Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Political Events using RAG with LLMs

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline built on the Llama 2 language model can extract structured political events from news headlines, reporting 0.87 accuracy on a 50-event health-politics test set.

desk verdict A clearly written proof-of-concept for RAG-based political event extraction, but the single accuracy figure is undefined and the evaluation is too thin to support it. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.15701 v1 pith:7NAKQWLN submitted 2025-01-06 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

Muhammad Arslan (Le2i , ICB) , Saba Munawar (NUCES) , Christophe Cruz (ICB) This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords PoliticalAnalysisNaturalLanguageProcessingLargeModelsRetrieval-AugmentedGenerationEventExtractionEventsLlama2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Media reports are full of political events, but turning them into structured data usually requires hand-built rules or domain-specific training sets. The paper argues that combining retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with a large language model removes that burden: an off-the-shelf LLM, given relevant news headlines retrieved from an external index, can identify the who, what, whom, how, why, when, where, and who-reported of a political event. To show this, the authors build a proof-of-concept system that extracts these eight event properties from news headlines and report 0.87 accuracy on 50 manually curated health-politics events. The point of the claim is practical: if it holds, analysts and organizations with limited NLP resources can assemble political event extractors by supplying a news dataset instead of engineering models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the RAG loop: news articles are embedded and stored in a vector index; a query is transformed into an embedding and used to retrieve the most relevant headline chunks; those chunks are injected into a prompt for Llama 2, which generates the event-property answer. The eight-property event schema (actor, action, recipient, instrument, reason, time, location, reporter) defines what counts as an extracted event, and the evaluation uses an entity-to-entity cosine similarity matrix to compare system output with the manually curated reference events.

What would settle it

Rerun the system on the same 50 curated events and score each extracted event property by exact match against a predeclared reference annotation; a per-property exact-match accuracy well below 0.87 would refute the paper's accuracy claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The system's central claim is that RAG makes LLM-based political event extraction work without task-specific training. The system indexes roughly three years of news headlines (2020-2022) in a vector store, retrieves the passages most relevant to a query, and passes them to a Llama 2 model prompted to return the event's actor, action, recipient, instrument, reason, time, location, and reporter. An event is defined as an action by a political actor in a particular time and place, and sentences rarely contain all eight properties. The paper evaluates the system by manually curating 50 health-related political events, comparing extracted entities against the curated set with cosine-similarity matching, and reports an accuracy of 0.87. The contribution is therefore a demonstration that a generic retrieval-plus-generation recipe can approximate domain-specialized event extraction in the political domain.

Load-bearing premise

The accuracy claim rests on the evaluation step, which compares extracted entities to 50 manually selected event records using cosine similarity; the paper does not say how the reference entities were defined, how matches were scored or thresholded, or how the 0.87 figure is aggregated across the eight event properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A political event extractor can be assembled by pointing the RAG pipeline at a news dataset and running off-the-shelf prompts, with no rule writing or model fine-tuning.
  • New events can be tracked by swapping in updated news files, so the system can follow a rapidly changing political situation without retraining.
  • Because answers are retrieved from indexed articles, extracted event properties carry an attribution trail back to the source text.
  • The eight-property schema gives analysts a fixed, comparable unit for downstream political event datasets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 0.87 figure is a proof-of-concept number, not a benchmark: rebuilding the evaluation on a large random sample with predefined reference annotations for each of the eight properties is the direct test the paper leaves for future work.
  • If the pipeline transfers to full articles and social-media sources, retrieval quality and response latency will likely matter more than the underlying LLM's reasoning ability.
  • A cheaper extension would measure per-property accuracy, since optional properties such as instrument and reason are rarer and may depress or inflate the aggregate score depending on how missing values are scored.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a proof-of-concept system, 'Political EE,' that combines Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with a pre-trained LLM (Llama 2) to extract political event properties (actor, action, recipient, instrument, reason, time, location, reporter) from news headlines. The system builds a vector index over a news dataset and uses a query engine to answer extraction questions. The evaluation claims an accuracy of 0.87 on 50 manually curated health-related political events, based on 'entity-to-entity comparisons utilizing the Cosine Similarity matrix.' The paper concludes that RAG enhances political event extraction, enabling rapid development and dynamic dataset updates. The system description is straightforward and the limitations section acknowledges the small, outdated dataset and the restriction to a single news source.

