Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Research Challenges and Progress in the End-to-End V2X Cooperative Autonomous Driving Competition

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The End-to-End V2X Cooperation Challenge establishes a unified two-track benchmark for cooperative perception and planning, with top solutions showing state-of-the-art results including a 44.5% planning-score improvement over the UniV2X…

desk verdict A useful competition write-up whose headline numbers are not yet checkable; worth reviewing, but only after the authors release the leaderboard and normalization details. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21610 v2 pith:72WWFSGH submitted 2025-07-29 cs.RO cs.CV

Ruiyang Hao , Haibao Yu , Jiaru Zhong , Chuanye Wang , Jiahao Wang , Yiming Kan , Wenxian Yang , Siqi Fan
show 11 more authors
Huilin Yin Jianing Qiu Yao Mu Jiankai Sun Li Chen Walter Zimmer Dandan Zhang Shanghang Zhang Mac Schwager Ping Luo Zaiqing Nie
This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords V2Xcooperativedrivingperceptionplanningbenchmarksparsefusionend-to-endautonomousUniV2X-Seq-SPD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports on the first End-to-End Autonomous Driving through V2X Cooperation Challenge, a two-track competition built on the UniV2X framework and the V2X-Seq-SPD dataset. The paper argues that the challenge provides a unified benchmark for evaluating cooperative perception and planning, and that the top submissions show measurable progress: SparseCoop achieves state-of-the-art detection and tracking, while MAP improves the planning score by 44.5% over the baseline. By analyzing submissions from over 30 teams, the paper identifies bandwidth-aware fusion, robust planning, and heterogeneous sensor integration as the field's central open problems. The value of the claim is that a standardized, reproducible platform now exists for comparing V2X cooperative driving systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the challenge benchmark itself: a two-track protocol on the UniV2X framework and the V2X-Seq-SPD dataset, with Track 1 scored as 0.5·mAP + 0.5·AMOTA and Track 2 scored as 0.5·normalized L2 error + 0.25·normalized collision rate + 0.25·normalized off-road rate, each metric averaged at 2.5s, 3.5s, and 4.5s. Within the top solutions, the key mechanisms are SparseCoop's anchor-aided instance queries (explicit geometric attributes per object enabling cross-agent fusion without dense BEV features) with cooperative instance denoising, and MAP's two-branch query generation (Ego-status-guided Planning plus Plan-enhancing Online Mapping) fused by a learned weight adapter that adaptively balances ego state and semantic priors.

What would settle it

Run the MAP planner and the UniV2X baseline in a closed-loop simulator on the same V2X-Seq-SPD scenarios and compare actual collision rates and off-road events; if MAP's advantage over the baseline shrinks or reverses under closed-loop control or under injected communication packet loss, the benchmark's proxy claim is weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, as the paper states it, is that a two-track benchmark can jointly evaluate cooperative temporal perception and cooperative end-to-end planning, and that top solutions under this benchmark demonstrate clear progress. SparseCoop, built on anchor-aided instance queries with cooperative instance denoising, achieves state-of-the-art detection and tracking performance under the V2X-Seq-SPD benchmark. MAP, which feeds semantic map information directly into planning via a learned adaptive fusion weight, improves the overall normalized planning score by 44.5% over the UniV2X baseline and ranks first on the planning leaderboard. From the submitted solutions, the paper identifies converging design trends: sparse query-based fusion, modular architectures, and temporal reasoning.

Load-bearing premise

The scoring protocol treats open-loop planning metrics — L2 error, collision rate, and off-road rate at three future timestamps — as a valid proxy for real driving safety and quality, and the paper itself notes that closed-loop evaluation and robustness to weather, lighting, and sensor degradation were not tested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sparse, query-based cooperative fusion can achieve top perception performance while keeping communication costs low, supporting bandwidth-aware deployment.
  • Explicitly using semantic map information as a planning input can substantially improve trajectory quality over ego-only or pure feature-fusion baselines.
  • A unified open benchmark for cooperative perception and planning is feasible and can attract diverse international participation, enabling reproducible comparison.
  • The identified research gaps — realistic communication modeling, bandwidth-adaptive fusion, and generalization across heterogeneous agents — define concrete next targets for the field.
  • Future challenge editions with closed-loop evaluation and adverse conditions are necessary to verify that benchmark progress transfers to deployment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 44.5% improvement is measured on open-loop planning metrics; if closed-loop simulation or real-world testing were applied, the ranking could change because collision rate and off-road rate are computed from planned trajectories, not actual control.
  • The challenge's emphasis on sparse fusion suggests that communication bandwidth, not perception accuracy alone, is the binding constraint for V2X deployment.
  • MAP's success implies that perception modules should be optimized for planning utility rather than for detection accuracy alone, a criterion the current benchmark only partially captures.
  • A direct test would be to re-run the same top solutions under injected packet loss or latency to see whether their advantage persists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports on the organization and outcomes of the first End-to-End V2X Cooperation Challenge, held at the MEIS Workshop @ CVPR 2025. The challenge consists of two tracks: cooperative temporal perception (3D detection and multi-object tracking) and cooperative end-to-end planning, built on the UniV2X framework and the V2X-Seq-SPD dataset. The paper describes the task setup, evaluation metrics, participation statistics, technical challenges observed, and the top-performing solutions: SparseCoop (Track 1) and MAP (Track 2). The central claims are that the challenge establishes a unified benchmark for cooperative driving systems and that the top solutions demonstrate meaningful progress, exemplified by MAP's 44.5% improvement over the UniV2X baseline and SparseCoop's state-of-the-art detection/tracking performance. The paper also discusses future research directions including realistic communication modeling, bandwidth-adaptive fusion, generalization across heterogeneous agents, and language-based V2X communication.

