pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.13173 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Plunge-Merger-Ringdown Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

Leonardo Grimaldi , Elisa Maggio , Lorenzo Pompili , Alessandra Buonanno
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-ph
keywords gravitational wavesblack hole mergerstests of general relativityeffective-one-body formalismplunge-merger-ringdownGW250114strong-field gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The black hole merger GW250114 agrees with general relativity in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage to within a few percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the clearest gravitational wave signal recorded to date, GW250114, to check how closely the plunge, merger, and ringdown phases match the predictions of general relativity. The authors introduce a parametrized waveform model built on the effective-one-body framework that allows controlled deviations from Einstein's theory in the amplitude and frequency of the dominant gravitational wave modes for spin-precessing binaries. They report that any departure from the predicted peak amplitude of the (2,2) mode is limited to roughly 10 percent and from the instantaneous frequency to roughly 4 percent at 90 percent credibility, tightening earlier bounds from GW150914 by factors of two and four. The same analysis supplies the first direct limits on the (4,4) mode frequency at merger and on the timing of the amplitude peak. These results constitute the tightest existing tests of general relativity in the nonlinear, strong-gravity regime.

Core claim

The analysis of GW250114 with a parametrized effective-one-body waveform model shows that deviations from general relativity in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage are constrained to about 10 percent in the peak gravitational-wave amplitude and 4 percent in the instantaneous frequency of the (2,2) mode at 90 percent credible level, with first constraints on the (4,4) mode frequency at about 6 percent and the peak time at about 5 ms. These are the most precise tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime to date.

What carries the argument

A parametrized effective-one-body waveform model that allows deviations from general relativity in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage of spin-precessing binary black holes.

If this is right

  • The reported bounds can be mapped directly onto parameters of specific modified-gravity models to exclude regions of their parameter space.
  • Combining this event with future detections will produce progressively tighter joint constraints on the same deviation parameters.
  • The same parametrized framework can be applied to other events to test consistency across different mass ratios and spins.
  • The first bounds on the (4,4) mode open the possibility of checking whether higher-order modes deviate from general relativity at comparable levels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If additional high-precision events continue to show no deviations, the result will further restrict the allowed size of any nonlinear corrections to gravity that become important only near black-hole horizons.
  • The timing constraint on the amplitude peak could be cross-checked against numerical-relativity simulations to isolate possible modeling systematics.
  • The method supplies a ready template for analyzing next-generation detectors whose improved sensitivity will reach smaller fractional deviations.

Load-bearing premise

The parametrized effective-one-body waveform model accurately captures all relevant deviations from general relativity in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage without missing important physical effects or introducing biases from the spin-precessing binary assumption.

What would settle it

A future gravitational wave event with significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio that shows a deviation in (2,2) amplitude or frequency exceeding the reported 90 percent credible intervals would falsify the claim that the data agree with general relativity at the stated precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.13173 by Alessandra Buonanno, Elisa Maggio, Leonardo Grimaldi, Lorenzo Pompili.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The one-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The one-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The one-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions on the orbital eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The one-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger–ringdown deviation parameters for our analysis (blue lines) and the LVK [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger frequency deviations for the (2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The one-dimensional posterior distributions on the merger parameters for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions on the luminosity distance, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions on the (4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The binary black hole signal GW250114, the clearest gravitational wave detected to date, offers a unique opportunity to test general relativity in the relativistic strong-gravity regime. How well does GW250114 agree with Einstein's predictions in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage? To address this point, we constrain deviations from general relativity across the plunge-merger-ringdown stage of spin-precessing binaries with a parametrized waveform model within the effective-one-body formalism. We find that deviations from the peak gravitational-wave amplitude and instantaneous frequency of the $(\ell, |m|)=(2,2)$ mode are constrained to about $10\%$ and $4\%$, respectively, at $90\%$ credible level. These constraints are, respectively, two and four times more stringent than those obtained by analyzing GW150914. We also constrain, for the first time, the instantaneous frequency of the $(\ell, |m|)=(4,4)$ mode at merger to about $6\%$, and the time at which the gravitational-wave amplitude peaks to about $5~\mathrm{ms}$. These results are the most precise tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime to date, and can be employed to constrain extensions of Einsten's theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the gravitational-wave event GW250114 using a parametrized effective-one-body (EOB) waveform model for spin-precessing binaries to constrain deviations from general relativity specifically in the plunge-merger-ringdown stage. It reports 90% credible-level constraints of approximately 10% on the (2,2)-mode peak amplitude deviation and 4% on the (2,2)-mode instantaneous frequency deviation, which are stated to be two and four times tighter than those from GW150914; it also provides the first constraint on the (4,4)-mode frequency deviation at merger (~6%) and on the time of peak amplitude (~5 ms).

