Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 102 references

Rapidly spinning strange dwarfs become practically indistinguishable from ordinary white dwarfs in mass and radius, the paper argues.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 04:18 UTC pith:7HFAUUR2

load-bearing objection First Hartle–Thorne rotating strange-dwarf sequences, but the headline 75%-of-Kepler indistinguishability threshold is outside the regime the paper's own equations can defend. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.05177 v2 pith:7HFAUUR2 submitted 2026-02-05 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Rotating strange dwarfs and their indistinguishability from white dwarfs

Edson Otoniel , Jos\'e D. V. Arba\~nil , Geanderson A. Carvalho , Fridolin Weber This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords strange dwarfswhite dwarfsstrange quark matterHartle–Thorne approximationrotationmass–radius relationhybrid starsKepler frequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds models of strange dwarfs: hybrid stars with a self-bound strange quark matter core wrapped in a white-dwarf-like crust of degenerate carbon and electrons. It shows that when such stars spin faster than about 75% of their breakup (Kepler) frequency, rotation inflates their radius enough that their mass–radius curve overlaps the ordinary white-dwarf curve. The authors conclude that global observables alone—mass, radius, luminosity, and spin period—cannot reveal the presence of a quark core when the spin is below about 80% of the Kepler frequency. This matters because surveys that classify white dwarfs from photometry and parallax could be silently counting strange dwarfs with exotic interiors as ordinary stars.

Core claim

For a strange dwarf, a star built from a strange quark matter core and a white-dwarf-like crust, rotation does more than shift the mass–radius relation: it inflates the stellar radius and pushes the sequence toward the white-dwarf locus. At fractional spin Ω/Ω_K ≳ 0.75, the rotating strange dwarf branch converges with the white-dwarf curve in the (M, R) plane. The paper quantifies this as practical indistinguishability: for Ω/Ω_K ≲ 0.8, mass, radius, luminosity, and spin period are insufficient to reveal the presence of quark matter. The result is robust to reasonable variations in the bag constant (B^{1/4} = 135–160 MeV, few-percent changes in maximum mass) and to crustal composition, so th

What carries the argument

The central object is the hybrid strange-dwarf model: a crust of degenerate electrons and a body-centered-cubic ion lattice matched at the neutron-drip pressure to a strange quark matter core described by the MIT bag model (p_core = (ρ_core − 4B)/3), with an allowed density discontinuity at the interface. Static configurations are built with the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equations; uniform rotation is added through the Hartle–Thorne slow-rotation expansion to second order in Ω. The Kepler frequency Ω_K is used as a reference spin scale for each mass and equation of state, and the turning-point criterion dM/dρ_c > 0 is adopted as a radial-stability screening. This machinery lets the authors

Load-bearing premise

The paper uses the Hartle–Thorne slow-rotation expansion, formally valid for small rotation parameters, to draw its central conclusion at Ω/Ω_K ≈ 0.75–1.0 near the mass-shedding limit; if the expansion overestimates how much rotation inflates the radius, the claimed overlap with the white-dwarf locus could disappear.

