP 08 (2000), 050 [hep-th/0005049 [hep-th]]

    F. Denef, JHEP 08 (2000), 050 [hep-th/0005049 [hep-th]]. B. Bates and F. Denef, JHEP 11 (2011), 127 [hep-th/0304094 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Meessen, T

    P . Meessen, T. Ortín and P . F. Ramírez, JHEP 10 (2017), 066 [arXiv:1707.03846 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    K. P . Tod, Class. Quant. Grav . 12 (1995), 1801-1820

    1995

  44. [52]

    J. P . Gauntlett, J. B. Gutowski, C. M. Hull, S. Pakis and H. S. Reall, Class. Quant. Grav .20 (2003), 4587-4634 [hep-th/0209114 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Meessen, Phys

    P . Meessen, Phys. Rev . D 65 (2002), 087501 [hep-th/0111031 [hep-th]]. 21

    2002 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Penrose, in Differential Geometry and Relativity , Reidel, Dordrecht ( 1976) 271-275

    R. Penrose, in Differential Geometry and Relativity , Reidel, Dordrecht ( 1976) 271-275. R. Gueven, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000), 255-263 [hep-th/0005061 [hep-th]]. M. Blau, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. Hull and G. Papadopoulos, Clas s. Quant. Grav . 19 (2002), L87-L95 [hep-th/020...

    2000 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. C. Breckenridge, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 391 (1997), 93-98 [hep-th/9602065 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Elvang, R

    H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev . L ett. 93 (2004), 211302 [hep-th/0407065 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  49. [57]

    J. P . Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, Phys. Rev . D 71 (2005), 045002 [hep-th/0408122 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ortín, Class

    T. Ortín, Class. Quant. Grav . 22 (2005), 939-946 [hep-th/0410252 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [59]

    H. K. Kunduri and J. Lucietti, Phys. Rev . Lett. 113 (2014) no. 21, 211101 [arXiv:1408.6083 [hep-th]]. H. K. Kunduri and J. Lucietti, Phys. Rev . D 94 (2016) no.6, 064007 [arXiv:1605.01545 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  52. [60]

    H. K. Kunduri and J. Lucietti, Living Rev . Rel. 16 (2013), 8 [arXiv:1306.2517 [hep- th]]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. P . Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, Phys. Rev . D 68 (2003), 105009 [erratum: Phys. Rev . D70 (2004), 089901] [hep-th/0304064 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall, JHEP 04 (2004), 048 [hep-th/0401129 [hep-th]]. J. B. Gutowski and W. Sabra, JHEP 10 (2005), 039 DOI:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/039 [hep-th/0505185 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Bellorín, P

    J. Bellorín, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, JHEP 01 (2007), 020 [hep-th/0610196 [hep-th]]. J. Bellorín and T. Ortín, JHEP 08 (2007), 096 [arXiv:0705.2567 [hep-th]]. J. Bellorín, Class. Quant. Grav . 26 (2009), 195012 [arXiv:0810.0527 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Preskill and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 378 (1992), 175-246 [hep-th/9201059 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Meessen, T

    P . Meessen, T. Ortín and P . F. Ramírez, JHEP 03 (2016), 112 [arXiv:1512.07131 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  58. [66]

    M. M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm, JHEP 09 (2003), 019 [hep-th/0307022 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Meessen and T

    P . Meessen and T. Ortíin, supergravity coupled to vector su permultiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 749 (2006), 291-324 [hep-th/0603099 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Behrndt, D

    K. Behrndt, D. Lüst and W. A. Sabra, Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998), 264-288 [hep-th/9705169 [hep-th]]. 22

    1998 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Huebscher, P

    M. Huebscher, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 759 (2006), 228-248 [hep-th/0606281 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  62. [70]

    S. L. Cacciatori, D. Klemm, D. S. Mansi and E. Zorzan, JHEP 05 (2008), 097 [arXiv:0804.0009 [hep-th]]. D. Klemm and E. Zorzan, Class. Quant. Grav . 26 (2009), 145018 [arXiv:0902.4186 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hübscher, P

    M. Hübscher, P . Meessen, T. Ortín and S. Vaulà, Phys. Rev . D 78 (2008), 065031 [arXiv:0712.1530 [hep-th]]. M. H ¨bscher, P . Meessen, T. Ortín and S. Vaulá, JHEP 09 (2008), 099 [arXiv:0806.1477 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Meessen and T

    P . Meessen and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 863 (2012), 65-89 [arXiv:1204.0493 [hep- th]]

    2012 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Meessen, Phys

    P . Meessen, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008), 388-391 [arXiv:0803.0684 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Bellorín and T

