REVIEW 1 cited by
Holographic RG and Exact RG in O(N) Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this paper an Exact Renormalization Group (ERG) equation is written for the the critical $O(N)$ model in $D$-dimensions (with $D\approx 3$) at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point perturbed by a scalar composite operator. The action is written in terms of an auxiliary scalar field and reproduces correlation functions of a scalar composite operator. The equation is derived starting from the Polchinski ERG equation for the fundamental scalar field. As described in arXiv:1706.03371 an evolution operator for the Polchinski ERG equation can be written in the form of a functional integral, with a $D+1$ dimensional scalar field theory action. In the case of the fundamental scalar field this action only has a kinetic term and therefore looks quite different from Holographic RG where there are potential terms. But in the composite operator case discussed in this paper, the ERG equation and consequently the $D+1$ dimensional action contains higher order potential terms for the scalar field and is therefore very similar to the case of Holographic RG. Furthermore this action can be mapped to a scalar field action in $AdS_{D+1}$ using the techniques of arXiv:1706.03371. The leading cubic term of the potential is computed in this paper for $D \approx 3$ and expectedly vanishes in $D=3$ in agreement with results in the AdS/CFT literature.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Yang-Mills interaction from boundary vector model
The ERG flow of the USp(2N) singlet sector of a free 3D U(2N) scalar theory yields a bulk AdS4 cubic action that is on-shell equivalent to Yang-Mills plus a field-strength-cubed term.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.