Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in Twistor space for 3D CFT

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The authors show that the infinity twistor must be added to twistor-space invariants to describe general primary operators in 3D CFTs, and they derive the corresponding Penrose, Witten, and super-Penrose transforms.

desk verdict Solid twistor-space extension for 3D CFT correlators, with a real but contained gap: the non-local SCT generator for general Delta is only verified on two-point examples. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14082 v1 pith:7GVG4WEL submitted 2025-05-20 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Aswini Bala , Dhruva K.S This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords twistormathbbsupersymmetricdeltapenrosespacetransformwitten
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twistor space is a way of encoding points and fields in a spacetime using four-component spinors. In three spacetime dimensions it connects to the usual position space through the Penrose transform and to momentum space through Witten's half-Fourier transform. Earlier work used this language for conserved currents and for scalars of scaling dimension one. This paper asks what happens for more general fields: scalars with other dimensions, fields with spin that are not conserved, and parity-odd correlators.

The answer is that a bi-twistor called the infinity twistor must be added to the list of conformally invariant ingredients. The infinity twistor by itself breaks conformal symmetry and selects the flat metric of the spacetime, but the paper shows that inside correlation functions it combines with other invariants so that the final expressions are conformally invariant. For arbitrary scalar dimensions this requires a non-local action of special conformal transformations, built from inverse derivatives. The paper also derives a supersymmetric version for N=1 theories, with the infinity twistor emerging naturally from the super-incidence relations.

The bulk of the paper consists of explicit formulas for two- and three-point Wightman functions, contact terms, and parity-odd correlators, with many checks against known position-space and momentum-space results in appendices.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that 'in order to accommodate general representations of the conformal group, one must extend the space of Sp(4) invariants to allow for those that involve the infinity twistor' (Section 4 introduction), and that correlators involving scalars with Delta != 1, generic spinning primaries, and parity-odd correlators require the infinity twistor. If correct, general primary operators can be represented in twistor space, with conformal invariance restored by a non-local action of special conformal transformations for Delta != 1.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the inverse derivative (lambda dot partial/partial mu_bar)^(-1) defined in (4.18) is well-defined on twistor-space operators and that integration by parts in the conformal Ward identity produces no boundary terms. Appendix J proves invariance of the Delta two-point function (4.21) only under this assumption, stating that the relevant f vanishes at mu_bar to infinity for the examples considered. If boundary terms survive for generic Delta, the non-local special conformal generator (4.17) does not act as claimed and the central extension to arbitrary scalars fails.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a twistor-space framework for three-dimensional conformal field theories, building on previous work on Sp(4) invariants. It constructs projective delta functions and symplectic dot product invariants, and uses them to write two- and three-point Wightman functions for conserved currents and Δ=1 scalars purely in twistor space. The main new claim is that general representations—scalars with Δ≠1, generic spinning primaries, and parity-odd correlators—require incorporating the infinity twistor of R^{2,1} into the set of conformally invariant objects. Conformal invariance is then maintained by a non-local action of special conformal transformations for Δ≠1. The paper derives Penrose and Witten transforms for these cases, including the supersymmetric versions for N=1 super-twistor space, and constructs several super-Wightman functions. Numerous appendices provide technical details and checks against position-space and momentum-space results.

