Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 138 references

Introduction to abelian anyons in planar systems

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Planar anyons: spin equals statistics; the ν=1/3 plateau gives spin 1/6.

desk verdict A genuinely useful, expert-level review of abelian anyons that is honest about its scope, with one extrapolation—S=1/6 for the FQHE—that the paper itself flags as an open problem. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03597 v1 pith:74Y4J32R submitted 2025-07-04 hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Pieralberto Marchetti This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords abeliananyonsbraidstatisticsspin-statisticsconnectionChern-SimonstermfractionalquantumHalleffectalgebraicfieldtheoryspace-likeconelocalizationplanar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that in two spatial dimensions the spin of an abelian anyon and its braiding statistics are not independent: a universal identity locks them together, and the same identity fixes the quantum numbers of the quasiparticles seen in the fractional quantum Hall effect. The paper develops the connection twice—once through the Chern-Simons gauge-field description, where the statistics parameter θ equals 1/(2k) and the anyon’s spin-type is the same θ, and once through algebraic quantum field theory, where charged sectors localized in space-like cones satisfy $e^{i4\pi\theta_{j,\bar j}}=e^{i4\pi S_j}$. If this is right, the observed ν=1/3 plateau quasiparticles, with θ=ν/2=1/6, must carry spin 1/6, and the measured interferometer phase jumps of 1/3 are the direct experimental signature. The review also draws the boundary of its own claim, noting that non-relativistic systems without antiparticle worldlines can evade the relation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gauge-invariant dressing that converts a local charged field into an anyon field: electric and magnetic flux lines split on the lattice, and every 2π rotation or oriented exchange of two such dressed fields gives a phase equal to the linking number of the two flux lines. The rubber-band lemma equates the linking number of an exchange with that of a 2π twist, which is why statistics and spin come out equal. In the algebraic formulation this becomes a statement about charged intertwiners localized in space-like cones: rotating an intertwiner by 2π multiplies it by $e^{i2\pi(S_i-S_k)}$, and comparing the two orderings of intertwiners yields the R-matrix relation that produces $e^{i4\pi\theta_{j,\bar j}}=e^{i4\pi S_j}$. The Chern-Simons term supplies the concrete model: a level-k gauge field transmutes bosons into anyons with θ=1/(2k).

What would settle it

Measure the interferometric phase jump produced by removing one localized quasiparticle at the ν=1/3 plateau: the theory predicts a normalized jump of 2θ=1/3 (i.e. 2π/3 radians per quasiparticle), so a reproducibly different jump while the Hall conductance stays at e²/3h would falsify the spin-statistics chain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for abelian anyons in a local, massive 2+1-dimensional relativistic quantum field theory, the statistics phase and the spin are locked by $e^{i4\pi\theta_{j,\bar j}} = e^{i4\pi S_j}$, with relativistic covariance sharpening it to $e^{i2\pi\theta_{j,\bar j}} = e^{i2\pi S_j}$. In the Chern-Simons construction, θ=1/(2k), so a level-k anyon has spin-type 1/(2k); in the fractional quantum Hall mapping θ=ν/2, which at filling ν=1/3 gives θ=S=1/6. A direct corollary is the spin addition rule $S_{nj}=n^2 S_j \mod \mathbb{Z}$ for n anyons, reflecting the double winding of electric and magnetic flux lines. The review presents this as a model-independent result of the algebraic framework, not as a property of any one Hamiltonian, and explicitly flags the non-relativistic counterexample in which spin 0 coexists with anyonic statistics when antiparticles are absent.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain assumes that anyons are described by a local, massive quantum field theory that contains antiparticles; the review notes that without antiparticle worldlines, non-relativistic systems can have spin 0 with anyonic statistics, and the real quantum Hall anyons are non-relativistic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identity holds, every abelian anyon sector in a local, massive, relativistic 2+1 quantum field theory has spin equal to its statistics parameter modulo integers, and a theory with only permutation statistics must have all spins in (1/2)Z.
  • At filling ν=1/3 of the fractional quantum Hall effect, the quasiparticles have θ=ν/2=1/6 and therefore spin 1/6, so the measured interferometer phase jump of 2θ=1/3 per localized quasiparticle is a direct test of the whole chain.
  • A stack of N anyons does not add spins linearly: the total spin is N²S modulo integers, a distinctive signature of the flux-line braiding mechanism.
  • Because the algebraic proof assumes antiparticle sectors, the relation is expected to hold in gapped relativistic theories but can fail in non-relativistic models, so experiments on condensed-matter anyons test whether the effective low-energy theory inherits the relativistic constraint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the review’s spin-statistics chain is right, then measuring the internal angular momentum of the ν=1/3 quasiparticles—for example through polarization or mechanical response—should find S=1/6; a clean deviation would show where the relativistic theorem ceases to apply to the condensed-matter system.
  • The same θ=ν/2 rule applied to other odd-denominator plateaux predicts spin ν/2 for their quasiparticles, giving a sequence of testable predictions for interferometric experiments at ν=1/5, 2/5, and beyond.
  • The algebraic derivation suggests the relation is robust to adding arbitrary short-range interactions, as long as the mass gap and antiparticle symmetry survive; a controlled lattice model that violates spin-statistics would point to a broken axiom rather than to a failure of the idea.
  • The review leaves the boundary theory in 1+1 dimensions as an open problem; if the edge conformal field theory carries the bulk spin, the anyon spin should reappear as a conformal weight of the edge fields, linking the bulk identity to boundary measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of the theory of abelian anyons in planar systems, organized as a progression from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory and then to the algebraic QFT framework, with the fractional quantum Hall effect as the experimental anchor. Section 2 develops braid-group statistics and anyon wave functions; Section 3 reviews spin in quantum mechanics and in relativistic single-particle theory; Section 4 introduces the path-integral and Chern-Simons treatment, including a Wilson-loop calculation of the statistics phase and a spin-statistics argument based on the rubber-band lemma; Section 5 constructs anyonic quantum fields using the Dirac dressing ansatz for charged particles and for vortices; Section 6 surveys the quantum Hall effect, the effective Chern-Simons description, edge currents, and the 2020 Fabry-Pérot measurement of braiding statistics at nu = 1/3; Section 7 presents the algebraic QFT treatment of superselection sectors, braid statistics, the spin-statistics connection e^{i4πθ_{j,bar j}} = e^{i4πS_j} (eq. (103)), sharpened to e^{i2πθ_{j,bar j}} = e^{i2πS_j} under Poincaré covariance, and the spin addition rule S_{nj} = n^2 S_j mod Z (eq. (111)). The review claims no new results; it is largely a synthesis of the author's earlier work with Fröhlich and of the standard references.