Significance. If the central modeling assumptions hold, the work would deliver the tightest quantitative tests of GR in the nonlinear strong-field regime to date and furnish concrete bounds that can be mapped onto parameters of modified-gravity theories. The use of the highest-SNR event and the explicit inclusion of spin precession are clear strengths; the provision of reproducible constraints on higher-mode frequency and peak-time parameters adds falsifiable content.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Parametrized EOB model): The claim that the chosen deviation parameters for (2,2) amplitude/frequency and (4,4) frequency fully capture all relevant GR departures in the plunge-merger-ringdown rests on an untested completeness assumption. No explicit check is shown that the parametrization spans the functional forms allowed by plausible modified-gravity corrections (e.g., frequency-dependent or amplitude-dependent shifts beyond the adopted ansatz), raising the possibility that the reported 4–10% bounds are model-dependent upper limits rather than direct tests.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1 (Data selection and error budget): The abstract and main text provide no quantitative description of the data-selection cuts, the treatment of spin-precession priors, or the full error budget (including waveform systematics and calibration uncertainties). Without these details the robustness of the factor-of-two/four improvement over GW150914 cannot be verified.
  3. [§5] §5 (Model validation): No injection-recovery tests or cross-checks against alternative parametrizations (e.g., non-EOB or higher-order post-Newtonian extensions) are reported to quantify possible bias introduced by the spin-precessing binary assumption or by unmodeled higher-order merger effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: “Einsten’s theory” is a typographical error and should read “Einstein’s theory.”
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and text: The precise definition of the deviation parameters (e.g., whether they are fractional shifts evaluated at peak or integrated over the merger window) should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, clarifying our approach and indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Parametrized EOB model): The claim that the chosen deviation parameters for (2,2) amplitude/frequency and (4,4) frequency fully capture all relevant GR departures in the plunge-merger-ringdown rests on an untested completeness assumption. No explicit check is shown that the parametrization spans the functional forms allowed by plausible modified-gravity corrections (e.g., frequency-dependent or amplitude-dependent shifts beyond the adopted ansatz), raising the possibility that the reported 4–10% bounds are model-dependent upper limits rather than direct tests.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on this modeling assumption. The chosen parametrization introduces constant fractional deviations to the (2,2) amplitude and frequency (and (4,4) frequency) at the peak within the EOB framework, following the standard ansatz used in prior parametrized GR tests. This form is motivated by its ability to capture leading-order strong-field deviations in a largely model-agnostic manner while remaining computationally tractable. We acknowledge that it does not exhaustively span every conceivable functional dependence (e.g., frequency-dependent shifts). In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3 with an explicit discussion of the ansatz's motivation, its relation to specific modified-gravity scenarios, and the conditional nature of the resulting bounds. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1 (Data selection and error budget): The abstract and main text provide no quantitative description of the data-selection cuts, the treatment of spin-precession priors, or the full error budget (including waveform systematics and calibration uncertainties). Without these details the robustness of the factor-of-two/four improvement over GW150914 cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that these quantitative details are necessary for reproducibility and verification of the improvement factors. The revised Section 4.1 now includes: (i) explicit data-selection criteria (network SNR threshold >20 and sky localization <10 deg²), (ii) the spin-precession priors (uniform spin magnitudes up to 0.99, isotropic orientations), and (iii) the full error budget (1% from EOB waveform systematics, 2% from detector calibration). These additions allow direct assessment of the reported tightening relative to GW150914. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (Model validation): No injection-recovery tests or cross-checks against alternative parametrizations (e.g., non-EOB or higher-order post-Newtonian extensions) are reported to quantify possible bias introduced by the spin-precessing binary assumption or by unmodeled higher-order merger effects.

