Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Topological Quantum Molecular Dynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single global electronic overlap matrix encodes all effects beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, and it builds a numerically exact, divergence-free molecular quantum dynamics on that object.

desk verdict A clean formal unification of beyond-Born-Oppenheimer effects in one overlap matrix, but the ab initio evidence for 'numerically exact' is undercut by an uncontrolled linked-product approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.11124 v1 pith:75ACTKJN submitted 2025-05-16 physics.chem-ph

Yujuan Xie , Ruoxi Liu , Bing Gu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords Born-Oppenheimerapproximationgeometricphaseconicalintersectionnonadiabaticdynamicsquantumtensorelectronicoverlapmatrixfiberbundlemetric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the standard Born-Oppenheimer picture of molecular dynamics leaves out exactly one object: the overlap between electronic wave functions evaluated at different nuclear geometries, and that this single overlap matrix accounts for every effect beyond the approximation, including geometric phase, diagonal Born-Oppenheimer corrections, and nonadiabatic transitions. It constructs a discrete local trivialization of the molecular wavefunction in which the nuclear kinetic energy is dressed by this overlap matrix, yielding a divergence-free equation of motion that requires no gauge fixing, no vector potential, and no knowledge of conical intersection locations. Numerical tests on a model conical intersection, phenol photodissociation, and ab initio H3+ dynamics show that single-surface simulations reproduce geometric-phase interference and that multi-surface simulations reproduce internal conversion. If correct, the result unifies adiabatic and nonadiabatic quantum dynamics into one quantum-geometric framework and makes ab initio wave-packet dynamics robust to random electronic phases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the discrete local trivialization ansatz, which covers a globally nontrivial electron-nuclear fiber bundle by a finite set of topologically trivial product states $\psi(r;R_n)\chi_n(R)$ with electronic eigenstates taken at DVR grid centers. The identity that carries the argument is the equation of motion $i\dot C=(TA+V)C$, together with the cumulant expansion $\ln A_{mn}\approx\sum_\mu F_\mu\Delta_\mu-\frac12\sum_{\mu\nu}Q_{\mu\nu}\Delta_\mu\Delta_\nu$, where $F_\mu$ is the gauge connection and $Q_{\mu\nu}$ is the electronic quantum geometric tensor. Because the overlap matrix is bounded within $[-1,1]$ and does not require smoothness or a global gauge, the divergences of derivative couplings and vector potentials are bypassed entirely. The same construction extends to arbitrary fiber bundles by replacing the electronic states with eigenstates of a fiber Hamiltonian, including non-Hermitian cases.

