The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2207.13761 · v2 · pith:6ZTROSKP · submitted 2022-07-27 · gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Systematic bias on the inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test due to neglect of orbital eccentricity

Sajad A. Bhat , Pankaj Saini , Marc Favata , K. G. Arun This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:6ZTROSKPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords finalconsistencymasstestbiaseccentricityspinbinary
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The inspiral-merger-ringdown (IMR) consistency test checks the consistency of the final mass and final spin of a binary black hole merger remnant, independently inferred via the inspiral and merger-ringdown parts of the waveform. As binaries are expected to be nearly circularized when entering the frequency band of ground-based detectors, tests of general relativity (GR) currently employ quasicircular waveforms. We quantify the effect of residual orbital eccentricity on the IMR consistency test. We find that eccentricity causes a significant systematic bias in the inferred final mass and spin of the remnant black hole at an orbital eccentricity (defined at $10$ Hz) of $e_0 \gtrsim 0.1$ in the LIGO band (for a total binary mass in the range $65$-$200 \,M_{\odot}$). For binary black holes observed by Cosmic Explorer (CE), the systematic bias becomes significant for $e_0 \gtrsim 0.015$ (for $200$-$600 \,M_{\odot}$ systems). This eccentricity-induced bias on the final mass and spin leads to an apparent inconsistency in the IMR consistency test, manifesting as a false violation of GR. Hence, eccentric corrections to waveform models are important for constructing a robust test of GR, especially for third-generation detectors. We also estimate the eccentric corrections to the relationship between the inspiral parameters and the final mass and final spin; they are shown to be quite small.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accurate waveforms for generic planar-orbit binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv6EHM

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SEOBNRv6EHM is a multipolar EOB model for eccentric planar-orbit BBHs calibrated to NR simulations, showing low waveform mismatches up to eccentricity 0.9.

  2. Highly eccentric non-spinning binary black hole mergers: quadrupolar post-merger waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Polynomial models for the (2,2) post-merger waveform amplitudes of eccentric non-spinning binary black holes are constructed from numerical-relativity data as functions of symmetric mass ratio and two merger-time dyna...

  3. Plunge-Merger-Ringdown Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data constrains GR deviations in merger amplitude to 10% and frequency to 4% at 90% CL, with first bounds on the (4,4) mode frequency at 6%.

  4. Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

    gr-qc 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bayesian inference on LVK O1-O3 events with eccentric aligned-spin waveforms yields log10 Bayes factors of 1.77-4.75 favoring eccentricity for GW200129, GW190701 and GW200208_22, and >99.5% probability that at least o...

  5. Probing modified gravitational-wave dispersion with bursts from eccentric black-hole binaries

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    Applies parameterized dispersion to eccentric BBH burst waveforms, deriving a 2.5PN time-delay correction and Bessel amplitude modulation, then uses Fisher matrix to project LIGO constraints that are stronger than cur...