REVIEW 1 cited by
Why the pseudo label based semi-supervised learning algorithm is effective?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, pseudo label based semi-supervised learning has achieved great success in many fields. The core idea of the pseudo label based semi-supervised learning algorithm is to use the model trained on the labeled data to generate pseudo labels on the unlabeled data, and then train a model to fit the previously generated pseudo labels. We give a theory analysis for why pseudo label based semi-supervised learning is effective in this paper. We mainly compare the generalization error of the model trained under two settings: (1) There are N labeled data. (2) There are N unlabeled data and a suitable initial model. Our analysis shows that, firstly, when the amount of unlabeled data tends to infinity, the pseudo label based semi-supervised learning algorithm can obtain model which have the same generalization error upper bound as model obtained by normally training in the condition of the amount of labeled data tends to infinity. More importantly, we prove that when the amount of unlabeled data is large enough, the generalization error upper bound of the model obtained by pseudo label based semi-supervised learning algorithm can converge to the optimal upper bound with linear convergence rate. We also give the lower bound on sampling complexity to achieve linear convergence rate. Our analysis contributes to understanding the empirical successes of pseudo label-based semi-supervised learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Label-Free Concept Drift Assessment for Reliable AI in Emerging Wireless Applications
CFPT and TabAutoDrift detect concept drift by comparing macro-F1 scores from pseudo-label or transfer-learning retraining, reaching F1 of 0.94 in fingerprinting and 1.00 in link anomalies without post-deployment labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.