Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Demystifying the Data Need of ML-surrogates for CFD Simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.08355 v1 pith:6Y4BJSPN submitted 2022-05-05 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords simulationsml-basedtrainingcomputationalcomputedatadesigneven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, a critical tool in various engineering applications, often require significant time and compute power to predict flow properties. The high computational cost associated with CFD simulations significantly restricts the scope of design space exploration and limits their use in planning and operational control. To address this issue, machine learning (ML) based surrogate models have been proposed as a computationally efficient tool to accelerate CFD simulations. However, a lack of clarity about CFD data requirements often challenges the widespread adoption of ML-based surrogates among design engineers and CFD practitioners. In this work, we propose an ML-based surrogate model to predict the temperature distribution inside the cabin of a passenger vehicle under various operating conditions and use it to demonstrate the trade-off between prediction performance and training dataset size. Our results show that the prediction accuracy is high and stable even when the training size is gradually reduced from 2000 to 200. The ML-based surrogates also reduce the compute time from ~30 minutes to around ~9 milliseconds. Moreover, even when only 50 CFD simulations are used for training, the temperature trend (e.g., locations of hot/cold regions) predicted by the ML-surrogate matches quite well with the results from CFD simulations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Geometry-aware PINNs for Turbulent Flow Prediction

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An SDF-embedded RANS-PINN predicts turbulent flow fields for unseen NACA 4-digit airfoil geometries and Reynolds numbers with a few percent normalized error.

Pith tools