Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 43 references

SMASH: Results from hadronic transport for heavy-ion collisions at high densities

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the SMASH hadronic transport approach is a validated multi-purpose framework for heavy-ion collisions across beam energies from about 2.4 to 200 GeV per nucleon pair.

desk verdict A clear, self-aware mini-review of SMASH with no new results; worth a referee, but cite the original papers for physics claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21477 v1 pith:73CQWYKD submitted 2025-08-29 nucl-th nucl-ex

Hannah Elfner , Renan Góes-Hirayama This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thnucl-ex PACS 25.75.-q25.70.-z24.10.Lx
keywords SMASHhadronictransportheavy-ioncollisionsequationofstatecollectiveflowdileptonslightnucleicriticalfluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SMASH is a hadronic transport approach that follows more than 150 vacuum hadron species through heavy-ion collisions, and this mini-review argues that it has matured into a validated, multi-purpose tool for the entire energy range from low beam energies up to the top of the beam energy scan. The evidence presented covers collective flow, production of light nuclei, dilepton emission, and the fate of critical fluctuations, and the paper draws on these comparisons to extract equation-of-state parameters such as incompressibility and symmetry energy, as well as the shear and bulk viscosities of the produced matter. A sympathetic reader would care because these are bulk properties of dense matter that cannot be measured directly—SMASH is the dynamical link between the observed final-state particles and the underlying physics. If the framework is right, it gives the community a reproducible, extensible model for interpreting the next generation of heavy-ion experiments, including the low-energy collisions that probe conditions relevant to neutron-star mergers.

What carries the argument

The central object is SMASH itself: a hadronic transport code that propagates more than 150 vacuum hadronic species using a Lorentz-covariant geometric collision criterion, resonance excitation and decay at low energies, a string picture at high energies, and optional non-relativistic mean-field potentials (Skyrme, symmetry, Coulomb) evaluated from test particles. Multi-particle stochastic reactions and coalescence produce deuterons, tritons, helium-3, and hypertritons. The load-bearing mechanism is the transport equation itself, tracking every hadron through a dense fireball, supplemented at high energies by coupling to a 3+1-dimensional viscous hydrodynamic evolution and back to a SMASH af

What would settle it

Measure the rho dilepton peak in central heavy-ion collisions near sqrt(s_NN) ~ 3.5 GeV with enough statistics to extract the in-medium width; if the width does not follow SMASH's quasi-universal density-dependent curve within model uncertainties, the resonance-lifetime treatment and the equation-of-state constraints built on it are wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that one microscopic description can hold together a broad set of otherwise separate heavy-ion phenomena. SMASH's vacuum hadronic dynamics, with resonance excitation and decay at low energies and string fragmentation at high energies, reproduces measured yield ratios of protons, deuterons, tritons, and helium-3 when light clusters are produced either by coalescence or by stochastic multi-particle reactions. The review shows that mean-field potentials tuned to measured collective flow constrain the nuclear equation of state, that net-proton cumulants seeded with Ising critical fluctuations can survive the hadronic stage for sufficiently stron