Significance. If the central construction is correct, it provides a unified twistor-space description of all primary operators in 3D CFT, which could serve as a new stage for the conformal bootstrap. The paper contains substantial technical work: careful derivations of the Sp(4) projective delta functions, explicit equivalence between Penrose and Witten transforms, and cross-checks of several two-point functions against known results. The extension to super-twistor space and the construction of OSp(N|4) invariants are original and potentially useful. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that the key generalization to arbitrary Δ rests on a non-local operator whose domain and boundary conditions are not fully established, and the verification of the two-point function is only shown for integer Δ.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.1.4, Eq. (4.18)] The definition of the inverse derivative (λ·∂/∂μ̄)^{-1} in Eq. (4.18) is a right inverse only if the function vanishes as μ̄→∞ along the λ direction; the paper itself notes this in the sentence following Eq. (4.19): 'provided f vanishes when ¯µ → ∞which is true of the examples we consider in this paper such as the two point function to be derived soon.' This is a limitation statement, and it matters because the special conformal generator (4.17) acts on arbitrary twistor-space operators, not only on the two-point function. No function space or decay condition is specified on which (4.18) is a well-defined operator, and the kernel of λ·∂/∂μ̄ (functions independent of the μ̄ component along λ) is not discussed. Appendix J verifies invariance of the two-point function (4.21) under this generator, but the verification relies on the specific fall-off of that correlator. For three-point functions or for the operator O_Δ itself, the required boundary terms have not been shown to vanish. The central claim that arbitrary Δ scalars admit this non-local twistor representation therefore remains conditional. Please specify the domain, prove that the operators from (4.15) lie in it, and check the Ward identity without boundary terms at least for a three-point example (or state the restricted domain of validity).
  2. [Appendix K.4, Eq. (K.11)] The position-space check of the arbitrary-Δ two-point function uses the identity with (∂^2)^{Δ-1} and (2Δ-2)!. This identity is only defined for integer Δ (or requires an analytic continuation that is not specified). Since the paper claims arbitrary Δ (Section 4.1.4), the check does not cover non-integer Δ. For non-integer dimensions, the twistor-space integral may still be evaluated by analytic continuation, but the manuscript does not describe such a procedure. Please either restrict the claim to integer Δ or provide the appropriate distributional/fractional treatment.
  3. [4.3, Eq. (4.41)-(4.43)] The Penrose transform for non-conserved spinning operators is presented with undetermined coefficients c_k in (4.41), and the two-point function (4.43) contains coefficients c_kl stated to be 'all related' but not given. The claim that 'one can check' that (4.43) reproduces the known position-space result is not demonstrated; the only comment is a passing reference to matching the spin-1 case in momentum space. Since generic spinning primaries are part of the paper's stated scope, this section needs either an explicit derivation of the coefficients or a detailed check for at least s=1 away from the conservation limit.
  4. [4.2.2-4.2.3, Eqs. (4.31), (4.33)] The conformal invariance of the parity-odd two- and three-point correlators is asserted with the parenthetical remark 'We give details of the same in appendix H' (after Eq. (4.31)). Appendix H, however, only derives the epsilon transform (H.3) and does not verify the Ward identities for the sign-factor correlators. Given that these objects are distributions and the sign factors involving the infinity twistor are delicate under rescaling, an explicit verification is needed. The two-point Penrose transform check in K.3 is helpful but does not replace the invariance proof under the conformal generators.
minor comments (6)
  1. [4.1.4] The phrase 'unitary bound (∆ ≥ ∆−2/2)' is ambiguous; it should read (d−2)/2, i.e., Δ ≥ 1/2 in three dimensions.
  2. [6.2, Eq. (6.11)] The sign-function argument in (6.11) is c12⟨Z1IZ2⟩ + c31⟨Z3IZ2⟩, whereas the non-supersymmetric counterpart Eq. (4.33) has c31⟨Z3IZ1⟩. Please check which is the correct transcription.
  3. [4.2.2] The reference to Appendix H for the conformal invariance check appears to be a miscitation, since Appendix H does not contain that verification (see major comment 4).
  4. [2.4] The subsection title 'F ourier' contains a typo; it should be 'Fourier'.
  5. [Figure 3] The labels in Figure 3 are garbled in places (for example, 'δ(Z2 −Z3)' appears where a symplectic dot product is meant); please clean up the diagram.
  6. [Notation] The notation '⟨Z1IZ 2⟩' with a stray space is visually confusing; consider using ⟨Z1 I Z2⟩ consistently throughout.
Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard twistor-theory inputs, the choice of the infinity twistor, and a non-local inverse-derivative representation for general scaling dimensions. The main structural inputs are the Penrose representation for conserved currents, projective integral regularization, distributional sign identities, and the invertibility and boundary assumptions for the inverse derivative. The only new auxiliary objects are coordinates and twistor extensions in the super case, with no independent physical evidence.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha, beta coefficients in <JsJsO1> ansatz = beta = alpha
    Conformal invariance leaves alpha and beta independent in (3.11); matching the known momentum-space Wightman function in appendix G fixes beta = alpha.
  • Infinity twistor IAB = epsilon_ab block, zeros elsewhere
    Chosen in (2.11) to cancel the <12>^2 conformal factor and yield the flat Minkowski metric; it is the standard infinity twistor of R^{2,1}, an input rather than a fitted datum.
  • Super-incidence parameters alpha, beta in (5.7) = alpha = i/4, beta = -sqrt(2) e^{-i pi/4}
    Fixed by matching the superfield component expansion (5.4) to the ansatz (5.8); derived in the paper, but recorded here because they are tuned within the construction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Conserved currents admit the unconstrained Penrose representation (2.14)
    Section 2.2 assumes any symmetric traceless conserved current can be written as a projective integral over twistor space; this is standard twistor theory and is the entry point for all subsequent correlator constructions.
  • standard math Projective integral identities and the finiteness of Vol(GL(1,R))
    Appendix C derives the reduction of projective integrals by dividing by Vol(GL(1,R)); the paper treats the infinite volume as a regulator that cancels in final expressions.
  • standard math Distributional identity integral dx/x e^{iax} proportional to Sgn(a)
    Used throughout for sign factors and parity-odd correlators, as stated in appendix A with the caveat that it is interpreted in a regularized sense like reference [4].
  • domain assumption Invertibility of lambda dot partial/partial mu_bar and vanishing boundary terms at mu_bar to infinity
    The non-local SCT generator (4.17)-(4.18) and the Ward identity proof in appendix J require that twistor-space operators are not in the kernel of lambda dot partial/partial mu_bar and vanish sufficiently fast at infinity; stated for examples, not proven generally.
  • domain assumption Spacelike momentum reality and analytic continuation
    The spinor-helicity and Witten transforms are defined for spacelike momenta with real spinors (footnote 5 of section 2.3) and results are analytically continued to general momenta.
invented entities (2)
  • psi_minus, an extra Grassmann coordinate for Delta=1 scalar superfields
    purpose: Appears in (6.13) to represent the full scalar supermultiplet J0 in supertwistor space; it is integrated out in the scalar super-Penrose transform (6.14).
    Auxiliary coordinate of the formalism, not a physical particle or force; no falsifiable prediction is attached to it.
  • Super-infinity twistor IAB = IAB direct sum 0_{N x N}
    purpose: Extends the infinity twistor to supertwistor space and controls parity-odd super-correlators and contact terms, as in (6.8) and (6.10).
    Mathematical extension of the standard infinity twistor; it has no observable signature outside the constructed correlators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in Twistor space for 3D CFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7GVG4WEL

