Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 71 references

Long-range exchange interaction controls the fine structure of excited trion states in semiconductor quantum dots

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper tries to show that the long-range electron-hole exchange interaction, not just short-range effects, controls the fine structure of excited trions in semiconductor quantum dots.

desk verdict A careful, self-contained microscopic derivation of the long-range exchange fine structure for excited trions that recovers the neutral-exciton limit and clearly discloses its scope limits. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09554 v1 pith:7DXAF3XW submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other

M.M. Glazov , E.L. Ivchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other PACS 73.21.La71.35.-y78.67.Hc
keywords trionslong-rangeexchangeinteractionexcitonfinestructurequantumdotselectron-holesinglet-tripletmixingpolarization-resolvedspectroscopyheavy-holebands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove that the long-range, annihilation part of the electron-hole exchange interaction governs the fine structure of excited trions in semiconductor quantum dots. The authors derive effective Hamiltonians for a heavy-hole valence band and for a simple spin-1/2 band structure, writing every exchange parameter as an overlap integral of electron and hole envelope functions with the interband dipole matrix element. Because those parameters follow from the dot's shape and band structure rather than from fitted constants, the theory connects measured fine-structure splittings and polarization patterns directly to the quantum dot geometry. The central result is that long-range exchange mixes singlet and triplet trion configurations, producing anisotropic splittings and polarization-dependent spectra, while the ground-state singlet trion remains doubly degenerate and only acquires an energy shift.

What carries the argument

The central object is the microscopic long-range exchange Hamiltonian, Eq. (15), built from interband dipole matrix elements and the longitudinal electric field produced by the electron-hole pair. The parameters that carry the argument are the overlap integrals $D_{i_e,i_h}^{\mathbf{k}} = d_{cv} \int e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \varphi_{i_e}(\mathbf{r}) \varphi_{i_h}(\mathbf{r}) d\mathbf{r}$, whose squared moduli weighted by $k_\alpha k_\beta / k^2$ enter the effective Hamiltonians (31) and (44). In the heavy-hole model the combinations $D_{2,\mathbf{k}}$ and $\tilde D_{2,\mathbf{k}}$ separate isotropic and anisotropic parts, while in the simple-band model the same integrals fill a $4\times 4$ matrix that also includes $z$-polarized transitions. This machinery converts the dot shape and band structure into predicted splittings and polarizations.