    J. Bellorín and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005), 171-209 [hep-th/0506056 [hep- th]]

    2005 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Meessen, T

    P . Meessen, T. Ortín and S. Vaulà, JHEP 11 (2010), 072 [arXiv:1006.0239 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Shmakova, Phys

    M. Shmakova, Phys. Rev . D 56 (1997), 540-544 [hep-th/9612076 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  69. [77]

    J. B. Gutowski, D. Martelli and H. S. Reall, Class. Quant. Gr av .20 (2003), 5049-5078 [hep-th/0306235 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cariglia and O

    M. Cariglia and O. A. P . Mac Conamhna, Class. Quant. Grav . 21 (2004), 3171-3196 [hep-th/0402055 [hep-th]]. M. Akyol and G. Papadopoulos, Class. Quant. Grav . 28 (2011), 105001 [arXiv:1010.2632 [hep-th]]. H. Het Lam and S. Vandoren, JHEP 06 (2018), 021 [arXiv:1804.04681 [hep-...

    2004 arXiv

  71. [79]

    R. R. Khuri and T. Ortín, Phys. Lett. B 373 (1996), 56-60 [hep-th/9512178 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Ortín, Phys

    T. Ortín, Phys. Lett. B 422 (1998), 93-100 [hep-th/9612142 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ceresole and G

    A. Ceresole and G. Dall’Agata, JHEP 03 (2007), 110 [hep-th/0702088 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Mohaupt and K

    T. Mohaupt and K. Waite, JHEP 10 (2009), 058 [arXiv:0906.3451 [hep-th]]. T. Mo- haupt and O. Vaughan, JHEP 07 (2012), 163 [arXiv:1112.2876 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Galli, T

    P . Galli, T. Ortín, J. Perz and C. S. Shahbazi, JHEP 07 (2011), 041 [arXiv:1105.3311 [hep-th]]. P . Meessen and T. Ortín, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012), 178-183 [arXiv:1107.5454 [hep-th]]. 23

    2011 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Meessen, T

    P . Meessen, T. Ortín, J. Perz and C. S. Shahbazi, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012), 260-265 [arXiv:1112.3332 [hep-th]]. P . Meessen, T. Ortín, J. Perz and C. S. Shahbazi, J HEP 09 (2012), 001 [arXiv:1204.0507 [hep-th]]. P . Galli, T. Ortín, J. Perz and C. S. Shah- bazi, JHEP 04 (2013...

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev . D 52 (1995), R 5412- R5416 [hep-th/9508072 [hep-th]]. A. Strominger, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996), 39-43 [hep-th/9602111 [hep-th]]. S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, Phys. Rev . D 54 (1996), 1514- 1524 [hep-th/9602136 [hep-th]]. S. Fe...

    1995 arXiv

  78. [86]

    de Antonio Martín, T

    A. de Antonio Martín, T. Ortín and C. S. Shahbazi, JHEP 05 (2012), 045 [arXiv:1203.0260 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Pioline, Class

    B. Pioline, Class. Quant. Grav . 23 (2006), S 981 [hep-th/0607227 [hep-th]]. B. Pio- line, Lect. Notes Phys. 755 (2008), 283-373

    2006 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Breitenlohner, D

    P . Breitenlohner, D. Maison and G. W. Gibbons, Commun. Math . Phys. 120 (1988), 295

    1988

  81. [89]

    Borsten, D

    L. Borsten, D. Dahanayake, M. J. Duff and W. Rubens, Phys. Re v . D 80 (2009), 026003 [arXiv:0903.5517 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Ferrara, A

    S. Ferrara, A. Marrani and A. Yeranyan, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011), 640-645 [arXiv:1102.4857 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Galli, P

    P . Galli, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, JHEP 05 (2013), 011 [arXiv:1211.7296 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Ballesteros, C

    R. Ballesteros, C. Gómez-Fayrén, T. Ortín and M. Zatti, JHE P 05 (2023), 158 [arXiv:2302.11630 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    G. W. Gibbons, R. Kallosh and B. Kol, Phys. Rev . Lett. 77 (1996), 4992-4995 [hep-th/9607108 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Sen, JHEP 03 (2006), 008 [hep-th/0508042 [hep-th]].]