Significance. If the quantitative claims were fully substantiated, this paper would document a useful community resource: a unified benchmark covering both cooperative perception and planning, with open-source baselines and external participation. The challenge addresses a real gap in V2X benchmarking, which has been dominated by perception-only tasks. The analysis of technical trends and the future-directions section are thoughtful and could help guide the field. However, the current manuscript does not provide the underlying leaderboard data, metric definitions in sufficient operational detail, or statistical significance assessments that would allow readers to verify the claimed progress. The main value at present is as a qualitative competition summary; the benchmark's quantitative evidence and the verification of SOTA claims require substantial additional reporting.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.1 and §5.2] The Track 2 final score is defined as 0.5 × normalized L2 error + 0.25 × normalized collision rate + 0.25 × normalized off-road rate, where each metric is min-max normalized based on 'predefined reference ranges.' The reference ranges are never specified. Since min-max normalization is an affine transformation, the reported '44.5% improvement' in Section 5.2 is not scale-invariant and cannot be interpreted without these bounds. Please provide the reference ranges, the raw per-metric values for MAP and the UniV2X baseline, and the number of evaluation scenes used.
  2. [§5.1] The claim that SparseCoop achieves 'state-of-the-art detection and tracking performance' is not supported by any numerical results. No mAP or AMOTA values, no comparison against the UniV2X baseline, and no leaderboard table are given. Please include a full leaderboard for Track 1 with final scores and per-metric breakdowns for all ranked teams, and state whether the results are averaged over multiple runs with reported variance or statistical tests.
  3. [§3.2 and §5.1] The paper does not disclose that the SparseCoop team (Wang et al., Tsinghua University) includes co-authors of this paper (several authors are affiliated with Tsinghua University), and that the organizers themselves evaluated the challenge using their own dataset and baseline. This creates a potential conflict of interest that should be explicitly acknowledged. Additionally, the roles of the organizers in designing, running, and evaluating the methods should be clarified to assure readers of impartiality.
  4. [§3.2 and §5] Only 5 finalists achieved ranked results out of over 30 registered teams. The paper does not state how many teams actually submitted valid results, what criteria determined the finalists, or the evaluation conditions (e.g., allowed compute, communication bandwidth limits, test-time constraints). This information is necessary to assess whether the reported progress is representative of the broader participant pool and to understand the practical conditions of the benchmark.
  5. [§6] The paper concedes in Section 6 that closed-loop evaluation and robustness to weather, lighting, and sensor degradation were not tested. Given that all headline progress claims are based on open-loop planning metrics (L2 error, collision rate, off-road rate averaged at fixed future timestamps), the framing that the results demonstrate 'meaningful progress' toward deployable V2X systems is overstated. Please temper the claims accordingly, or add an explicit discussion of the limitations of open-loop metrics as a proxy for real-world safety.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The challenge is referred to inconsistently: 'End-to-End Autonomous Driving through V2X Cooperation Challenge' in the abstract and conclusion versus 'End-to-End V2X Cooperation Challenge' elsewhere. Please use a consistent name.
  2. [Table 1] The abbreviation 'NA VSIM' appears to be a typo for 'NAVSIM.' Also, the 'Competition' entries for V2X-Seq list 'CVPRW25 (Ours)' while other datasets list multiple years; consider formatting consistency.
  3. [§5.2] The text says 'On the DAIR-V2X-Seq-SPD benchmark,' but the dataset is called 'V2X-Seq-SPD' elsewhere. Please clarify whether these refer to the same benchmark and use a single name consistently.
  4. [§4] The paragraph beginning 'Multi-Agent Sensor Fusion under Bandwidth Constraints' is not visually separated from the following paragraph; add formatting or bullet structure to improve readability.
  5. [§3.1] For Track 1, the paper should specify the object class (merged 'Car'), the 3D IoU threshold used for mAP, and the exact formulation of AMOTA (e.g., standard MOTA with interpolation parameters). These details are needed for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No formal circularity: the challenge report is a self-referential evaluation rather than a derivation, so its progress claims are under-supported but not circular by construction.

full rationale

The paper is a competition retrospective, not a derivation chain: there is no equation in which the reported outcome is defined from the same quantity it is said to predict. Track 2's final score is an explicitly defined aggregation (0.5 normalized L2 + 0.25 normalized collision + 0.25 normalized off-road, averaged at 2.5s/3.5s/4.5s), and MAP's 44.5% improvement over the UniV2X baseline is an empirical comparison rather than a quantity forced by that definition. The absence of the predefined min-max reference ranges and raw per-metric scores makes the magnitude of the claimed improvement non-checkable, but missing reporting is not circular reasoning. Similarly, SparseCoop's 'state-of-the-art' claim in Section 5.1 is an evaluative assertion supported by in-house challenge results; the undisclosed overlap between the challenge organizers and the two highlighted top teams (SparseCoop and MAP) creates a self-referential evidence loop and a conflict-of-interest concern, yet no step reduces to its own input by construction. The Section 6 admission that robustness to weather, lighting, and sensor degradation was not evaluated is a stated limitation, not a circular move. Because the central claims are empirical and at least partly grounded in external team participation, although weakly reported, I find no specific circular step under the strict definition and assign a low score reflecting the self-referential reporting rather than a formal circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities, but the evaluation design relies on hand-chosen metric weights, undisclosed normalization ranges, and domain assumptions about the validity of open-loop metrics and the authors' own dataset as a fair testbed. These choices are not fitted to data in the usual sense, but they directly shape the reported results.