What would settle it

A fully two-dimensional relativistic rotating-star calculation for strange dwarfs at Ω/Ω_K ≈ 0.75–1.0 that shows the mass–radius curve no longer crosses the white-dwarf locus would falsify the central claim; alternatively, a survey detecting a white-dwarf-mass object with a non-white-dwarf tidal deformability or g-mode spectrum would support it.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At near-Keplerian spins, the effective maximum mass of white-dwarf-like objects increases by roughly 10% relative to the canonical Chandrasekhar limit, while slowly rotating configurations still obey the ≤1.4 M_sun limit.
  • Global observables alone are insufficient to reveal quark matter when Ω/Ω_K ≲ 0.8, so any white-dwarf catalog built on mass and radius could contain hidden strange dwarfs.
  • Distinguishing rotating strange dwarfs from white dwarfs requires non-global diagnostics such as tidal deformability, gravitational-wave signatures, asteroseismic mode spectra, or quadrupole-moment measurements.
  • The mass–radius overlap is insensitive to bag constant variations over the tested range, so the conclusion is not tied to a finely tuned quark matter equation of state.
  • Heavier crust compositions like O/Ne/Mg shift mass and radius by less than about 3%, leaving the main indistinguishability conclusion intact.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the overlap survives full two-dimensional relativistic rotating-star calculations, then large photometric white-dwarf surveys may need a population-level correction: some fraction of apparently ordinary white dwarfs could be strange dwarfs, with consequences for the inferred stellar evolution and the cosmic census of quark matter.
  • A testable extension is to identify white-dwarf-like objects with spin periods close to their breakup limits; such fast rotators should be examined for non-white-dwarf signatures, since the paper's framework predicts they are the most likely hidden strange dwarfs.
  • The result implies that rotation acts as a mask, not a discriminator: future instruments measuring only M and R will be blind to quark cores in rapidly spinning objects, so searches for exotic compact stars should prioritize spin-resolved observables or dynamical measurements rather than static structure alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a hybrid equation of state for strange dwarfs (a MIT-bag strange-quark-matter core matched at neutron drip to a degenerate-electron/carbon-ion crust) and computes static TOV sequences plus uniformly rotating sequences in the Hartle–Thorne slow-rotation expansion to O(Ω²). The authors compare the resulting mass–radius relations with ordinary white dwarfs and with observational WD catalogs. Their main claim is that rotation inflates the strange-dwarf radius and, for spin frequencies ≳75% of the Kepler frequency, makes strange dwarfs practically indistinguishable from ordinary white dwarfs in the (M,R) plane; they further argue that global observables (mass, radius, luminosity, spin) are insufficient to reveal quark matter when Ω/Ω_K ≲ 0.8. A bag-constant scan (B^1/4 = 135–160 MeV) is used to show that the conclusion is insensitive to the quark-matter parameter.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper has practical relevance for searches for exotic compact objects in white-dwarf catalogs and for interpreting high-precision mass–radius measurements. The paper has clear strengths: it uses a fully relativistic treatment rather than a Newtonian centrifugal correction, it performs a bag-constant sensitivity analysis, and it repeatedly acknowledges the slow-rotation limitation and the interface-stability debate. The qualitative leading-order trend — rotation inflates the radius and moves strange-dwarf sequences toward the white-dwarf locus — is credible and useful. However, the quantitative headline thresholds (≳75% Ω_K and ≲0.8 Ω_K) are not established by the O(Ω²) calculation, and the manuscript itself contains the caveat that near-mass-shedding statements require two-dimensional relativistic rotating-star codes. The paper also includes a passage in §4.2 that promises a robustness check without reporting it. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's central quantitative conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, §5, Fig. 3] The headline conclusion that a strange dwarf spinning at ≳75% of its Kepler frequency becomes practically indistinguishable from an ordinary white dwarf is asserted from Hartle–Thorne O(Ω²) sequences. At Ω/Ω_K = 0.75 the dimensionless expansion parameter is (Ω/Ω_K)² ≈ 0.56, so the neglected O(Ω⁴) terms are not small and the claimed overlap could shift or disappear. The manuscript itself states in §2.2 that configurations near Ω∼Ω_K must be revisited with fully two-dimensional relativistic rotating-star codes, yet the Conclusion presents the 75% threshold as a quantitative result. Please either provide full 2D rotating-star verification for the high-spin branch or replace the quantitative threshold with the qualitative statement that rotation reduces the separation between the two families, which is what the O(Ω²) calculation can support.
  2. [§4.2] The paragraph beginning 'To anticipate common referee concerns...' states that a minimal robustness check was performed (varying integrator tolerances and matching tolerance) and that a compact summary can be reported in a short appendix. No such appendix or numerical tolerance study appears in the manuscript. This is an explicit self-asserted missing support. Either include the results of those checks or delete the claim; as written, it does not substantiate the numerical robustness of the reported quantities.
  3. [§4.2, §3] The stable branch is selected using the turning-point condition dM/dρ_c > 0. The authors correctly note that this is only a necessary criterion and that, for hybrid stars with a sharp interface, full dynamical stability depends on the phase-conversion rate and boundary conditions at the interface (refs. [6,7,11]). Nevertheless, the subsequent indistinguishability claim is interpreted as applying to physical, observable stars. If any of the computed high-spin branches satisfying dM/dρ_c > 0 are radially unstable once interface reactions are treated consistently, the observational conclusion would not apply. The manuscript should either compute radial oscillation modes with explicit interface boundary conditions or state clearly that the conclusion applies only to configurations whose full stability has been verified.
  4. [Abstract, §4.2, Fig. 3] The abstract promises a 'quantifiable' reduction in the separation between strange dwarfs and white dwarfs, but no quantitative measure of SD–WD proximity is defined anywhere in the text. The threshold Ω/Ω_K ≳ 75% appears to be inferred by eye from the curves in Fig. 3, and the term 'practically indistinguishable' is not assigned a quantitative meaning. Define the criterion used (e.g., fractional radius difference at fixed mass, or an overlap metric in the (M,R) plane) and report the numerical values for the sequences shown.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (23)–(24), §3.1] The text after Eq. (23) says the first term on the right-hand side 'depicts the pressure generated by the relativistic degenerate electron gas', but p_L(Z) is the Coulomb lattice pressure (the electron term is the integral). Please correct this mislabeling.
  2. [Table I, §3.2, §4.1] The text and Section 4.1 use B^1/4 = {135, 145, 160} MeV, but Table I lists 134 MeV for the first row (and computes ΔM_max relative to 145 MeV). Make the values consistent throughout.
  3. [Fig. 3] The top panel legend has '25% Ω_K' while the bottom panel uses '24% Ω_K' for the same sequence; the caption should agree with the curves. The bottom caption also cites 'Madej et al. 2014' while reference [96] is Madej, Naleźyty & Althaus 2004.
  4. [§3, §4.1] The text in §4.1 refers to 'same electrostatic matching and transition criterion', but §3 states that the thin electrostatic layer is neglected and the interface is implemented as a sharp boundary at fixed pressure. Please rephrase to avoid implying an electrostatic-layer model is included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the M-R sequences are computed from the stated EoS via standard TOV and Hartle-Thorne equations, with no parameter fitted to the WD comparison data; self-citations are background or robustness, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The hybrid EoS (carbon crust, Eqs. 23-25; MIT bag core, Eq. 26) is stated in the paper; static M-R sequences come from integrating TOV Eqs. (4)-(6) with the turning-point stability criterion; rotating sequences come from the standard Hartle-Thorne O(Omega^2) equations (11)-(22) with the Kepler frequency used only as a normalization scale (Eq. 16). No parameter is fitted to the observed WD data (Madej et al. 2004; Nalezyty & Madej 2004): the data are overplotted, and the bag constant is scanned as a sensitivity analysis (Table I, Fig. 2), not tuned to force the overlap. The central 'indistinguishability' claim is a computed consequence of (i) the SD's outer envelope being the same degenerate electron-ion EoS as a WD, so that at large radii the quark core becomes hydrostatically negligible (Conclusion item 1), and (ii) rotational radius inflation moving the SD branch toward the WD locus (Fig. 3), an effect obtained from the stated equations, not imposed. Self-citations ([73] Otoniel et al. 2019 for crust EoS data; [89] Malheiro/Otoniel/Coelho for the <3% O/Ne/Mg shift) are real published evidence, parameter-free for the present claim, and are used only for background and robustness; neither carries the central derivation. The paper's own caveats that Hartle-Thorne results near Omega~Omega_K should be revisited with fully two-dimensional rotating-star codes (Sec. 2.2; Conclusion) and that hybrid-interface stability depends on boundary conditions ([6,7,11]; Secs. 3 and 4.2) are validity/scope limitations, not circular reductions: the claims do not reduce to their inputs by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Overall circularity is therefore minimal (score 1).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced; the quark core is a pre-existing hypothesis. The axioms are standard EoS modeling choices plus the HT-validity assumption that becomes load-bearing at high spin. The bag constant and crust composition are inputs chosen from the literature, not fitted to the target result.

