pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30331 · v1 · pith:6ZCKOXN3new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.atm-clus· physics.atom-ph

Size Effects in the Strong-Field Ionization and Dissociation Dynamics of (H₂O)_n (n=1-4)

Chen Jiang , Cody L. Cavington , Kalman Varga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 03:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clusphysics.atom-ph
keywords water clustersstrong-field ionizationdissociation dynamicsproton transferRT-TDDFTEhrenfest dynamicskinetic energy releasecluster size effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Water cluster size reshapes strong-field response mainly through proton dynamics rather than net ionization changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adding water molecules from one to four affects ionization and breakup when hit by the same intense near-infrared laser pulse. Simulations show the average charge removed per molecule stays roughly constant across sizes, but the motions of protons and oxygen atoms shift strongly once clusters exceed the dimer. Hydrogen ejection becomes much more active, proton transfer between molecules appears and grows, and overall dissociation increases. A reader would care because these small clusters are models for water under extreme laser conditions, revealing that the way protons move within the cluster structure matters more than simply how many electrons are stripped.

Core claim

Real-time TDDFT-Ehrenfest simulations under a common few-cycle NIR pulse find net ionization per monomer varies only weakly with size n=1-4, while protonic and oxygen responses strengthen markedly beyond the dimer: H-ejection rises sharply, stable H-transfer is absent in the dimer but substantial in the trimer and amplified in the tetramer, early-time proton response concentrates during and right after the pulse in larger clusters, dissociation propensity increases systematically with size, and a clean subset of direct two-body dimer breakups yields asymptotic kinetic energy release of 4.47 ± 1.03 eV matching the experimental unprotonated Coulomb-explosion channel.

What carries the argument

RT-TDDFT coupled to Ehrenfest molecular dynamics tracking net ionization, proton timing, H-transfer classification, and endpoint oxygen statistics across identical laser pulses on clusters of size 1-4.

If this is right

  • H-ejection activity increases sharply once cluster size reaches the trimer and tetramer.
  • Stable H-transfer between molecules is negligible in the dimer but becomes substantial and grows further in larger clusters.
  • Early-time protonic response is weak and spread out in the dimer but strong and concentrated within the laser pulse window for trimers and tetramers.
  • Dissociation propensity rises systematically with cluster size according to endpoint oxygen statistics.
  • Direct two-body dimer breakup channels release 4.47 ± 1.03 eV kinetic energy in the asymptotic limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dominance of proton-mediated effects suggests that models of larger water aggregates or liquid water under strong fields should prioritize nuclear topology over simple charge counting.
  • The timing difference implies that laser-pulse duration could be tuned to control whether proton transfer activates in small clusters.
  • The reported KER agreement with one experimental channel indicates the clean-trajectory selection isolates a physically relevant breakup pathway.
  • Extending the same pulse and analysis to n=5-8 clusters would test whether the proton-response amplification saturates or continues to grow.

Load-bearing premise

The post-hoc rules for labeling stable H-transfer trajectories and for picking the clean subset of direct two-body dimer breakup trajectories introduce no selection bias that changes the reported size trends or the 4.47 eV kinetic energy release value.

