Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RecPS: Privacy Risk Scoring for Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.18365 v4 pith:76DCEVJP submitted 2025-07-24 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CR
keywords privacyrecsysmethodmodelrecpsscoringrisksensitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems (RecSys) have become an essential component of many web applications. The core of the system is a recommendation model trained on highly sensitive user-item interaction data. While privacy-enhancing techniques are actively studied in the research community, the real-world model development still depends on minimal privacy protection, e.g., via controlled access. Users of such systems should have the right to choose \emph{not} to share highly sensitive interactions. However, there is no method allowing the user to know which interactions are more sensitive than others. Thus, quantifying the privacy risk of RecSys training data is a critical step to enabling privacy-aware RecSys model development and deployment. We propose a membership-inference attack (MIA)- based privacy scoring method, RecPS, to measure privacy risks at both the interaction and user levels. The RecPS interaction-level score definition is motivated and derived from differential privacy, which is then extended to the user-level scoring method. A critical component is the interaction-level MIA method RecLiRA, which gives high-quality membership estimation. We have conducted extensive experiments on well-known benchmark datasets and RecSys models to show the unique features and benefits of RecPS scoring in risk assessment and RecSys model unlearning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Auditing Approximate Machine Unlearning for Differentially Private Models

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Approximate machine unlearning can raise the privacy risk of retained samples in differentially private models, according to a new augmentation-based membership inference audit.

Pith tools