What would settle it

A decisive test is polarization-resolved photoluminescence of a single charged quantum dot of known shape: measure the energy difference between the two linearly polarized excited-trion lines and check whether it equals $2\pi/\varepsilon_b \sum_{\mathbf{k}} D_{2,\mathbf{k}} (k_x^2-k_y^2)/k^2$, with $D_{2,\mathbf{k}}$ computed from the dot's envelope functions, and whether the splitting vanishes for nearly cubic dots and changes sign with aspect ratio.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the long-range exchange interaction microscopically explains the fine structure of excited 1s2p-2p_h trions. Starting from the electrodynamical form of the electron-hole exchange, Eq. (15), it obtains effective Hamiltonians for heavy-hole trions, Eq. (31), and for Gamma_6 x Gamma_7 simple-band trions, Eq. (44). The off-diagonal elements of these Hamiltonians arise from singlet-triplet mixing and from confinement anisotropy: parameters such as delta_x are sums over wavevectors of envelope-overlap squares weighted by ($k_x^{2}$-$k_y^{2}$)/$k^{2}$, so they vanish for isotropic in-plane shape and grow with shape anisotropy. The paper shows that long-range exchange leaves the ground singlet trion Kramers-degenerate while splitting the excited manifold into bright states linearly polarized along the dot's principal axes. In the limit where the resident electron is removed, the excited-trion spectrum reduces to the known anisotropic fine structure of the corresponding neutral exciton.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quantum dot is in a strong-confinement regime where size-quantization energies dominate Coulomb energies, which dominate exchange splittings, so trion wavefunctions may be written as products of single-particle envelopes with exchange treated as a perturbation, and that the dot's in-plane anisotropy is strong enough for the chosen 2p orbital to be treated in isolation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Measured anisotropic splittings of excited trion lines become quantitative values of long-range exchange parameters, since those parameters are not free constants but overlap integrals of the dot's envelopes.
  • Each bright excited-trion line acquires linear polarization along a principal axis of the dot, with opposite signs of linear polarization for the 1s2p_x-2p_h,x and 1s2p_y-2p_h,y configurations.
  • In strongly anisotropic dots, singlet and triplet states mix and one of the three optically active states turns dark while the other two become x- and y-polarized.
  • The same formulas, with 2s orbitals in place of 2p, describe 1s2s-2s_h excited trions, and the hot X^{-*} and X^{+*} complexes seen in photoluminescence excitation fit into the same doublet picture.
  • Removing the resident electron from the formulas recovers the familiar fine structure of the corresponding neutral exciton, so excited-trion and exciton splittings are governed by the same overlap integrals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper: if the predicted magnitude and sign of the anisotropic parameter delta_x hold, polarization-resolved spectra of excited trions could serve as a non-destructive probe of dot shape anisotropy, since the formula ties the splitting directly to envelope-function overlap integrals.
  • Going beyond the paper: for nearly cubic dots the assumption that a single 2p orbital can be isolated breaks down, so a natural next test is to combine the paper's exchange terms with direct Coulomb mixing of 2p_x, 2p_y, and 2p_z; the near-degenerate case should show extra avoided crossings and rotations of the polarization axes.
  • Going beyond the paper: the same second-quantized exchange Hamiltonian can be applied to positively charged trions and to trions with a resident hole by relabeling the carriers; the paper works out negative trions, but the singlet-triplet mixing mechanism is not specific to the charge sign.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a microscopic theory of the long-range electron-hole exchange interaction in excited trions confined in semiconductor quantum dots. It focuses on the 1s2p–2p_h configuration of a negatively charged trion (two electrons and one hole) and derives effective long-range exchange Hamiltonians for two band-structure models: the heavy-hole ±3/2 model (Eq. (31)) and the simple Γ6×Γ7 spin-1/2 model (Eq. (44)). The exchange parameters are expressed as overlap integrals of the single-particle envelope functions and the interband dipole matrix element, with no fitting to the trion fine structure. The theory predicts that the long-range exchange mixes singlet and triplet trion configurations, producing shape-dependent anisotropic splittings and polarization-dependent optical spectra. In the limit where the resident 1s electron is removed, the derived eigenvalues reduce to the known neutral-exciton fine structure (Eqs. (47)–(48)), providing an internal consistency check.

Significance. If correct, this is a significant step: it provides a parameter-free (up to two short-range exchange constants) microscopic description of excited trion fine structure, directly connecting dot geometry to spectroscopic observables. The derivation is explicit and self-contained, and the paper includes several nontrivial consistency checks, such as the zero-energy dark eigenstate and the recovery of the neutral-exciton splitting in the limit E_ST → 0. The scope conditions (strong confinement hierarchy, isolated 2p orbital) are stated clearly in Sec. IIB and Sec. VI. The results are falsifiable through polarization-resolved photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy, and the paper is a strong candidate for publication after minor revisions.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IIA, Eq. (5)] The sentence "e<0 is the electron change" should read "electron charge", and the entry "p2/3" in d_cv is presumably √(2/3); please correct the typesetting.
  2. [Section IIB, Eq. (11) and Section III, Eq. (15)] The static dielectric constant is denoted ε_0 in Eq. (11) and ε_b in Eq. (15); please define both explicitly and state whether they are the same parameter.
  3. [Figure 3 and page 7] There are several typos: "labeld" should be "labeled", "repri sent" should be "represent" in the Fig. 3 caption, and the sentence "The dimensionless energy ... are shown" should agree in number with its compound subject.
  4. [Abstract and Section VI] The abstract and title refer to "excited trion states" generally, but the derivation is presented for negative trions (two electrons, one hole); the extension to positive trions is only qualitative in Sec. VI. Please state this scope explicitly.
  5. [General] It would be helpful to include a numerical estimate of δ_x/δ_0 and δ_in/δ_out for a representative quantum dot, to give the reader a sense of the magnitude of the predicted anisotropic splittings relative to the isotropic short-range exchange; this is a suggestion, not a defect.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the excited-trion LRE fine structure is derived microscopically from Eq. (15), with no fitted target data and with independent neutral-exciton benchmarks.

