Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 178 references

A pulsar timing array is a diffraction-limited gravitational-wave observatory whose angular resolution is set by the gravitational-wave wavelength divided by pulsar distance, and whose Earth-term approximation is quantitatively justified fo

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:43 UTC pith:7FOSXLTD

load-bearing objection Full response derivation and regime analysis are solid, but the headline 10^11 pulsar threshold double-counts shared measurements and is roughly four orders too high; the Earth-term conclusion still survives. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19329 v1 pith:7FOSXLTD submitted 2026-07-21 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Gravitational-Wave Sky Mapping with Pulsar Timing Arrays: The Full Earth-Pulsar Response and Fundamental Resolution Limits

S. A. Andrianov , S. M. Kopeikin This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords pulsar timing arraysgravitational-wave sky mappingtensor spherical harmonicsEarth-term approximationangular resolutiondiffraction limitstochastic gravitational-wave backgroundFisher information matrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are the only instruments sensitive to nanohertz gravitational waves, and current analyses keep only the Earth term of the response. This paper constructs the full Earth-plus-pulsar response in a tensor spherical-harmonic basis and derives closed-form response functions for a single Earth-pulsar baseline. It shows that a PTA is a diffraction-limited observatory: angular resolution is theta ~ lambda/L, with an exponential sensitivity cutoff at multipole l_cut ~ omega L. The same formalism, combined with Fisher-matrix and singular-value analysis, yields the paper's headline result: coherent pulsar-term information can improve full-sky GW mapping only for arrays of order 10^11 precisely timed pulsars. The net conclusion is that the Earth-term approximation adopted in contemporary PTA work is quantitatively justified for full-sky mapping.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the full PTA response—Earth term plus pulsar term—can be written in closed form in a tensor spherical-harmonic basis, and that this closed form exposes a fundamental diffraction limit. For a monochromatic GW of angular frequency omega and a pulsar at distance L, the baseline response is R^G_lm = 2 pi Y_lm(p-hat) e^{-iy} (-i)^l f_l(y), where y = omega L and f_l(y) is a combination of spherical Bessel functions. The analysis of f_l(y) reveals four regimes: Earth-term domination at low multipoles, a transition near l ~ sqrt(y), pulsar-term domination with roughly constant sensitivity up to l ~ y, and an exponential cutoff beyond l_cut ~ omega L. The cutoff mean

What carries the argument

The key object is the multipole response function f_l(y), defined in Eq. (B57) as a linear combination of spherical Bessel functions j_{l-1}(y) and j_l(y) with y = omega L. Inserted into the closed-form baseline response R^G_lm = 2 pi Y_lm(p-hat) e^{-iy} (-i)^l f_l(y), it encodes all angular-sensitivity information: an Earth-term-dominated plateau with sensitivity falling as l^{-2}, an oscillatory pulsar-term regime between l ~ sqrt(y) and l ~ y, and an exponential cutoff at the Airy turning point l_cut ~ y. The whitened design matrix R-tilde is then inverted by singular-value decomposition; the SVD both regularizes the ill-conditioned inverse problem and provides the rank bound N_modes <= N

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the order-of-magnitude SNR scaling in Section 4.2—that an approximately isotropic PTA has singular values falling as l^{-2}, that per-mode SNR grows as sqrt(N_l) sigma_l, and that ten independent measurements per quadrupole mode is a sufficient anchor—so the quoted 10^11 threshold inherits these assumptions; a different normalization shifts the number by orders of magnitude, though the rank bound N_modes <= N_pulsars independently supports the qual