free parameters (3)
  • Track 1 final score weights = 0.5 * mAP + 0.5 * AMOTA
    Chosen by the organizers in Section 3.1; the unweighted average is a design choice that affects the reported rankings and is not derived from data.
  • Track 2 final score weights = 0.5 * normalized L2 + 0.25 * normalized collision + 0.25 * normalized off-road
    Chosen in Section 3.1; these weights favor trajectory accuracy over safety metrics and influence the final scores, including MAP's reported 44.5% gain.
  • Min-max normalization reference ranges for Track 2 = not specified
    Section 3.1 states normalization uses predefined reference ranges but does not list them, so the final scores are not reproducible without the competition infrastructure.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Open-loop planning metrics are a valid proxy for real-world driving safety and quality.
    Section 3.1 defines L2, collision rate, and off-road rate as evaluation metrics; Section 6 acknowledges closed-loop evaluation and robustness to weather/sensor degradation are not included, so the benchmark assumes these open-loop numbers reflect deployment readiness.
  • domain assumption V2X-Seq-SPD is a representative and unbiased sample of real-world V2X cooperative driving scenarios.
    The challenge's conclusions are drawn from the organizers' V2X-Seq-SPD dataset ([86]); the paper treats this dataset as a fair testbed without external validation.
  • domain assumption UniV2X is an appropriate baseline for measuring progress.
    Section 2.2 designates UniV2X as the official baseline, so the reported improvements (e.g., MAP's 44.5%) are relative to a baseline built by the same group; a weak or mismatched baseline would inflate perceived progress.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Research Challenges and Progress in the End-to-End V2X Cooperative Autonomous Driving Competition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/72WWFSGH

@misc{pith2026250721610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Research Challenges and Progress in the End-to-End V2X Cooperative Autonomous Driving Competition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/72WWFSGH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21610}
}
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology, vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication has emerged as a key enabler for extending perception range and enhancing driving safety by providing visibility beyond the line of sight. However, integrating multi-source sensor data from both ego-vehicles and infrastructure under real-world constraints, such as limited communication bandwidth and dynamic environments, presents significant technical challenges. To facilitate research in this area, we organized the End-to-End Autonomous Driving through V2X Cooperation Challenge, which features two tracks: cooperative temporal perception and cooperative end-to-end planning. Built on the UniV2X framework and the V2X-Seq-SPD dataset, the challenge attracted participation from over 30 teams worldwide and established a unified benchmark for evaluating cooperative driving systems. This paper describes the design and outcomes of the challenge, highlights key research problems including bandwidth-aware fusion, robust multi-agent planning, and heterogeneous sensor integration, and analyzes emerging technical trends among top-performing solutions. By addressing practical constraints in communication and data fusion, the challenge contributes to the development of scalable and reliable V2X-cooperative autonomous driving systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21610 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Challenge Baseline UniV2X [87] and V2X-Seq-SPD Dataset [86] 3. Challenge Design 3.1. Task Setup and Evaluation Metrics The challenge comprises two complementary tracks de￾signed to evaluate different aspects of V2X cooperative au￾tonomous driving: Cooperative Temporal Perception and Cooperative End-to-End Planning. 1) Track 1: Cooperative Temporal Perception This track focuses on cooperative 3D detection and multi-o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architecture of SparseCoop, the top-ranked solution in Track 1: Cooperative Temporal Perception. The method adopts a fully sparse cooperative detection and tracking pipeline, where each object is represented by an anchor-aided instance query containing structured geometric attributes (position, size, velocity, orientation) and semantic features. Cross-agent fusion is performed directly at the object level without re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Architecture of MAP, the top-ranked solution in Track 2: Cooperative End-to-End Planning. This planning-centric framework explicitly incorporates semantic map information into trajectory generation. It consists of two query-generation branches: the Plan￾enhancing Online Mapping (POM) module extracts semantic priors from segmentation outputs, while the Ego-status-guided Planning (EP) module models motion dynamics. A … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahmed, Siegfried Mercelis, and Ali Anwar

    Ahmed N. Ahmed, Siegfried Mercelis, and Ali Anwar. Delawarecol: Delay aware collaborative perception. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, 6:1164–1177, 2025. 6

    2025

  2. [2]

    Vehicles-to-everything standardiza- tion, services and enhancements for intelligent transportation systems

    Moin Ali, Ali Nauman, Muhammad Ali Jamshed, Su Min Kim, and Junsu Kim. Vehicles-to-everything standardiza- tion, services and enhancements for intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2025. 7

    2025

  3. [3]

    5g nr- v2x: Toward connected and cooperative autonomous driv- ing

    Hamidreza Bagheri, Md Noor-A-Rahim, Zilong Liu, Haey- oung Lee, Dirk Pesch, Klaus Moessner, and Pei Xiao. 5g nr- v2x: Toward connected and cooperative autonomous driv- ing. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , 5(1):48– 54, 2021. 1

    2021

  4. [4]

    Malicious drone identification by vi- bration signature measurement: A radar-based approach

    Matteo Bertocco, Alessandro Brighente, Gianluca Ciattaglia, Ennio Gambi, Giacomo Peruzzi, Alessandro Pozzebon, and Susanna Spinsante. Malicious drone identification by vi- bration signature measurement: A radar-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , 74:8004415, 2025. 7

    2025

  5. [5]

    nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Gi- ancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11621–11631, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  6. [6]

    nuplan: A closed-loop ml-based plan- ning benchmark for autonomous vehicles

    Holger Caesar, Juraj Kabzan, Kok Seang Tan, Whye Kit Fong, Eric Wolff, Alex Lang, Luke Fletcher, Oscar Beijbom, and Sammy Omari. nuplan: A closed-loop ml-based plan- ning benchmark for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11810, 2021. 2

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Cooperative perception with localization uncertainty: A cubature split covariance intersection framework

    Kunyang Cai, Ting Qu, Fen Liu, Hong Chen, and Lihua Xie. Cooperative perception with localization uncertainty: A cubature split covariance intersection framework. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(11): 18006–18024, 2024. 8

    2024

  8. [8]

    Yolov4-5d: An effective and efficient object detector for au- tonomous driving

    Yingfeng Cai, Tianyu Luan, Hongbo Gao, Hai Wang, Long Chen, Yicheng Li, Miguel Angel Sotelo, and Zhixiong Li. Yolov4-5d: An effective and efficient object detector for au- tonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70:1–13, 2021. 1

    2021

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Bev-v2x: Coop- erative birds-eye-view fusion and grid occupancy prediction via v2x-based data sharing