What would settle it

Measuring net ionization yield per molecule together with H-ejection counts and dissociation fractions for water dimers versus tetramers under identical few-cycle near-infrared pulses would directly test whether net ionization remains nearly constant while proton activity and dissociation rise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30331 by Chen Jiang, Cody L. Cavington, Kalman Varga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Electric field (unit: V/Å) versus time (unit: fs) for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Net ionization per monomer at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Representative snapshots along a partially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Representative snapshots along a three-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Representative snapshots along a partially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Bar plots of (a) the number of H-ejection events per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Histograms showing the time distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Bar plots of (a) the number of H-transfer events per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Histograms showing the time distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Final O–O distance distributions for (H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Bar plots showing the percentages of the endpoint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Bar plots showing the percentages of the endpoint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Average remaining electrons for the full dimer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The size-dependent strong-field ionization and dissociation dynamics of (H$_2$O)$_n$ (n=1-4) are investigated using real-time time-dependent density functional theory (RT-TDDFT) coupled to Ehrenfest molecular dynamics under a common few-cycle near-infrared laser pulse. It is found that the net ionization per monomer varies only weakly on cluster size, whereas the protonic and oxygen response is changed much more strongly once the cluster size grows beyond the dimer. In particular, H-ejection activity is observed to rise sharply from the dimer to the trimer/tetramer regime, while stable H-transfer is essentially absent in the dimer under the present criterion but becomes substantial in the trimer and is further amplified in the tetramer. Through timing analyses, it is shown that the dimer exhibits a weak and temporally broad response, whereas the larger clusters display a much stronger early-time protonic response concentrated within and immediately after the laser pulse window. By endpoint oxygen statistics, a systematic increase in dissociation propensity with cluster size is likewise shown. For a clean subset of direct two-body dimer breakup trajectories, the asymptotic kinetic energy release is estimated to be 4.47 $\pm$ 1.03 eV, in reasonably good agreement with the experimental value for the unprotonated two-body Coulomb-explosion channel. Overall, it is shown by the results that increasing water-cluster size primarily reshapes the strong-field response through proton-mediated and topology-level nuclear dynamics rather than through a large change in net ionization alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses RT-TDDFT coupled to Ehrenfest MD to simulate strong-field ionization and dissociation of (H₂O)ₙ clusters (n=1–4) under a common few-cycle NIR pulse. It reports that net ionization per monomer changes only weakly with size, while protonic responses (H-ejection activity, stable H-transfer, early-time timing, and dissociation propensity) change strongly beyond the dimer; a clean subset of direct two-body dimer trajectories yields KER = 4.47 ± 1.03 eV, stated to agree with experiment for the unprotonated Coulomb-explosion channel. The central conclusion is that size effects act primarily through proton-mediated and topology-level nuclear dynamics rather than net ionization.