What would settle it

Compute the same H3+ adiabatic dynamics twice, once with the linked-product global overlap matrix and once with direct many-electron overlaps at every grid pair; if the wave-packet trajectories or populations differ beyond convergence tolerance, the linked-product assumption fails. Alternatively, repeat the vibronic model on grids of increasing density; the nodal-line signature of the geometric phase should remain unchanged as the grid spacing shrinks, otherwise the discrete local trivialization limit is not reached.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the global electronic overlap matrix $A_{mn}=\langle\psi(R_m)|\psi(R_n)\rangle$, the fidelity between many-electron states at two nuclear geometries, fully encodes the quantum geometry of the adiabatic electronic manifold. In the discrete local trivialization ansatz $\Psi=\sum_n C_n(t)\psi(r;R_n)\chi_n(R)$, the Schrödinger equation becomes $i\dot C=(TA+V)C$, where $T$ is the nuclear kinetic-energy matrix and $V$ the potential-energy matrix; the only difference from Born-Oppenheimer dynamics is the dressing of $T$ by $A$. Expanding $\ln A_{mn}$ for nearby geometries shows that the overlap matrix's amplitude encodes the quantum metric and its phase encodes the Berry connection, so the singular quantum geometric tensor is replaced by a bounded object. The nonadiabatic generalization uses the multi-state overlap matrix $\langle\phi_\beta(R_m)|\phi_\alpha(R_n)\rangle$, unifying first- and second-derivative couplings, diagonal corrections, and geometric-phase vector potentials. The paper demonstrates that geometric-phase nodal lines appear in single-surface adiabatic dynamics near an energetically inaccessible conical intersection, that quantum-metric effects alter adiabatic dynamics even without degeneracies, and that ab initio nonadiabatic internal conversion in H3+ is reproduced without phase smoothing.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that, on a sufficiently dense nuclear grid, the exact molecular wavefunction is completely spanned by product states formed from the electronic eigenstates at the grid points; the H3+ demonstrations further assume that a path-ordered product of nearest-neighbor electronic overlaps reproduces the exact overlap between distant nuclear geometries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Geometric phase effects in ground-state adiabatic reactions can be captured using only single-surface information, so simulations no longer need to locate conical intersections or construct vector potentials.
  • Nonadiabatic dynamics can be run directly from ab initio electronic states carrying random phases or signs, eliminating the diabatization bottleneck.
  • Quantum-metric corrections are predicted to affect adiabatic dynamics even in systems with no electronic degeneracy, as shown by the H3+ example.
  • The same equation of motion governs adiabatic and nonadiabatic dynamics, with the Abelian overlap matrix upgraded to a non-Abelian multi-state matrix.
  • Because the formalism applies to arbitrary fiber bundles, the same discrete local trivialization could be used for vibrational-rotational dynamics, band-structure problems, and non-Hermitian dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A practical corollary not pursued in the paper is that the computational bottleneck shifts to computing accurate many-electron overlaps between nearby nuclear geometries; improving overlap algorithms would directly determine how far the method scales.
  • The linked-product approximation used for the H3+ overlaps introduces potential path and gauge dependence whose error is not quantified; a direct comparison with exact overlaps would test the practical reliability of the ab initio demonstrations.
  • The framework suggests that Born-Oppenheimer dynamics may fail more often than assumed, since even energetically inaccessible conical intersections can alter reaction rates through geometric-phase interference.
  • One testable extension would be to apply the same overlap-dressed equation to exceptional points in non-Hermitian settings, where the quantum geometric tensor is ill-defined but the overlap matrix remains bounded.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'topological' formulation of molecular quantum dynamics based on a discrete local trivialization ansatz Ψ = Σ_n C_n(t) ψ(r;R_n) χ_n(R), where χ_n are DVR nuclear basis functions and ψ(r;R_n) are adiabatic electronic states at grid geometries. Inserting this ansatz into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation gives i Ċ = (T A + V) C, with A_{mn} = ⟨ψ(R_m)|ψ(R_n)⟩_r. The authors argue that this single overlap matrix encodes all beyond-Born-Oppenheimer effects (diagonal BO corrections, geometric phase, and nonadiabatic transitions), is invariant under the random phases/signs produced by electronic structure codes, and is divergence-free. Numerical illustrations are given for a two-mode vibronic model, a phenol photodissociation model, and ab initio H3+ (FCI/cc-pVTZ) in both the adiabatic and nonadiabatic regimes.

