Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automatically Adaptive Conformal Risk Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17819 v4 pith:6YBGK7XG submitted 2024-06-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords conditioningcontrolperformancebeyondconditionaldifficultdifficultyframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Science and technology have a growing need for effective mechanisms that ensure reliable, controlled performance from black-box machine learning algorithms. These performance guarantees should ideally hold conditionally on the input-that is the performance guarantees should hold, at least approximately, no matter what the input. However, beyond stylized discrete groupings such as ethnicity and gender, the right notion of conditioning can be difficult to define. For example, in problems such as image segmentation, we want the uncertainty to reflect the intrinsic difficulty of the test sample, but this may be difficult to capture via a conditioning event. Building on the recent work of Gibbs et al. [2023], we propose a methodology for achieving approximate conditional control of statistical risks-the expected value of loss functions-by adapting to the difficulty of test samples. Our framework goes beyond traditional conditional risk control based on user-provided conditioning events to the algorithmic, data-driven determination of appropriate function classes for conditioning. We apply this framework to various regression and segmentation tasks, enabling finer-grained control over model performance and demonstrating that by continuously monitoring and adjusting these parameters, we can achieve superior precision compared to conventional risk-control methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Conformal Arbitrage calibrates a score-gap threshold with conformal risk control so that a primary model can act when confident and defer to a guardian otherwise, with the expected guardrail loss bounded by a user-cho...

Pith tools