Significance. If the central accuracy claim were substantiated, the paper would be a modest demonstration that a standard RAG pipeline with a general-purpose LLM can extract structured event data without fine-tuning, which is a plausible and potentially useful result for computational social science. The paper also usefully identifies an underexplored application area (RAG for political event extraction) and collects a compact survey of relevant work. However, the empirical contribution is the load-bearing element, and it is not adequately specified: the evaluation lacks grounding in a defined gold standard, a reproducible matching protocol, a baseline, or an error analysis. The paper also ships no code or data, further limiting verification. The significance is therefore currently low, and the claimed 0.87 accuracy cannot be credited without a properly documented evaluation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] The central accuracy claim of 0.87 is not well-defined. The paper states that 'entity-to-entity comparisons utilizing the Cosine Similarity matrix' were conducted, but it does not report (a) how the gold-standard event properties from the Halterman schema [41] were represented or annotated for the 50 manually curated events; (b) the cosine similarity threshold used to declare a predicted value a match; (c) how partial matches were scored; (d) whether all eight properties, including non-entity properties such as action and reason, were scored or only named entities; or (e) how property-level and event-level results were aggregated into the single 0.87 figure. Without these specifications, the accuracy claim cannot be reproduced or falsified.
  2. [Section 4] The evaluation provides no baseline or ablation, so the paper's core assertion that RAG improves political event extraction is not tested. There is no comparison of the RAG–Llama 2 system to Llama 2 without retrieval, to a prompt-only LLM, or to any existing political event extraction method. Consequently, the reported accuracy cannot be attributed to the retrieval-augmented component, which is the paper's stated contribution, as opposed to the intrinsic capability of the LLM itself.
  3. [Sections 4 and 5] The test set consists of 50 health-related political events only, and Section 5 acknowledges the small dataset, but the paper's title, abstract, and introduction make general claims about 'political events' in national and global contexts. The single-domain, small-sample evaluation provides no evidence for the system's performance on the broader political event space, so the generalization from health-related headlines to political events at large is unsupported.
  4. [Sections 3 and 4] The Halterman schema includes non-entity properties (action, reason) that are not straightforwardly handled by 'entity-to-entity comparison with a cosine similarity matrix.' The paper does not explain how these non-named-entity properties were extracted and matched, leaving the scope of the 0.87 accuracy figure ambiguous and the matching method potentially inapplicable to a subset of the target properties.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains two tables numbered 'Table 1': the background use-case table in Section 2 and the sample evaluation records in Section 4; the second is also titled 'Sampe records' instead of 'Sample records.'
  2. [Figures 1 and 2] Figures 1 and 2 are referenced in the text but do not appear in the manuscript as provided; their captions and images are missing, which prevents the reader from inspecting the event property schema and the system architecture.
  3. [Reference [44]] Reference [44] cites the News Category Dataset paper but does not provide a direct link, version, or license identifier for the actual dataset; please supply the exact source used.
  4. [Throughout] The model name is spelled inconsistently as 'LLama2' and 'Llama2'; standardize to the official 'Llama 2' spelling.
  5. [Algorithm 1 and Section 3] The implementation details omit several parameters needed for reproducibility, including the embedding model name, chunk size, number of retrieved documents per query, and the similarity threshold used in the vector index; adding these details would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's reported accuracy is an empirical measurement, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain whose inputs and outputs coincide. It builds a RAG-with-LLM system using standard components (Llama 2, embeddings, vector index) and then reports an empirical accuracy of 0.87 on 50 manually curated health-related political events. The evaluation is described as 'entity-to-entity comparisons utilizing the Cosine Similarity matrix,' which is an external comparison against curated data, not a quantity fitted by the system or defined in terms of the system's own outputs. The event property schema is imported from Halterman [41], an independent external source, and no load-bearing claim is justified by a citation to the authors' own prior work. The main weakness is that the evaluation protocol is underspecified (no gold-standard annotation details, no cosine threshold, no aggregation rule), which makes the accuracy figure hard to reproduce or falsify; however, that is an empirical-validity and reporting problem, not circular reasoning. No self-definitional reduction, no fitted-input-called-prediction, and no self-citation chain appear in the manuscript, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities. The accuracy claim depends on hidden evaluation choices (matching threshold) and on unverified domain assumptions about the dataset and the event schema.

free parameters (1)
  • Cosine similarity match threshold = not reported
    The reported 0.87 accuracy depends on how similar two entity strings must be to count as a match; the threshold is never specified in Section 4.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption RAG with Llama 2 can retrieve relevant news passages for political questions.
    The entire system presumes retrieval quality is sufficient; no retrieval evaluation is provided.
  • domain assumption Halterman's eight-property schema is an appropriate target for political events.
    Section 3 adopts the schema without justification or comparison to alternative schemas.
  • domain assumption Manually curated labels for the 50 health-related events are correct.
    No inter-annotator agreement, label release, or annotation protocol is given; Section 4 relies on this assumption.
  • domain assumption News headlines from the News Category Dataset contain enough context to populate the eight event properties.
    The demonstration uses headlines only and assumes they encode the required event fields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Political Events using RAG with LLMs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7NAKQWLN