Significance. The central identification—that the local-diabatic kinetic coupling is dressed by the electronic overlap matrix—is simple, explicit, and attractive. If the method is exact in the convergent-grid limit, it would provide a practical route to nonadiabatic and geometric-phase quantum dynamics without derivative couplings, vector potentials, or conical-intersection seam information, and the random-phase gauge-invariance argument is a genuine practical advantage. The model-system comparisons (vibronic and phenol) show the expected nodal-line signatures and agree well with full nonadiabatic references, which is encouraging. However, the paper's strongest claim—'numerically exact ab initio' dynamics—is not supported by the numerical evidence, because the H3+ calculations replace the exact overlap matrix by a linked-product approximation and no convergence tests are reported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V.B, first paragraph; Section V.C] The ab initio calculations do not use the global overlap matrix A_{mn} of Eq. (9); following Ref. [73], they replace non-nearest-neighbor entries by a path-ordered product of nearest-neighbor links. This is not an exact representation of A_{mn}. For smooth real electronic states, |⟨ψ(R)|ψ(R+Δ)⟩| ≃ 1 − (1/2) g Δ², so the product over N = L/Δ links has magnitude ≃ exp(−g L Δ / 2), which tends to 1 as Δ → 0, while the direct overlap |⟨ψ(R)|ψ(R+L)⟩| can remain arbitrarily small. The approximation therefore suppresses exactly the quantum-metric amplitude that Section V.B claims to demonstrate, and it is not guaranteed to preserve the sign/phase of the direct overlap (path dependence in the presence of Berry curvature). No path-independence check or error quantification is provided. Consequently, the H3+ results in Figs. 3 and 4 do not validate the 'numerically exact' claim for ab initio dynamics.
  2. [Abstract; Section VI] The method is repeatedly called 'numerically exact', but the numerical demonstrations do not include convergence studies with respect to grid spacing, grid extent, or the number of electronic states retained. For the H3+ adiabatic example, no comparison to a direct-overlap calculation or to an independent reference is given; for the H3+ nonadiabatic example, the number of electronic states retained in the multi-state overlap matrix is not specified. The phenol simulation is explicitly not fully adiabatic (about 10% population transfer to S2), so its single-state result is approximate. The exactness claim should be either demonstrated with convergence/basis-set checks or reformulated as 'convergent in the complete-basis and dense-grid limit'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (12)] The continuum-limit statement C_n(t) χ_n(R) → χ(R_n,t) is schematic: C_n are DVR expansion coefficients, not pointwise values in coordinate space, so the limiting relation should involve the DVR transformation and quadrature weights. Please state the precise definition of the continuum limit.
  2. [Eq. (26)] The non-Abelian electronic quantum geometric tensor is said to be gauge-invariant under the stated local transformations; it is actually gauge-covariant (it transforms as U† Q U). Please correct the wording or restrict the invariance statement to the Abelian case.
  3. [Section V.A.2 and Section IV] There are minor language errors: 'potenatial' in Section V.A.2, 'developped' in Section IV, and Eq. (??) in Appendix B should be given a proper equation number.
  4. [Fig. 3b] The color scale and normalization of the overlap-matrix plot are not described; please specify the plotted quantity and explicitly explain how negative entries arise from the random sign gauge of the many-electron wavefunctions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation is self-contained; the overlap matrix is computed from electronic structure, not fitted to the dynamics, and the only self-citation is a numerical approximation rather than a circular input.

full rationale

The core equation of motion, Eq. (8), is derived by inserting the discrete local trivialization ansatz, Eq. (7), into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the overlap matrix A_mn = <psi(R_m)|psi(R_n)> is evaluated directly from the electronic eigenstates rather than chosen to reproduce the target nuclear dynamics. The expansions in Eqs. (13) and (24) are Taylor expansions of that overlap in terms of the gauge connection and the electronic quantum geometric tensor, so the statement that the overlap encodes quantum geometry is an identity following from the definition of the overlap, not a fitted or self-referential input. The vibronic and phenol demonstrations are checked against full nonadiabatic reference calculations, and the H3+ examples compare a first-principles overlap-based calculation against the Born-Oppenheimer limit; the observed differences are consequences of the equations, not parameters adjusted to force those differences. The only notable dependence on prior work by the same authors is the linked-product approximation (Ref. 73) used to construct the global overlap matrix in the ab initio H3+ sections; this is a numerical implementation choice whose accuracy is not quantified here, but it is not a parameter fitted to the outputs, nor is the central derivation reduced to that citation. No step in the derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation of Eq. (8) from the ansatz is algebraic and does not introduce fitted physical parameters. The practical exactness claim rests on completeness of the finite product basis, locality of DVR centers, and, in the ab initio examples, the linked-product approximation; none of these is validated by convergence studies. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • DVR grid spacing and grid extent = e.g., 255x31 for the vibronic model, 231x231 for H3+
    Chosen by hand to avoid boundary reflection; the exactness claim requires a continuum limit, and no convergence study versus grid spacing is reported.
  • Number of electronic states retained = 1 in adiabatic examples, 2 to 3 in nonadiabatic examples
    Eqs. (7) and (20) truncate the electronic basis at each geometry; exactness requires this subspace to be effectively closed, which is asserted rather than checked.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math DVR basis sets are orthonormal and localized, and Strang splitting converges for the time steps used.
    Section II.A uses DVR and Section V.A uses Strang splitting with dt=0.1 a.u.; this is standard numerical machinery but no convergence check is shown.
  • domain assumption Electronic states computed at DVR grid centers accurately represent the electronic state over the support of the associated nuclear basis function.
    Section II.A states 'Owing to locality, we can choose the electronic states at the center of each nuclear basis as an electronic basis set'; this locality is not quantified.
  • domain assumption The finite product basis {phi_alpha(r;R_n) chi_n(R)} spans the relevant molecular Hilbert space in the dense-grid limit.
    Eqs. (7) and (20) rely on completeness of the discrete local trivialization; no proof or numerical convergence test is supplied.
  • ad hoc to paper The linked-product path-ordered product of nearest-neighbor electronic overlaps reproduces the exact global electronic overlap matrix.
    Section V.B computes non-nearest-neighbor elements by a path-ordered product [73]; this is an approximation that can be gauge or path dependent and its error is not quantified.
  • domain assumption FCI/cc-pVTZ wavefunctions are accurate enough for the ab initio H3+ dynamics.
    Sections V.B and V.C use PySCF FCI/cc-pVTZ; basis-set and method truncation errors are not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Quantum Molecular Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75ACTKJN