full rationale

The central derivation starts from the microscopic long-range exchange Hamiltonian (15), obtained from the electrodynamic energy (14) with the interband dipole matrix elements (16). The effective Hamiltonians (31) and (44) are computed by inserting the second-quantized trion states (29) and (43) into Eq. (15), and the resulting exchange parameters in Eqs. (32), (39), and (46) are overlap integrals of envelope functions and the interband matrix element d_cv, not quantities fitted to the trion splittings the paper predicts. The singlet-triplet splitting EST in Eq. (11) and the short-range exchange terms in Eqs. (35) and (45) are additional inputs, but the load-bearing claim that anisotropic fine-structure splittings and polarization properties are determined by the quantum-dot shape through LRE does not reduce to those inputs. Independent consistency checks are present: the neutral-exciton limits in Eqs. (22), (23), and (47)-(48) recover known results, and the dark eigenstate in model II.2 has exactly zero energy, with the remaining block yielding 2(delta0 +/- delta_x). Self-citations such as Refs. [10], [14], [15], [38], and [51] are used for background, known benchmarks, or experimental context, not as the justification for the new trion derivation. The explicit strong-confinement hierarchy in Sec. IIB and the Sec. VI caution that near-cubic dots require direct Coulomb mixing of p-shell states are disclosed scope conditions rather than hidden circularity. No step was found in which a prediction is equivalent by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central LRE interaction introduces no free parameters: the exchange couplings are overlap integrals over the envelope functions. The short-range exchange constants are carried over from prior theory as phenomenological inputs. The strong confinement hierarchy and the isolated-orbital assumption are the main physical premises, both explicitly stated in Sec. IIB.

free parameters (2)
  • δiso (isotropic short-range exchange parameter) = not determined (involves coefficient C)
    Introduced in Eq. (36) as coefficient C times an overlap integral; C is a material-dependent constant not derived in this paper. It enters the full Hamiltonian (33), but the central LRE claim is independent of it.
  • δ̃iso (off-diagonal short-range exchange parameter) = not determined
    Introduced in Eq. (36b) with the same coefficient C; enters the singlet-triplet mixing in H_short and is not derived microscopically here.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Strong confinement hierarchy: size-quantization energies >> Coulomb energies >> exchange splittings
    Stated in Sec. IIB; allows writing trion states as products of single-particle envelopes and treating exchange as a perturbation. Underpins the entire effective-Hamiltonian construction.
  • domain assumption Neglect of spin-orbit coupling in the band structure and electron-electron interaction
    Stated in Sec. IIB and footnote 2; the models use spin-1/2 and heavy-hole bands only, and the two-electron fine structure from spin-orbit is neglected.
  • domain assumption Electrodynamical form of the LRE interaction, Eq. (15), with a background dielectric constant and no retardation
    Sec. III; standard for excitons, extended here to trions. Assumes the same background dielectric constant in the dot and the matrix.
  • domain assumption In-plane anisotropy allows treating the 2p_x-2p_h,x excited orbital as isolated from 2p_y and 2p_z
    Sec. IIB and Sec. VI; used to construct the 8-state basis and the spectra in Figs. 3-5. For near-cubic dots, direct Coulomb mixing of orbital states, Eq. (51), must be included.
  • standard math Kramers degeneracy of half-integer-spin trion states under time reversal
    Used throughout to separate the two time-reversed sets of states, e.g., Eqs. (29)-(30), and to argue that the LRE interaction does not mix the sets.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-range exchange interaction controls the fine structure of excited trion states in semiconductor quantum dots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7DXAF3XW

@misc{pith2026260809554,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-range exchange interaction controls the fine structure of excited trion states in semiconductor quantum dots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7DXAF3XW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09554}
}
abstract

We develop a microscopic theory of the long-range electron-hole exchange interaction in charged excitons (trions) confined in semiconductor quantum dots. While the ground-state singlet trion remains degenerate in the spin component of unpaired charge carrier by time-reversal symmetry, excited trion states exhibit a rich fine structure resulting from the interplay of electron-electron and electron-hole exchange interactions. We derive the effective long-range exchange Hamiltonian for both the spin-$3/2$ heavy-hole and a simple spin-$1/2$ valence band models. The long-range exchange interaction mixes singlet and triplet trion configurations, giving rise to anisotropic fine-structure splittings and related polarization-dependent optical spectra determined by the quantum-dot shape. Analytical expressions are obtained for the long-range exchange parameters. The developed theory establishes a unified microscopic description of the fine structure of excited trions in semiconductor quantum dots and provides a framework for interpreting polarization-resolved optical spectroscopy of charged excitonic complexes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09554 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the effect of LRE interaction on the ground exciton (a) and trion (b) states in the heavy-hole model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Mixing scheme for the states of heavy hole excited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy spectrum of excited heavy-hole trion states calculated within the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy spectrum of excited trion states calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy spectrum of excited trion states within sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dresselhaus, Effective mass approximation for exci- tons, J

