Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Backstepping for Partial Differential Equations:A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15146 v4 pith:76MHHPBO submitted 2024-10-19 math.OC

Backstepping for Partial Differential Equations:A Survey

classification math.OC
keywords controlsurveysystemsbacksteppingdifferentialequationsnonlinearpdes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Systems modeled by partial differential equations (PDEs) are at least as ubiquitous as systems that are by nature finite-dimensional and modeled by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). And yet, systematic and readily usable methodologies, for such a significant portion of real systems, have been historically scarce. Around the year 2000, the backstepping approach to PDE control began to offer not only a less abstract alternative to PDE control techniques replicating optimal and spectrum assignment techniques of the 1960s, but also enabled the methodologies of adaptive and nonlinear control, matured in the 1980s and 1990s, to be extended from ODEs to PDEs, allowing feedback synthesis for physical and engineering systems that are uncertain, nonlinear, and infinite-dimensional. The PDE backstepping literature has grown in its nearly a quarter century of development to many hundreds of papers and nearly a dozen books. This survey aims to facilitate the entry, for a new researcher, into this thriving area of overwhelming size and topical diversity. Designs of controllers and observers, for parabolic, hyperbolic, and other classes of PDEs, in one and more dimensions (in box and spherical geometries), with nonlinear, adaptive, sampled-data, and event-triggered extensions, are covered in the survey. The lifeblood of control are technology and physics. The survey places a particular emphasis on applications that have motivated the development of the theory and which have benefited from the theory and designs: applications involving flows, flexible structures, materials, thermal and chemically reacting dynamics, energy (from oil drilling to batteries and magnetic confinement fusions), and vehicles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A State-Space Representation of Coupled Linear Multivariate PDEs and Stability Analysis using SDP

    math.AP 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    Extends PIE representation inductively to multivariate PDEs via domain intersections, proves consistency condition for operator inverse, and enables SDP-based stability analysis with PIETOOLS software.

  2. Optimization-based One-side Boundary Control of LWR Traffic Models

    math.OC 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    A single boundary controller for the LWR traffic model is not certified by the main theorems, because the proof omits endpoint optima and mishandles infeasibility of the stability constraint.

  3. Optimization-based One-side Boundary Control of LWR Traffic Models

    math.OC 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An optimization problem selects a boundary control input from the intersection of Lyapunov-stabilizing and barrier-invariant sets for LWR traffic models to achieve both goals simultaneously.