What would settle it

Build a simulated short-arm PTA with y = omega L in the range 3–13 and 500 pulsars, exactly as in Section 5, and compare the singular-value spectrum and reconstructed sky maps with and without the pulsar term. The paper predicts a clear rise in high-l singular values and recovery of modes up to l ~ 11 when the pulsar term is included (Figs. 4 and 8); if no such enhancement appears, the claimed pulsar-term extension of angular resolution—and the regime analysis behind it—is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A PTA's finest resolvable angular scale is set by the most distant pulsars in the array: theta ~ lambda/L, independent of the number of pulsars.
  • Multipoles above l_cut ~ omega L are exponentially suppressed and cannot be recovered even with arbitrarily high signal-to-noise.
  • The number of independently measurable GW-sky modes is bounded by the number of pulsars, so angular resolution also requires adequate sky sampling, not just long baselines.
  • For realistic Galactic millisecond-pulsar populations (around 10^5 objects), the Earth-term approximation is quantitatively justified for full-sky GW mapping.
  • Polarization leakage between + and x maps is intrinsic to the PTA response, because the curl response vanishes; it cannot be removed by better noise modeling or inversion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The diffraction-limit relation suggests that increasing the GW frequency or discovering even a few very distant pulsars extends the accessible multipole range more efficiently than adding many nearby pulsars; the paper does not optimize this trade-off.
  • Although the 10^11 threshold applies to full-sky mapping, the same full-response formalism could be used for targeted continuous-wave localization, where pulsar-phase information may help with far smaller arrays—an application the paper explicitly leaves open.
  • The parity selection rules for the gradient-curl couplings in the stochastic-background likelihood imply that anisotropy measurements could in principle separate parity-even from parity-odd background components; the paper derives the rules but does not pursue this diagnostic.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops a tensor-spherical-harmonic reformulation of the pulsar timing array (PTA) response that retains both Earth and pulsar terms. The key analytic results are the closed-form gradient response R^G_lm = 2π Y_lm(hat p) e^{-iy}(-i)^l f_l(y), the vanishing of the curl response, and an asymptotic classification of f_l(y) into four regimes separated by l_{1→2} ~ sqrt(y), l_{2→3} ~ 2 sqrt(y), and l_{cut} ~ y. The authors then formulate PTA sky reconstruction as a linear inverse problem, analyze conditioning via the Fisher information matrix and SVD, and illustrate the regime picture with long-arm and short-arm simulations. A central quantitative claim is that coherent pulsar-term information improves full-sky mapping only for PTAs with N_trans ~ 10^11 precisely timed pulsars, providing a quantitative justification of the Earth-term approximation. The formalism is also extended to anisotropic stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds.