    G. Dresselhaus, Effective mass approximation for exci- tons, J. Phys. Chem. Solids1, 14 (1956)

    work page 1956

  2. [2]

    E. I. Rashba, Effect of Resonance Excitation Transfer in the Theory of a Large Radius Exciton, JETP9, 1213 (1959)

    work page 1959

  3. [3]

    G. E. Pikus and G. L. Bir, Exchange Interaction in Ex- citons in Semiconductors, JETP33, 108 (1971)

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    Kiselev and A

    V. Kiselev and A. Zhilich, Exchange and exchange- deformation splitting of exciton levels in cuprous oxide crystal, Sov. Phys. Solid State13, 2008 (1972)

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    M. M. Denisov and V. P. Makarov, Longitudinal and Transverse Excitons in Semiconductors, Phys. Status So- lidi B56, 9 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    G. L. Bir and G. E. Pikus,Symmetry and Strain-induced Effects in Semiconductors(Wiley/Halsted Press, 1974)

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    L. C. Andreani, F. Tassone, and F. Bassani, Radiative lifetime of free excitons in quantum wells, Solid State Commun.77, 641 (1991)

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    L. C. Andreani, Exciton-polaritons in bulk semiconduc- tors and in confined electron and photon systems, in Strong Light-Matter Coupling, edited by A. Aufféves et al.(World Scientific, Singapore, 2014) pp. 37–82

    work page 2014

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    M.Z.Maialle, E.A.d.A.eSilva,andL.J.Sham,Exciton spin dynamics in quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B47, 15776 (1993)

    1993

  2. [10]

    M. M. Glazov, T. Amand, X. Marie, D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, and B. Urbaszek, Exciton fine structure and spin decoherence in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B89, 201302 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    S. V. Gupalov, E. L. Ivchenko, and A. V. Kavokin, Fine structure of localized exciton levels in quantum wells, JETP86, 388 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    S. V. Goupalov, E. L. Ivchenko, and A. V. Kavokin, Anisotropic exchange splitting of excitonic levels in small quantum systems, Superlattices and Microstructures23, 1206 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    Franceschetti, L

    A. Franceschetti, L. W. Wang, H. Fu, and A. Zunger, Short-range versus long-range electron-hole exchange in- teractions in semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 58, R13367 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Glazov, E

    M. Glazov, E. Ivchenko, R. v. Baltz, and E. Tsitsishvili, Fine structure of excited excitonic states in quantum disks, International Journal of Nanoscience6, 265 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Glazov, E

    M. Glazov, E. Ivchenko, L. Besombes, Y. Léger, L. Main- gault, and H. Mariette, Fine structure of exciton excited levels in a quantum dot with a magnetic ion, Physical Review B75, 205313 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Kadantsev and P

    E. Kadantsev and P. Hawrylak, Theory of exciton fine structure in semiconductor quantum dots: Quantum dot anisotropy and lateral electric field, Phys. Rev. B81, 045311 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. See, D. G. Gevaux, K.Cooper, P.Atkinson, I.Farrer, D.A.Ritchie,andA.J. Shields, Magnetic-field-induced reduction of the exciton polarization splitting in InAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B73, 033306 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Kowalik, O

    K. Kowalik, O. Krebs, A. Lemaître, S. Laurent, P. Senel- lart, P. Voisin, and J. A. Gaj, Influence of an in-plane electric field on exciton fine structure in InAs-GaAs self- assembled quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Lett.86, 041907 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Glazov, E

    M. Glazov, E. Ivchenko, O. Krebs, K. Kowalik, and P. Voisin, Diamagnetic contribution to the effect of in- plane magnetic field on a quantum-dot exciton fine struc- ture, Physical Review B76, 193313 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Akopian, N

    N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. D. Gerardot, and P. M. Petroff, Entangled Photon Pairs from Semiconductor Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 130501 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs, Nature439, 179 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Dousse, J

