Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine Learning in Official Statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10422 v1 pith:7M2OEARS submitted 2018-12-13 cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CYcs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningmachinestatisticaldestatismethodsofficialstatisticssurveys
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the first half of 2018, the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis) carried out a "Proof of Concept Machine Learning" as part of its Digital Agenda. A major component of this was surveys on the use of machine learning methods in official statistics, which were conducted at selected national and international statistical institutions and among the divisions of Destatis. It was of particular interest to find out in which statistical areas and for which tasks machine learning is used and which methods are applied. This paper is intended to make the results of the surveys publicly accessible.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prediction-powered estimators for finite population statistics in highly imbalanced textual data: Public hate crime estimation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using a BERT classifier's predicted hate-crime probabilities as an auxiliary sampling variable yields a Hansen-Hurwitz estimate of 6,051 hate crimes among 2022 Swedish police reports, with a design effect of 0.0068.

Pith tools