Significance. The physics surveyed is standard and, as far as I can verify, correct: the classification of one-dimensional braid-group representations in Section 2, the Chern-Simons linking-number computation in Section 4.3, the identification theta = 1/(2k), the FQHE mapping theta = nu/2, and the algebraic-QFT statements of Section 7 are all consistent with the literature. The genuine strengths are the explicit Wilson-loop derivation of the statistics phase, the transparent listing of the algebraic axioms in Section 7.1, and the honest acknowledgment of the non-relativistic gap in Section 4.3, in the opening of Section 7, and in the Final Remark that lists the non-relativistic formulation as an open problem. I do not regard the reliance on the author's own earlier papers as circular: the review attributes results to their sources and claims no new derivations. The review offers no new falsifiable predictions; its value is pedagogical and organizational. Its main weakness is that the domain of validity of the headline spin-statistics relation is stated in scattered caveats rather than at the point where the theory meets the experiment; my two major comments concern that gap.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 7.4, eq. (103) and Section 6.4; cf. Section 4.3 and the Final Remark of Section 7] The headline spin-statistics relation (103) and its Poincaré-covariant sharpening are derived in Section 7 under the axioms of Section 7.1 (Einstein causality, Poincaré covariance, mass gap, duality, existence of conjugate sectors), and Section 4.3 explicitly concedes that non-relativistic systems without antiparticle worldlines can have spin 0 with non-trivial statistics, citing [33]. The FQHE is a non-relativistic condensed-matter system, and the Final Remark of Section 7 lists as open problem 2 'a formulation for the non-relativistic theory which covers the description of models of systems where anyons can be found experimentally.' Since the Abstract and Introduction promise to clarify the connections among the mathematical structure, the theory, and the experiment, and since Section 6.4 reports the measured braiding phase at nu = 1/3 as being in 'perfect agreement' with theta = 1/6, the narrative invites the reader to combine (103) with theta = nu/2 and conclude that FQHE quasiparticles carry spin S = 1/6; the manuscript nowhere states that this last step is an extrapolation rather than a theorem. I recommend an explicit statement, placed at the end of Section 6.4 or in a concluding paragraph, distinguishing the model-dependent S = theta of Sections 4.3 and 5.4, the axiomatic S = theta for relativistic local QFTs of Section 7.4, and the conjectural status of the spin-statistics connection for experimentally realized FQHE anyons, whose effective low-energy description is not proven to inherit the relativistic framework.
  2. [Section 7.4, Remark after eq. (103); eqs. (85) and (102)] The Remark following (103) states that the connection '(103) depends only on the local structure discussed in section 7.1 and on (85) and (102) but without using the full Poincaré covariance.' This phrasing overstates the independence of the result from the relativistic axioms: (85) and (102) are introduced in the text as deep results 'in relativistic theories' whose proofs are delegated to [119], and the sharpened form is delegated to [91] and [127]. A reader of the Remark alone could conclude that (103) is valid in any local theory satisfying only the structural assumptions of Section 7.1, which is not established by the manuscript. I recommend rewording the Remark so that 'without full Poincaré covariance' refers only to the final algebraic step combining (85), (102), and (100), and so that the provenance of the input identities is explicit. Since (103) is a headline result of the review, it would also help to state which claims in Sections 7.4-7.5 are proven in the text (e.g., (112) and the induction for (111)) and which are imported from the primary literature.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract; Section 1; ref. [1]; Section 5.4; Section 6] The manuscript needs a copyedit pass for language and typos: 'with the aim of clarify' (Abstract), 'Leeinaas' for Leinaas (Section 1), 'Sientific' in ref. [1], 'Maxell-Chern-Simons' for Maxwell-Chern-Simons (Remark in Section 5.4), 'completely satisfactorily' (Section 6), and the stray 'https://arxiv.org/' fragment embedded in the sentence at the end of Section 1.
  2. [Section 2.4, eq. (5)] Eq. (5) should state explicitly that this is the effective wave function for Laughlin quasiparticles (with pair power nu = 1/m), not the Laughlin electron wave function (which has power m = 1/nu), and the Gaussian exponent exp[-nu |z_i|^2 / (2 ell)^2] should be written with unambiguous parentheses.
  3. [Section 7.3, eqs. (86) and (89)] The basis statement preceding (86) and the index ranges in (89) contain notation typos that make an already dense section harder to follow: the second basis should read {V^{ip}_gamma(rho^{C_q}_q) V^{pr}_delta(rho^{C_j}_j)} (the second factor carries rho^{C_j}_j, not rho^{C_q}_q), and the range index printed as N^r_{pq} should be N^r_{p j}.
  4. [Section 6.4] The reported value alpha = -0.31 +/- 0.04 is said to be in 'perfect agreement' with theta = 1/6 without displaying the actual comparison: the extracted quantity is the phase jump Delta_alpha in units of 2pi, with predicted value 2theta = 1/3 (and hence -2theta = -1/3 under the sign convention corresponding to removal of a localized quasiparticle). One sentence making this comparison explicit would remove the apparent sign and magnitude discrepancy.
  5. [Section 7.1] The mass-gap assumption appears only in the opening prose ('without zero-mass particles'); since it is load-bearing for exponential clustering and for the Buchholz-Fredenhagen localization used throughout Section 7, it should be promoted to the numbered list of postulates.