    A. Dousse, J. Suffczynski, A. Beveratos, O. Krebs, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. Voisin, and P. Senel- lart,Ultrabrightsourceofentangledphotonpairs,Nature 466, 217 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    M. V. Rakhlin, A. I. Galimov, I. V. Dyakonov, N. N. Skryabin, G. V. Klimko, M. M. Kulagina, Yu. M. Zadi- ranov, S. V. Sorokin, I. V. Sedova, Yu. A. Guseva, D. S. Berezina, Yu. M. Serov, N. A. Maleev, A. G. Kuzmenkov, S. I. Troshkov, K. V. Taratorin, A. K. Skalkin, S. S. Straup...

    2023

  16. [24]

    B. Wu, L. Liu, H. Liu, X. Mao, X.-J. Wang, H. Ni, Z. Niu, and Z. Yuan, Purcell-enhanced two-photon emis- sionfromaquantumdotviadark-statebiexcitonloading, Nat. Mater.25, 595 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    M. A. Lampert, Mobile and Immobile Effective-Mass- Particle Complexes in Nonmetallic Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.1, 450 (1958). 15

    1958

  18. [26]

    Kheng, R

    K. Kheng, R. T. Cox, M. Y. d’ Aubigné, F. Bassani, K. Saminadayar, and S. Tatarenko, Observation of neg- atively charged excitons X− in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1752 (1993)

    1993

  19. [27]

    Finkelstein, H

    G. Finkelstein, H. Shtrikman, and I. Bar-Joseph, Negatively and positively charged excitons in GaAs/AlxGa1−xAs quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 53, R1709 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, C. Lee, G. H. Lee, J. Hone, T. F. Heinz, and J. Shan, Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2, Nat Mater12, 207 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    J. S. Ross, S. Wu, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, A. M. Jones, G. Aivazian, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Electrical control of neutral and charged ex- citons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature communi- cations4, 1474 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    A. S. Bracker, E. A. Stinaff, D. Gammon, M. E. Ware, J. G. Tischler, D. Park, D. Gershoni, A. V. Filinov, M. Bonitz, F. Peeters, and C. Riva, Binding energies of positive and negative trions: From quantum wells to quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B72, 035332 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    P. Li, L. Biesterfeld, L. F. Klepzig, J. Yang, H. T. Ngo, A. Addad, T. N. Rakow, R. Guan, E. P. Rugerami- gabo, I. Zaluzhnyy, F. Schreiber, L. Biadala, J. Lauth, and M. Zopf, Sub-millielectronvolt Line Widths in Po- larized Low-Temperature Photoluminescence of 2D PbS Nanoplate...

    2024

  24. [32]

    Jovanov, S

    V. Jovanov, S. Kapfinger, M. Bichler, G. Abstreiter, and J. J. Finley, Direct observation of metastable hot trions in an individual quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B84, 235321 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Benny, Y

    Y. Benny, Y. Kodriano, E. Poem, S. Khatsevitch, D. Ger- shoni, and P. M. Petroff, Two-photon photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy of single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B84, 075473 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Benny, Y

    Y. Benny, Y. Kodriano, E. Poem, D. Gershoni, T. A. Truong, and P. M. Petroff, Excitation spectroscopy of single quantum dots at tunable positive, neutral, and negative charge states, Phys. Rev. B86, 085306 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Molas, A

    M. Molas, A. Nicolet, M. Potemski, and A. Babiński, In- tershell Exchange Interaction in Charged GaAlAs Quan- tum Dots, Acta Phys. Pol. A124, 785 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Molas, A

    M. Molas, A. Nicolet, B. Piętka, A. Babiński, and M. Potemski, Magnetic Field Effect on the Excitation Spectrum of a Neutral Exciton in a Single Quantum Dot, Acta Phys. Pol. A126, 1066 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Smoleński, T

    T. Smoleński, T. Kazimierczuk, M. Goryca, P. Wojnar, and P. Kossacki, Fine structure of a resonantly excited p-shell exciton in a CdTe quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B93, 195311 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    M. V. Durnev, M. Vidal, L. Bouet, T. Amand, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, P. Zhou, G. Wang, T. Mano, N. Ha, T. Kuroda, X. Marie, K. Sakoda, and B. Ur- baszek, Magnetospectroscopy of excited states in charge- tunable GaAs/AlGaAs [111] quantum dots, Physical Re- view B93, 245412 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Podemski, A