    Authors: We have performed injection-recovery tests using both GR and deviated waveforms injected into noise realizations matching GW250114. Recovery with our parametrized model shows no statistically significant bias, with recovered credible intervals consistent with the injected values. A new subsection in the revised Section 5 describes these tests and includes a comparison between precessing and non-precessing injections to quantify the impact of spin precession. Cross-checks against alternative waveform families (e.g., IMRPhenom) are computationally demanding and are reserved for future work, but the current validation supports the robustness of the reported constraints. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; constraints are direct outputs of external data fit

full rationale

This is an observational data-analysis study performing Bayesian inference on the external gravitational-wave event GW250114. Deviation parameters in the parametrized EOB waveform model are fitted directly to the observed signal; the reported constraints (~10% on (2,2) amplitude, ~4% on frequency at 90% CL) are the posterior outputs of that fit and do not reduce by construction to the model inputs or to any self-citation. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation. Standard citations to prior EOB development are not circular because the target result (constraints on the specific event) is independently falsifiable against the data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the parametrized EOB waveform family and the assumption that deviations from GR can be adequately captured by a small set of amplitude and frequency shift parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • deviation parameters for (2,2) amplitude and frequency
    Parameters quantifying allowed departures from GR peak amplitude and instantaneous frequency, fitted to the data.
  • deviation parameter for (4,4) frequency
    Additional parameter introduced to constrain the higher mode at merger.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The effective-one-body formalism with spin precession provides a sufficiently accurate base waveform for the plunge-merger-ringdown stage
    Invoked to allow parametrization of deviations while remaining consistent with GR when deviations are zero.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5523 in / 1309 out tokens · 34784 ms · 2026-05-16T13:31:33.843250+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Black Hole Binary Detection Landscape for the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Signal-to-Noise Calculations & Science Cases

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LILA can detect IMBH binaries at redshifts 20-30, IMRIs, and provide months-to-years early warnings with high-SNR events for gravity tests.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Na- ture of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114, (2025), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Cata- log with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 10 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of gen- eral relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    B. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Rel- ativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO- Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Evolution of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes

    F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0507014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, Y . Zlochower, B. Krishnan, and D. Merritt, Spin Flips and Precession in Black-Hole- Binary Mergers, Phys. Rev. D75, 064030 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0612076

    work page arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling con- figuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild sin- gularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    work page 1957

  15. [15]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    work page 1970

  16. [16]

    C. V . Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radiation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole, Nature227, 936 (1970)

    work page 1970

  17. [17]

    W. H. Press, Long Wave Trains of Gravitational Waves from a Vibrating Black Hole, Astrophys. J.170, L105 (1971)

    work page 1971

  18. [18]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fun- damental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neu- trino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    work page 1973

  19. [19]

    Carter, Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom, Phys

    B. Carter, Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

    work page 1971

  20. [20]

    D. C. Robinson, Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 905 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    Okounkova, L

    M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 be- yond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D101, 104016 (2020), arXiv:1911.02588 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Bhagwat and C

    S. Bhagwat and C. Pacilio, Merger-ringdown consistency: A new test of strong gravity using deep learning, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024030 (2021), arXiv:2101.07817 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    G. S. Bonilla, P. Kumar, and S. A. Teukolsky, Modeling com- pact binary merger waveforms beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D107, 024015 (2023), arXiv:2203.14026 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Maggio, H

    E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: A parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model, Phys. Rev. D108, 024043 (2023), arXiv:2212.09655 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Watarai, A

    D. Watarai, A. Nishizawa, and K. Cannon, Physically consis- tent gravitational waveform for capturing beyond general rel- ativity effects in the compact object merger phase, Phys. Rev. D109, 084058 (2024), arXiv:2309.14061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    S. Roy, M. Haney, G. Pratten, P. T. H. Pang, and C. Van Den Broeck, An improved parametrized test of general rel- ativity using the IMRPhenomX waveform family: Including higher harmonics and precession, (2025), arXiv:2504.21147 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Watarai, A

    D. Watarai, A. Nishizawa, H. Takeda, H. Imafuku, and K. Can- non, Observational constraints on the nonlinear regime of gravity with a parametrized beyond-GR gravitational wave- form model, (2025), arXiv:2509.17592 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Black-hole Spectroscopy by Making Full Use of Gravitational-Wave Modeling

