Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Driving Generative Agents With Their Personality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14879 v1 pith:73Q7SH76 submitted 2024-02-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords personalitycharacterconsistentlygameinformationmodelrepresentresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This research explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to utilize psychometric values, specifically personality information, within the context of video game character development. Affective Computing (AC) systems quantify a Non-Player character's (NPC) psyche, and an LLM can take advantage of the system's information by using the values for prompt generation. The research shows an LLM can consistently represent a given personality profile, thereby enhancing the human-like characteristics of game characters. Repurposing a human examination, the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) questionnaire, to evaluate an LLM shows that the model can accurately generate content concerning the personality provided. Results show that the improvement of LLM, such as the latest GPT-4 model, can consistently utilize and interpret a personality to represent behavior.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of six dimensions of LLM psychological assessment concludes that results are strongly affected by test design and remain inconsistent across models and settings.

Pith tools