@misc{pith2026250511124,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Quantum Molecular Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75ACTKJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.11124}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a unified quantum geometric framework to understand reactive quantum dynamics. The critical roles of the quantum geometry of adiabatic electronic states in both adiabatic and non-adiabatic quantum dynamics are unveiled. A numerically exact, divergence-free topological quantum molecular dynamics method is developed through a discrete local trivialization of the projected electronic Hilbert space bundle over the nuclear configuration space. In this approach, the singular electronic quantum geometric tensor-Abelian for adiabatic dynamics and non-Abelian for non-adiabatic dynamics-is fully encoded in the global electronic overlap matrix. With numerical illustrations, it is demonstrated that atomic motion-whether adiabatic or non-adiabatic-is governed not only by the variation in electronic energies with nuclear configurations (potential energy surface) but also by the variation in electronic states (electronic quantum geometry).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.11124 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The APESs of the vibronic coupling model. (b) The position of the nuclear wave packet. (c) and (d) display the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The geometry and APESs of phenol. (b) and (c) display the distribution of nuclear wave packets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Adiabatic wave packet dynamics in H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ab initio nonadiabatic conical intersection dynamics of internal conversion in H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Geometric phase-induced nuclear quantum interference is robust against quantum dissipation

    physics.chem-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Geometric phase-induced destructive interference in conical intersection dynamics survives non-Markovian dissipation from vibrational and electronic baths, as shown by numerically exact LDR-HEOM simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [73]

    Z. Lan, W. Domcke, V. Vallet, A. L. Sobolewski, and S. Mahapatra, Time-dependent quantum wave-packet description of the Π1σ* photochemistry of phenol, The Journal of Chemical Physics122, 224315 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    Here,xandyrepresent the tun- ing mode and coupling mode, respectively

    Vibronic model We first consider a two-state, two-dimensional vibronic coupling model with the Hamiltonian given by H= ˆTNI+V(37) whereIis the identity matrix in electronic space, and the nuclear kinetic energy operator is defined as ˆTN = − 1 2 ∂2/∂x2 +∂ 2/∂y2 . Here,xandyrepresent the tun- ing mode and coupling mode, respectively. The diabatic potential...

    work page

  3. [2]

    It has been shown that the geometric phase effect plays a critical role in this photodissociation process [62, 70]