Significance. The analytic derivation in Appendices B–C is self-contained, internally consistent, and correctly reproduces the Gair et al. Earth-term limit. The four-regime picture and the diffraction-like cutoff l_cut ~ ωL are genuine contributions, and the numerical experiments qualitatively support the distinction between Earth-term-dominated and pulsar-term-sensitive regimes. The rank bound N_modes ≤ N_pulsars (Eq. 49) is rigorous and useful. However, the headline threshold N_trans ~ 10^11 is inflated by a mode-counting error in Eq. (68); under the paper's own scaling assumptions the corrected order-of-magnitude estimate is ~2.6×10^7. This is still many orders above the Galactic millisecond-pulsar population, so the qualitative conclusion that realistic PTAs cannot exploit pulsar-term information survives, but the central number and the claim that Eq. (68) is a 'conservative lower bound' must be revised.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (62)–(68)] The headline N_trans ~ 10^11 is obtained by summing (2l'+1) per-mode measurement requirements, but in the same isotropic limit used for Eq. (62) the design-matrix columns are orthogonal (Eq. 57), so every pulsar measurement is shared by all modes. The correct scaling is N_puls ≥ N_lmin (l1→2 / lmin)^4, not the sum in Eq. (67). With the authors' fiducials (N_lmin=10, lmin=2, l1→2=80) this gives ~2.6×10^7, about four orders below Eq. (68). The text's caveat that 'the same PTA measurements contribute simultaneously to multiple spherical-harmonic modes' directly contradicts the use of Eq. (67) as a lower bound. The qualitative conclusion survives, but the abstract's numerical claim is not established.
  2. [§4.2, Eqs. (62)–(63)] Even after correcting the mode-counting, N_trans is not a rigorous bound. Equation (62) assumes an idealized isotropic singular-value spectrum σ_l ∝ f_l(y) ∝ l^{-2}, and N_lmin=10 is an ad hoc normalization; both are order-of-magnitude assumptions. The rank bound (49) cannot fix the threshold because N_modes at l1→2=80 is only ~6.4×10^3, far below the SNR-driven requirement. The paper should present N_trans as a fiducial scaling estimate with a plausible range, and should avoid the phrase 'conservative lower bound' in Eq. (68) and the discussion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (69)] The phrase 'reduces to a quantity proportional to the analytical sensitivity function, 2π|f_l(y)|,z from Eq. (16)' contains a stray 'z' and should read '2π|f_l(y)| from Eq. (16)'.
  2. [§4.3 title] The heading 'The Uneven Sky Sensitivity Distribution Consequence' is awkward; 'Consequences of Nonuniform Sky Coverage' would be clearer.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says 'Mean MeerKAT sensitivity,' but the text discusses scatter of individual m-modes about the ideal f_l(y). Please clarify what quantity is plotted and why it is called a 'mean.'
  4. [Eq. (44)] The angular resolution expression θ = 180°/l3→4 mixes degrees with the dimensionless multipole; writing θ = π/l_cut and then converting numerically would be cleaner.
  5. [References] The author name 'Cury lo et al. 2026' should be typeset with the proper diacritic (Curyło) if the journal style permits Unicode, or otherwise with a clear ASCII equivalent.
  6. [Abstract and §7] After correcting Eq. (68), the abstract and Discussion should be updated consistently so that the 'of order 10^11' statement is not repeated as a central quantitative claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the closed-form response is derived, the N_trans estimate is an explicitly labeled scaling calculation, and the central claims do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The central derivation chain is: (i) the plane-wave timing-residual integral, Eq. (6), is transformed into tensor-harmonic response functions, Eqs. (13)-(15); (ii) the closed-form gradient response, Eq. (16), is derived in Appendix B from the Rayleigh expansion, Wigner-D rotations, and spherical-Bessel identities, with the auxiliary function f_l(y) given explicitly by Eq. (B57); (iii) the four sensitivity regimes and the cutoff l_cut ~ omega*L follow from the asymptotic analysis of spherical Bessel functions in Appendix C; (iv) the rank bound N_modes <= N_pulsars, Eq. (49), is an algebraic identity; and (v) the headline N_trans ~ 10^11, Eq. (68), is an order-of-magnitude scaling estimate built on stated fiducial assumptions. No parameter is fitted to data and then reported as a prediction: the paper explicitly says 'As a fiducial reference, we adopt N_lmin = 10' and labels Eq. (67) an order-of-magnitude relation, noting that 'the same PTA measurements contribute simultaneously to multiple spherical-harmonic modes.' That caveat means the 10^11 threshold is sensitive to normalization and mode-sharing assumptions, which is a numerical fragility rather than a circular reduction. The only self-citations (Kopeikin 1997, 1999) concern binary-pulsar orbital perturbations and are not load-bearing for the sky-mapping derivation. The tensor-harmonic framework is grounded in external prior work (Gair et al. 2014, 2015); where the text says 'Following ... one finds' for Eq. (16), Appendix B supplies the independent derivation. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard GR and Bessel-function asymptotics plus two hand-chosen quantities: the asymptotic tolerance epsilon=50% and the fiducial normalization N_lmin=10. The latter controls the numerical value of N_trans, so the headline '10^11' is not parameter-free; the qualitative conclusion is robust to reasonable changes.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon (asymptotic tolerance) = 0.50 (50%)
    Chosen in Section 3.2/Appendix C to define the transition multipoles l1→2 and l2→3; it affects Eqs. (37)-(38) and propagates into N_trans through l1→2. Not fitted to data, but arbitrary.
  • N_lmin fiducial normalization = 10 independent measurements at l=2
    Adopted in Section 4.2 before Eq. (68) to anchor the SNR scaling; N_trans ~ 10^11 scales linearly with this choice.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Linearized GR/TT-gauge plane-wave expansion of the GW field (Eq. 2)
    Standard weak-field approximation; the PTA timing-residual response in Eq. (3) is derived in this setting.
  • domain assumption Gaussian noise model with known covariance (Eq. 19)
    Used to define the likelihood and Fisher matrix; real PTA noise includes red processes, but the simulations restrict to white noise.
  • domain assumption Pulsar distances known exactly for coherent pulsar-term phase (ωΔL<<1)
    Stated in Section 5; this is an idealized coherence limit acknowledged by the authors.