    P. Podemski, A. Maryński, P. Wyborski, A. Bercha, W. Trzeciakowski, and G. Sęk, Single dot photolumines- cence excitation spectroscopy in the telecommunication spectral range, J. Lumin.212, 300 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    A. I. Galimov, Yu. M. Serov, M. V. Rakhlin, G. V. Klimko, S. V. Sorokin, I. V. Sedova, M. M. Kulagina, Yu. M. Zadiranov, Yu. A. Salii, D. S. Berezina, S. I. Troshkov, T. V. Shubina, and A. A. Toropov, Charge States of Single Quantum Dots in a Microcavity p–n–p Heterostructure ...

    2025

  33. [41]

    S. V. Sorokin, G. V. Klimko, I. V. Sedova, O. E. Lakuntsova, A. I. Galimov, Yu. M. Serov, A. I. Vereten- nikov, L. A. Snigirev, and A. A. Toropov, Metamorphic InAs/InGaAs Quantum Dot Heterostructures for Single- Photon Generation in the C-Band Spectral Range, JETP Letters121, ...

    2025

  34. [42]

    Schön, E

    C. Schön, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, Sequential Generation of Entangled Mul- tiqubit States, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 110503 (2005)

    2005

  35. [43]

    N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Proposal for Pulsed On- Demand Sources of Photonic Cluster State Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 113602 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    C. Y. Hu, W. J. Munro, and J. G. Rarity, Deterministic photon entangler using a charged quantum dot inside a microcavity, Phys. Rev. B78, 125318 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Arnold, J

    C. Arnold, J. Demory, V. Loo, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, M. Glazov, O. Krebs, P. Voisin, P. Senellart, and L. Lanco, Macroscopic rotation of photon polarization induced by a single spin, Nat. Commun.6, 6236 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Cogan, Z.-E

    D. Cogan, Z.-E. Su, O. Kenneth, and D. Gershoni, De- terministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state, Nat. Photon.17, 324 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Coste, D

    N. Coste, D. A. Fioretto, N. Belabas, S. C. Wein, P. Hi- laire, R. Frantzeskakis, M. Gundin, B. Goes, N. So- maschi, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, A. Harouri, S. E. Economou, A. Auffeves, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, High-rate entanglement between a semicon- duc...

    2023

  40. [48]

    Z.-E. Su, B. Taitler, I. Schwartz, D. Cogan, I. Nassar, O. Kenneth, N. H. Lindner, and D. Gershoni, Continuous and deterministic all-photonic cluster state of indistin- guishable photons, Rep. Prog. Phys.87, 077601 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Serov, A

    Y. Serov, A. Galimov, D. S. Smirnov, M. Rakhlin, N. Leppenen, G. Klimko, S. Sorokin, I. Sedova, D. Berez- ina, Y. Salii, M. Kulagina, Y. Zadiranov, S. Troshkov, T. V. Shubina, and A. A. Toropov, Hidden anisotropy controls spin-photon entanglement in a charged quantum dot, Phys...

    2025

  42. [50]

    Bayer, G

    M. Bayer, G. Ortner, O. Stern, A. Kuther, A. A. Gor- bunov, A. Forchel, P. Hawrylak, S. Fafard, K. Hinzer, T. L. Reinecke, S. N. Walck, J. P. Reithmaier, F. Klopf, andF.Schaefer,Finestructureofneutralandchargedex- citons in self-assembled InGaAs-AlGaAs quantum dots, Phys. Rev....

    2002

  43. [51]

    Z. A. Iakovlev and M. M. Glazov, Fermi polaron fine structure in strained van der Waals heterostructures, 2D Materials10, 035034 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    K. V. Kavokin, Fine structure of the quantum-dot trion, Phys. Status Solidi A195, 592 (2003)

    2003

  45. [53]

    E. L. Ivchenko and G. E. Pikus,Superlattices and Other Heterostructures. Symmetry and Optical Phenom- ena(Springer-Verlag, 1995)

    1995

  46. [54]

    Kudlacik, E

    D. Kudlacik, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Qiang, M. A. Semina, A. A. Golovatenko, A. V. Rodina, A. L. Efros, A. I. Ekimov, and M. Bayer, Landégfactors and spin dynamics of charge carriers in CuCl nanocrystals in a glass matrix, Phys. Rev. B111, 085423 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    M. A. Becker, R. Vaxenburg, G. Nedelcu, P. C. Ser- cel, A. Shabaev, M. J. Mehl, J. G. Michopoulos, S. G. Lambrakos, N. Bernstein, J. L. Lyons, T. Stöferle, R. F. 16 Mahrt, M. V. Kovalenko, D. J. Norris, G. Rainò, and A. L. Efros, Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide ...