    Phenol photodissociation The geometric phase in adiabatic dynamics has been demonstrated to be important in phenol photodissoci- ation, wherein the O−H bond breaks via nonadiabatic tunneling [65–69]. It has been shown that the geometric phase effect plays a critical role in this photodissociation process [62, 70]. The adiabatic tunneling lifetime cal- cul...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Born and R

    M. Born and R. Oppenheimer, Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln, Ann. Phys.389, 457 (1927)

    1927

  5. [4]

    D. J. Tannor,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective(University Science Books, 2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [5]

    Szabo and N

    A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund,Modern Quantum Chem- istry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure The- ory(Courier Corporation, 1996)

    1996

  7. [6]

    J. M. J. M. Thijssen,Computational Physics(Cam- bridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    G. A. Meek and B. G. Levine, Wave function continuity and the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction at conical intersections, J. Chem. Phys.144, 184109 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    Larson, E

    J. Larson, E. Sj¨ oqvist, and P. ¨Ohberg,Conical Intersec- tions in Physics: An Introduction to Synthetic Gauge Theories, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 965 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Domcke, D

    W. Domcke, D. R. Yarkony, and H. K¨ oppel,Coni- cal Intersections: Theory, Computation and Experiment (World Scientific, 2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Prigogine and S

    I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice,The Role of Degenerate States in Chemistry, Volume 124, 1st ed., edited by M. Baer and G. D. Billing (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N.J, 2002)

    2002

  4. [11]

    Heras, Dirac quantisation condition: A com- prehensive review, Contemporary Physics59, 331 (2018), arXiv:1810.13403 [hep-th, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

    R. Heras, Dirac quantisation condition: A com- prehensive review, Contemporary Physics59, 331 (2018), arXiv:1810.13403 [hep-th, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ”Hidden” Variables

    D. Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ”Hidden” Variables. I, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)

    1952

  6. [13]

    Garashchuk and V

    S. Garashchuk and V. A. Rassolov, Semiclassical Dynam- ics with Quantum Trajectories: Formulation and Com- parison with the Semiclassical Initial Value Representa- tion Propagator, J. Chem. Phys.118, 2482 (2003)

    2003

  7. [14]

    C. L. Lopreore and R. E. Wyatt, Quantum Wave Packet Dynamics with Trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 5190 (1999)

    1999

  8. [15]

    R. E. Wyatt,Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories, In- terdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 28 (Springer- Verlag, New York, 2005)

    2005

  9. [16]

    Gu and I

    B. Gu and I. Franco, Partial hydrodynamic representa- tion of quantum molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 194104 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    Abedi, N

    A. Abedi, N. T. Maitra, and E. K. U. Gross, Corre- lated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction, J. Chem. Phys.137, 22A530 (2012)

    2012

  11. [18]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun.Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  12. [19]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B81, 245129 (2010)

    2010

  13. [20]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  14. [21]

    C. A. Mead, The geometric phase in molecular systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 51 (1992)

    1992

  15. [22]

    C. Xie, C. L. Malbon, H. Guo, and D. R. Yarkony, Up to a Sign. The Insidious Effects of Energetically Inacces- sible Conical Intersections on Unimolecular Reactions, Acc. Chem. Res.52, 501 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    C. A. Mead, Superposition of reactive and nonreactive scattering amplitudes in the presence of a conical inter- section, J. Chem. Phys.72, 3839 (1980)

    1980

  17. [24]

    C. A. Mead, Electronic spin—orbit interaction and the molecular Aharonov—Bohm effect, Chemical Physics49, 33 (1980)

    1980

  18. [25]

    D. G. Truhlar and C. A. Mead, Relative likelihood of en- countering conical intersections and avoided intersections 14 on the potential energy surfaces of polyatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A68, 032501 (2003)

    2003

  19. [26]

    C. A. Mead and D. G. Truhlar, Conditions for the def- inition of a strictly diabatic electronic basis for molecu- lar systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics77, 6090 (1982)

    1982

  20. [27]

    H. C. Longuet-Higgins, U. Opik, M. H. L. Pryce, and R. A. Sack, Studies of the Jahn-Teller effect .II. The dy- namical problem, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A244, 1 (1958)