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that dense matter can be treated as a gas of vacuum hadrons with non-relativistic mean fields and adjustable in-medium resonance widths; if quarks and gluons become the relevant degrees of freedom at these densities, the inferred equation-of-state and viscosity values would be model artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The calibrated framework can serve as an event generator for the low-energy beam energy scan, giving baseline predictions for flow, cluster yields, and dilepton spectra that future experiments can test out of the box.
  • The Bayesian posteriors for incompressibility and symmetry energy provide quantitative prior information on the density dependence of the nuclear equation of state, which can be exported to neutron-star structure calculations.
  • The quasi-universal density-dependent effective width of vector mesons supplies a simple, transferable parametrization for in-medium resonance properties in other dynamic descriptions.
  • The reported survival of critical fluctuations at large coupling keeps higher-order net-proton cumulants viable as observables in the search for the critical endpoint.
  • The dynamically initialized hybrid approach offers a way to model the gradual transition from a dilute hadron gas to a hydrodynamic fluid in collisions where the two stages overlap in time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unexpectedly high incompressibility holds up under systematic checks, a simple density-dependent potential is likely insufficient, and momentum-dependent and many-body forces will need to carry more of the equation-of-state burden than they do in most transport models.
  • The idealized spherical-expansion study of critical fluctuations could be rerun inside a full hybrid collision with realistic geometry; if the signal washes out there, the pessimistic scenario becomes the relevant one for the beam energy scan.
  • The universal broadening curve for the rho meson implies a testable scaling for other vector mesons and possibly for baryons; measuring omega broadening in small systems would show whether the universality extends outside the dense-fireball regime.
  • Dynamic fluidization changes what 'initial time' means in hybrid models; comparing bulk-flow observables at intermediate beam energies between fixed-time and dynamical initialization would isolate the effect of pre-equilibrium dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This mini-review, authored by two SMASH developers, surveys the current state of the SMASH hadronic transport approach. It describes the model's general setup (degrees of freedom, cross sections, resonance properties, software structure), cluster production mechanisms (coalescence, a fictitious d' resonance, and stochastic multi-particle reactions), constraints on the nuclear equation of state from Bayesian analyses of HADES flow data, the fate of critical fluctuations during hadronic rescattering, dilepton emission and resonance broadening, and the SMASH-vHLLE hybrid approach with Bayesian extraction of transport coefficients. No new derivations or calculations are presented; the paper is a summary of previously published results, mostly from the same group. The central claim is that SMASH is a mature, multi-purpose, reproducible tool for low-to-intermediate energy heavy-ion collisions, particularly in the energy range relevant for FAIR-CBM.

Significance. If the summarized results are taken at face value, the paper is a useful and readable entry point to a widely used transport code. It documents concrete advances: public release with unit tests and analysis suites, systematic resonance-parameter tuning, cluster production mechanisms, EoS constraints from flow, critical-fluctuation survival studies, electromagnetic probes, and hybrid initialization. The manuscript explicitly flags some limitations, including the pessimistic scenario for critical fluctuations and the unexpectedly high incompressibility. However, the evidence base is almost entirely the authors' own publications, and no independent third-party benchmark is reported. This limits the strength of the 'well suited' validation claim, though it does not undermine the usefulness of the survey as a status report.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3 / Fig. 3] The Bayesian EoS constraint is presented as a headline result, but it is conditional on a specific non-relativistic Skyrme ansatz with the momentum dependence fixed and only kappa and the symmetry energy varied. The paper itself states that 'The unexpectedly high incompressibility points to the necessity of considering a more involved density dependence of the potential.' This is a sign of an over-restrictive parametrization: if the functional form cannot span the true density dependence, the posterior (Fig. 3, left) is a property of the ansatz rather than of the matter. The following sentence claiming consistency with astrophysical and chiral-EFT constraints is therefore too strong. Please soften the claim to 'consistent within this Skyrme ansatz' or add a short sensitivity discussion (e.g., varying the density dependence, or using the model-comparison results in [22,23]), and carry thi
  2. [Section 3, first paragraph; general] The manuscript cites the transport-model comparison effort [22] and names JAM, PHSD, and UrQMD in the Introduction, but it never states whether SMASH participated in [22] or how its flow/EoS results compare with those independent codes. Without an independent benchmark, the summary claim that SMASH is 'well suited' rests entirely on the authors' own previous analyses. For a review article, a paragraph describing the outcome of any SMASH participation in [22], or an explicit statement that only internal consistency with HADES/FOPI data is demonstrated, would materially strengthen the validation claim and help the reader place SMASH in the landscape.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1] Typo: 'Obvioulsy' should read 'Obviously'.
  2. [Author affiliations] The affiliation text 'Heavy-in physics' should read 'Heavy-ion physics'.
  3. [Section 4 / Fig. 7] The notation 'vee2' is not standard; please use math notation such as v_2^{ee} in the text and captions.
  4. [Fig. 2] The axis labels '1v' and '2v' appear truncated; they should be typeset as v_1 and v_2.
  5. [Fig. 3] The caption legend 'Huth' should be expanded to refer to reference [26], and 'This work' should be labeled 'this work [24]' for clarity.
  6. [Section 2.1] The statement that the hybrid model yield ratios 'agree rather well' with experiment could be quantified (e.g., by providing chi^2 or uncertainty bands) to strengthen the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper is a review of prior work with external data benchmarks.