@misc{pith2026250514082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in Twistor space for 3D CFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7GVG4WEL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14082}
}
abstract

Here we discuss the construction of Sp$(4;\mathbb{R})$ invariant objects in the twistor space for three dimensional conformal field theories. The Sp$(4;\mathbb{R})$ invariant projective delta function, alongside the Twistor symplectic dot product invariants form the basis for conformal Wightman functions involving conserved currents and $\Delta=1$ scalars. For correlators involving scalars with $\Delta\ne 1$, generic spinning primaries and parity odd correlators we show that the infinity twistor of $\mathbb{R}^{2,1}$ must be incorporated into the analysis. We show that this feature can be traced to the Penrose and Witten transforms of these operators that we derive. We then discuss the super-twistor space construction and derive the supersymmetric Penrose transform for $\mathcal{N}=1$ theories using the Fourier transform and the supersymmetric Witten transform. We construct OSp$(\mathcal{N}|4;\mathbb{R})$ invariants and its application to several super-Wightman functions. Similar to the non supersymmetric case, we find an important role played by the (super) infinity twistor which we exemplify through parity odd super-correlators and a supersymmetric contact term.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 4d CFT Correlators from Ambitwistors

    hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Conserved spinning two- and three-point correlators in 4d CFTs are obtained from holomorphic contour integrals on ambitwistor space, with spin, parity, and even a conformally coupled scalar treated uniformly.