  • ad hoc to paper Singular-value spectrum of an isotropic PTA follows σ_l ∝ f_l(y) ∝ l^{-2} (Eq. 62)
    Assumed for the N_trans scaling estimate; not derived from the design matrix for finite nonuniform arrays.
  • ad hoc to paper N_lmin=10 as the fiducial SNR normalization
    Sets the reference SNR for the scaling estimate and directly drives the numerical value of N_trans in Eq. (68).
  • standard math Spherical Bessel, Debye, and Airy asymptotics (DLMF 10.19, 10.20)
    Used in Appendix C to determine the four sensitivity regimes and the cutoff l_cut≃ωL.
  • standard math Tensor-spherical-harmonic orthonormality and l≥2 for TT tensor fields
    Standard CMB-polarization-style decomposition; curl response vanishes because X_l0=0 in the computational frame.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 44372 in / 17469 out tokens · 171930 ms · 2026-08-01T12:43:40.531290+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are the only means to observe nanohertz gravitational waves (GWs). While current analyses primarily exploit the Earth term, the full detector response encodes additional directional information in the pulsar terms. We develop a GW sky-mapping framework based on the complete Earth--pulsar response and a tensor spherical harmonic decomposition of the GW field. This yields closed-form response functions for an elementary baseline and casts PTA sky reconstruction as a linear inverse problem. We show that a PTA behaves as a diffraction-limited GW observatory whose angular sensitivity is governed by the dimensionless parameter $\omega L$, where $\omega$ is the GW angular frequency and $L$ is the pulsar distance. The detector response exhibits four distinct regimes: an Earth-term dominated regime, a transition regime, a pulsar-term-dominated regime, and an exponential sensitivity cutoff at $l_{cut}\simeq\omega L$. This cutoff defines the fundamental angular resolution limit of PTA sky maps. Using Fisher-information and singular-value analyses, we show that the achievable angular resolution is constrained not only by the intrinsic detector response but also by the finite number of pulsars, their sky distribution, and timing noise. In particular, we find that coherent pulsar-term information can improve full-sky gravitational-wave mapping only for PTAs containing of order $N_{trans}\sim10^{11}$ precisely timed pulsars. This result demonstrates that, although the transition to a pulsar-term-sensitive regime exists mathematically, it is inaccessible for realistic PTAs and therefore provides a quantitative justification for the Earth-term approximation adopted in contemporary observations. Finally, we extend the formalism to stochastic GW backgrounds, establishing a unified mathematical framework for PTA sky mapping and anisotropy studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19329 by S. A. Andrianov, S. M. Kopeikin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Point-spread function (PSF) of an ideal pulsar timing array for a unit-ampli￾tude, plus-polarized gravitational-wave point source located at (θ, ϕ) = (90◦ , 180◦ ). The reconstruction is truncated at lmax = 10. The left and right panels show the reconstructed plus- and cross-polarization maps, respectively. The detector’s curl-mode blindness and the finite multipole cutoff produce the characteristic diffra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Deviation of individual m modes from the ideal sensitivity function fl(y) for the MeerKAT PTA pulsar distribution. Vertical lines separate successive multipole orders l. In an isotropic PTA all modes with the same l would have identical sensitivity. The observed scatter therefore quantifies the loss of rotational symmetry introduced by the finite and nonuniform pulsar distribution. To quantify this effect,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Point-spread function for the MeerKAT PTA. The GW source parameters are identical to those of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Singular-value spectra of the PTA design matrix for four mock arrays. “Long” and “Short” refer to realistic and reduced pulsar-distance distributions, respectively, while “ET” and “PT” denote the Earth-term approximation and the full Earth–pulsar response. Vertical lines separate different multipole orders l. The singular values quantify the num￾ber of independently recoverable sky modes and therefore the … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sky reconstruction for a realistic PTA using the Earth-term approximation. Upper panels show the reconstructed plus- and cross-polarization gravitational-wave maps as well as the ideal maps constructed directly from Eq. (11). Lower panel compares the magnitudes of the injected and recovered spherical-harmonic coefficients |a G lm|. Vertical lines separate multipole orders l. The reconstruction accurately r… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sky reconstruction for a realistic long-arm PTA using the full Earth–pulsar response. Upper panels display the reconstructed polarization maps as well as the ideal maps constructed directly from Eq. (11). The lower panel compares recovered and injected harmonic coefficients. The close similarity to the Earth-term reconstruction demonstrates that pulsar-term information contributes negligibly in the asympto… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sky reconstruction for a short-arm PTA in the Earth-term approximation. Upper panels show the reconstructed polarization maps as well as the ideal maps con￾structed directly from Eq. (11). The lower panel compares recovered and injected harmonic coefficients. Despite the shorter pulsar distances, the Earth-term approximation yields a reconstruction comparable to that of the realistic long-arm PTA [PITH_FU… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sky reconstruction in the pulsar-term-sensitive regime for the short-arm PTA in the PT regime. Upper panels show the reconstructed polarization maps as well as the ideal maps constructed directly from Eq. (11). The lower panel compares injected and recovered harmonic coefficients. The enhanced high-multipole sensitivity illustrates the theoretical gain in angular resolution obtainable when pulsar-term info… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Absolute value of the sensitivity function fl(y), with y = ωL, shown as a func￾tion of multipole number l. Four asymptotic regimes can be identified: (I) an Earth-term– dominated regime at low multipoles; (II) a transition region; (III) a pulsar-term-dominated regime at intermediate multipoles; and (IV) a sensitivity-cutoff regime for l ≳ ωL. The onset of the cutoff is associated with the turning point of … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