  6. [Sections 4.2, 5.5, and 6.2] The symbol k is used with different normalizations in Section 4.2 (level with theta = 1/(2k)) and in Section 6.2 (k = 2pi sigma_H = nu), and the flux-charge relations (14) and (46) attach different Chern-Simons coefficients to the same theta in the two models of Sections 4.2 and 5.5; a one-line remark fixing the normalization convention (in both cases the exchange phase is q*Phi/2) would prevent confusion.
  7. [References [23] and [80]] Ref. [23] lacks publication data, and the citations 'see paper 73 in [80]' (Section 5.5) and 'see paper 4 in [80]' (Section 6.1) would be much easier to check with titles or page numbers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review derives or cites external results, and its own admitted non-relativistic gap is a limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. In the Chern-Simons path-integral treatment (Sects. 4–5), the statistics parameter θ is fixed by k=1/(2θ), and both the exchange and 2π-rotation phases are computed from the same Wilson-loop/linking-number expression, with the equality of the two ℓ=1 contributions justified by the Finkelstein–Rubinstein lemma and by explicit flux-line geometry. That is a calculation, not a definitional identification. In Sect. 5.4 the equality S=θ=1/(2k) follows from the computed rotation phase, not from assuming the conclusion. In the algebraic QFT section, the spin-statistics connection (103) is derived from (85) and (102), which are cited to Fröhlich–Gabbiani [119], an independent published theorem, and the sharper Poincaré-covariant form is attributed to [91] and [127]; the latter is an independent algebraic spin-statistics theorem. The author's own papers [40],[75],[91] are cited for detailed constructions, but the review includes the relevant arguments, and the citations are normal literature support rather than a self-citation chain that forces the result. The FQHE application is benchmarked against external data [8],[98]. The genuinely weak point is the gap between the relativistic assumptions of Sect. 7 and the non-relativistic experimental FQHE setting; this is an extrapolation/correctness risk, not circularity. The review itself states the limitation in Section 7 Final Remark: 'To give a formulation for the non-relativistic theory which covers the description of models of systems where anyons can be found experimentally,' and in Sect. 4.3 concedes that without antiparticle worldlines non-relativistic systems can have spin 0 with nontrivial θ statistics. These admissions strengthen, rather than undermine, the conclusion that no circular step is hidden.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a review, so its ledger is mostly what it borrows. The only numbers that enter the central comparison with experiment are the statistics parameter θ (set to ν/2 for Laughlin states) and the fitted phase parameter α of the interferometry analysis. The axioms are the standard mathematical facts about braid groups and SO(2), plus the physical assumptions of a Chern-Simons-dominated Hall-fluid effective action and the axioms of algebraic QFT, including OS reconstructability and cone localization. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • θ (anyon statistics parameter) = 1/6 for the ν=1/3 plateau (predicted as ν/2; measured via α)
    The central comparison with experiment rests on the statistics parameter θ; the review sets θ=ν/2 for Laughlin states and reports a measured value consistent with θ=1/6.
  • k (Chern-Simons level) = k=1/(2θ)=3 for θ=1/6
    The Chern-Simons level k enters the action (9) and the statistics relation θ=1/(2k); it is fixed once θ is chosen.
  • α (Fabry-Perot phase fit parameter) = -0.31±0.04 (from [8])
    In the interferometry analysis, the observed phase jump is read off by fitting the conductance to δσ0 cos(2π(e*BA+α)); interpreting α as 2θ makes the 'direct observation' depend on a fit.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The fundamental group of the configuration space of N identical particles in R2 is the braid group B_N, and the wave functions are flat sections with monodromy in Hom(B_N,U(1)).
    Invoked in Section 2 to define the statistics parameter θ and the anyon wave functions.
  • standard math The universal covering of SO(2) is R, so irreducible unitary representations yield arbitrary real spin.
    Used in Section 3.1 to argue that d=2 allows any spin.
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of an incompressible, parity-broken 2+1 dimensional Hall fluid is described by a Chern-Simons effective action for the external gauge field.
    Section 6.2 uses locality, gauge invariance and parity breaking to select the Chern-Simons term as the leading scaling-dimension-3 operator, connecting FQHE to the anyon QFT.
  • domain assumption The Osterwalder-Schrader reconstruction theorem applies to the Euclidean Chern-Simons plus scalar model, with lattice UV regularization, giving a positive-metric Hilbert space with a one-particle anyon sector.
    Section 5.4 relies on this to define physical anyon fields and to prove they couple the vacuum to one-particle states; the review only sketches the theorem and points to [40].
  • domain assumption Algebraic QFT axioms: Einstein causality, Poincaré covariance, vacuum uniqueness, Haag duality for cones, mass gap, finite statistical dimensions.
    Section 7.1 lists these as the postulates under which braid statistics, the R-matrix, and the spin-statistics theorem are derived.
  • standard math Buchholz-Fredenhagen localization: one-particle states in a massive relativistic QFT can be localized in space-like cones.
    Quoted in Section 7.1 to justify the cone-localized observables and charge intertwiners used throughout Section 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Introduction to abelian anyons in planar systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/74Y4J32R