full rationale

This mini-review summarizes previously published SMASH results and does not present new derivations or predictions that reduce to their inputs. The Bayesian analyses in Secs. 3 and 5 explicitly fit parameters (incompressibility, symmetry energy, shear/bulk viscosity) to experimental flow and bulk observables; these are presented as constraints/extractions, not as predictions. The comparisons to FOPI, HADES, and STAR data provide external, falsifiable benchmarks. The self-citations refer to the original papers where the results were established, and they are not used as unverified authority; the code is publicly available and the underlying comparisons are to experimental data. The acknowledged limitation about the Skyrme density dependence ('The unexpectedly high incompressibility points to the necessity of considering a more involved density dependence of the potential') is an honest statement of model dependence, not a circular step. No equation or fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no circularity is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The review itself fits nothing; this ledger records the model ingredients and fitted quantities from the cited SMASH analyses that the highlighted results rest on. The free parameters are posteriors or tunings from earlier papers, and the axioms are the core modeling choices of the transport and hybrid frameworks.

free parameters (6)
  • Incompressibility (kappa) = Posterior from Bayesian analysis; not stated numerically in this review (Fig. 3)
    Free parameter in the SMASH-to-HADES flow analysis; its posterior is used to constrain the nuclear EoS.
  • Symmetry energy parameter = Posterior from Bayesian analysis; not stated numerically in this review (Fig. 3)
    Free parameter in the same Bayesian fit; relevant for neutron star matter extrapolation.
  • Resonance properties and branching ratios = Adjusted by genetic algorithm to exclusive cross-section data
    Parameters of resonances relevant for strangeness production are tuned in [15] and then used in SMASH.
  • Shear viscosity over entropy density (eta/s) = Posterior distribution as function of T and mu_B (Fig. 9)
    Extracted from Bayesian analysis of the SMASH-vHLLE hybrid against RHIC beam energy scan data.
  • Bulk viscosity over entropy density (zeta/s) = Posterior distribution as function of T (Fig. 9)
    Extracted in the same Bayesian analysis.
  • Coupling constant of the critical mode = Varied; larger but still reasonable values needed for signal survival
    Controls the strength of critical fluctuations injected in the hadron gas in [28].
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Hadronic transport based on vacuum hadronic degrees of freedom is an adequate framework for the studied energy range
    Section 2 states SMASH is based on vacuum degrees of freedom; if dense matter requires deconfined or off-shell degrees of freedom, the extracted constraints are compromised.
  • domain assumption Cross-sections follow experimental data or additive quark model extrapolations
    Section 2 describes the cross-section input; the reliability of transport results depends on these external cross-sections.
  • domain assumption The Lorentz covariant geometric collision criterion is a valid way to select collision partners
    Section 2 says this criterion is used by default; it affects all subsequent collision rates.
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic Skyrme, symmetry, and electromagnetic mean-field potentials apply at low beam energies
    Section 3 explicitly limits the mean-field prescription to low beam energies; if violated, the flow constraints and EoS posteriors are not reliable.
  • domain assumption Light nuclei production is captured by coalescence or stochastic multiparticle reactions
    Section 2.1 describes these mechanisms; the cluster yield ratios and EoS comparisons assume they include the dominant physics.
  • ad hoc to paper A hadron gas with Ising-model critical fluctuations can represent the QCD critical endpoint if it exists
    Section 3.1 uses this enhancement; the paper itself calls the scenario pessimistic and notes caveats in mapping equilibrium theory to dynamical reactions.
  • ad hoc to paper A fluidized core plus corona decomposition is valid at low beam energies
    Section 5 describes dynamical fluidization based on local energy density; the outlook depends on this model ansatz.
invented entities (2)
  • Fictitious d' resonance for deuteron production
    purpose: Acts as an intermediate state in deuteron formation in the transport code
    Described in Section 2.1 with references [17,18]; no independent experimental evidence for this resonance is provided.
  • Critical mode (Ising-model field) coupled to net baryon density
    purpose: Seeds critical fluctuations that may survive hadronic rescattering
    Used in Section 3.1 as a model input; no direct experimental detection is claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SMASH: Results from hadronic transport for heavy-ion collisions at high densities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/73CQWYKD

