Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias Resilient Multi-Step Off-Policy Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.17565 v1 pith:7G7HACKS submitted 2023-11-29 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learninggcrlbiasesmulti-stepefficiencygoal-conditionedoff-policyreinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (GCRL), sparse rewards present significant challenges, often obstructing efficient learning. Although multi-step GCRL can boost this efficiency, it can also lead to off-policy biases in target values. This paper dives deep into these biases, categorizing them into two distinct categories: "shooting" and "shifting". Recognizing that certain behavior policies can hasten policy refinement, we present solutions designed to capitalize on the positive aspects of these biases while minimizing their drawbacks, enabling the use of larger step sizes to speed up GCRL. An empirical study demonstrates that our approach ensures a resilient and robust improvement, even in ten-step learning scenarios, leading to superior learning efficiency and performance that generally surpass the baseline and several state-of-the-art multi-step GCRL benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive but flawed survey of RL algorithms that catalogs many methods and applications without rigorous comparative analysis.

Pith tools