@misc{pith2026250703597,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Introduction to abelian anyons in planar systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/74Y4J32R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03597}
}
read the original abstract

This paper is a review of the theory of abelian anyons in planar systems at an introductory level and with focus on the formalism of quantum field theory, but with the aim of clarify the connections between the mathematical structure and the theoretical and experimental physical aspects of these particle excitations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.03597 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) An oriented exchange (b) Its deformation into an exchange with op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) A braid with N = 4 (b) Overcrossing and undercrossing. 2.2 Homotopic definition of the braid group Braid groups can also be defined as the fundamental group of certain configura￾tion spaces. Let M be a connected manifold, M×N its product space N times and (M) ◦ N = M×N \ DN where DN = {x1 , . . . , xN |xi ∈ M, xi = x j , i ̸= j, i, j = 1, . . . ,N}. Quotienting for the permutations of N points, i.e. considering … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Yang-Baxter relation for braids represented in two equivalent ways. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Paths γ01 and ω in a plane with darkened regions omitted. is satisfied. Clearly a change of γ01 may shift all the homotopy classes α → α + β, but it cannot change the physics, so that the total amplitude can only change for a global phase e iφ(β) , i.e. χ(α + β) = χ(α)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Electric (blue) and magnetic (red) flux lines in the lattice; in drawings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) A closed braid with the connecting paths in red. (b) A pictorial rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Worldline of an electron (in blue) and Coulomb field associated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Electric and magnetic flux lines appearing in the Euclidean cone for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic representation of an inversion layer (a) and of the associated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Schematic representation of a Hall bar used in QHE experiments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) The Corbino disk for the Laughlin argument in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Experimental data from [98], with blue circles for ν = 1/3, red triangles for ν = 1, yellow squares for ν = 2. The experimental verification of their braid statistics theoretically predicted with θ = 1/6 required a more sophisticated apparatus: a Fabry-Pérot interfero…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Schematic representation of the Fabry-Pérot interferometer used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a) Schematic representation of the smeared Wilson loop resulting from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Space-like cones C1 , C and the angle θ1 . (b) Geometry of the rela￾tive positions of the asymptotic directions of the cones used in the proof of braid statistics. (c) The labels associated with an R + matrix. For fixed ρ C j these operators form a complex vector …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Graphical representation of the Yang-Baxter equation (91), where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Geometry of the relative positions of the asymptotic directions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Lerda, Anyons: Quantum mechanics of particles with fractional statistics , vol

    A. Lerda, Anyons: Quantum mechanics of particles with fractional statistics , vol. 14. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    2008

  2. [119]

    Braid statistics in local quantum theory ,

    J. Fröhlich and F . Gabbiani, “Braid statistics in local quantum theory ,”Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 03, pp. 251–353, 1990. 66

    work page 1990

  3. [91]

    Spin-statistics theorem and scattering in pla- nar quantum field theories with braid statistics,

    J. Fröhlich and P . Marchetti, “Spin-statistics theorem and scattering in pla- nar quantum field theories with braid statistics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 533–573, 1991

    work page 1991

  4. [127]

    An algebraic spin and statistics theorem,

    D. Guido and R. Longo, “An algebraic spin and statistics theorem,” Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 172, pp. 517–533, 1995

    work page 1995

  5. [1]

    Wilczek, Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity

    F . Wilczek, Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity . Singapore: World Sientific, 1990

    1990

  6. [2]

    Khare, Fractional statistics and quantum theory

    A. Khare, Fractional statistics and quantum theory. World Scientific, 2005. 59

    2005

  7. [3]

    Comtet, T

    A. Comtet, T . Jolicoeur, S. Ouvry , and F . David, eds.,Aspects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension. Topological Aspects of Low Dimensional Systems, vol. 69 of Les Houches - Ecole d’Ete de Physique Theorique . Springer Science & Business Media, 2000

    2000

  8. [4]

    On the theory of identical particles,

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, “On the theory of identical particles,” Nuovo Cim. B, vol. 37, pp. 1–23, 1977

    1977

Show all 138 references
  1. [5]

    Representations of a Local Cur- rent Algebra in Nonsimply Connected Space and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect,

    G. A. Goldin, R. Menikoff, and D. H. Sharp, “Representations of a Local Cur- rent Algebra in Nonsimply Connected Space and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 22, p. 1664, 1981

    1981

  2. [6]

    R. P . Prange and S. M. Girvin, The Quantum Hall Effect . Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, 2nd edn., New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990

    1990

  3. [7]

    Nobel Lecture: The fractional quantum Hall effect,

    H. L. Stormer, “Nobel Lecture: The fractional quantum Hall effect,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 71, no. 4, p. 875, 1999

    1999

  4. [8]

    Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics,

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, “Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics,” Nature Physics, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 931–936, 2020

    2020

  5. [9]

    Non- abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, “Non- abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 1083–1159, 2008

    2008

  6. [10]

    Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in an InAs-Al hybrid device,

    M. Aghaee, A. A. Ramirez, Z. Alam, R. Ali, M. Andrzejczuk, A. Antipov, M. Astafev, A. Barzegar, B. Bauer, J. Becker,et al., “Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in an InAs-Al hybrid device,”Nature, vol. 638, pp. 651– 655, 2025

    2025

  7. [11]

    Theory of braids,

    E. Artin, “Theory of braids,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 101– 126, 1947

    1947

  8. [12]

    General theory for quantum statistics in two dimensions,

    Y.-S. Wu, “General theory for quantum statistics in two dimensions,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 24, p. 2103, 1984

    1984

  9. [13]

    Multiparticle quantum mechanics obeying fractional statistics,

    Y.-S. Wu, “Multiparticle quantum mechanics obeying fractional statistics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 2, p. 111, 1984

    1984

  10. [14]

    Topological exchange statistics in one dimension,

    N. L. Harshman and A. C. Knapp, “Topological exchange statistics in one dimension,” Physical Review A, vol. 105, no. 5, p. 052214, 2022

    2022

  11. [15]

    Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,

    C.-N. Yang, “Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 19, no. 23, p. 1312, 1967

    1967

  12. [16]

    Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order- disorder transition,

    L. Onsager, “Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order- disorder transition,” Physical review, vol. 65, no. 3-4, p. 117, 1944

    1944

  13. [17]

    Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model,

    R. J. Baxter, “Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model,” Annals of Physics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 193–228, 1972

    1972

  14. [18]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of physics, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. 2–30, 2003. 60

    2003

  15. [19]

    Hilbert spaces for nonrelativistic and relativistic ’Free’ Plektons (Particles with braid group statistics),