@misc{pith2026250821477,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SMASH: Results from hadronic transport for heavy-ion collisions at high densities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/73CQWYKD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21477}
}
read the original abstract

This mini-review summarizes the general setup and some highlight results from the hadronic transport approach SMASH (Simulating Many Accelerated Strongly-interacting Hadrons). We start by laying out the software development structures as well as the particle properties and how they are determined by elementary collisions. The different ways to produce light clusters in SMASH, either by coalescence or dynamic multi-particle reactions, are explained. The constraints on nuclear mean fields and the corresponding equation of state from collective flow observables are discussed. In addition, we show how fluctuations associated with a potential critical endpoint survive through the hadronic rescattering stage. Besides hadronic observables, electromagnetic probes offer nice possibilities to study the properties of matter. We present results on collisional broadening of resonances and elliptic flow of dileptons. Last but not least, we review how SMASH can be employed as part of a hybrid approach including a Bayesian analysis for transport coefficients as a function of temperature and chemical potential. We end with an outlook how the hybrid approach has been recently extended to lower collision energies by dynamical fluidization initial conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Wolter, H., et al.: Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103962 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962 arXiv:2202.06672 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    https://indico.cern.ch/event/1334113/contributions/6209753/attachments/ 3050090/5390673/QM2025 Rennecke.pdf

    Rennecke, F.: QCD Phase Diagram and Equation of State: A Functional Perspec- tive. https://indico.cern.ch/event/1334113/contributions/6209753/attachments/ 3050090/5390673/QM2025 Rennecke.pdf

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    Precision Measurement of (Net-)proton Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Colli- sions at RHIC (2025) arXiv:2504.00817 [nucl-ex] 10

    arXiv 2025

  4. [3]

    Petersen, H.: Anisotropic flow in transport + hydrodynamics hybrid approaches. J. Phys. G 41(12), 124005 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/41/12/ 124005 arXiv:1404.1763 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [4]

    Schenke, B., Shen, C., Tribedy, P.: Running the gamut of high energy nuclear col- lisions. Phys. Rev. C 102(4), 044905 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 102.044905 arXiv:2005.14682 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    Everett, D., et al.: Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter. Phys. Rev. C 103(5), 054904 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.103.054904 arXiv:2011.01430 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Nijs, G., Schee, W., G¨ ursoy, U., Snellings, R.: Bayesian analysis of heavy ion collisions with the heavy ion computational framework Trajectum. Phys. Rev. C 103(5), 054909 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054909 arXiv:2010.15134 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Nara, Y., Otuka, N., Ohnishi, A., Niita, K., Chiba, S.: Study of relativistic nuclear collisions at AGS energies from p + Be to Au + Au with hadronic cascade model. Phys. Rev. C 61, 024901 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.024901 arXiv:nucl-th/9904059

    arXiv 2000

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    Cassing, W., Bratkovskaya, E.L.: Parton-Hadron-String Dynamics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies. Nucl. Phys. A 831, 215–242 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.09.007 arXiv:0907.5331 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [9]

    : Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion colli- sions

    Bass, S.A., et al. : Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion colli- sions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255–369 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0146-6410(98)00058-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

