Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

In-field Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors through XGBoost \& Aggregate Sensor Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.15840 v1 pith:7J4ENZAB submitted 2025-06-18 cs.LG

In-field Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors through XGBoost \& Aggregate Sensor Data

classification cs.LG
keywords sensorscalibrationdatain-fieldlow-costsensorxgboostaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Effective large-scale air quality monitoring necessitates distributed sensing due to the pervasive and harmful nature of particulate matter (PM), particularly in urban environments. However, precision comes at a cost: highly accurate sensors are expensive, limiting the spatial deployments and thus their coverage. As a result, low-cost sensors have become popular, though they are prone to drift caused by environmental sensitivity and manufacturing variability. This paper presents a model for in-field sensor calibration using XGBoost ensemble learning to consolidate data from neighboring sensors. This approach reduces dependence on the presumed accuracy of individual sensors and improves generalization across different locations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A temporal deep learning framework for calibration of low-cost air quality sensors

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LSTM with time-lagged features and harmonic encodings calibrates low-cost sensors to higher R2 and regulatory-compliant uncertainties of 9.1-22.11% for three pollutants.