Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09910 v2 pith:742LGJGJ submitted 2024-02-15 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords de-coptrainingcontentcopyrightedlanguagemodelmodelsprior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How can we detect if copyrighted content was used in the training process of a language model, considering that the training data is typically undisclosed? We are motivated by the premise that a language model is likely to identify verbatim excerpts from its training text. We propose DE-COP, a method to determine whether a piece of copyrighted content was included in training. DE-COP's core approach is to probe an LLM with multiple-choice questions, whose options include both verbatim text and their paraphrases. We construct BookTection, a benchmark with excerpts from 165 books published prior and subsequent to a model's training cutoff, along with their paraphrases. Our experiments show that DE-COP surpasses the prior best method by 9.6% in detection performance (AUC) on models with logits available. Moreover, DE-COP also achieves an average accuracy of 72% for detecting suspect books on fully black-box models where prior methods give approximately 4% accuracy. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/LeiLiLab/DE-COP.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PPE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Unlearning under Private-Public Entanglement

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Existing MLLM unlearning methods reduce private-attribute leakage on entangled images but substantially harm co-occurring public figures and landmarks, with private knowledge often re-emerging after public finetuning.

  2. Identifying Pre-training Data in LLMs: A Neuron Activation-Based Detection Framework

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    NA-PDD detects pre-training data in LLMs by comparing which neurons activate for a test text against neurons linked to known training versus non-training texts, and claims large AUC improvements on three benchmarks.

  3. SOFT: Selective Data Obfuscation for Protecting LLM Fine-tuning against Membership Inference Attacks

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SOFT paraphrases low-loss fine-tuning samples before training, reducing MIA AUC from about 0.82 to about 0.54 across six datasets at roughly 7% perplexity cost.

Pith tools