    1998 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Bleicher, M., et al.: Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G 25, 1859–1896 (1999) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    1999 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Weil, J., et al.: Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 94(5), 054905 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054905 arXiv:1606.06642 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Mohs, J., Ryu, S., Elfner, H.: Particle Production via Strings and Baryon Stopping within a Hadronic Transport Approach. J. Phys. G 47(6), 065101 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab7bd1 arXiv:1909.05586 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    San Martin, J.S., Hirayama, R., Hammelmann, J., Karthein, J.M., Parotto, P., Noronha-Hostler, J., Ratti, C., Elfner, H.: Thermodynamics of an updated hadronic resonance list and influence on hadronic transport (2023) arXiv:2309.01737 [nucl-th] 11

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Sciarra, A., Elfner, H.: SMASH as an event generator for heavy-ion collisions. Front. in Phys. 12, 1502621 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1502621 arXiv:2409.20024 [nucl-th]

    2024

  8. [15]

    Rosenkvist, C.B., Elfner, H.: Systematic optimization of resonance parameters in a transport approach (2025) arXiv:2503.05504 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Mohs, J., Ege, M., Elfner, H., Mayer, M.: Collective flow at SIS energies within a hadronic transport approach: Influence of light nuclei formation and equation of state. Phys. Rev. C 105(3), 034906 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 105.034906 arXiv:2012.11454 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Oliinychenko, D., Shen, C., Koch, V.: Deuteron production in AuAu collisions at √sN N =7–200 GeV via pion catalysis. Phys. Rev. C 103(3), 034913 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034913 arXiv:2009.01915 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Oliinychenko, D., Pang, L.-G., Elfner, H., Koch, V.: Microscopic study of deuteron production in PbPb collisions at √s = 2 .76T eV via hydrodynamics and a hadronic afterburner. Phys. Rev. C 99(4), 044907 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.99.044907 arXiv:1809.03071 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Staudenmaier, J., Oliinychenko, D., Torres-Rincon, J.M., Elfner, H.: Deuteron production in relativistic heavy ion collisions via stochastic multiparticle reac- tions. Phys. Rev. C 104(3), 034908 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 104.034908 arXiv:2106.14287 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Abdulhamid, M., et al.: Beam Energy Dependence of Triton Production and Yield Ratio (Nt × Np/N2 d) in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 202301 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.202301 arXiv:2209.08058 [nucl- ex]

    2023

  14. [21]

    Ege, M., Mohs, J., Staudenmaier, J., Elfner, H.: Deuteron, triton, helium-3 and hypertriton production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions via stochastic multi- particle reactions (2024) arXiv:2409.04209 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Reisdorf, W., Aichelin, J., Hartnack, C.: Constrain- ing the nuclear matter equation of state around twice saturation density. Nucl. Phys. A 945, 112–133 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.09.015 arXiv:1501.05246 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Mohs, J., Spies, S., Elfner, H.: Constraints on the Equation of State of Nuclear Matter from Systematically Comparing SMASH Calculations to HADES Data (2024) arXiv:2409.16927 [nucl-th] 12

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tarasoviˇ cov´ a, L.A., Mohs, J., Andronic, A., Elfner, H., Kampert, K.-H.: Flow and equation of state of nuclear matter at Ekin/A = 0.25 − 1.5 GeV with the SMASH transport approach. Eur. Phys. J. A 60(11), 232 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/s10050-024-01445-w arXiv:2405...

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    : Constraining Neutron-Star Matter with Microscopic and Macroscopic Collisions

    Huth, S., et al. : Constraining Neutron-Star Matter with Microscopic and Macroscopic Collisions. Nature 606, 276–280 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04750-w arXiv:2107.06229 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bzdak, A., Esumi, S., Koch, V., Liao, J., Stephanov, M., Xu, N.: Map- ping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan. Phys. Rept. 853, 1–87 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005 arXiv:1906.00936 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hammelmann, J., Bluhm, M., Nahrgang, M., Elfner, H.: Fate of critical fluctu- ations in an interacting hadronic medium using maximum-entropy distributions. Phys. Rev. C 110(5), 054910 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110. 054910 arXiv:2310.06636 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Seck, F., Galatyuk, T., Mukherjee, A., Rapp, R., Steinheimer, J., Stroth, J., Wiest, M.: Dilepton signature of a first-order phase transition. Phys. Rev. C 106(1), 014904 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.014904 arXiv:2010.04614 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Staudenmaier, J., Weil, J., Steinberg, V., Endres, S., Petersen, H.: Dilepton pro- duction and resonance properties within a new hadronic transport approach in the context of the GSI-HADES experimental data. Phys. Rev. C 98(5), 054908 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98...