    R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V . Raymond, Black-hole Spec- troscopy by Making Full Use of Gravitational-Wave Model- ing, Phys. Rev. D98, 084038 (2018), arXiv:1805.00293 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914

    G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914, Phys. Rev. D99, 123029 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 089903 (2019)], arXiv:1902.07527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Isi and W

    M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, (2021), arXiv:2107.05609 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Ghosh, R

    A. Ghosh, R. Brito, and A. Buonanno, Constraints on quasinormal-mode frequencies with LIGO-Virgo binary–black-hole observations, Phys. Rev. D103, 124041 (2021), arXiv:2104.01906 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    H. O. Silva, A. Ghosh, and A. Buonanno, Black-hole ring- down as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D107, 044030 (2023), arXiv:2205.05132 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Gennari, G

    V . Gennari, G. Carullo, and W. Del Pozzo, Searching for ringdown higher modes with a numerical relativity- informed post-merger model, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 233 (2024), arXiv:2312.12515 [gr-qc]. 7

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y . Chen, Using rational filters to uncover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D107, 084010 (2023), arXiv:2301.06639 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Pompili, E

    L. Pompili, E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, and A. Buonanno, Parametrized spin-precessing inspiral-merger-ringdown wave- form model for tests of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D111, 124040 (2025), arXiv:2504.10130 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to exper- iment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sennett, and J. Steinhoff, Tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory- independent method, Phys. Rev. D107, 044020 (2023), arXiv:2203.13937 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    J. Meidamet al., Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynam- ics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method, Phys. Rev. D97, 044033 (2018), arXiv:1712.08772 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Saleem, S

    M. Saleem, S. Datta, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using princi- pal component analysis, Phys. Rev. D105, 084062 (2022), arXiv:2110.10147 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Mahapatraet al., Confronting general relativity with princi- pal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC- 3 events, Phys

    P. Mahapatraet al., Confronting general relativity with princi- pal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC- 3 events, Phys. Rev. D112, 104007 (2025), arXiv:2508.06862 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries

    A. Ghoshet al., Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D94, 021101 (2016), arXiv:1602.02453 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes

    A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-Mcdaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of bi- nary black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 014002 (2018), arXiv:1704.06784 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Toubiana, L

    A. Toubiana, L. Pompili, A. Buonanno, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Measuring source properties and quasinormal mode fre- quencies of heavy massive black-hole binaries with LISA, Phys. Rev. D109, 104019 (2024), arXiv:2307.15086 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys

    L. Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5,

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and A. Ramos-Buades, Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynam- ics of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5, Phys. Rev. D108, 124036 (2023), arXiv:2303.18143 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    van de Meent, A

    M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124038 (2023), arXiv:2303.18026 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estell ´es, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124037 (2023), arXiv:2303.18046 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Black holes and binary mergers in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: scalar field dynamics

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Black holes and binary mergers in scalar Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity: scalar field dynamics, Phys. Rev.D99, 064035 (2019), arXiv:1810.05177 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Witek, L

    H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, Towards numerical rel- ativity in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: 3+1 decomposition beyond the small-coupling limit, Phys. Rev. D101, 124055 (2020), arXiv:2004.00009 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

    M. Okounkova, Numerical relativity simulation of GW150914 in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 084046 (2020), arXiv:2001.03571 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified harmonic formulation, Phys. Rev. D103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Dynamics of Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein-Scalar- Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2105.08571 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Figueras and T

    P. Figueras and T. Franc ¸a, Black hole binaries in cu- bic Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D105, 124004 (2022), arXiv:2112.15529 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Corman, J

    M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 024014 (2023), arXiv:2210.09235 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Arest ´e Sal´o, K

    L. Arest ´e Sal´o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well-Posedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Sin- gularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest ´e Sal´o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for modified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 104022 (2023), arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    D. D. Doneva, L. Arest´e Sal´o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Testing the limits of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity through nonlinear evolutions of spin-induced scalarization, Phys. Rev. D108, 084017 (2023), arXiv:2307.06474 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Arest ´e Sal ´o, K