178 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbott, B. P. and Abbott, R. and Abbott, T. D. and Acernese, F. and Ackley, K. and Adams, C. and Adams, T. and Addesso, P. and Adhikari, R. X. and Adya, V. B. and Affeldt, C. and Afrough, M. and Agarwal, B. and Agathos, M. and Agatsuma, K. and Aggarwal, N. and Aguiar, O. D. and Aiello, L. and Ain, A. and Ajith, P. and Allen, B. and Allen, G. and Allocca, ...

  2. [2]

    and Abe, H

    Abbott, R. and Abe, H. and Acernese, F. and Ackley, K. and Adhikari, N. and Adhikari, R. X. and Adkins, V. K. and Adya, V. B. and Affeldt, C. and Agarwal, D. and Agathos, M. and Agatsuma, K. and Aggarwal, N. and Aguiar, O. D. and Aiello, L. and Ain, A. and Ajith, P. and Akutsu, T. and Albanesi, S. and Alfaidi, R. A. and Allocca, A. and Altin, P. A. and Am...

  3. [3]

    , year = 1965, month = jan, publisher =

    Abramowitz, Milton and Stegun, Irene A. , year = 1965, month = jan, publisher =. Handbook of

    1965

  4. [4]

    and Alshourbagy, M

    Acernese, F. and Alshourbagy, M. and Amico, P. and Antonucci, F. and Aoudia, S. and Astone, P. and Avino, S. and Baggio, L. and Barone, F. and Barsotti, L. and Barsuglia, M. and Bauer, T. S. and Bigotta, S. and Birindelli, S. and Bizouard, M. and Boccara, C. and Bondu, F. and Bosi, L. and Braccini, S. and Bradaschia, C. and Brillet, A. and Brisson, V. and...

  5. [5]

    and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baier, Jeremy G

    Agarwal, Nikita and Agazie, Gabriella and Anumarlapudi, Akash and Archibald, Anne M. and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baier, Jeremy G. and Baker, Paul T. and Bécsy, Bence and Blecha, Laura and Brazier, Adam and Brook, Paul R. and. The. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3719 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3719 2041

  6. [6]

    and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baker, Paul T

    Agazie, Gabriella and Anumarlapudi, Akash and Archibald, Anne M. and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baker, Paul T. and Bécsy, Bence and Blecha, Laura and Brazier, Adam and Brook, Paul R. and. The. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2041

  7. [7]

    and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baker, Paul T

    Agazie, Gabriella and Anumarlapudi, Akash and Archibald, Anne M. and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baker, Paul T. and Bécsy, Bence and Blecha, Laura and Brazier, Adam and Brook, Paul R. and. The. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acda88 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acda88 2041

  8. [8]

    and Ando, M

    Akutsu, T. and Ando, M. and Arai, K. and Arai, Y. and Araki, S. and Araya, A. and Aritomi, N. and Asada, H. and Aso, Y. and Atsuta, S. and Awai, K. and Bae, S. and Baiotti, L. and Barton, M. A. and Cannon, K. and Capocasa, E. and Chen, C.-S. and Chiu, T.-W. and Cho, K. and Chu, Y.-K. and Craig, K. and Creus, W. and Doi, K. and Eda, K. and Enomoto, Y. and ...