free parameters (2)
  • MIT bag constant B^{1/4} = 135, 145, 160 MeV
    Core EoS parameter taken from literature (Farhi–Jaffe, Alcock–Farhi–Olinto) and varied by hand; not fitted in this paper, but the central curves depend on it.
  • Crust composition (Z, A) = (6, 12)
    Pure carbon, fully ionized; chosen as representative. Authors argue O/Ne/Mg crusts would change M and R by less than ~3%.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Strange quark matter is absolutely stable (energy per baryon below 930.4 MeV) and described by the MIT bag EoS p = (ρ − 4B)/3 with massless u,d,s quarks and no color-superconducting pairing.
    Bodmer–Witten hypothesis invoked in Sec. 3.2; used to build the quark core EoS.
  • domain assumption Crust matter is a zero-temperature, unmagnetized, fully ionized degenerate electron gas with a bcc Coulomb lattice; nuclear masses taken from experimental tables.
    Salpeter/Hamada–Salpeter EoS used in Sec. 3.1; residual magnetic fields are argued to be dynamically irrelevant.
  • domain assumption The equilibrium branch is selected by the turning-point criterion dM/dρ_c > 0, and these configurations are treated as stable.
    Sec. 4.2: authors note full stability depends on boundary conditions and phase conversion at the sharp interface, citing [6,7,11] for controversy but not resolving it.
  • ad hoc to paper The Hartle–Thorne slow-rotation expansion remains qualitatively valid for drawing conclusions at Ω/Ω_K ≳ 0.75.
    Sec. 2.2: the paper itself says near-Ω_K configurations should be revisited with 2D codes; the central 'indistinguishability' claim is made in this regime.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14980 in / 13301 out tokens · 126270 ms · 2026-08-03T04:18:30.796849+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the structure of strange dwarfs, modeled as hybrid compact stars composed of a self bound strange quark matter core surrounded by a white dwarf like crust, within a fully relativistic framework. Static configurations are constructed by solving the Tolman Oppenheimer Volkoff equations, and uniformly rotating configurations are modeled within the Hartle Thorne slow rotation expansion (to ${\cal O}(\Omega^2)$). We therefore interpret results at large fractional spins conservatively, and use the Kepler frequency mainly as a reference scale for comparing different masses and models. The stellar matter is described using a hybrid equation of state, in which the crust is modeled by a degenerate electron ion system and the core by the MIT Bag Model. By comparing strange dwarfs with conventional white dwarfs across a range of rotation rates, we show that rotation inflates the radius and can reduce (in a quantifiable way) the separation between the two families in the $(M,R)$ plane, potentially masking structural signatures associated with the presence of a quark core. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for rotational effects when interpreting mass radius measurements and other global observables in the context of searches for exotic compact objects in current and future high precision surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05177 by Edson Otoniel, Fridolin Weber, Geanderson A. Carvalho, Jos\'e D. V. Arba\~nil.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Fluid pressure against the energy density (carbon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Mass-radius relations for SDs computed with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Top: Radial energy-density profiles for a 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The most mas- sive WDs have masses similar to that of the Sun and radii of about 10 3 km, which makes them extremely compact, with an average mass density of 106 g/cm3 [1]