    Cheng Chang, Jiawei Zhang, Kunpeng Zhang, Wenqin Zhong, Xinyu Peng, Shen Li, and Li Li. Bev-v2x: Coop- erative birds-eye-view fusion and grid occupancy prediction via v2x-based data sharing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8(11):4498–4514, 2023. 4

    2023

  2. [10]

    Argoverse: 3d tracking and forecasting with rich maps

    Ming-Fang Chang, John Lambert, Patsorn Sangkloy, Jag- jeet Singh, Slawomir Bak, Andrew Hartnett, De Wang, Peter Carr, Simon Lucey, Deva Ramanan, et al. Argoverse: 3d tracking and forecasting with rich maps. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and patte...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Deep neu- ral network based vehicle and pedestrian detection for au- tonomous driving: A survey

    Long Chen, Shaobo Lin, Xiankai Lu, Dongpu Cao, Hang- bin Wu, Chi Guo, Chun Liu, and Fei-Yue Wang. Deep neu- ral network based vehicle and pedestrian detection for au- tonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelli- gent Transportation Systems, 22(6):3234–3246, 2021. 1

    2021

  4. [12]

    End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers

    Li Chen, Penghao Wu, Kashyap Chitta, Bernhard Jaeger, An- dreas Geiger, and Hongyang Li. End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 46(12):10164– 10183, 2024. 1

    2024

  5. [13]

    A fast coordination approach for large-scale drone swarm

    Wu Chen, Jiayi Zhu, Jiajia Liu, and Hongzhi Guo. A fast coordination approach for large-scale drone swarm. Journal of Network and Computer Applications , 221:103769, 2024. 7

    2024

  6. [14]

    An effective information theoretic framework for channel pruning

    Yihao Chen and Zefang Wang. An effective information theoretic framework for channel pruning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16772, 2024. 6

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Transfuser: Imitation with transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driv- ing

    Kashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash, Bernhard Jaeger, Zehao Yu, Katrin Renz, and Andreas Geiger. Transfuser: Imitation with transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driv- ing. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine in- telligence, 45(11):12878–12895, 2022. 2

    2022

  8. [16]

    V2v- llm: Vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative autonomous driving with multi-modal large language models

    Hsu-kuang Chiu, Ryo Hachiuma, Chien-Yi Wang, Stephen F Smith, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, and Min-Hung Chen. V2v- llm: Vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative autonomous driving with multi-modal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09980, 2025. 8

    2025

  9. [17]

    Drone-assisted cooperative routing scheme for seamless connectivity in v2x communication

    Omer Chughtai, Nadia Nawaz Qadri, Zeeshan Kaleem, and Chau Yuen. Drone-assisted cooperative routing scheme for seamless connectivity in v2x communication. IEEE Access, 12:17369–17381, 2024. 7

    2024

  10. [18]

    Wireless access for v2x communi- cations: Research, challenges and opportunities

    Joseph Clancy, Darragh Mullins, Brian Deegan, Jonathan Horgan, Enda Ward, Ciar ´an Eising, Patrick Denny, Edward Jones, and Martin Glavin. Wireless access for v2x communi- cations: Research, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(3):2082–21...

    2024

  11. [19]

    End-to-end v2x latency modeling and analysis in 5g networks

    Baldomero Coll-Perales, M Carmen Lucas-Esta ˜n, Takayuki Shimizu, Javier Gozalvez, Takamasa Higuchi, Sergei Avedisov, Onur Altintas, and Miguel Sepulcre. End-to-end v2x latency modeling and analysis in 5g networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , 72(4):5094–5109,

  12. [20]

    Carla autonomous driving leaderboard, 2024

    Contributors. Carla autonomous driving leaderboard, 2024. 3

    2024

  13. [21]

    Towards natural language communication for coopera- tive autonomous driving via self-play

    Jiaxun Cui, Chen Tang, Jarrett Holtz, Janice Nguyen, Alessandro G Allievi, Hang Qiu, and Peter Stone. Towards natural language communication for coopera- tive autonomous driving via self-play. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18334, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A vehicle-infrastructure multi-layer cooperative decision- making framework

    Yiming Cui, Shiyu Fang, Peng Hang, and Jian Sun. A vehicle-infrastructure multi-layer cooperative decision- making framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16552, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Navsim: Data-driven non-reactive autonomous vehicle simulation and benchmarking

    Daniel Dauner, Marcel Hallgarten, Tianyu Li, Xinshuo Weng, Zhiyu Huang, Zetong Yang, Hongyang Li, Igor Gilitschenski, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, et al. Navsim: Data-driven non-reactive autonomous vehicle simulation and benchmarking. Advances in Neural Information Processing...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Carla: An open urban driv- ing simulator

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, German Ros, Felipe Codevilla, Anto- nio Lopez, and Vladlen Koltun. Carla: An open urban driv- ing simulator. In Conference on robot learning, pages 1–16. PMLR, 2017. 2

    2017

  17. [25]

    Quest: Query stream for practical cooperative percep- tion

    Siqi Fan, Haibao Yu, Wenxian Yang, Jirui Yuan, and Zaiqing Nie. Quest: Query stream for practical cooperative percep- tion. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 18436–18442. IEEE, 2024. 4

    2024

  18. [26]

    U2udata: A large-scale cooperative perception dataset for swarm uavs autonomous flight

    Tongtong Feng, Xin Wang, Feilin Han, Leping Zhang, and Wenwu Zhu. U2udata: A large-scale cooperative perception dataset for swarm uavs autonomous flight. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 7600–7608, 2024. 6

    2024

  19. [27]

    Self- supervised visual odometry based on scene appearance- structure incremental fusion

    Fuji Fu, Jinfu Yang, Jiaqi Ma, and Jiahui Zhang. Self- supervised visual odometry based on scene appearance- structure incremental fusion. IEEE Transactions on Intel- ligent Transportation Systems, 2025. 6

    2025

  20. [28]