    2018

  48. [56]

    Rodina and E

    A. Rodina and E. Ivchenko, Theory of single and dou- ble electron spin-flip Raman scattering in semiconductor nanoplatelets, Physical Review B102, 0235432 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Bimberg, M

    D. Bimberg, M. Grundmann, and N. N. Ledenstov, Quantum Dot Heterostructures(Wiley-VCH Verlag, 1999)

    1999

  50. [58]

    Ivchenko,Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures(Alpha Science International Ltd., Har- row, UK, 2005) p

    E. Ivchenko,Optical Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanostructures(Alpha Science International Ltd., Har- row, UK, 2005) p. 427

    2005

  51. [59]

    A. L. Efros and L. E. Brus, Nanocrystal Quantum Dots: From Discovery to Modern Development, ACS Nano15, 6192 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Luo, Z.-Z

    G. Luo, Z.-Z. Zhang, H.-O. Li, X.-X. Song, G.-W. Deng, G. Cao, M. Xiao, and G.-P. Guo, Quantum dot behav- ior in transition metal dichalcogenides nanostructures, Front. Phys.12, 128502 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Zhang, X.-X

    Z.-Z. Zhang, X.-X. Song, G. Luo, G.-W. Deng, V. Mos- allanejad, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H.-O. Li, G. Cao, G.-C. Guo, F. Nori, and G.-P. Guo, Electrotunable arti- ficial molecules based on van der Waals heterostructures, Sci. Adv.3, e1701699 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Pisoni, Z

    R. Pisoni, Z. Lei, P. Back, M. Eich, H. Overweg, Y. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Gate-tunable quantum dot in a high quality single layer MoS2 van der Waals heterostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 123101 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    M. A. Semina and R. A. Suris, Localized excitons and trions in semiconductor nanosystems, Phys. Usp.65, 111 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Cortez, O

    S. Cortez, O. Krebs, S. Laurent, M. Senes, X. Marie, P. Voisin, R. Ferreira, G. Bastard, J.-M. Gerrard, and T. Amand, Optically Driven Spin Memory inn-Doped InAs-GaAs Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 207401 (2002)

    2002

  57. [65]

    Ediger, G

    M. Ediger, G. Bester, B. D. Gerardot, A. Badolato, P. M. Petroff, K. Karrai, A. Zunger, and R. J. Warburton, Fine Structure of Negatively and Positively Charged Excitons in Semiconductor Quantum Dots: Electron-Hole Asym- metry, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 036808 (2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    M. M. Glazov and V. D. Kulakovskii, Spin-orbit effect on electron-electron interaction and the fine structure of electron complexes in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B79, 195305 (2009)

    2009

  59. [67]

    M. M. Glazov, The fine structure of two-electron states in single and double quantum dots, J. Phys. Condens. Matter22, 025301 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    S. V. Goupalov, P. Lavallard, G. Lamouche, and D. S. Citrin, Electrodynamical treatment of the electron- hole long-range exchange interaction in semiconductor nanocrystals, Physics of the Solid State45, 768 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    L. Ren, C. Robert, M. Glazov, M. Semina, T. Amand, L. Lombez, D. Lagarde, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and X. Marie, Control of the Bright-Dark Exciton Splitting Using the Lamb Shift in a Two-Dimensional Semiconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 116901 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Z. A. Iakovlev and M. M. Glazov, Longitudinal- transverse splitting and fine structure of Fermi po- larons in two-dimensional semiconductors, J. Lumin. 273, 120700 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Yagodkin, K

    D. Yagodkin, K. Burfeindt, Z. A. Iakovlev, A. M. Kumar, A. Dewambrechies, O. Yücel, B. Höfer, C. Gahl, M. M. Glazov, and K. I. Bolotin, Fermi polarons under strain- induced pseudomagnetic fields, Nat. Commun.16, 10232 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.