  2. The Cosmological Grassmannian

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Massless spinning de Sitter correlators can be written as integrals over the orthogonal Grassmannian OGr(n,2n), which makes conformal and current-conservation constraints manifest and yields four-point functions nearl...

  3. Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Lecture notes recapping off-shell spinor helicity, twistor, and super-twistor methods for 3d CFT correlators, with 55 exercises and no substantial new research result.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Penrose, Twistor algebra, J

    R. Penrose, Twistor algebra, J. Math. Phys. 8 (1967) 345

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Nair, A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes , Phys

    V.P. Nair, A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes , Phys. Lett. B 214 (1988) 215

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Commun

    E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 189 [ hep-th/0312171]

    arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Mason and D

    L.J. Mason and D. Skinner, Scattering Amplitudes and BCFW Recursion in Twistor Space , JHEP 01 (2010) 064 [ 0903.2083]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan, The S-Matrix in Twistor Space , JHEP 03 (2010) 110 [ 0903.2110]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Baumann, G

    D. Baumann, G. Mathys, G.L. Pimentel and F. Rost, A New Twist on Spinning (A)dS Correlators, 2408.02727

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar and V. Singh, 3D Conformal Field Theory in Twistor Space, 2502.18562

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Belavin, A.M

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 333

    work page 1984

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Rattazzi, V.S

    R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT , JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [ 0807.0004]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Poland and D

    D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Snowmass White Paper: The Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022 [ 2203.08117]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hartman, D

    T. Hartman, D. Mazac, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Snowmass White Paper: The Analytic Conformal Bootstrap, in Snowmass 2021 , 2, 2022 [ 2202.11012]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Maldacena and G.L

    J.M. Maldacena and G.L. Pimentel, On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation , JHEP 09 (2011) 045 [ 1104.2846]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    McFadden and K

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Cosmological 3-point correlators from holography, JCAP 06 (2011) 030 [ 1104.3894]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ghosh, N

    A. Ghosh, N. Kundu, S. Raju and S.P. Trivedi, Conformal Invariance and the Four Point Scalar Correlator in Slow-Roll Inflation , JHEP 07 (2014) 011 [ 1401.1426]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Coriano, L

    C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Mottola and M. Serino, Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Feynman ’s Master Integrals , JHEP 07 (2013) 011 [ 1304.6944]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space, JHEP 03 (2014) 111 [ 1304.7760]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies , JHEP 03 (2016) 066 [ 1510.08442]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT , JHEP 11 (2018) 153 [ 1711.09105]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Farrow, A.E

    J.A. Farrow, A.E. Lipstein and P. McFadden, Double copy structure of CFT correlators , JHEP 02 (2019) 130 [ 1812.11129]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Renormalised CFT 3-point functions of scalars, currents and stress tensors , JHEP 11 (2018) 159 [ 1805.12100]. – 63 –

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bautista and H

    T. Bautista and H. Godazgar, Lorentzian CFT 3-point functions in momentum space , JHEP 01 (2020) 142 [ 1908.04733]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lipstein and P

    A.E. Lipstein and P. McFadden, Double copy structure and the flat space limit of conformal correlators in even dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 125006 [ 1912.10046]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization , SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 071 [ 2005.04234]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat, Momentum space spinning correlators and higher spin equations in three dimensions , JHEP 11 (2020) 049 [ 2005.07212]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat, Constraining momentum space correlators using slightly broken higher spin symmetry , JHEP 04 (2021) 231 [ 2008.08610]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh, Momentum space parity-odd CFT 3-point functions, JHEP 08 (2021) 089 [ 2101.11635]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Baumann, W.-M

