REVIEW 2 cited by
To BERT or Not To BERT: Comparing Speech and Language-based Approaches for Alzheimer's Disease Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Research related to automatically detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important, given the high prevalence of AD and the high cost of traditional methods. Since AD significantly affects the content and acoustics of spontaneous speech, natural language processing and machine learning provide promising techniques for reliably detecting AD. We compare and contrast the performance of two such approaches for AD detection on the recent ADReSS challenge dataset: 1) using domain knowledge-based hand-crafted features that capture linguistic and acoustic phenomena, and 2) fine-tuning Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer (BERT)-based sequence classification models. We also compare multiple feature-based regression models for a neuropsychological score task in the challenge. We observe that fine-tuned BERT models, given the relative importance of linguistics in cognitive impairment detection, outperform feature-based approaches on the AD detection task.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reverse-Speech-Finder: A Neural Network Backtracking Architecture for Generating Alzheimer's Disease Speech Samples and Improving Diagnosis Performance
RSF uses causal tracing and backtracking in a fine-tuned LLM to identify 'most probable' AD speech markers and generates synthetic transcripts that improve AD classification by about 3.5% accuracy.
-
Predicting Cognitive Decline: A Multimodal AI Approach to Dementia Screening from Speech
A multimodal speech-analysis pipeline ranks mid-pack in the PROCESS dementia screening challenge, though its reported rank numbers are internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.