  9. [9]

    , year = 1999, month = mar, journal =

    Allen, Bruce and Romano, Joseph D. , year = 1999, month = mar, journal =. Detecting a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Radiation:. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.102001 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.102001 1999

  10. [10]

    Variance of the

    Allen, Bruce , year = 2023, month = feb, journal =. Variance of the. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043018 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043018 2023

  11. [11]

    , year = 2023, month = aug, journal =

    Allen, Bruce and Romano, Joseph D. , year = 2023, month = aug, journal =. Hellings and. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043026 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.043026 2023

  12. [12]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Pulsar Timing Array Harmonic Analysis and Source Angular Correlations , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043043 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.043043

  13. [13]

    , year = 2025, month = jan, journal =

    Allen, Bruce and Romano, Joseph D. , year = 2025, month = jan, journal =. Optimal. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.031401 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.031401 2025

  14. [14]

    Обработка Наблюдений Пульсарного Тайминга , author =

  15. [15]

    Andrianov, S. A. , year = 2023, pages =

    2023

  16. [16]

    Andrianov, S. A. , year = 2024, pages =. doi:10.15826/B978-5-7996-3848-1.10 , url =

    work page doi:10.15826/b978-5-7996-3848-1.10 2024

  17. [17]

    Andrianov, S. A. , year = 2025, pages =. doi:10.15826/B978-5-7996-3986-0.12 , url =

    work page doi:10.15826/b978-5-7996-3986-0.12 2025

  18. [18]

    Andrianov, S. A. and Potapov, V. A. and Tyul'bashev, S. A. and Logvinenko, S. V. and Oreshko, V. V. , year = 2025, month = nov, journal =. The. doi:10.1134/S1063772925702294 , url =

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063772925702294 2025

  19. [19]

    Andrianov, S. A. and Potapov, V. A. and Tyul'bashev, S. A. , year = 2025, month = nov, journal =. The. doi:10.1134/S1063772925702300 , url =

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063772925702300 2025

  20. [20]

    Andrianov, S. A. , year = 2026, pages =

    2026

  21. [21]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Optimal Strategies for Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Searches in Pulsar Timing Data , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084030 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.084030

  22. [22]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

  23. [23]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.17081336 , url =

    The Spherical Package , author =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17081336 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17081336

  24. [24]

    Detection of Gravitational Waves from the

    Caprini, Chiara and Durrer, Ruth and Siemens, Xavier , year = 2010, month = sep, journal =. Detection of Gravitational Waves from the. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.063511 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.063511 2010

  25. [25]

    Chen, Siyuan and Xu, Heng and Guo, Yanjun and Wang, Bojun and Caballero, R. Nicolas and Jiang, Jinchen and Xu, Jiangwei and Xue, Zihan and Lee, Kejia and Yuan, Jianping and Xu, Yonghua and Wang, Jingbo and Hao, Longfei and Luo, Jintao and Han, Jinlin and Jiang, Peng and Shen, Zhiqiang and Wang, Min and Wang, Na and Xu, Renxin and Wu, Xiangping and Qian, L...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452550 2025

  26. [26]

    , year = 2010, month = aug, publisher =

    Corbin, Vincent and Cornish, Neil J. , year = 2010, month = aug, publisher =. Pulsar. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1008.1782 , url =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1008.1782 2010

  27. [27]

    Cornish, Neil J. and. Mapping the Nano-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1406.4511 , url =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.4511

  28. [28]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.19073 , url =

    A Comprehensive Framework for Phase-Coherent Mapping of the Gravitational-Wave Sky with Pulsar Timing Arrays , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.19073 , url =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.19073

  29. [29]

    and Deruelle, N

    Damour, T. and Deruelle, N. , year = 1985, month = jan, journal =. General Relativistic Celestial Mechanics of Binary Systems

    1985

  30. [30]

    and Deruelle, N

    Damour, T. and Deruelle, N. , year = 1986, month = jan, journal =. General Relativistic Celestial Mechanics of Binary Systems

    1986

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/301 , url =

    Danzmann, Karsten and Rüdiger, Albrecht , year = 2003, month = may, journal =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/301 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/301 2003

  32. [32]

    Davis, M. M. and Taylor, J. H. and Weisberg, J. M. and Backer, D. C. , year = 1985, month = jun, journal =. High-Precision Timing Observations of the Millisecond Pulsar. doi:10.1038/315547a0 , url =

    work page doi:10.1038/315547a0 1985

  33. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , volume =

    Antenna Synthesis and Solution of Inverse Problems by Regularization Methods , author =. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , volume =. doi:10.1109/TAP.1972.1140197 , url =

    arXiv 1972

  34. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    Pulsar Timing Measurements and the Search for Gravitational Waves , author =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/157593 , url =

    doi:10.1086/157593

  35. [35]