    A. Sen, JHEP 03 (2006), 008 [hep-th/0508042 [hep-th]].]

    2006 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Andrianopoli, M

    L. Andrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, P . Fré and T. Ma- gri, J. Geom. Phys. 23 (1997), 111-189 [hep-th/9605032 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Goldstein, N

    K. Goldstein, N. Iizuka, R. P . Jena and S. P . Trivedi, Phys. R ev . D72 (2005), 124021 [hep-th/0507096 [hep-th]]. P . K. Tripathy and S. P . Trivedi, JHEP 03 (2006), 022 [hep-th/0511117 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Lopes Cardoso, A

    G. Lopes Cardoso, A. Ceresole, G. Dall’Agata, J. M. Oberreu ter and J. Perz, JHEP 10 (2007), 063 [arXiv:0706.3373 [hep-th]]. 24

    2007 arXiv

  90. [98]

    C. M. Miller, K. Schalm and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev . D 76 (2007), 044001 [hep-th/0612308 [hep-th]]. D. Klemm and M. Rabbiosi, JHEP 10 (2017), 149 [arXiv:1706.05862 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Skenderis and P

    K. Skenderis and P . K. Townsend, Phys. Rev . D 74 (2006), 125008 [hep-th/0609056 [hep-th]]. M. Trigiante, T. Van Riet and B. V ercnocke, JHEP 05 (2012), 078 [arXiv:1203.3194 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  92. [100]

    E. A. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989), 439-468

    1989

  93. [101]

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981), 221-244

    1981

  94. [102]

    Papadopoulos, P

    G. Papadopoulos, P . K. Townsend and P . V . Landshoff, Phys. L ett. B 380 (1996), 273-279 [hep-th/9603087 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  95. [103]

    M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri and J. X. Lu, Phys. Rept. 259 (1995), 213-326 [hep-th/9412184 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995), 85-126 [hep-th/9503124 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Polchinski, Phys

    J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev . Lett. 75 (1995), 4724-4727 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4724 [hep-th/9510017 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Bergshoeff, C

    E. Bergshoeff, C. M. Hull and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995), 547-578 [hep-th/9504081 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  99. [107]

    C. M. Hull and P . K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 109-137 [hep-th/9410167 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  100. [108]

    P . A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, Phys. Rev . D 105 (2022) no. 4, 044022 [arXiv:2111.04750 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [109]

    P . A. Cano, P . Meessen, T. Ortín and P . F. Ramírez, JHEP 05 (2018), 110 [arXiv:1803.01919 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    P . A. Cano, S. Chimento, P . Meessen, T. Ortín, P . F. Ramírez a nd A. Ruipérez, JHEP 02 (2019), 192 [arXiv:1808.03651 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  103. [111]

    M. J. Duff, J. T. Liu and J. Rahmfeld, Nucl. Phys. B 459 (1996), 125-159 [hep-th/9508094 [hep-th]]. R. R. Khuri and T. Ortín, Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996), 355-382 [hep-th/9512177 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  104. [112]

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev . Lett. 77 (1996), 428-429 [hep-th/9603060 [hep-th]]. C. V . Johnson, R. R. Khuri and R. C. Myers, Phys. Lett. B 378 (1996), 78-86 [hep-th/9603061 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996), 99-104 [hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]]. 25

    1996 arXiv

  106. [114]

    J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten, JHEP 12 (1997), 002 [hep-th/9711053 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  107. [115]

    G. W. Gibbons and R. E. Kallosh, Phys. Rev . D 51 (1995), 2839-2862 [hep-th/9407118 [hep-th]]. S. W. Hawking, G. T. Horowitz and S. F. Ross, Phys. Rev . D51 (1995), 4302-4314 [gr-qc/9409013 [gr-qc]]

    1995 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Kallosh, T

    R. Kallosh, T. Ortín and A. W. Peet, Phys. Rev . D 47 (1993), 5400-5407 [hep-th/9211015 [hep-th]]

    1993 arXiv

  109. [117]

    L. V . Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, JHEP 05 (2021), 145 [arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]]. M. Heydeman, L. V . Iliesiu, G. J. Turiaci and W. Zhao, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) no.1, 014004 [arXiv:2011.01953 [hep-th]]. M. Kolanowski, D. Marolf, I. Rakic, M. Rangamani and G. J. Turiaci, [ arXiv...

    2021 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Ozkan, Y

    M. Ozkan, Y . Pang and E. Sezgin, Phys. Rept. 1086 (2024), 1-95 [arXiv:2401.08945 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Balasubramanian, NATO Sci

    V . Balasubramanian, NATO Sci. Ser. C 520 (1999), 399-410 [hep-th/9712215 [hep- th]]

    1999 arXiv

  112. [120]

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, Nucl. Phys. B 498 (1997), 195-227 [hep-th/9701093 [hep-th]]. M. B. Green and P . Vanhove, Phys. Lett. B 408 (1997), 122-134 [hep-th/9704145 [hep-th]]. M. B. Green, M. Gutperle and P . Vanhove, Phys. Let t. B 409 (1997), 177-184 [hep-th/9706175 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  113. [121]