    Automated vehicles should be connected with natural language

    Xiangbo Gao, Keshu Wu, Hao Zhang, Kexin Tian, Yang Zhou, and Zhengzhong Tu. Automated vehicles should be connected with natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01059, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Langcoop: Collaborative driving with language

    Xiangbo Gao, Yuheng Wu, Rujia Wang, Chenxi Liu, Yang Zhou, and Zhengzhong Tu. Langcoop: Collaborative driving with language. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 4226–4237, 2025. 8

    2025

  22. [30]

    Airv2x: Unified air- ground vehicle-to-everything collaboration

    Xiangbo Gao, Yuheng Wu, Fengze Yang, Xuewen Luo, Keshu Wu, Xinghao Chen, Yuping Wang, Chenxi Liu, Yang Zhou, and Zhengzhong Tu. Airv2x: Unified air- ground vehicle-to-everything collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19283, 2025. 6

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Stamp: Scalable task and model-agnostic collaborative perception

    Xiangbo Gao, Runsheng Xu, Jiachen Li, Ziran Wang, Zhi- wen Fan, and Zhengzhong Tu. Stamp: Scalable task and model-agnostic collaborative perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18616, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Integrating cybersecurity in v2x: A review of simulation environments

    Kevin Herman Muraro Gularte, Jo ˜ao Paulo Javidi Da Costa, Jos´e Alfredo Ruiz Vargas, Antonio Santos Da Silva, Gio- vanni Almeida Santos, Yuming Wang, Christian Alfons M¨uller, Christoph Lipps, Rafael Tim ´oteo de Sousa J ´unior, Walter de Britto Vidal Filho, et al. Integratin...

  25. [33]

    Rcooper: A real-world large-scale dataset for roadside cooperative perception

    Ruiyang Hao, Siqi Fan, Yingru Dai, Zhenlin Zhang, Chenxi Li, Yuntian Wang, Haibao Yu, Wenxian Yang, Jirui Yuan, and Zaiqing Nie. Rcooper: A real-world large-scale dataset for roadside cooperative perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and patt...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Styledrive: Towards driving-style aware benchmark- ing of end-to-end autonomous driving

    Ruiyang Hao, Bowen Jing, Haibao Yu, and Zaiqing Nie. Styledrive: Towards driving-style aware benchmark- ing of end-to-end autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23982, 2025. 2

    2025

  27. [35]

    Agc-drive: A large-scale dataset for real-world aerial-ground collaboration in driving scenarios

    Yunhao Hou, Bochao Zou, Min Zhang, Ran Chen, Shang- dong Yang, Yanmei Zhang, Junbao Zhuo, Siheng Chen, Jian- sheng Chen, and Huimin Ma. Agc-drive: A large-scale dataset for real-world aerial-ground collaboration in driving scenarios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16371, 2025. 6

    2025

  28. [36]

    Planning-oriented autonomous driving

    Yihan Hu, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Keyu Li, Chonghao Sima, Xizhou Zhu, Siqi Chai, Senyao Du, Tianwei Lin, Wenhai Wang, et al. Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17853–17862, 2023. 1

    2023

  29. [37]

    Gameformer: Game-theoretic modeling and learning of transformer-based interactive prediction and planning for autonomous driving

    Zhiyu Huang, Haochen Liu, and Chen Lv. Gameformer: Game-theoretic modeling and learning of transformer-based interactive prediction and planning for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3903–3913, 2023. 1

    2023

  30. [38]

    Dif- ferentiable integrated motion prediction and planning with learnable cost function for autonomous driving

    Zhiyu Huang, Haochen Liu, Jingda Wu, and Chen Lv. Dif- ferentiable integrated motion prediction and planning with learnable cost function for autonomous driving. IEEE trans- actions on neural networks and learning systems , 35(11): 15222–15236, 2023. 1

    2023

  31. [39]

    Rcfl: Redundancy- aware collaborative federated learning in vehicular networks

    Yilong Hui, Jie Hu, Nan Cheng, Gaosheng Zhao, Rui Chen, Tom H Luan, and Khalid Aldubaikhy. Rcfl: Redundancy- aware collaborative federated learning in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25 (6):5539–5553, 2023. 6

    2023

  32. [40]

    Bench2drive: Towards multi-ability bench- marking of closed-loop end-to-end autonomous driving

    Xiaosong Jia, Zhenjie Yang, Qifeng Li, Zhiyuan Zhang, and Junchi Yan. Bench2drive: Towards multi-ability bench- marking of closed-loop end-to-end autonomous driving. Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:819– 844, 2024. 2

    2024

  33. [41]

    Vad: Vectorized scene representa- tion for efficient autonomous driving

    Bo Jiang, Shaoyu Chen, Qing Xu, Bencheng Liao, Jiajie Chen, Helong Zhou, Qian Zhang, Wenyu Liu, Chang Huang, and Xinggang Wang. Vad: Vectorized scene representa- tion for efficient autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision ,...

    2023

  34. [42]

    A survey on vision-language- action models for autonomous driving

    Sicong Jiang, Zilin Huang, Kangan Qian, Ziang Luo, Tianze Zhu, Yang Zhong, Yihong Tang, Menglin Kong, Yunlong Wang, Siwen Jiao, et al. A survey on vision-language- action models for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24044, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Dusa: Decoupled unsupervised sim2real adaptation for vehicle-to-everything collaborative perception

    Xianghao Kong, Wentao Jiang, Jinrang Jia, Yifeng Shi, Run- sheng Xu, and Si Liu. Dusa: Decoupled unsupervised sim2real adaptation for vehicle-to-everything collaborative perception. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 1943–1954, 2023. 6

    1943

  36. [44]

    Risk map as middleware: Towards interpretable coop- erative end-to-end autonomous driving for risk-aware plan- ning

    Mingyue Lei, Zewei Zhou, Hongchen Li, Jiaqi Ma, and Jia Hu. Risk map as middleware: Towards interpretable coop- erative end-to-end autonomous driving for risk-aware plan- ning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07686, 2025. 7, 8

    2025

  37. [45]