Significance. If the trajectory classifications hold under scrutiny, the separation between weak ionization-size dependence and strong proton-response dependence would usefully highlight many-body nuclear effects in strong-field cluster physics. The consistent protocol across sizes and the reported experimental KER match are strengths. However, the current lack of parameter validation and sensitivity testing on post-selection criteria reduces the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / trajectory post-selection protocol] Abstract and trajectory-classification description: the claims that 'stable H-transfer is essentially absent in the dimer under the present criterion but becomes substantial in the trimer' and that a 'clean subset' yields the 4.47 eV KER rest on post-hoc filters whose exact thresholds, timing windows, and cleanliness definitions are not specified. No sensitivity analysis on these criteria is described, which directly affects whether the reported size trends in H-transfer and dissociation are robust or selection-dependent.
  2. [Abstract / computational details] Abstract and methods: quantitative results (weak net-ionization variation, KER agreement, timing of protonic response) are presented without reported validation or convergence tests for the density functional, basis set, laser-pulse parameters, or Ehrenfest integrator. This is load-bearing for the central claim that ionization changes only weakly while nuclear dynamics change strongly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We agree that explicit documentation of post-selection criteria and convergence tests will improve the manuscript and will revise accordingly to address both major points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / trajectory post-selection protocol] Abstract and trajectory-classification description: the claims that 'stable H-transfer is essentially absent in the dimer under the present criterion but becomes substantial in the trimer' and that a 'clean subset' yields the 4.47 eV KER rest on post-hoc filters whose exact thresholds, timing windows, and cleanliness definitions are not specified. No sensitivity analysis on these criteria is described, which directly affects whether the reported size trends in H-transfer and dissociation are robust or selection-dependent.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not provide the exact numerical thresholds, timing windows, or full definition of 'clean subset' used for the H-transfer classification and KER analysis. The 'present criterion' is referenced but not quantified in detail. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit description of these criteria (including distance cutoffs for stable transfer, time windows relative to the pulse, and exclusion rules for the clean two-body subset) in the Methods section. We will also include a sensitivity analysis varying the key thresholds within physically reasonable ranges and demonstrate that the reported size trends in H-transfer activity and dissociation propensity remain robust. This addition directly addresses the concern about selection dependence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / computational details] Abstract and methods: quantitative results (weak net-ionization variation, KER agreement, timing of protonic response) are presented without reported validation or convergence tests for the density functional, basis set, laser-pulse parameters, or Ehrenfest integrator. This is load-bearing for the central claim that ionization changes only weakly while nuclear dynamics change strongly.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit convergence and validation tests weakens the presentation of the quantitative claims. While the computational parameters were chosen following standard protocols for RT-TDDFT on water systems, the manuscript does not report dedicated tests. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection (or supplementary material) presenting convergence checks with respect to basis-set size, Ehrenfest time step, and limited variations in laser parameters. We will also reference available literature benchmarks for the functional on related water-cluster properties. These additions will support the reliability of the reported weak size dependence of net ionization versus the stronger changes in proton dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from RT-TDDFT+Ehrenfest trajectory runs under a fixed laser pulse, followed by post-simulation classification of H-ejection, H-transfer, and dissociation channels. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any reported size trend or KER value to an input by construction. Net ionization and protonic response quantities are computed quantities, not redefined or predicted from themselves. The classification criteria, while post-hoc, do not create a self-definitional loop or rename a fitted result as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the simulation protocol.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the assumption that the chosen RT-TDDFT functional and Ehrenfest approximation capture the relevant electron-nuclear coupling without major artifacts for these cluster sizes and field strengths; no independent benchmarks are visible in the abstract.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption RT-TDDFT with the chosen functional and basis accurately models strong-field ionization in water clusters
    Invoked by the use of the method without stated validation in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Ehrenfest dynamics sufficiently describes nuclear motion on the time scale of the laser pulse and subsequent dissociation
    Required for the reported proton response and KER values.
  • ad hoc to paper The operational definitions of 'H-ejection activity', 'stable H-transfer', and 'direct two-body breakup' correctly identify the physical channels of interest
    These criteria are used to extract the size trends but are not derived from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5832 in / 1507 out tokens · 52670 ms · 2026-06-30T03:38:05.098172+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references

  1. [1]

    M. B. Hahn, P. M. Dietrich, and J. Radnik, In situ monitoring of the influence of water on dna radiation damage by near-ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Commun. Chem.4, 50 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    J. A. Reisz, N. Bansal, J. Qian, W. Zhao, and C. M. Fur- dui, Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules— mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection, Ra- diat. Res.180, 189 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    H. T. Kratochvil, L. C. Watkins, M. Mravic, J. L. Thomaston, J. M. Nicoludis, N. H. Somberg, L. Liu, M. Hong, G. A. V oth, and W. F. DeGrado, Transient water wires mediate selective proton transport in designed channel proteins, Nat. Chem.15, 1012 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Mücke, M

    M. Mücke, M. Braune, S. Barth, M. Förstel, T. Lischke, V . Ul- rich, T. Arion, U. Becker, A. Bradshaw, and U. Hergenhahn, A hitherto unrecognized source of low-energy electrons in water, Nat. Phys.6, 143 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Jahnkeet al., Ultrafast energy transfer between water molecules, Nat

    T. Jahnkeet al., Ultrafast energy transfer between water molecules, Nat. Phys.11, 308 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    L. S. Cederbaum, J. Zobeley, and F. Tarantelli, Giant inter- molecular decay and fragmentation of clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4778 (1997)

    1997

  7. [7]

    Thurmer, M

    S. Thurmer, M. Oncák, N. Ottosson, R. Seidel, U. Hergenhahn, S. E. Bradforth, P. Slaví ˇcek, and B. Winter, On the nature and origin of dicationic, charge-separated species formed in liquid water on x-ray irradiation, Nat. Chem.5, 590 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Kazandjian, J