    J. Mund and R. Schrader, “Hilbert spaces for nonrelativistic and relativistic ’Free’ Plektons (Particles with braid group statistics),” in Conference on Ad- vances in Dynamical Systems and Quantum Physics, pp. 0235–259, 5 1993

    1993

  16. [20]

    Statistics of quasiparticles and the hierarchy of fractional quantized Hall states,

    B. I. Halperin, “Statistics of quasiparticles and the hierarchy of fractional quantized Hall states,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 18, p. 1583, 1984

    1984

  17. [21]

    Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,

    R. B. Laughlin, “Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 18, p. 1395, 1983

    1983

  18. [22]

    Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,

    X.-G. Wen, “Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,” Re- views of Modern Physics, vol. 89, no. 4, p. 041004, 2017

    2017

  19. [23]

    Quantum information meets quan- tum matter: From quantum entanglement to topological phases of many- body systems,

    X. Chen, B. Zeng, X. Wen, and D. Zhou, “Quantum information meets quan- tum matter: From quantum entanglement to topological phases of many- body systems,” 2019

    2019

  20. [24]

    Statistics in space dimension two,

    G. Dell’Antonio, R. Figari, and A. Teta, “Statistics in space dimension two,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 40, pp. 235–256, 1997

    1997

  21. [25]

    Representations of braid groups and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation,

    H. Wenzl, “Representations of braid groups and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation,” Pacific journal of mathematics, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 153–180, 1990

    1990

  22. [26]

    The connection between spin and statistics,

    W . Pauli, “The connection between spin and statistics,” Physical Review , vol. 58, no. 8, p. 716, 1940

    1940

  23. [27]

    R. F . Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT , spin and statistics, and all that, vol. 30. Princeton University Press, 2000

    2000

  24. [28]

    Wigner, Group theory: and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra, vol

    E. Wigner, Group theory: and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra, vol. 5. Elsevier, 2012

    2012

  25. [29]

    Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,

    V . Bargmann, “Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,”An- nals of Mathematics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 568–640, 1947

    1947

  26. [30]

    On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,

    E. Wigner, “On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,” Annals of mathematics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 149–204, 1939

    1939

  27. [31]

    Induced representations of locally compact groups I,

    G. W . Mackey , “Induced representations of locally compact groups I,”Annals of mathematics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 101–139, 1952

    1952

  28. [32]

    Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics,

    S. Forte, “Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 193, 1992

    1992

  29. [34]

    Glimm and A

    J. Glimm and A. Jaffe, Quantum physics: a functional integral point of view . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  30. [35]

    Statistical mechanical methods in particle struc- ture analysis of lattice field theories. part 1. general theory ,

    J. Bricmont and J. Fröhlich, “Statistical mechanical methods in particle struc- ture analysis of lattice field theories. part 1. general theory ,” Nucl. Phys. B;(Netherlands), vol. 251, no. 4, 1985. 61

    1985

  31. [36]

    G. F . Lawler,Introduction to stochastic processes . Chapman and Hall /CRC, 2018

    2018

  32. [37]

    Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,

    S.-S. Chern and J. Simons, “Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 48–69, 1974

    1974

  33. [38]

    Classical and quantal nonrelativistic Chern-Simons theory ,

    R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, “Classical and quantal nonrelativistic Chern-Simons theory ,”Physical Review D, vol. 42, no. 10, p. 3500, 1990

    1990

  34. [39]

    Linking numbers, spin, and statistics of solitons,

    F . Wilczek and A. Zee, “Linking numbers, spin, and statistics of solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 51, no. 25, p. 2250, 1983

    1983

  35. [40]

    Quantum field theories of vortices and anyons,

    J. Fröhlich and P . Marchetti, “Quantum field theories of vortices and anyons,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 121, pp. 177–223, 1989

    1989

  36. [41]

    On the connetion between Euclidean and Hamiltonian lattice field theories of vortices and anyons,

    V . Müller, “On the connetion between Euclidean and Hamiltonian lattice field theories of vortices and anyons,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 51, pp. 665–674, 1991

    1991

  37. [42]

    Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory ,

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory ,”Physical Review, vol. 115, no. 3, p. 485, 1959

    1959

  38. [43]

    Confinement of quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of quarks,” Physical Review D , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2445–2459, 1974

    1974

  39. [44]

    Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,” Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 351–399, 1989

    1989

  40. [45]

    Rolfsen, Knots and links

    D. Rolfsen, Knots and links. American Mathematical Soc., 2003

    2003

  41. [46]

    A lemma on systems of knotted curves,

    J. W . Alexander, “A lemma on systems of knotted curves,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 93–95, 1923

    1923

  42. [47]

    Fractional topological insulators: a pedagogical review,

    A. Stern, “Fractional topological insulators: a pedagogical review,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 349–368, 2016

    2016

  43. [48]

    Fractional (Chern and topological) insulators,

    T . Neupert, C. Chamon, T . Iadecola, L. H. Santos, and C. Mudry , “Fractional (Chern and topological) insulators,” Physica Scripta, vol. 2015, no. T164, p. 014005, 2015

    2015

  44. [49]

    Non-abelian bosonization in two- dimensional condensed matter physics,

    J. Fröhlich, T . Kerler, and P . Marchetti, “Non-abelian bosonization in two- dimensional condensed matter physics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 374, no. 3, pp. 511–542, 1992

    1992

  45. [50]

    Slave anyons in the t-J model at the supersymmetric point,

    A. Lerda and S. Sciuto, “Slave anyons in the t-J model at the supersymmetric point,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 410, no. 3, pp. 577–616, 1993

    1993

  46. [51]

    Connection between spin, statistics, and kinks,

    D. Finkelstein and J. Rubinstein, “Connection between spin, statistics, and kinks,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1762–1779, 1968

    1968

  47. [52]

    Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern-Simons the- ory ,

    R. Iengo and K. Lechner, “Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern-Simons the- ory ,”Physics Reports, vol. 213, no. 4, pp. 179–269, 1992

    1992

  48. [53]