    V2x-dgw: Domain generalization for multi-agent perception under ad- verse weather conditions

    Baolu Li, Jinlong Li, Xinyu Liu, Runsheng Xu, Zhengzhong Tu, Jiacheng Guo, Xiaopeng Li, and Hongkai Yu. V2x-dgw: Domain generalization for multi-agent perception under ad- verse weather conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11371,

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Coarse-to-fine: A dual-phase channel- adaptive method for wireless image transmission

    Hanlei Li, Guangyi Zhang, Kequan Zhou, Yunlong Cai, and Guanding Yu. Coarse-to-fine: A dual-phase channel- adaptive method for wireless image transmission. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08211, 2024. 6

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Efficient collaborative perception with integrated un- certainty estimation via evidence regression

    Wei Li, Lin Ma, Haoze Chang, Xiangyun He, and Longteng Huang. Efficient collaborative perception with integrated un- certainty estimation via evidence regression. IEEE Transac- tions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025. 8

    2025

  40. [48]

    Di-v2x: Learning domain- 10 invariant representation for vehicle-infrastructure collabora- tive 3d object detection

    Xiang Li, Junbo Yin, Wei Li, Chengzhong Xu, Ruigang Yang, and Jianbing Shen. Di-v2x: Learning domain- 10 invariant representation for vehicle-infrastructure collabora- tive 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence, pages 3208–3215...

    2024

  41. [49]

    V2x-sim: Multi-agent col- laborative perception dataset and benchmark for autonomous driving

    Yiming Li, Dekun Ma, Ziyan An, Zixun Wang, Yiqi Zhong, Siheng Chen, and Chen Feng. V2x-sim: Multi-agent col- laborative perception dataset and benchmark for autonomous driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(4):10914– 10921, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  42. [50]

    A full-scale hierarchical encoder-decoder network with cascading edge-prior for infrared and visible image fusion

    Xiaoqing Luo, Juan Wang, Zhancheng Zhang, and Xiao-jun Wu. A full-scale hierarchical encoder-decoder network with cascading edge-prior for infrared and visible image fusion. Pattern Recognition, 148:110192, 2024. 6

    2024

  43. [51]

    V2x-unipool: Unifying multimodal perception and knowl- edge reasoning for autonomous driving

    Xuewen Luo, Fengze Yang, Fan Ding, Xiangbo Gao, Shuo Xing, Yang Zhou, Zhengzhong Tu, and Chenxi Liu. V2x-unipool: Unifying multimodal perception and knowl- edge reasoning for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02580, 2025. 8

    2025

  44. [52]

    Class-specific feature selection using fuzzy information- theoretic metrics

    Xi-Ao Ma, Hao Xu, Yi Liu, and Justin Zuopeng Zhang. Class-specific feature selection using fuzzy information- theoretic metrics. Engineering Applications of Artificial In- telligence, 136:109035, 2024. 6

    2024

  45. [53]

    Collective percep- tion messages: New low complexity fusion and v2x con- nectivity analysis

    Nadia Mouawad and Val ´erian Mannoni. Collective percep- tion messages: New low complexity fusion and v2x con- nectivity analysis. In 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2021. 5

    2021

  46. [54]

    Vlp: Vision language planning for autonomous driving

    Chenbin Pan, Burhaneddin Yaman, Tommaso Nesti, Abhirup Mallik, Alessandro G Allievi, Senem Velipasalar, and Liu Ren. Vlp: Vision language planning for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14760–14769, 2024. 1

    2024

  47. [55]

    Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies

    Songyou Peng, Kyle Genova, Chiyu Jiang, Andrea Tagliasacchi, Marc Pollefeys, Thomas Funkhouser, et al. Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 815–824, 2023. 2

    2023

  48. [56]

    Interruption- aware cooperative perception for v2x communication-aided autonomous driving

    Shunli Ren, Zixing Lei, Zi Wang, Mehrdad Dianati, Yafei Wang, Siheng Chen, and Wenjun Zhang. Interruption- aware cooperative perception for v2x communication-aided autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehi- cles, 9(4):4698–4714, 2024. 5

    2024

  49. [57]

    First mile: An open inno- vation lab for infrastructure-assisted cooperative intelligent transportation systems

    Rui Song, Andreas Festag, Abhishek Dinkar Jagtap, Maxim- ilian Bialdyga, Zhiran Yan, Maximilian Otte, Sanath Tiptur Sadashivaiah, and Alois Knoll. First mile: An open inno- vation lab for infrastructure-assisted cooperative intelligent transportation systems. In 2024 IEEE Inte...

    2024

  50. [58]

    Col- laborative semantic occupancy prediction with hybrid fea- ture fusion in connected automated vehicles

    Rui Song, Chenwei Liang, Hu Cao, Zhiran Yan, Walter Zim- mer, Markus Gross, Andreas Festag, and Alois Knoll. Col- laborative semantic occupancy prediction with hybrid fea- ture fusion in connected automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision...

    2024

  51. [59]

    A systematic literature review of vehicular connectivity and v2x communications: Technical aspects and new chal- lenges

    Alireza Souri, Mani Zarei, Atefeh Hemmati, and Mingliang Gao. A systematic literature review of vehicular connectivity and v2x communications: Technical aspects and new chal- lenges. International Journal of Communication Systems , 37(10):e5780, 2024. 6

    2024

  52. [60]

    Sae j2735 standard: applying the systems engineering process

    Roy Sumner, Bruce Eisenhart, John Baker, et al. Sae j2735 standard: applying the systems engineering process. Techni- cal report, United States. Department of Transportation. In- telligent Transportation . . . , 2013. 8

    2013

  53. [61]

    Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset

    Pei Sun, Henrik Kretzschmar, Xerxes Dotiwalla, Aurelien Chouard, Vijaysai Patnaik, Paul Tsui, James Guo, Yin Zhou, Yuning Chai, Benjamin Caine, et al. Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer ...