    1958

  21. [28]

    Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications, Proc

    S. Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.44, 247 (1956)

    1956

  22. [29]

    Cohen, H

    E. Cohen, H. Larocque, F. Bouchard, F. Nejadsat- tari, Y. Gefen, and E. Karimi, Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 437 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Martinazzo and I

    R. Martinazzo and I. Burghardt, Dynamics of the Molec- ular Geometric Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 243002 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    X. Zhu, P. Lu, and M. Lein, Control of the Geomet- ric Phase and Nonequivalence between Geometric-Phase Definitions in the Adiabatic Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 030401 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Gu, Nonadiabatic Conical Intersection Dynamics in the Local Diabatic Representation with Strang Splitting and Fourier Basis, J

    B. Gu, Nonadiabatic Conical Intersection Dynamics in the Local Diabatic Representation with Strang Splitting and Fourier Basis, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 2711 (2024)

    2024

  26. [33]

    Wittig, Geometric phase and gauge connection in polyatomic molecules, Phys

    C. Wittig, Geometric phase and gauge connection in polyatomic molecules, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.14, 6409 (2012)

    2012

  27. [34]

    Manini and F

    N. Manini and F. Pistolesi, Off-Diagonal Geometric Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3067 (2000)

    2000

  28. [35]

    I. G. Ryabinkin, L. Joubert-Doriol, and A. F. Izmaylov, Geometric Phase Effects in Nonadiabatic Dynamics near Conical Intersections, Acc. Chem. Res.50, 1785 (2017)

    2017

  29. [36]

    Babikov, B

    D. Babikov, B. K. Kendrick, P. Zhang, and K. Mo- rokuma, Cyclic-N3. II. Significant geometric phase ef- fects in the vibrational spectra, The Journal of Chemical Physics122, 044315 (2005)

    2005

  30. [37]

    D. Yuan, Y. Guan, W. Chen, H. Zhao, S. Yu, C. Luo, Y. Tan, T. Xie, X. Wang, Z. Sun, D. H. Zhang, and X. Yang, Observation of the geometric phase effect in the H + HD→H2 + D reaction, Science362, 1289 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Kendrick and C

    B. Kendrick and C. A. Mead, The geometric vector po- tential in molecular systems with arbitrarily many iden- tical nuclei, J. Chem. Phys.102, 4160 (1995)

    1995

  32. [39]

    B. K. Kendrick, C. Alden Mead, and D. G. Truh- lar, Properties of nonadiabatic couplings and the gen- eralized Born–Oppenheimer approximation, Chemical Physics277, 31 (2002)

    2002

  33. [40]

    D. R. Yarkony, C. Xie, X. Zhu, Y. Wang, C. L. Mal- bon, and H. Guo, Diabatic and adiabatic representations: Electronic structure caveats, Computational and Theo- retical Chemistry1152, 41 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    I. G. Ryabinkin, L. Joubert-Doriol, and A. F. Izmaylov, When do we need to account for the geometric phase in excited state dynamics?, J. Chem. Phys.140, 214116 (2014)

    2014

  35. [42]

    Aharonov and J

    Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1593 (1987)

    1987

  36. [43]

    Zilberg and Y

    S. Zilberg and Y. Haas, Conical intersections in molecu- lar photochemistry – the role of phase change, Chemical Physics259, 249 (2000)

    2000

  37. [44]

    S. Li, J. Huang, Z. Lu, Y. Shu, W. Chen, D. Yuan, T. Wang, B. Fu, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, D. H. Zhang, and X. Yang, Observation of geometric phase effect through backward angular oscillations in the H + HD→H2 + D reaction, Nat Commun15, 1698 (2024)

    2024

  38. [45]

    D. Yuan, Y. Huang, W. Chen, H. Zhao, S. Yu, C. Luo, Y. Tan, S. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Sun, and X. Yang, Observation of the geometric phase effect in the H+HD→H2+D reaction below the conical intersection, Nat Commun11, 3640 (2020)

    2020

  39. [46]

    C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya-Agudelo, R. J. MacDonell, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, J. B. P´ erez- S´ anchez, J. Yuen-Zhou, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, T. R. Tan, and I. Kassal, Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection,...