    Canonical Chern-Simons theory and the braid group on a Riemann surface,

    M. Bergeron, D. Eliezer, and G. Semenoff, “Canonical Chern-Simons theory and the braid group on a Riemann surface,”Physics Letters B, vol. 311, no. 1- 4, pp. 137–146, 1993. 62

    1993

  49. [54]

    On quantum field theories,

    R. Haag, “On quantum field theories,” Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selakab, Mat.- Fys. Medd., vol. 29, 1955

    1955

  50. [55]

    Haag, Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras

    R. Haag, Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  51. [56]

    Strocchi,An introduction to non-perturbative foundations of quantum field theory, vol

    F . Strocchi,An introduction to non-perturbative foundations of quantum field theory, vol. 158. Oxford University Press, USA, 2013

    2013

  52. [57]

    Axioms for Euclidean Green’s functions,

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, “Axioms for Euclidean Green’s functions,” Commun. math. Phys, vol. 31, pp. 83–112, 1973

    1973

  53. [58]

    Seiler, Gauge Theories as a Problem of Constructive Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics, vol

    E. Seiler, Gauge Theories as a Problem of Constructive Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics, vol. 159 ofLecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 1982

    1982

  54. [59]

    Magnetic monopoles and charged states in four-dimensional, abelian lattice gauge theories,

    J. Fröhlich and P . Marchetti, “Magnetic monopoles and charged states in four-dimensional, abelian lattice gauge theories,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 933, 1986

    1986

  55. [60]

    Superselection sectors in quantum field mod- els: Kinks inφ4 2 and charged states in lattice (QED)4,

    J. Fröhlich and P . A. Marchetti, “Superselection sectors in quantum field mod- els: Kinks inφ4 2 and charged states in lattice (QED)4,” The Algebraic Theory of Superselection Sectors. Introduction and Recent Results, pp. 428–484, 1990

    1990

  56. [61]

    Fermion states of a boson field,

    R. Streater and I. Wilde, “Fermion states of a boson field,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 561–575, 1970

    1970

  57. [62]

    New super-selection sectors (“soliton-states

    J. Fröhlich, “New super-selection sectors (“soliton-states”) in two dimen- sional bose quantum field models,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 269–310, 1976

    1976

  58. [63]

    Disorder variables and para-fermions in two- dimensional statistical mechanics,

    E. Fradkin and L. P . Kadanoff, “Disorder variables and para-fermions in two- dimensional statistical mechanics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 1– 15, 1980

    1980

  59. [64]

    Fröhlich, Non-perturbative quantum field theory: Mathematical aspects and applications, vol

    J. Fröhlich, Non-perturbative quantum field theory: Mathematical aspects and applications, vol. 15 of Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics . World Sci- entific, 1992

    1992

  60. [65]

    Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electro- magnetic interaction,

    R. P . Feynman, “Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electro- magnetic interaction,” Physical Review, vol. 80, no. 3, p. 440, 1950

    1950

  61. [66]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,

    J. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,” Physical Re- view, vol. 82, no. 5, p. 664, 1951

    1951

  62. [67]

    Gauge-invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics,

    P . A. Dirac, “Gauge-invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 650–660, 1955

    1955

  63. [68]

    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in local gauge quantum field theory; the Higgs mechanism,

    F . Strocchi, “Spontaneous symmetry breaking in local gauge quantum field theory; the Higgs mechanism,” Communications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 1977

    1977

  64. [69]

    The abelian Higgs Kibble model, unitarity of the S-operator,

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “The abelian Higgs Kibble model, unitarity of the S-operator,” Physics Letters B, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 344–346, 1974

    1974

  65. [70]

    Renormalization of gauge theories,

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of gauge theories,” An- nals of Physics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 287–321, 1976. 63

    1976

  66. [71]

    Gauge invariance in field theory and statistical physics in opera- tor formalism,

    I. V . Tyutin, “Gauge invariance in field theory and statistical physics in opera- tor formalism,” preprint of P .N. Lebedev Physical Institute, No. 39, 1975-arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.0580, 1975

    1975 arXiv

  67. [72]

    Local covariant operator formalism of non-abelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem,

    T . Kugo and I. Ojima, “Local covariant operator formalism of non-abelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, vol. 66, pp. 1–130, 1979

    1979

  68. [73]

    Gauge-invariant charged, monopole and dyon fields in gauge theories,

    J. Fröhlich and P . A. Marchetti, “Gauge-invariant charged, monopole and dyon fields in gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 551, no. 3, pp. 770– 812, 1999

    1999

  69. [74]

    Quantum electrodynamics without potentials,

    S. Mandelstam, “Quantum electrodynamics without potentials,” Annals of Physics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1962

    1962

  70. [75]

    Quantum field theory of anyons,

    J. Fröhlich and P . A. Marchetti, “Quantum field theory of anyons,”Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 16, pp. 347–358, 1988

    1988

  71. [76]

    Spin-statistics transmutation in quantum field theory ,

    P . A. Marchetti, “Spin-statistics transmutation in quantum field theory ,”Foun- dations of Physics, vol. 40, pp. 746–764, 2010

    2010

  72. [77]

    Spin-statistics transmutation in relativistic quantum field theories of dyons,

    K. Lechner and P . A. Marchetti, “Spin-statistics transmutation in relativistic quantum field theories of dyons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2000, no. 12, p. 028, 2001

    2000

  73. [78]

    Quantum skyrmions,

    J. Fröhlich and P . A. Marchetti, “Quantum skyrmions,” Nuclear Physics B , vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1990

    1990

  74. [79]

    Exotic spin and statistics in (2 + 1)- dimensional canonical quantum field theory ,

    G. W . Semenoff and P . Sodano, “Exotic spin and statistics in (2 + 1)- dimensional canonical quantum field theory ,” Nuclear Physics B , vol. 328, no. 3, pp. 753–776, 1989

    1989

  75. [80]