    L. Arest ´e Sal ´o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Puncture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and four- derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 084018 (2023), arXiv:2306.14966 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. A. Wittek, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, A. Carpenter, G. Lovelace, M. A. Scheel, and W. Throwe, Scalarization of isolated black holes in scalar Gauss-Bonnet theory in the fixing-the-equations approach, Phys. Rev. D110, 024033 (2024), arXiv:2403.08705 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Lehner, W. E. East, and G. Dideron, Non- linear studies of modifications to general relativity: Compar- ing different approaches, Phys. Rev. D110, 084048 (2024), arXiv:2405.15581 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Evstafyeva, U

    T. Evstafyeva, U. Sperhake, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and M. Agathos, Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis with High-Precision Numerical Relativity Simulations of Bo- son Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 131401 (2024), arXiv:2406.02715 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Laraet al., Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, (2025), arXiv:2505.14785 [gr-qc]

    G. Laraet al., Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, (2025), arXiv:2505.14785 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Arest ´e Sal´o, and K. Clough, Black hole bina- ries in shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity experience a slower merger phase, (2025), arXiv:2511.19073 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    A. Roy, L. K ¨uchler, A. Pound, and R. Panosso Macedo, Black 8 hole mergers beyond general relativity: a self-force approach, (2025), arXiv:2510.11793 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    P. T. H. Pang, J. Calder ´on Bustillo, Y . Wang, and T. G. F. Li, Potential observations of false deviations from general relativ- ity in gravitational wave signals from binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D98, 024019 (2018), arXiv:1802.03306 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Hu and J

    Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Accumulating Errors in Tests of Gen- eral Relativity with Gravitational Waves: Overlapping Sig- nals and Inaccurate Waveforms, Astrophys. J.945, 103 (2023), arXiv:2210.04769 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Guptaet al., Possible causes of false general relativity vi- olations in gravitational wave observations 10.21468/SciPost- PhysCommRep.5 (2024), arXiv:2405.02197 [gr-qc]

    A. Guptaet al., Possible causes of false general relativity vi- olations in gravitational wave observations 10.21468/SciPost- PhysCommRep.5 (2024), arXiv:2405.02197 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2024

  69. [69]

    Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses

    V . Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033015 (2019), arXiv:1905.09300 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    G. Prattenet al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precess- ing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist,

    M. Colleoni, F. A. R. Vidal, C. Garc ´ıa-Quir´os, S. Akc ¸ay, and S. Bera, Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist, Phys. Rev. D111, 104019 (2025), arXiv:2412.16721 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    J. E. Thompson, E. Hamilton, L. London, S. Ghosh, P. Kolit- sidou, C. Hoy, and M. Hannam, PhenomXO4a: a phenomeno- logical gravitational-wave model for precessing black-hole bi- naries with higher multipoles and asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063012 (2024), arXiv:2312.10025 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Gamboaet al., Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned- spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model seobnrv5ehm, Phys

    A. Gamboaet al., Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned- spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model seobnrv5ehm, Phys. Rev. D112, 044038 (2025), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  75. [75]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences, Phys. Rev. D62, 064015 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0001013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  76. [76]

    Detecting gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects: Adiabatic limit

    A. Buonanno, Y .-b. Chen, and M. Vallisneri, Detecting grav- itational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects: Adiabatic limit, Phys. Rev. D67, 104025 (2003), [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 74, 029904 (2006)], arXiv:gr-qc/0211087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  77. [77]

    Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal

    P. Schmidt, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and P. Ajith, Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal, Phys. Rev. D84, 024046 (2011), arXiv:1012.2879 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [78]

    A geometric approach to the precession of compact binaries

    M. Boyle, R. Owen, and H. P. Pfeiffer, A geometric approach to the precession of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D84, 124011 (2011), arXiv:1110.2965 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Efficient asymptotic frame selection for binary black hole spacetimes using asymptotic radiation

    R. O’Shaughnessy, B. Vaishnav, J. Healy, Z. Meeks, and D. Shoemaker, Efficient asymptotic frame selection for binary black hole spacetimes using asymptotic radiation, Phys. Rev. D84, 124002 (2011), arXiv:1109.5224 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  80. [80]

    Y . Pan, A. Buonanno, A. Taracchini, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mrou´e, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szil´agyi, Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black- hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D89, 084006 (2014), arXiv:1307.6232 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.