    INTRODUCTION White dwarfs (WDs) are the most common final evo- lutionary stage of stars; in fact, about 90% of the main- sequence stars will evolve into WDs [76]. The most mas- sive WDs have masses similar to that of the Sun and radii of about 10 3 km, which makes them extremely compact, with an average mass density of 106 g/cm3 [1]. They can remain stabl...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    indistinguishability

    STELLAR EQUILIBRIUM EQUA TIONS, HAR TLE-THORNE EQUA TIONS, AND EQUA TION OF ST A TE For the sake of completeness, we begin by presenting the Einstein field equations that govern a system con- taining matter, which, in geometric units, is given by Gµν = 8πTµν,(1) withµ, ν,etc. running from 0 to 3.G µν represents the Einstein tensor andT µν stands the energ...

  3. [3]

    EQUA TION OF ST A TE To investigate rotating SDs, we consider a crust com- posed of a gas of degenerate electrons and a core of SQM. Additionally, we match the two phases at the neutron- drip point by imposing continuity of the (mechanical) fluid pressure,p crust =p core =p drip, while allowing for a discontinuity in the energy density across the inter- f...

    1961

  4. [4]

    indistinguishability

    RESUL TS 4.1. Sensitivity of the hybrid EoS to the bag constant Throughout this section, we adopt the cold limit (T= 0), which is well justified for compact objects older than ≳10 8 yr, for which thermal contributions to the pres- sure are negligible compared to electron degeneracy. In addition, SDs may retain residual magnetic fields inher- ited from the...

    2000

  5. [5]

    The stellar fluid is modeled with a crust composed of a degenerate electron gas and a core of quark matter

    CONCLUSION The present investigation analyzes how the presence of a quark matter core would imprint itself on the global properties of compact stars that, at first glance, resem- ble ordinary WDs. The stellar fluid is modeled with a crust composed of a degenerate electron gas and a core of quark matter. By solving the TOV equations in con- junction with t...