    Ter Haar,Collected papers of L.D

    D. Ter Haar,Collected papers of L.D. Landau. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  76. [81]

    Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons,

    P . W . Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 508, 1964

    1964

  77. [82]

    Higgs phenomenon without sym- metry breaking order parameter,

    J. Fröhlich, G. Morchio, and F . Strocchi, “Higgs phenomenon without sym- metry breaking order parameter,”Nuclear Physics B, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 553– 582, 1981

    1981

  78. [83]

    Jaffe and C

    A. Jaffe and C. Taubes,Vortices and Monopoles. Structure of Static Gauge The- ories, vol. 2. Birkhäuser Verlag, 1980

    1980

  79. [84]

    Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass,

    P . W . Anderson, “Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass,” Physical Review, vol. 130, no. 1, p. 439, 1963

    1963

  80. [85]

    Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,

    F . Englert and R. Brout, “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 321, 1964

    1964

  81. [86]

    Global conservation laws and massless particles,

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T . W . Kibble, “Global conservation laws and massless particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 585, 1964

    1964

  82. [87]

    Ultradistributions and quantum fields: Fourier-Laplace transforms and boundary values of analytic functions,

    F . Constantinescu and W . Thalheimer, “Ultradistributions and quantum fields: Fourier-Laplace transforms and boundary values of analytic functions,” Re- ports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 167–180, 1979. 64

    1979

  83. [88]

    Locality and the structure of particle states,

    D. Buchholz and K. Fredenhagen, “Locality and the structure of particle states,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 84, pp. 1–54, 1982

    1982

  84. [89]

    Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions,

    R. Haag, “Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions,” Physical Review, vol. 112, no. 2, p. 669, 1958

    1958

  85. [90]

    On asymptotic condition in quantum field theory ,

    D. Ruelle, “On asymptotic condition in quantum field theory ,”Helvetica Phys- ica Acta, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 147, 1962

    1962

  86. [92]

    Scattering states of plek- tons (particles with braid group statistics) in (2 +1)-dimensional quantum field theory ,

    K. Fredenhagen, M. R. Gaberdiel, and S. M. Rüger, “Scattering states of plek- tons (particles with braid group statistics) in (2 +1)-dimensional quantum field theory ,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 175, pp. 319–335, 1996

    1996

  87. [93]

    Two-dimensional magneto- transport in the extreme quantum limit,

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, “Two-dimensional magneto- transport in the extreme quantum limit,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 48, no. 22, p. 1559, 1982

    1982

  88. [94]

    New method for high-accuracy deter- mination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance,

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, “New method for high-accuracy deter- mination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance,” Physical review letters, vol. 45, no. 6, p. 494, 1980

    1980

  89. [95]

    Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices,

    P . W . Anderson, “Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices,” Physical Review, vol. 109, no. 5, p. 1492, 1958

    1958

  90. [96]

    Fractional statistics, gauge invariance and anomalies in con- densed matter physics,

    J. Fröhlich, “Fractional statistics, gauge invariance and anomalies in con- densed matter physics,” Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, pp. 417– 449, 2024

    2024

  91. [97]

    Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions,

    R. B. Laughlin, “Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions,” Physical Review B, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 5632, 1981

    1981

  92. [98]

    Two recent experiments on the Fractional Quantized Hall Effect,

    D. Tsui, “Two recent experiments on the Fractional Quantized Hall Effect,” Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 65, no. 2-3, pp. 143–150, 1992

    1992

  93. [99]

    Fractional statistics and the quan- tum Hall effect,

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F . Wilczek, “Fractional statistics and the quan- tum Hall effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 7, p. 722, 1984

    1984

  94. [100]

    Gauge invariance and current algebra in non relativistic many-body theory ,

    J. Fröhlich and U. M. Studer, “Gauge invariance and current algebra in non relativistic many-body theory ,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 65, no. 3, p. 733, 1993

    1993

  95. [101]

    Gauss’ law in local quantum field theory ,

    F . Strocchi, “Gauss’ law in local quantum field theory ,” inField Theory, Quan- tization and Statistical Physics: In Memory of Bernard Jouvet , pp. 227–236, Springer, 1981

    1981

  96. [102]

    Quantized Hall conductance, current-carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered poten- tial,

    B. I. Halperin, “Quantized Hall conductance, current-carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered poten- tial,” Physical Review B, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 2185, 1982

    1982

  97. [103]

    Generalization of a Fermi liquid to a liquid with fractional exclu- sion statistics in arbitrary dimensions: Theory of a Haldane liquid,

    K. Iguchi, “Generalization of a Fermi liquid to a liquid with fractional exclu- sion statistics in arbitrary dimensions: Theory of a Haldane liquid,” Physical review letters, vol. 80, no. 8, p. 1698, 1998. 65

    1998

  98. [104]

    Chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states,

    X.-G. Wen, “Chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states,” Physical Review B, vol. 41, no. 18, p. 12838, 1990

    1990

  99. [105]

    ”Fractional statistics

    F . D. M. Haldane, “”Fractional statistics”in arbitrary dimensions: A general- ization of the Pauli principle,” Physical review letters, vol. 67, no. 8, p. 937, 1991

    1991

  100. [106]

    Statistical distribution for generalized ideal gas of fractional- statistics particles,

    Y.-S. Wu, “Statistical distribution for generalized ideal gas of fractional- statistics particles,” Physical review letters, vol. 73, no. 7, p. 922, 1994

    1994

  101. [107]

    Hall effect, edge states, and Haldane exclusion statistics in two-dimensional space,

    F . Ye, P . Marchetti, Z. Su, and L. Yu, “Hall effect, edge states, and Haldane exclusion statistics in two-dimensional space,” Physical Review B , vol. 92, no. 23, p. 235151, 2015

    2015

  102. [108]

    Quantum Hall effect of ideal anyons,

    M. Ma and F . C. Zhang, “Quantum Hall effect of ideal anyons,” Physical Re- view Letters, vol. 66, no. 13, p. 1769, 1991

    1991

  103. [109]