    Dirac, Paul Adrien Maurice , year = 1975, publisher =. General

    1975

  36. [36]

    , year = 2002, month = jul, journal =

    Dong, Shi-hai and Lemus, R. , year = 2002, month = jul, journal =. The Overlap Integral of Three Associated. doi:10.1016/S0893-9659(02)80004-0 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0893-9659(02)80004-0 2002

  37. [37]

    Doroshenko, O. V. and Kopeikin, S. M. , year = 1990, month = oct, journal =. High

    1990

  38. [39]

    Näherungsweise

    Einstein, Albert , year = 1916, month = jan, journal =. Näherungsweise

    1916

  39. [40]

    Einstein, Albert , year = 1918, month = jan, journal =. Über

    1918

  40. [41]

    Ellis, J. A. , year = 2013, month = nov, journal =. A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/22/224004 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/22/224004 2013

  41. [42]

    , title =

    Ellis, Justin A. , title =. 2014 , month = aug, advisor =

    2014

  42. [43]

    and Vallisneri, Michele and Taylor, Stephen R

    Ellis, Justin A. and Vallisneri, Michele and Taylor, Stephen R. and Baker, Paul T. , title =. 2020 , month = sep, publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4059815 , url =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.4059815 2020

  43. [44]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

    The Second Data Release from the. Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 , url =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844

  44. [45]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

    The Second Data Release from the. Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346842 , url =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346842

  45. [46]

    Estabrook, F. B. and Wahlquist, H. D. , year = 1975, month = oct, journal =. Response of. doi:10.1007/BF00762449 , url =

    doi:10.1007/bf00762449 1975

  46. [47]

    Foster, R. S. and Backer, D. C. , year = 1990, month = sep, journal =. Constructing a. doi:10.1086/169195 , url =

    doi:10.1086/169195 1990

  47. [48]

    and Taylor, Stephen and Mingarelli, Chiara M

    Gair, Jonathan and Romano, Joseph D. and Taylor, Stephen and Mingarelli, Chiara M. F. , year = 2014, month = oct, journal =. Mapping Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds Using Methods from. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.082001 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.082001 2014

  48. [49]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Mapping Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds in Modified Theories of Gravity Using Pulsar Timing Arrays , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.102003 , url =. arXiv , keywords =:1506.08668 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [50]

    Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , author =

  50. [51]

    Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters , volume =

    Primordial Gravitons and Possibility of Their Observation , author =. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters , volume =

  51. [52]

    and Thrane, Eric and Champion, David J

    Grunthal, Kathrin and Nathan, Rowina S. and Thrane, Eric and Champion, David J. and Miles, Matthew T. and Shannon, Ryan M. and Kulkarni, Atharva D. and Abbate, Federico and Buchner, Sarah and Cameron, Andrew D. and Geyer, Marisa and Gitika, Pratyasha and Keith, Michael J. and Kramer, Michael and Lasky, Paul D. and Parthasarathy, Aditya and Reardon, Daniel...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [53]

    and Millman, K

    Harris, Charles R. and Millman, K. Jarrod and. Array Programming with. Nature , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , url =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

  53. [54]

    , author =

    Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational Radiation Background from Pulsar Timing Analysis. , author =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/183954 , url =

    doi:10.1086/183954

  54. [55]

    Hobbs, G. B. , url =

  55. [56]

    Hobbs, G. B. and Edwards, R. T. and Manchester, R. N. , year = 2006, month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10302.x , url =

    arXiv 2006

  56. [57]

    and Archibald, A

    Hobbs, G. and Archibald, A. and Arzoumanian, Z. and Backer, D. and Bailes, M. and Bhat, N. D. R. and Burgay, M. and. The. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084013 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084013

  57. [58]

    Hobbs, G. B. and Edwards, R. T. , url =

  58. [59]

    Högbom, J. A. , year = 1974, month = jun, journal =. Aperture

    1974

  59. [60]

    , author =

    Discovery of a Pulsar in a Binary System. , author =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/181708 , url =

    doi:10.1086/181708

  60. [61]

    , year = 2007, month = jan, journal =

    Hunter, John D. , year = 2007, month = jan, journal =. Matplotlib:. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , url =

    doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  61. [62]