    D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators , JHEP 09 (2022) 010 [ 2106.05294]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh, Double copy structure of parity-violating CFT correlators, JHEP 07 (2021) 033 [ 2104.12803]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh, Higher spin 3-point functions in 3d CFT using spinor-helicity variables , JHEP 09 (2021) 041 [ 2106.00016]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Jain and R.R

    S. Jain and R.R. John, Relation between parity-even and parity-odd CFT correlation functions in three dimensions , JHEP 12 (2021) 067 [ 2107.00695]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta and D.K. S, Constraining momentum space CFT correlators with consistent position space OPE limit and the collider bound , JHEP 02 (2022) 084 [2111.08024]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Isono, T

    H. Isono, T. Noumi and T. Takeuchi, Momentum space conformal three-point functions of conserved currents and a general spinning operator , JHEP 05 (2019) 057 [ 1903.01110]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gillioz, Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space , Commun

    M. Gillioz, Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space , Commun. Math. Phys. 379 (2020) 227 [ 1909.00878]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds , JHEP 12 (2020) 204 [ 1910.14051]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Adamo, Lectures on twistor theory , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 003 [ 1712.02196]

    T. Adamo, Lectures on twistor theory , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 003 [ 1712.02196]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S.P. Trivedi, S.R. Wadia and X. Yin, Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter , Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2112 [ 1110.4386]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks , JHEP 04 (2014) 146 [1204.3894]

    D. Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks , JHEP 04 (2014) 146 [1204.3894]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nakayama, Conformal Contact Terms and Semi-Local Terms , Annales Henri Poincare 21 (2020) 3201 [ 1906.07914]

    Y. Nakayama, Conformal Contact Terms and Semi-Local Terms , Annales Henri Poincare 21 (2020) 3201 [ 1906.07914]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Khodaee and D

    S. Khodaee and D. Vassilevich, Note on correlation functions in conformal quantum mechanics, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 (2017) 1750157 [ 1706.10225]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks, JHEP 02 (2018) 081 [ 1706.07813]. – 64 –

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li, Helicity basis for three-dimensional conformal field theory , JHEP 06 (2021) 041 [ 2102.08160]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Marotta, K

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma, Momentum space CFT correlators of non-conserved spinning operators, JHEP 03 (2023) 196 [ 2212.13135]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar, V. Singh and B. Thakkar, A Supertwistor Formalism for N = 1, 2, 3, 4 SCFT3, 2503.19970

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Nizami, T

    A.A. Nizami, T. Sharma and V. Umesh, Superspace formulation and correlation functions of 3d superconformal field theories , JHEP 07 (2014) 022 [ 1308.4778]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jain, D.K

    S. Jain, D.K. S, D. Mazumdar and S. Yadav, A foray on SCFT 3 via super spinor-helicity and Grassmann twistor variables , JHEP 09 (2024) 027 [ 2312.03059]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Costa, J

    M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Blocks , JHEP 11 (2011) 154 [ 1109.6321]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Costa, J

    M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [ 1107.3554]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Drummond and L

    J.M. Drummond and L. Ferro, Yangians, Grassmannians and T-duality , JHEP 07 (2010) 027 [1001.3348]

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Drummond and L

    J.M. Drummond and L. Ferro, The Yangian origin of the Grassmannian integral , JHEP 12 (2010) 010 [ 1002.4622]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Korchemsky and E

    G.P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev, Superconformal invariants for scattering amplitudes in N=4 SYM theory , Nucl. Phys. B 839 (2010) 377 [ 1002.4625]

    2010 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, 1308.1697

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Mazumdar, The supersymmetric penrose transform in 3d , To appear (2025)

    D. Mazumdar, The supersymmetric penrose transform in 3d , To appear (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Note, Delta functions on twistor space and their sign factors , 2504.08523

    J.-i. Note, Delta functions on twistor space and their sign factors , 2504.08523. – 65 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.