    2020

  54. [62]

    Dy- namic v2x perception from road-to-vehicle vision

    Jiayao Tan, Fan Lyu, Linyan Li, Fuyuan Hu, Tingliang Feng, Fenglei Xu, Zhang Zhang, Rui Yao, and Liang Wang. Dy- namic v2x perception from road-to-vehicle vision. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024. 6

    2024

  55. [63]

    A comprehensive overview of the protocols associated with intelligent transportation systems

    Jonas V ogt. A comprehensive overview of the protocols associated with intelligent transportation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12799, 2024. 8

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Griffin: Aerial-ground cooperative detection and tracking dataset and benchmark

    Jiahao Wang, Xiangyu Cao, Jiaru Zhong, Yuner Zhang, Haibao Yu, Lei He, and Shaobing Xu. Griffin: Aerial-ground cooperative detection and tracking dataset and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06983, 2025. 2, 6

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    V2x-dgpe: Addressing domain gaps and pose errors for robust collaborative 3d object detection

    Sichao Wang, Ming Yuan, Chuang Zhang, Lei He, Qing Xu, and Jianqiang Wang. V2x-dgpe: Addressing domain gaps and pose errors for robust collaborative 3d object detection. In 2025 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) , pages 2074–2080. IEEE, 2025. 6

    2025

  58. [66]

    Driving into the future: Multiview visual forecasting and planning with world model for au- tonomous driving

    Yuqi Wang, Jiawei He, Lue Fan, Hongxin Li, Yuntao Chen, and Zhaoxiang Zhang. Driving into the future: Multiview visual forecasting and planning with world model for au- tonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pa...

    2024

  59. [67]

    Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, integrated technolo- gies, and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21583,

    Yixian Wang, Geng Sun, Zemin Sun, Jiacheng Wang, Ji- ahui Li, Changyuan Zhao, Jing Wu, Shuang Liang, Minghao Yin, Pengfei Wang, et al. Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, integrated technolo- gies, and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:...

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Generative ai for autonomous driving: Frontiers and opportunities

    Yuping Wang, Shuo Xing, Cui Can, Renjie Li, Hongyuan Hua, Kexin Tian, Zhaobin Mo, Xiangbo Gao, Keshu Wu, Sulong Zhou, et al. Generative ai for autonomous driving: Frontiers and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08854, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Coopdetr: A unified cooperative perception framework for 3d detection via object query

    Zhe Wang, Shaocong Xu, Xucai Zhuang, Tongda Xu, Yan Wang, Jingjing Liu, Yilun Chen, and Ya-Qin Zhang. Coopdetr: A unified cooperative perception framework for 3d detection via object query. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19313, 2025. 4

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hecofuse: Cross-modal complemen- tary v2x cooperative perception with heterogeneous sensors

    Chuheng Wei, Ziye Qin, Walter Zimmer, Guoyuan Wu, and Matthew J Barth. Hecofuse: Cross-modal complemen- tary v2x cooperative perception with heterogeneous sensors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13677, 2025. 6

    2025

  63. [71]

    V2x-llm: Enhancing v2x integration and un- derstanding in connected vehicle corridors

    Keshu Wu, Pei Li, Yang Zhou, Rui Gan, Junwei You, Yang Cheng, Jingwen Zhu, Steven T Parker, Bin Ran, David A Noyce, et al. V2x-llm: Enhancing v2x integration and un- derstanding in connected vehicle corridors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02239, 2025. 8 11

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    One is plenty: A polymorphic feature interpreter for im- mutable heterogeneous collaborative perception

    Yuchen Xia, Quan Yuan, Guiyang Luo, Xiaoyuan Fu, Yang Li, Xuanhan Zhu, Tianyou Luo, Siheng Chen, and Jinglin Li. One is plenty: A polymorphic feature interpreter for im- mutable heterogeneous collaborative perception. InProceed- ings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognit...

    2025

  65. [73]

    V2x-real: a largs-scale dataset for vehicle-to- everything cooperative perception

    Hao Xiang, Zhaoliang Zheng, Xin Xia, Runsheng Xu, Letian Gao, Zewei Zhou, Xu Han, Xinkai Ji, Mingxi Li, Zonglin Meng, et al. V2x-real: a largs-scale dataset for vehicle-to- everything cooperative perception. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 455–470. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  66. [74]

    V2x-realo: An open online framework and dataset for cooperative perception in reality

    Hao Xiang, Zhaoliang Zheng, Xin Xia, Seth Z Zhao, Letian Gao, Zewei Zhou, Tianhui Cai, Yun Zhang, and Jiaqi Ma. V2x-realo: An open online framework and dataset for cooperative perception in reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10034, 2025. 5

    2025 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Autotrust: Benchmark- ing trustworthiness in large vision language models for au- tonomous driving

    Shuo Xing, Hongyuan Hua, Xiangbo Gao, Shenzhe Zhu, Renjie Li, Kexin Tian, Xiaopeng Li, Heng Huang, Tian- bao Yang, Zhangyang Wang, et al. Autotrust: Benchmark- ing trustworthiness in large vision language models for au- tonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15206, 2024. 8

    2024

  68. [76]

    Delay-aware cooperative perception with deep reinforce- ment learning in vehicular networks

    Fan Xu, Chen Chen, Haifeng Zheng, and Xinxin Feng. Delay-aware cooperative perception with deep reinforce- ment learning in vehicular networks. In 2024 9th Interna- tional Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS), pages 980–985. IEEE, 2024. 6

    2024

  69. [77]

    V2x-vit: Vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception with vision transformer

    Runsheng Xu, Hao Xiang, Zhengzhong Tu, Xin Xia, Ming- Hsuan Yang, and Jiaqi Ma. V2x-vit: Vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception with vision transformer. InEuropean conference on computer vision , pages 107–124. Springer,

  70. [78]

    V2v4real: A real-world large-scale dataset for vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative perception

    Runsheng Xu, Xin Xia, Jinlong Li, Hanzhao Li, Shuo Zhang, Zhengzhong Tu, Zonglin Meng, Hao Xiang, Xiaoyu Dong, Rui Song, et al. V2v4real: A real-world large-scale dataset for vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative perception. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vis...