    S. Kazandjian, J. Rist, M. Weller, F. Wiegandt, D. Asliturk, S. Grundmann, M. Kircher, G. Nalin, D. Pitters, I. Vela Pérez, M. Waitz, G. Schiwietz, B. Griffin, J. B. Williams, R. Dörner, M. Schöffler, T. Miteva, F. Trinter, T. Jahnke, and N. Sisourat, Frustrated coulomb explosion of small helium clusters, Phys. Rev. A98, 050701(R) (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Zhang, J

    P. Zhang, J. Trester, J. Dubský, P. Koloren ˇc, P. Slaví ˇcek, and H. J. Worner, Intermolecular coulombic decay in liquid water competes with proton transfer and non-adiabatic relaxation, Na- ture Communications16, 6732 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Zhang, C

    P. Zhang, C. Perry, T. T. Luu, D. Matselyukh, and H. J. Worner, Intermolecular coulombic decay in liquid water, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 133001 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lu, T. Feng, and H. Rottke, Proton transfer dynam- ics following strong-field ionization of the water dimer, Phys. Rev. A99, 053408 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Tachikawa, Ionization dynamics of a water dimer: spe- cific reaction selectivity, Phys

    H. Tachikawa, Ionization dynamics of a water dimer: spe- cific reaction selectivity, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 11206 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    Schnorr, M

    K. Schnorr, M. Belina, S. Augustin, H. Lindenblatt, Y . Liu, S. Meister, T. Pfeifer, G. Schmid, R. Treusch, F. Trost, P. Slavíˇcek, and R. Moshammer, Direct tracking of ultrafast proton transfer in water dimers, Sci. Adv.9, eadg7864 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    K. Wang, C. L. Covington, and K. Varga, Time-dependent density-functional study of intermolecular coulombic decay for 2a1 ionized water dimer, J. Chem. Phys.163, 074106 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    R. N. Barnett and U. Landman, Pathways and dynamics of dis- sociation of ionized (h2o)2, J. Phys. Chem.99, 17305 (1995)

    1995

  16. [16]

    P. P. Radi, P. Beaud, D. Franzke, H.-M. Frey, T. Gerber, B. Mischler, and A.-P. Tzannis, Femtosecond photoionization of (H2O)n and (D2O)n clusters, J. Chem. Phys.111, 512 (1999)

    1999

  17. [17]

    Svoboda, D

    O. Svoboda, D. Hollas, M. On ˇcák, and P. Slaví ˇcek, Reaction selectivity in an ionized water dimer: nonadiabatic ab initio dynamics simulations, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.15, 11531 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Chalabala, F

    J. Chalabala, F. Uhlig, and P. Slavíˇcek, Assessment of real-time time-dependent density functional theory (rt-tddft) in radiation chemistry: Ionized water dimer, J. Phys. Chem. A122, 3227 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Tachikawa and T

    H. Tachikawa and T. Takada, Proton transfer rates in ionized water clusters (h2o)n (n = 2–4), RSC Adv.5, 6945 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Z. P. Wang, P. M. Dinh, P.-G. Reinhard, and E. Suraud, Ultrafast nonadiabatic dynamics of a water dimer in femtosecond laser pulses, Laser Phys.24, 106004 (2014)

    2014

  21. [21]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. Zhao, H. Liu, Z. Yin, X. Zhao, P. Ma, X. Li, C. Wang, Q. Wang, S. Luo, and D. Ding, Ultrafast coulomb explosion of the nh3 dimer, trimer, and tetramer in strong laser fields, Phys. Rev. A109, 023112 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    J. Ma, M. Zhu, Z. Hu, H. Ni, H. Sun, Y . Yang, and Z. Sun, Ul- trafast proton transfer in femtosecond-laser-induced double ion- ization of HCOOH−h2O complexes, Phys. Rev. A112, 023114 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Runge and E

    E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 997 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    C. A. Ullrich,Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory: Concepts and Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    Varga and J

    K. Varga and J. A. Driscoll,Computational Nanoscience: Ap- 18 plications for Molecules, Clusters, and Solids(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    Bruner, S