    1986

  6. [6]

    J. P. Pereira, C. V. Flores and G. Lugones, Astrophys. J.860, 12 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Caiazzo et al., Nature595, 39 (2021)

    I. Caiazzo et al., Nature595, 39 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Kilic et al., Mon

    M. Kilic et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.522, 2181 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Bergeron et al., Astrophys

    P. Bergeron et al., Astrophys. J.876, 67 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Alcock, and A

    C. Alcock, and A. Olinto, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38, 161 (1988)

    1988

  11. [11]

    N. K. Glendenning, Ch. Kettnet and F. Weber, Phys. Rev. Let.74, 3519 (1995)

    1995

  12. [12]

    Di Clemente, A

    F. Di Clemente, A. Drago, P. Char and G. Pagliara, As- tron. Astrophys.678, L1 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    Di Clemente, M

    F. Di Clemente, M. Mannarelli and F. Tonelli, Phys. Rev. D101, 103003 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Perot, N

    L. Perot, N. Chamel and P. Vallet, Phys. Rev. D107, 103004 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Kurban, Y

    A. Kurban, Y. Huang, J. Geng and H. Zong, Phys. Lett. B832, 137204 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Wang et al., Astrophys

    K. Wang et al., Astrophys. J. 936, 5 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    M. G. Alford, S. P. Harris and P. S. Sachdeva, Astrophys. J.847, 109 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    G. O. da Rosa, S. O. Kepler, L. T. T. Soethe, A. D. Romero and K. J. Bell, Astrophys. J.974, 314 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Di Clemente, A

    F. Di Clemente, A. Drago and G. Pagliara, Universe10, 322 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Boshkayev, J

    K. Boshkayev, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini and I. Siutsou, Astrophys. J.762, 117 (2013)

    2013

  21. [21]

    Becerra, K

    L. Becerra, K. Boshkayev, J. A. Rueda and R. Ruffini, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.487, 812 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    M. F. Souza, J. G. Coelho and J. C. N. de Ara´ ujo, Mon. 9 Not. R. Astron. Soc.492, 5949 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Di Stefano, R

    R. Di Stefano, R. Voss, and J. S. W. Claeys, Astrophys. J.738, L1 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    On massive neutron cores

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. Volkoff, “On massive neutron cores”, Phys. Rev. D55, 374 (1939)

    1939

  25. [25]

    Alcock, C., Farhi, E., & Olinto, A. (1986). Strange stars. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 310, Nov. 1, 1986, p. 261-272., 310, 261-272

    1986

  26. [26]

    Cosmic separation of phases

    E. Witten, “Cosmic separation of phases”, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984)

    1984

  27. [27]

    Bodmer, A. R. (1971). Collapsed nuclei. Physical Review D, 4(6), 1601

    1971

  28. [28]

    Baym, G., Pethick, C., & Sutherland, P. (1971). The ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, p. 299, 170, 299

    1971

  29. [29]

    Static solution of Einstein’s field equation for spheres of fluid

    R. C. Tolman, “Static solution of Einstein’s field equation for spheres of fluid”, Phys. Rev. D55, 364 (1939)

    1939

  30. [30]

    Strange matter

    E. Farhi and R. L. Jaffe, “Strange matter”, Phys. Rev. D30, 2379 (1984)

    1984

  31. [31]

    Glendenning, N. K. (2012). Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics and general relativity. Springer Science & Business Media

    2012

  32. [32]

    Johnson, K. (1975). The MIT bag model. Acta Phys. Pol. B, 6(12), 8

    1975

  33. [33]

    Chodos, A. J. R. L., Jaffe, R. L., Johnson, K., Thorn, C. B., & Weisskopf, V. (1974). New extended model of hadrons. Physical Review D, 9(12), 3471

    1974

  34. [34]

    Broadhurst, D. J. (1976). Current algebra of quarks con- fined to a cavity. Nuclear Physics B, 105(2), 319-332

    1976

  35. [35]

    A rel- ativistic two-fluid model of compact stars

    K. Chakraborty, F. Rahaman, and A. Mallick, “A rel- ativistic two-fluid model of compact stars”, Modern Physics Letters A32, 1750055 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    On the Stability of Strange Dwarf Hybrid Stars

    M. G. Alford, S. P. Harris, and P. S. Sachdeva, “On the Stability of Strange Dwarf Hybrid Stars”, Astrophys. J. 847, 109 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    L., & Schaefer, R

    Haensel, P., Zdunik, J. L., & Schaefer, R. (1986). Strange quark stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004- 6361), vol. 160, no. 1, May 1986, p. 121-128., 160, 121- 128

    1986

  38. [38]