    2023

  40. [47]

    M. G. D. Nix, A. L. Devine, R. N. Dixon, and M. N. R. Ashfold, Observation of geometric phase effect induced photodissociation dynamics in phenol, Chemical Physics Letters463, 305 (2008)

    2008

  41. [48]

    G. D. Scholes, G. R. Fleming, L. X. Chen, A. Aspuru- Guzik, A. Buchleitner, D. F. Coker, G. S. Engel, R. van Grondelle, A. Ishizaki, D. M. Jonas, J. S. Lundeen, J. K. McCusker, S. Mukamel, J. P. Ogilvie, A. Olaya-Castro, M. A. Ratner, F. C. Spano, K. B. Whaley, and X. Zhu, Usi...

    2017

  42. [49]

    Rafiq, N

    S. Rafiq, N. P. Weingartz, S. Kromer, F. N. Castellano, and L. X. Chen, Spin–vibronic coherence drives singlet– triplet conversion, Nature620, 776 (2023)

    2023

  43. [50]

    Matselyukh, V

    D. Matselyukh, V. Despr´ e, N. Golubev, A. Kuleff, and H. J. W¨ orner, Decoherence and Revival in Attosecond Charge Migration Driven by Non-adiabatic Dynamics, Nature Physics18, 1 (2022)

    2022

  44. [51]

    Halpin, P

    A. Halpin, P. J. M. Johnson, R. Tempelaar, R. S. Mur- phy, J. Knoester, T. L. C. Jansen, and R. J. D. Miller, Two-dimensional spectroscopy of a molecular dimer un- veils the effects of vibronic coupling on exciton coher- ences, Nature Chem6, 196 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    Gu, A Discrete-Variable Local Diabatic Representa- tion of Conical Intersection Dynamics, J

    B. Gu, A Discrete-Variable Local Diabatic Representa- tion of Conical Intersection Dynamics, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 6557 (2023)

    2023

  46. [53]

    Zhu and B

    X. Zhu and B. Gu, Making Peace with Random Phases: Ab Initio Conical Intersection Quantum Dynamics in Random Gauges, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.15, 8487 (2024)

    2024

  47. [54]

    quantum holon- omy

    A. Uhlmann, Parallel transport and “quantum holon- omy” along density operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics24, 229 (1986)

    1986

  48. [55]

    Z. Zhou, Z. Jin, T. Qiu, A. M. Rappe, and J. E. Subotnik, A Robust and Unified Solution for Choosing the Phases of Adiabatic States as a Function of Geometry: Extend- ing Parallel Transport Concepts to the Cases of Trivial and Near-Trivial Crossings, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16...

    2020

  49. [56]

    Frankel,The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, 3rd ed

    T. Frankel,The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  50. [57]

    Zanardi, P

    P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information- Theoretic Differential Geometry of Quantum Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 100603 (2007)

    2007

  51. [58]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Quantum Critical Scaling of the Geometric Tensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 095701 (2007)

    2007

  52. [59]

    Gianfrate, O

    A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. W. West, L. N. 15 Pfeiffer, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Sanvitto, and G. Malpuech, Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift, Nature578, 381 (2020)

    2020

  53. [60]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports Geometry and Non- Adiabatic Response in Quantum and Classical Systems, 697, 1 (2017)

    2017

  54. [61]

    Het´ enyi and P

    B. Het´ enyi and P. L´ evay, Fluctuations, uncertainty re- lations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds, Phys. Rev. A108, 032218 (2023)

    2023

  55. [62]

    C. Xie, D. R. Yarkony, and H. Guo, Nonadiabatic tunnel- ing via conical intersections and the role of the geometric phase, Phys. Rev. A95, 022104 (2017)

    2017

  56. [63]