    2023

  71. [79]

    V2x-vitv2: Improved vision transformers for vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception

    Runsheng Xu, Chia-Ju Chen, Zhengzhong Tu, and Ming- Hsuan Yang. V2x-vitv2: Improved vision transformers for vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception. IEEE Trans- actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 47(1): 650–662, 2025. 1

    2025

  72. [80]

    Cooperative sensing and heterogeneous information fusion in vcps: A multi-agent deep reinforce- ment learning approach

    Xincao Xu, Kai Liu, Penglin Dai, Ruitao Xie, Jingjing Cao, and Jiangtao Luo. Cooperative sensing and heterogeneous information fusion in vcps: A multi-agent deep reinforce- ment learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(6):4876–4891, 2023. 1

    2023

  73. [81]

    Au- tonomous driving under v2x environment: state-of-the-art survey and challenges

    Xun Yang, Yunyang Shi, Jiping Xing, and Zhiyuan Liu. Au- tonomous driving under v2x environment: state-of-the-art survey and challenges. Intelligent Transportation Infrastruc- ture, 1:liac020, 2022. 1

    2022

  74. [82]

    V2iviewer: Towards efficient collaborative perception via point cloud data fusion and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications

    Sheng Yi, Hao Zhang, and Kai Liu. V2iviewer: Towards efficient collaborative perception via point cloud data fusion and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications. IEEE Trans- actions on Network Science and Engineering , 11(6):6219– 6230, 2024. 1, 8

    2024

  75. [83]

    V2x-vlm: End-to-end v2x cooperative autonomous driv- ing through large vision-language models

    Junwei You, Haotian Shi, Zhuoyu Jiang, Zilin Huang, Rui Gan, Keshu Wu, Xi Cheng, Xiaopeng Li, and Bin Ran. V2x-vlm: End-to-end v2x cooperative autonomous driv- ing through large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09251, 2024. 5, 6

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Dair-v2x: A large-scale dataset for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection

    Haibao Yu, Yizhen Luo, Mao Shu, Yiyi Huo, Zebang Yang, Yifeng Shi, Zhenglong Guo, Hanyu Li, Xing Hu, Jirui Yuan, et al. Dair-v2x: A large-scale dataset for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision a...

    2022

  77. [85]

    Flow-based feature fusion for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection

    Haibao Yu, Yingjuan Tang, Enze Xie, Jilei Mao, Ping Luo, and Zaiqing Nie. Flow-based feature fusion for vehicle- infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:34493–34503,

  78. [86]

    V2x-seq: A large-scale sequential dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception and forecast- ing

    Haibao Yu, Wenxian Yang, Hongzhi Ruan, Zhenwei Yang, Yingjuan Tang, Xu Gao, Xin Hao, Yifeng Shi, Yifeng Pan, Ning Sun, et al. V2x-seq: A large-scale sequential dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception and forecast- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conferenc...

  79. [87]

    End-to-end autonomous driving through v2x cooperation

    Haibao Yu, Wenxian Yang, Jiaru Zhong, Zhenwei Yang, Siqi Fan, Ping Luo, and Zaiqing Nie. End-to-end autonomous driving through v2x cooperation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 9598– 9606, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8

    2025

  80. [88]

    Vehicle- to-everything (v2x) in the autonomous vehicles domain–a technical review of communication, sensor, and ai technolo- gies for road user safety

    Syed Adnan Yusuf, Arshad Khan, and Riad Souissi. Vehicle- to-everything (v2x) in the autonomous vehicles domain–a technical review of communication, sensor, and ai technolo- gies for road user safety. Transportation Research Interdis- ciplinary Perspectives, 23:100980, 2024. 1

    2024

  81. [89]

    Heterogeneous multi- scale cooperative perception for connected autonomous ve- hicles via v2x interaction

    Yuanyuan Zha, Wei Shangguan, Junjie Chen, Linguo Chai, Weizhi Qiu, and Antonio M L ´opez. Heterogeneous multi- scale cooperative perception for connected autonomous ve- hicles via v2x interaction. IEEE Internet of Things Journal,

  82. [90]

    Remote driving of road vehicles: A survey of driving feed- back, latency, support control, and real applications

    Lin Zhao, Mikael Nybacka, Maytheewat Aramrattana, Malte Rothh¨amel, Azra Habibovic, Lars Drugge, and Frank Jiang. Remote driving of road vehicles: A survey of driving feed- back, latency, support control, and real applications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024. 5

    2024

  83. [91]

    Coopre: Cooperative pretraining for v2x coop- erative perception

    Seth Z Zhao, Hao Xiang, Chenfeng Xu, Xin Xia, Bolei Zhou, and Jiaqi Ma. Coopre: Cooperative pretraining for v2x coop- erative perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11241, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Leveraging temporal con- texts to enhance vehicle-infrastructure cooperative percep- tion

    Jiaru Zhong, Haibao Yu, Tianyi Zhu, Jiahui Xu, Wenxian Yang, Zaiqing Nie, and Chao Sun. Leveraging temporal con- texts to enhance vehicle-infrastructure cooperative percep- tion. In 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelli- gent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 9...

    2024

  85. [93]

    Cooptrack: Exploring end-to-end learn- ing for efficient cooperative sequential perception

    Jiaru Zhong, Jiahao Wang, Jiahui Xu, Xiaofan Li, Zaiqing Nie, and Haibao Yu. Cooptrack: Exploring end-to-end learn- ing for efficient cooperative sequential perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19239, 2025. 4 12

    2025 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Tum- traf v2x cooperative perception dataset

    Walter Zimmer, Gerhard Arya Wardana, Suren Sritharan, Xingcheng Zhou, Rui Song, and Alois C Knoll. Tum- traf v2x cooperative perception dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22668–22677, 2024. 2, 3 13

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.