    Equation of state of an anyon gas in a strong magnetic field,

    A. D. de Veigy and S. Ouvry , “Equation of state of an anyon gas in a strong magnetic field,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, no. 5, p. 600, 1994

    1994

  104. [110]

    Vector-meson mass generation by chiral anomalies,

    R. Jackiw and R. Rajaraman, “Vector-meson mass generation by chiral anomalies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 54, no. 12, p. 1219, 1985

    1985

  105. [111]

    U (1)× SU (2)-gauge invariance of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, and generalized Hall effects,

    J. Fröhlich and U. Studer, “U (1)× SU (2)-gauge invariance of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, and generalized Hall effects,”Communications in math- ematical physics, vol. 148, pp. 553–600, 1992

    1992

  106. [112]

    Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene,

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, “Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene,” Physical review letters, vol. 95, no. 22, p. 226801, 2005

    2005

  107. [113]

    Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells,

    B. A. Bernevig, T . L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, “Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells,” science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1757–1761, 2006

    2006

  108. [114]

    Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quan- tum wells,

    M. Konig, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W . Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, “Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quan- tum wells,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5851, pp. 766–770, 2007

    2007

  109. [115]

    Quantum spin Hall effect,

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, “Quantum spin Hall effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 106802, 2006

    2006

  110. [116]

    Topological gauge theories of antisymmetric tensor fields,

    M. Blau and G. Thompson, “Topological gauge theories of antisymmetric tensor fields,” Annals of Physics, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 130–172, 1991

    1991

  111. [117]

    Superconductors are topologi- cally ordered,

    T . Hansson, V . Oganesyan, and S. L. Sondhi, “Superconductors are topologi- cally ordered,” Annals of Physics, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. 497–538, 2004

    2004

  112. [118]

    Theory of the Fabry- Pérot quantum Hall interferometer,

    B. I. Halperin, A. Stern, I. Neder, and B. Rosenow, “Theory of the Fabry- Pérot quantum Hall interferometer,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 83, no. 15, p. 155440, 2011

    2011

  113. [120]

    Braid statistics in three- dimensional local quantum theory ,

    J. Fröhlich, F . Gabbiani, and P .-A. Marchetti, “Braid statistics in three- dimensional local quantum theory ,”Physics, Geometry and Topology, pp. 15– 79, 1990

    1990

  114. [121]

    Time translations in the algebraic formulation of statistical mechanics,

    D. Dubin and G. Sewell, “Time translations in the algebraic formulation of statistical mechanics,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2990–2998, 1970

    1970

  115. [122]

    Long range dynamics and spontaneous symmetry breaking in many-body systems,

    F . Strocchi, “Long range dynamics and spontaneous symmetry breaking in many-body systems,” in Fractals, quasicrystals, chaos, knots and algebraic quantum mechanics, pp. 265–285, Springer, 1988

    1988

  116. [123]

    A remark on a theorem of B. Misra,

    H.-J. Borchers, “A remark on a theorem of B. Misra,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 4, pp. 315–323, 1967

    1967

  117. [124]

    Technical properties of the quasi-local algebra,

    C. d’Antoni, “Technical properties of the quasi-local algebra,” The algebraic theory of superselection sectors (Palermo, 1989), pp. 248–258, 1989

    1989

  118. [125]

    Index of subfactors and statistics of quantum fields. I,

    R. Longo, “Index of subfactors and statistics of quantum fields. I,” Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 217–247, 1989

    1989

  119. [126]

    Index of subfactors and statistics of quantum fields: II. Corre- spondences, braid group statistics and Jones polynomial,

    R. Longo, “Index of subfactors and statistics of quantum fields: II. Corre- spondences, braid group statistics and Jones polynomial,” Communications in mathematical physics, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 285–309, 1990

    1990

  120. [128]

    Fields, observables and gauge transformations II,

    S. Doplicher, R. Haag, and J. E. Roberts, “Fields, observables and gauge transformations II,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 173–200, 1969

    1969

  121. [129]

    Fröhlich and T

    J. Fröhlich and T . Kerler,Quantum groups, quantum categories and quantum field theory. Springer, 2006

    2006

  122. [130]

    Anyon wave functions from anyon field operators,

    P . A. Marchetti, “Anyon wave functions from anyon field operators,”Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 6, no. 11n12, pp. 2275–2290, 1992

    1992

  123. [131]

    Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT,

    C. Northe, “Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras: I. General theory ,

    K. Fredenhagen, K.-H. Rehren, and B. Schroer, “Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras: I. General theory ,” Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics, vol. 125, pp. 201–226, 1989

    1989

  125. [133]

    Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras II: Geometric aspects and con- formal covariance,

    K. Fredenhagen, K.-H. Rehren, and B. Schroer, “Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras II: Geometric aspects and con- formal covariance,” Reviews in Mathematical Physics , vol. 4, no. spec01, pp. 113–157, 1992

    1992

  126. [134]

    Operator algebras and conformal field theory ,

    F . Gabbiani and J. Fröhlich, “Operator algebras and conformal field theory ,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 155, pp. 569–640, 1993

    1993

  127. [135]

    Phase bound- aries in algebraic conformal QFT,

    M. Bischoff, Y. Kawahigashi, R. Longo, and K.-H. Rehren, “Phase bound- aries in algebraic conformal QFT,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 342, pp. 1–45, 2016. 67

    2016

  128. [136]

    De Rham, Differentiable manifolds: forms, currents, harmonic forms , vol

    G. De Rham, Differentiable manifolds: forms, currents, harmonic forms , vol. 266. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  129. [137]

    Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,

    E. C. G. Stückelberg, “Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,” Helv. Phys. Acta, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 225, 1938

    1938

  130. [138]

    Theory of one-and two-dimensional magnets with an easy mag- netization plane. ii. the planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,

    J. Villain, “Theory of one-and two-dimensional magnets with an easy mag- netization plane. ii. the planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,” Journal de Physique, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 581–590, 1975. 68

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.