    , year = 1918, journal =

    Isserlis, L. , year = 1918, journal =. On a. doi:10.2307/2331932 , url =. 2331932 , eprinttype =

    doi:10.2307/2331932 1918

  62. [63]

    and Finn, L

    Jenet, F. and Finn, L. S. and Lazio, J. and Lommen, A. and McLaughlin, M. and Stairs, I. and Stinebring, D. and Verbiest, J. and Archibald, A. and Arzoumanian, Z. and Backer, D. and Cordes, J. and Demorest, P. and Ferdman, R. and Freire, P. and Gonzalez, M. and Kaspi, V. and Kondratiev, V. and Lorimer, D. and Lynch, R. and Nice, D. and Ransom, S. and Shan...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0909.1058 2009

  63. [64]

    and Romano, Joseph D

    Jenet, Fredrick A. and Romano, Joseph D. , year = 2015, month = jul, journal =. Understanding the Gravitational-Wave. doi:10.1119/1.4916358 , url =

    work page doi:10.1119/1.4916358 2015

  64. [65]

    and Meyers, Patrick M

    Johnson, Aaron D. and Meyers, Patrick M. and Baker, Paul T. and Cornish, Neil J. and Hazboun, Jeffrey S. and Littenberg, Tyson B. and Romano, Joseph D. and Taylor, Stephen R. and Vallisneri, Michele and Vigeland, Sarah J. and Olum, Ken D. and Siemens, Xavier and Ellis, Justin A. and. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103012 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103012

  65. [66]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Statistics of Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7368 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.7368

  66. [67]

    Kaspi, V. M. and Taylor, J. H. and Ryba, M. F. , year = 1994, month = jun, journal =. High-. doi:10.1086/174280 , url =

    doi:10.1086/174280 1994

  67. [68]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =

    Bayes Factors , author =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 , url =. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 , pages =

    arXiv 1995

  68. [69]

    Kopeikin, S. M. , year = 1989, month = dec, journal =. Asymptotic

    1989

  69. [70]

    Костина, М. В. , file =. Лекции

  70. [71]

    and Stairs, I

    Kramer, M. and Stairs, I. H. and Manchester, R. N. and Wex, N. and Deller, A. T. and Coles, W. A. and Ali, M. and Burgay, M. and Camilo, F. and Cognard, I. and Damour, T. and Desvignes, G. and Ferdman, R. D. and Freire, P. C. C. and Grondin, S. and Guillemot, L. and Hobbs, G. B. and Janssen, G. and Karuppusamy, R. and Lorimer, D. R. and Lyne, A. G. and Mc...

    2021

  71. [72]

    Ландау, Л. Д. and Лифшиц, Е. М. , year = 2003, url =

    2003

  72. [73]

    , year = 2009, month = jan, pages =

    Lazio, J. , year = 2009, month = jan, pages =. The. Panoramic. doi:10.22323/1.089.0058 , url =

    work page doi:10.22323/1.089.0058 2009

  73. [74]

    and Hobson, M

    Lentati, Lindley and Alexander, P. and Hobson, M. P. and Taylor, S. and Gair, J. and Balan, S. T. and. Hyper-Efficient Model-Independent. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104021 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.104021

  74. [75]

    Abbott, B. P. and others , collaboration =. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  75. [76]

    Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy , author =

  76. [77]

    , year = 2008, month = dec, journal =

    Lorimer, Duncan R. , year = 2008, month = dec, journal =. Binary and. doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-8 , url =

    doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-8 2008

  77. [78]

    , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =

    Lorimer, Duncan R. , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =. The. Neutron. doi:10.1017/S1743921312023769 , url =

    doi:10.1017/s1743921312023769 2013

  78. [79]

    Manchester, R. N. , year = 2008, month = feb, volume =. The. 40. doi:10.1063/1.2900303 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.2900303 2008

  79. [80]

    and Shannon, Ryan M

    Miles, Matthew T. and Shannon, Ryan M. and Reardon, Daniel J. and Bailes, Matthew and Champion, David J. and Geyer, Marisa and Gitika, Pratyasha and Grunthal, Kathrin and Keith, Michael J. and Kramer, Michael and Kulkarni, Atharva D. and Nathan, Rowina S. and Parthasarathy, Aditya and Singha, Jaikhomba and Theureau, Gilles and Thrane, Eric and Abbate, Fed...

    2025

  80. [81]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Characterizing Gravitational Wave Stochastic Background Anisotropy with Pulsar Timing Arrays , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.062005 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.062005

Showing first 80 references.