    A. Bruner, S. Hernandez, F. Mauger, P. M. Abanador, D. J. LaMaster, M. B. Gaarde, K. J. Schafer, and K. Lopata, At- tosecond charge migration with tddft: Accurate dynamics from a well-defined initial state, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.8, 3991 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Jiang, C

    C. Jiang, C. L. Covington, and K. Varga, Time-dependent density-functional-theory study of strong-field laser-induced coulomb explosion of the hcl dimer, Phys. Rev. A113, 043101 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    S. S. Taylor, K. Varga, K. Mogyorósi, V . Chikán, and C. Cov- ington, Fragmentation in coulomb explosion of hydrocarbon molecules, Phys. Rev. A111, 013109 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    S. S. Taylor, C. Covington, and K. Varga, Quantum effects of coulomb explosion simulations revealed by time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A111, 033109 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Jiang, S

    C. Jiang, S. S. Taylor, K. Wang, C. L. Covington, and K. Varga, H+ 3 formation in alkanes is governed by competing fragmen- tation pathways revealed by time-dependent density-functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.163, 214101 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Russakoff and K

    A. Russakoff and K. Varga, Time-dependent density-functional study of the ionization and fragmentation of c 2h2 and h 2 by strong circularly polarized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A92, 053413 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Russakoff, S

    A. Russakoff, S. Bubin, X. Xie, S. Erattupuzha, M. Kitzler, and K. Varga, Time-dependent density-functional study of the alignment-dependent ionization of acetylene and ethylene by strong laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A91, 023422 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Bubin and K

    S. Bubin and K. Varga, First-principles time-dependent simu- lation of laser assisted desorption of hydrogen atoms from h– si(111) surface, Appl. Phys. Lett.98, 154101 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    Bubin and K

    S. Bubin and K. Varga, Electron and ion dynamics in graphene and graphane fragments subjected to high-intensity laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B85, 205441 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    S. S. Taylor, N. Skoufis, H. Du, C. Covington, and K. Varga, Hydrogen adsorption and scattering on graphene with electron dynamics: Effects of incident point and kinetic energy, Phys. Rev. A112, 032812 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Troullier and J

    N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations, Phys. Rev. B43, 1993 (1991)

    1993

  37. [37]

    J. P. Perdew, Density-functional approximation for the correla- tion energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8822 (1986)

    1986

  38. [38]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approxima- tion with correct asymptotic behavior, Phys. Rev. A38, 3098 (1988)

    1988

  39. [39]

    Legrand, E

    C. Legrand, E. Suraud, and P.-G. Reinhard, Comparison of self- interaction-corrections for metal clusters, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, 1115 (2002)

    2002

  40. [40]

    Viveiros, S

    M. Viveiros, S. S. Taylor, C. Covington, and K. Varga, Ab initio study of highly-charged-ion-induced coulomb-explosion imag- ing, Phys. Rev. A113, 042805 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    D. E. Manolopoulos, Derivation and reflection properties of a transmission-free absorbing potential, J. Chem. Phys.117, 9552 (2002)

    2002

  42. [42]

    A. R. Hoy and P. R. Bunker, A precise solution of the rotation- bending schrödinger equation for a triatomic molecule with ap- plication to the water molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc.74, 1 (1979)

    1979

  43. [43]

    Jure ˇcka, J

    P. Jure ˇcka, J. Šponer, J. ˇCerný, and P. Hobza, Benchmark database of accurate (mp2 and ccsd(t) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, dna base pairs, and amino acid pairs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.8, 1985 (2006)

    1985

  44. [44]

    Maheshwary, N

    S. Maheshwary, N. Patel, N. Sathyamurthy, A. D. Kulkarni, and S. R. Gadre, Structure and stability of water clusters (h2o)n,n= 8–20: An ab initio investigation, J. Phys. Chem. A105, 10525 (2001)

    2001

  45. [45]

    Rakshit, P

    A. Rakshit, P. Bandyopadhyay, J. P. Heindel, and S. S. Xanth- eas, Atlas of putative minima and low-lying energy networks of water clustersn=3–25, J. Chem. Phys.151, 214307 (2019)

    2019