    Adiabatic Fluid Spheres in General Rel- ativity

    R. F. Tooper, “Adiabatic Fluid Spheres in General Rel- ativity”, Astrophys. J.142, 1541 (1965)

    1965

  39. [39]

    D., Lemos, J

    Arba˜ nil, J. D., Lemos, J. P., & Zanchin, V. T. (2013). Polytropic spheres with electric charge: compact stars, the Oppenheimer-Volkoff and Buchdahl limits, and qua- siblack holes. Physical Review D, 88(8), 084023

    2013

  40. [40]

    Nuclear solid crust on rotating strange quark stars

    Glendenning. Nuclear solid crust on rotating strange quark stars

  41. [41]

    Tidal deformability with sharp phase transitions in binary neutron stars

    S. Han and A. W. Steiner. “Tidal deformability with sharp phase transitions in binary neutron stars”, Phys. Rev. D99, 083014 (2019); arXiv:1810.10967 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    A model-agnostic analysis of hybrid stars with reactive in- terfaces

    G. Lugones, M. Mariania, and I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, “A model-agnostic analysis of hybrid stars with reactive in- terfaces”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. 03, (2023) 028

    2023

  43. [43]

    Radial stability of anisotropic strange quark stars

    J. D. V. Arba˜ nil and M. Malheiro, “Radial stability of anisotropic strange quark stars”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11, (2016) 012; arXiv:1607.03984 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Phase transition effects on the dynamical of hybrid neutron stars

    J. P. Pereira, C. V´ asquez-Flores and G. Lugones, “Phase transition effects on the dynamical of hybrid neutron stars”, Astrophys. J.860, 1 (2018); arXiv:1706.09371 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    From Strange Stars to Strange Dwarfs

    N. K. Glendenning, Ch. Kettner, and F. Weber, “From Strange Stars to Strange Dwarfs”, Astrophys. J.450, 253 (1995)

    1995

  46. [46]

    Phase Conversions in Neutron Stars: Implications for Stellar Stability and Gravitational Wave Astrophysics

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, “Phase Conversions in Neutron Stars: Implications for Stellar Stability and Gravitational Wave Astrophysics”, Universe2021, 7, 493

  47. [47]

    Stability and instability of strange dwarfs

    F. Di Clemente, A. Drago, P. Char, and G. Pagliara, “Stability and instability of strange dwarfs”, arXiv:2207.08704v1 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    GW151226: Observation of Gravi- tational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW151226: Observation of Gravi- tational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence”, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241103 (2016); arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    The nature of the quark-hadron phase transition in hy- brid stars and the mass-radius diagram

    M. B. Albino, F. S. Navarra, R. Fariello, and G. Lugones, “The nature of the quark-hadron phase transition in hy- brid stars and the mass-radius diagram”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2340, 012015 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars

    ANNALA, Eemeli, et al. Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars. Nature Physics, 2020, vol. 16, no 9, p. 907-910

    2020

  51. [51]

    Phase transition and stiffer core fluid in neutron stars: effects on stellar configurations, dynamical stability, and tidal deformability

    J. D. V. Arba˜ nil, L. S. Rodrigues, and C. H. Lenzi, “Phase transition and stiffer core fluid in neutron stars: effects on stellar configurations, dynamical stability, and tidal deformability”, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 211 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact ob- jects (Wiley, New York, 1983)

    1983

  53. [53]

    Observation of gravitational waves from binary black hole merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of gravitational waves from binary black hole merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016); arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Tests of General Relativity with GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with GW150914”, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016). Erra- tum: “Tests of General Relativity with GW150914 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016)]”, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 129902(E) (2018); arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    GW170817: Observation of gravita- tional waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of gravita- tional waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral”, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017); arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2”, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017); arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    GW170814: A Three-Detector Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170814: A Three-Detector Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence”, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141101 (2017); arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence”, Astro- phys. J. Lett.851, L35 (2017); arXiv:1711.05578 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Astrophysical implications of the bi- nary black hole merger GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Astrophysical implications of the bi- nary black hole merger GW150914”, Astrophys. J. Lett. 818, L22 (2016); arXiv:1602.03846 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Magnetized hybrid stars: effects of slow and rapid phase transitions at the quark–hadron in- terface

    M. Mariani, M. G. Orsaria, I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, G. Lugones, “Magnetized hybrid stars: effects of slow and rapid phase transitions at the quark–hadron in- terface”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.489, 4261 (2019); arXiv:1909.08661 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Multi-messenger observational of a binary neutron star merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Multi-messenger observational of a binary neutron star merger”, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L12 (2017); arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Phase transition in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves

    M. G. Orsaria, G. Malfatti, M. Mariani, I. F. Ranea- Sandoval, F. Garc ´ ıa, W. M. Spinella, G. A. Contrera, G. Lugones, and F. Weber, “Phase transition in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.46, (2019) 073002

    2019

  63. [63]

    Discontinuity gravity modes in hybrid stars: Assessing the role of rapid and slow phase conversions

    L. Tonetto and G. Lugones, “Discontinuity gravity modes in hybrid stars: Assessing the role of rapid and slow phase conversions”, Phys. Rev. D101, 123029 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Radial Oscilla- tions of Hybrid Stars

    V. K. Gupta, V. Tuli, and A. Goyal, “Radial Oscilla- tions of Hybrid Stars”, Astrophys. J.579, 374 (2002); 10 arXiv:astro-ph/0202016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Ra- dial pulsations of hybrid neutron stars

    C. V´ asquez-Flores, C. H. Lenzi, and G. Lugones, “Ra- dial pulsations of hybrid neutron stars”, Int. J. Modern Physics Conf. Ser.18, 105 (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    General relativistic fluid spheres

    H. A. Buchdahl, “General relativistic fluid spheres”, Phys. Rev.116, 1027 (1959)

    1959

  67. [67]

    Phase tran- sition in dense matter and radial pulsation of neutron stars

    P. Haensel, J. L. Zdunik, and R. Schaeffer, “Phase tran- sition in dense matter and radial pulsation of neutron stars”, Astron. Astrophys.217, 137 (1989)

    1989

  68. [68]

    Polytropic spheres with electric charge: compact stars, the Oppenheimer-Volkoff and Buchdahl limits, and quasiblack holes

    J. D. V. Arba˜ nil, J. P. S. Lemos, and V. T. Zanchin, “Polytropic spheres with electric charge: compact stars, the Oppenheimer-Volkoff and Buchdahl limits, and quasiblack holes”, Phys. Rev. D88, 084023 (2013); arXiv:1309.4470 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Chandrasekhar, “An Introduction to the Study of Stel- lar Structure (Chicago University Press, 1939) p.52

    S. Chandrasekhar, “An Introduction to the Study of Stel- lar Structure (Chicago University Press, 1939) p.52

    1939

  70. [70]

    Stability of thin-shell interfaces inside compact stars

    J. P. Pereira, J. G. Coelho, and J. A. Rueda, “Stability of thin-shell interfaces inside compact stars”, Phys. Rev. D90, 123011 (2014); arXiv:1412.1848 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Radial stability in strati- fied stars

    J. P. Pereira and J. A. Rueda, “Radial stability in strati- fied stars”, Astrophys. J.801, 1 (2015); arXiv:1501.02621 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    Hamada, T., & Salpeter, E. E. 1961, Astrophys. J. , 134, 683

    1961

  73. [73]

    High-density behavior and dynamical stability of neutron star models

    C. W. Misner and H. S. Zapolsky, “High-density behavior and dynamical stability of neutron star models”, Phys. Rev. Lett.13,122 (1964)

    1964

  74. [74]

    Haensel, A

    P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. YakovlevNeu- tron Stars1: Equation of State and Structure(Springer Verlag, New York, 2007)

    2007

  75. [75]

    General relativistic polytropic fluid spheres

    R. F. Tooper, “General relativistic polytropic fluid spheres”, Astrophys. J.140, 434 (1964)

    1964

  76. [76]

    Density discontinuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves

    H. Sotani, N. Yasutake, T. Maruyama and T. Tatsumi, “Density discontinuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves”, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024010 (2001)

    2001

  77. [77]

    Salpeter, E. E. 1961, Astrophys. J. , 134, 669

    1961

  78. [78]

    1939,Physical Review, 55, 718–725

    Gamow, G. 1939,Physical Review, 55, 718–725

    1939

  79. [79]

    A., Malheiro, M., Schramm, S., & Weber, F

    Otoniel, E., Franzon, B., Carvalho, G. A., Malheiro, M., Schramm, S., & Weber, F. 2019, Astrophys. J. , 879, 46. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24d1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24d1 2019

  80. [80]

    H., Kondev, F

    Wang, M., Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B. 2012,Chinese Physics C, 36, 1603

    2012

Showing first 80 references.