Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Computational design of optimal heterostructures for β-Ga₂O₃

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10557 v2 pith:774N3RCW submitted 2023-10-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Computational design of optimal heterostructures for β-Ga₂O₃

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords constantslatticeheterostructuresalloysconduction-bandfindheterostructureinterest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ga$_2$O$_3$ is a wide-bandgap material of interest for a wide variety of devices, many of these requiring heterostructures, for instance to achieve carrier confinement. A common method to create such heterostructures is to alloy with In$_2$O$_3$ or Al$_2$O$_3$. However, the lattice constants of these materials are significantly different from those of Ga$_2$O$_3$, leading to large amounts of strain in the resulting heterostructure. If the thickness of the heterostructure is increased, this can lead to cracking. By considering alloys of In$_2$O$_3$ and Al$_2$O$_3$, the lattice constants can be tailored to those of Ga$_2$O$_3$, while still keeping a sizable conduction-band offset. We use density functional theory with hybrid functionals to investigate the structural and electronic properties of In$_2$O$_3$ and Al$_2$O$_3$ alloys in the bixbyite, corundum, and monoclinic structures. We find that the lattice constants increase with In incorporation. Bandgaps decrease nonlinearly with increasing In concentration. We find the (In$_{\rm 0.25}$Al$_{\rm 0.75}$)$_{\rm 2}$O$_{\rm 3}$ monoclinic structure to be of particular interest, as it closely matches the Ga$_2$O$_3$ lattice constants while providing an indirect/direct bandgap of 5.94/5.70 eV and a conduction-band offset of 1 eV compared to Ga$_2$O$_3$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.