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    G´ oes-Hirayama, R., Elfner, H.: Distinguishing the sources of dielectron anisotropic flow at low beam energies. Phys. Rev. C 110(6), 064903 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.064903 arXiv:2408.16603 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Reichert, T., Savchuk, O., Kittiratpattana, A., Li, P., Steinheimer, J., Gorenstein, M., Bleicher, M.: Decoding the flow evolution in Au+Au reactions at 1.23A GeV using hadron flow correlations and dileptons. Phys. Lett. B 841, 137947 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb....

    2023

  25. [33]

    PoS HardProbes2023, 072 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.438

    Schild, N.: Characterising the hot and dense fireball with virtual photons at HADES. PoS HardProbes2023, 072 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.438. 0072

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Hirayama, R., Staudenmaier, J., Elfner, H.: Effective spectral function of vector mesons via lifetime analysis. Phys. Rev. C 107(2), 025208 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.025208 arXiv:2206.15166 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Buss, O., Gaitanos, T., Gallmeister, K., Hees, H., Kaskulov, M., Lalakulich, O., 13 Larionov, A.B., Leitner, T., Weil, J., Mosel, U.: Transport-theoretical Description of Nuclear Reactions. Phys. Rept. 512, 1–124 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2011.12.001 arXiv:1106...

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bratkovskaya, E.L., Cassing, W.: Dilepton production and off-shell transport dynamics at SIS energies. Nucl. Phys. A 807, 214–250 (2008) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.04.004 arXiv:0712.0635 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Sch¨ afer, A., Karpenko, I., Wu, X.-Y., Hammelmann, J., Elfner, H.: Particle pro- duction in a hybrid approach for a beam energy scan of Au+Au/Pb+Pb collisions between √sNN = 4.3 GeV and √sNN = 200.0 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A 58(11), 230 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-0...

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15880337

    Sciarra, A., Sch¨ afer, A., Sattler, R., Saß, N., Paulinyova, Z., Inghirami, G., Hammelmann, J., G¨ otz, N., G´ oes-Hirayama, R.: Smash-transport/smash-vhlle- hybrid: Hybrid-handler 2.1.3. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15880337 . https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15880337

    doi

  31. [39]

    G¨ otz, N., Karpenko, I., Elfner, H.: Bayesian analysis of a (3+1)D hybrid approach with initial conditions from hadronic transport (2025) arXiv:2503.10181 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    G¨ otz, N., Elfner, H.: Temperature and net baryochemical potential dependence of η/s in a hybrid approach. Phys. Rev. C 106(5), 054904 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054904 arXiv:2207.05778 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jahan, S.A., Roch, H., Shen, C.: Bayesian analysis of (3+1)D relativistic nuclear dynamics with the RHIC beam energy scan data. Phys. Rev. C 110(5), 054905 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054905 arXiv:2408.00537 [nucl-th]

    2024

  34. [42]

    G´ oes-Hirayama, R., Egger, J., Paul ´ ınyov´ a, Z., Karpenko, I., Elfner, H.: Pushing the hybrid approach to low beam energies with dynamic initial conditions from hadronic transport (2025) arXiv:2507.19389 [hep-ph]

    2025

  35. [43]

    Akamatsu, Y., Asakawa, M., Hirano, T., Kitazawa, M., Morita, K., Murase, K., Nara, Y., Nonaka, C., Ohnishi, A.: Dynamically integrated transport approach for heavy-ion collisions at high baryon density. Phys. Rev. C98(2), 024909 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.02490...

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.