    D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys. B 291 (1987), 41-89

    1987

  114. [122]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry , Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989), 673-698

    1989

  115. [123]

    Sahoo and A

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen, JHEP 01 (2007), 010 [hep-th/0608182 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Dabholkar, Phys

    A. Dabholkar, Phys. Rev . Lett. 94 (2005), 241301 [hep-th/0409148 [hep-th]]. A. Dabholkar, R. Kallosh and A. Maloney , JHEP 12 (2004), 059 [hep-th/0410076 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  117. [125]

    P . A. Cano, P . F. Ramírez and A. Ruipérez, JHEP 03 (2020), 115 [arXiv:1808.10449 [hep-th]]. A. Ruipérez, Class. Quant. Grav . 38 (2021) no. 14, 145011 [arXiv:2003.02269 [hep-th]]. P . A. Cano, Á. Murcia, P . F. Ramírez and A. Ruipérez, JHEP 05 (2021), 272 [arXiv:2102.04476 [...

    2020 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Behrndt, G

    K. Behrndt, G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, D. Lüst, T. Mohaupt a nd W. A. Sabra, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998), 289-296 [hep-th/9801081 [hep-th]]. G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit and T. Mohaupt, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999), 309-316 [hep-th/9812082 [hep- th]]. G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit and...

    1998 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Castro, J

    A. Castro, J. L. Davis, P . Kraus and F. Larsen, JHEP 04 (2007), 091 [hep-th/0702072 [hep-th]]. A. Castro, J. L. Davis, P . Kraus and F. Larsen, JHE P 06 (2007), 007 [hep-th/0703087 [hep-th]]. A. Castro, J. L. Davis, P . Kraus and F. Larsen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23 (2008), 613...

    2007 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Sen, JHEP 09 (2005), 038 [hep-th/0506177 [hep-th]]

    A. Sen, JHEP 09 (2005), 038 [hep-th/0506177 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Sen, Gen

    A. Sen, Gen. Rel. Grav . 40 (2008), 2249-2431 [arXiv:0708.1270 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Banerjee, R

    S. Banerjee, R. K. Gupta and A. Sen, JHEP 03 (2011), 147 [arXiv:1005.3044 [hep-th]]. S. Banerjee, R. K. Gupta, I. Mandal and A. Sen, JHE P 11 (2011), 143 [arXiv:1106.0080 [hep-th]]. A. Sen, Gen. Rel. Grav . 44 (2012) no. 5, 1207- 1266 [arXiv:1108.3842 [hep-th]]. A. Sen, Gen. R...

    2011 arXiv

  123. [131]

    B. A. Campbell, N. Kaloper and K. A. Olive, Phys. Lett. B 285 (1992), 199-205

    1992

  124. [132]

    Chimento, P

    S. Chimento, P . Meessen, T. Ortín, P . F. Ramírez and A. Ruipé rez, JHEP 07 (2018), 080 [arXiv:1803.04463 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  125. [133]

    P . A. Cano, S. Chimento, T. Ortín and A. Ruipérez, Phys. Rev . D 99 (2019) no. 4, 046014 [arXiv:1806.08377 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Faedo and P

    F. Faedo and P . F. Ramírez, JHEP 10 (2019), 033 [arXiv:1906.12287 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Prabhu, Class

    K. Prabhu, Class. Quant. Grav . 34 (2017) no.3, 035011 [arXiv:1511.00388 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Elgood, T

    Z. Elgood, T. Ortín and D. Pereñiguez, JHEP 05 (2021), 110 [arXiv:2012.14892 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  129. [137]

    P . A. Cano, S. Chimento, R. Linares, T. Ortín and P . F. Ramíre z, JHEP 02 (2020), 031 [arXiv:1910.14324 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  130. [138]

    P . A. Cano, T. Ortín, A. Ruipérez and M. Zatti, JHEP 03 (2022), 103 [arXiv:2111.15579 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  131. [139]

    P . A. Cano, T. Ortín, A. Ruipérez and M. Zatti, JHEP 12 (2022), 150 [arXiv:2210.01861 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Zatti, 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,” JHEP 11 (2023), 185 [arXiv:2308.12879 [hep-th]]

    M. Zatti, 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,” JHEP 11 (2023), 185 [arXiv:2308.12879 [hep-th]]. 27

    2023 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Ortín, A

    T. Ortín, A. Ruipérez and M. Zatti, SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) no. 4, 072 [arXiv:2112.12764 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Meessen, D

    P . Meessen, D. Mitsios and T. Ortín, JHEP 12 (2022), 155 [arXiv:2203.13588 [hep- th]]. 28

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.