    C. Xie, B. K. Kendrick, D. R. Yarkony, and H. Guo, Constructive and Destructive Interference in Nonadia- batic Tunneling via Conical Intersections, J. Chem. The- ory Comput.13, 1902 (2017)

    2017

  57. [64]

    C. Xie, J. Ma, X. Zhu, D. R. Yarkony, D. Xie, and H. Guo, Nonadiabatic Tunneling in Photodissociation of Phenol, J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 7828 (2016)

    2016

  58. [65]

    D. R. Yarkony, On the consequences of nonremovable derivative couplings. I. The geometric phase and quasidi- abatic states: A numerical study, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics105, 10456 (1996)

    1996

  59. [66]

    Choi and J

    S. Choi and J. Van´ ıˇ cek, How important are the resid- ual nonadiabatic couplings for an accurate simulation of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics in a quasidiabatic rep- resentation?, J. Chem. Phys.154, 124119 (2021)

    2021

  60. [67]

    X. Zhu, C. L. Malbon, and D. R. Yarkony, An improved quasi-diabatic representation of the 1, 2, 31A coupled adiabatic potential energy surfaces of phenol in the full 33 internal coordinates, The Journal of Chemical Physics 144, 124312 (2016)

    2016

  61. [68]

    Zhu and D

    X. Zhu and D. R. Yarkony, On the elimination of the electronic structure bottleneck in on the fly nonadia- batic dynamics for small to moderate sized (10-15 atom) molecules using fit diabatic representations based solely onab initioelectronic structure data: The photodissoci- ...

    2016

  62. [69]

    Xie and W

    W. Xie and W. Domcke, Accuracy of trajectory surface- hopping methods: Test for a two-dimensional model of the photodissociation of phenol, The Journal of Chemical Physics147, 184114 (2017)

    2017

  63. [70]

    X. Xu, J. Zheng, K. R. Yang, and D. G. Truhlar, Pho- todissociation Dynamics of Phenol: Multistate Trajec- tory Simulations including Tunneling, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16378 (2014)

    2014

  64. [71]

    K. R. Yang, X. Xu, J. Zheng, and D. G. Truhlar, Full- dimensional potentials and state couplings and multidi- mensional tunneling calculations for the photodissocia- tion of phenol, Chem. Sci.5, 4661 (2014)

    2014

  65. [72]

    C. L. Malbon, X. Zhu, H. Guo, and D. R. Yarkony, On the incorporation of the geometric phase in general sin- gle potential energy surface dynamics: A removable ap- proximation to ab initio data, The Journal of Chemical Physics145, 234111 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    Q. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Banerjee, P. Bao, M. Barbry, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, G. H. Booth, J. Chen, Z.-H. Cui, J. J. Eriksen, Y. Gao, S. Guo, J. Hermann, M. R. Hermes, K. Koh, P. Koval, S. Lehtola, Z. Li, J. Liu, N. Mardirossian, J. D. McClain, M. Motta, B. Mussard, H. Q. Pha...

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Xie and B

    Y. Xie and B. Gu, Path-ordered linked product approx- imation to the global electronic overlap matrix (2025), arXiv:2501.05003 [physics]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Wang and T

    X.-G. Wang and T. Carrington, Contracted basis Lanczos methods for computing numerically exact rovibrational levels of methane, J. Chem. Phys.121, 2937 (2004)

    2004

  69. [77]

    Lauvergnat and A

    D. Lauvergnat and A. Nauts, Smolyak Scheme for solving the Schr¨ odinger equation: Application to Malonaldehyde in Full Dimensionality, ChemPhysChem24, e202300501 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    Avila and T

    G. Avila and T. Carrington, A multi-dimensional Smolyak collocation method in curvilinear coordinates for computing vibrational spectra, J. Chem. Phys.143, 214108 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Y. Xie, Y. Yang, X. Zhu, A. Chen, and B. Gu, Nondirect- Product Local Diabatic Representation with Smolyak Sparse Grids, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 9512 (2024). Appendix A: Quantum Geometric Obstruction for diabatization In principle, transforming to the diabatic representa- t...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.