@misc{pith2026250215701,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Political Events using RAG with LLMs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7NAKQWLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.15701}
}
read the original abstract

In the contemporary digital landscape, media content stands as the foundation for political news analysis, offering invaluable insights sourced from various channels like news articles, social media updates, speeches, and reports. Natural Language Processing (NLP) has revolutionized Political Information Extraction (IE), automating tasks such as Event Extraction (EE) from these diverse media outlets. While traditional NLP methods often necessitate specialized expertise to build rule-based systems or train machine learning models with domain-specific datasets, the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a promising alternative. These models offer accessibility, alleviating challenges associated with model construction from scratch and reducing the dependency on extensive datasets during the training phase, thus facilitating rapid implementation. However, challenges persist in handling domain-specific tasks, leading to the development of the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework. RAG enhances LLMs by integrating external data retrieval, enriching their contextual understanding, and expanding their knowledge base beyond pre-existing training data. To illustrate RAG's efficacy, we introduce the Political EE system, specifically tailored to extract political event information from news articles. Understanding these political insights is essential for remaining informed about the latest political advancements, whether on a national or global scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.15701 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Properties of political events. Having identified the key properties essential for constructing political events, we integrate the power of the RAG with LLM model, driven by GenAI, to automatically extract these events without the need for manual intervention in extracting each event property. To facilitate interactive exploration of political events, we opt to develop a Political EE system. Leveraging the expertise… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Three Essays on Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction with Applications to Political Violence and International Security

    Halterman, A. (2021). “Three Essays on Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction with Applications to Political Violence and International Security” (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics

    Papacharissi Z. (2015) “Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics.” Oxford University Press

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    Television news coverage of public health issues and implications for public health policy and practice

    Gollust SE, Fowler EF, Niederdeppe J. (2019) “Television news coverage of public health issues and implications for public health policy and practice.” Annual Review of Public Health 1(40):167-85. 8 Arslan et al. / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2024) 000–000

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Extracting Info From Political News Through Big Data Network Analysis

    Giuffrida G, Gozzo S, Rinaldi FM, Tomaselli V. (2017) “Extracting Info From Political News Through Big Data Network Analysis. ” Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica 71(1)

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Information extraction: Past, present and future. Multi -source, multilingual information extraction and summarization

    Piskorski J, Yangarber R. (2013) “Information extraction: Past, present and future. Multi -source, multilingual information extraction and summarization.”:23-49

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    Open extraction of fine -grained political statements

    Bamman D, Smith NA. (2015) “Open extraction of fine -grained political statements. ” InProceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: 76-85

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    GenAI Application Level Security

    Huang K, Huang G, Dawson A, Wu D. (2024) “GenAI Application Level Security.” Generative AI Security: Theories and Practices: 199-237. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    A survey on large language model (llm) security and privacy: The good, the bad, and the ugly

    Yao Y, Duan J, Xu K, Cai Y, Sun Z, Zhang Y. (2024) “A survey on large language model (llm) security and privacy: The good, the bad, and the ugly.” High-Confidence Computing:100211

    work page 2024

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    Retrieval augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks

    Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, Petroni F, Karpukhin V, Goyal N, Küttler H, Lewis M, Yih WT, Rocktäschel T, Riedel S. (2020) “Retrieval augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks.” Advances in Neural Information Processing System 33:9459-74

    2020

  2. [9]

    A Survey on Retrieval -Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models

    Huang Y, Huang J. (2024) “A Survey on Retrieval -Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models. ” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10981

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    A survey on computational politics

    Haq EU, Braud T, Kwon YD, Hui P. (2020) “A survey on computational politics.” IEEE Access 8:197379-406

    2020

  4. [11]

    Protest event analysis: Developing a semiautomated NLP approach

    Lorenzini J, Kriesi H, Makarov P, Wüest B. (2022) “Protest event analysis: Developing a semiautomated NLP approach. ” American Behavioral Scientist 66(5):555-77

    2022

  5. [12]

    Nlp workflows for computational social science: Understanding triggers of state-led mass killings

    Burley T, Humble L, Sleeper C, Sticha A, Chesler A, Regan P, Verdeja E, Brenner P. (2020) “Nlp workflows for computational social science: Understanding triggers of state-led mass killings.” Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing: 152-159

    2020

  6. [13]

    Extracting political events from text using syntax and semantics

    Halterman, A. (2020). “Extracting political events from text using syntax and semantics.” Technical report MIT

    2020

  7. [14]

    Machine learning and Natural Language Processing of social media data for event detection in smart cities

    Hodorog A, Petri I, Rezgui Y. (2022) “Machine learning and Natural Language Processing of social media data for event detection in smart cities.” Sustainable Cities and Society 1(85):104026

    2022

  8. [15]

    Linking Events and Locations in Political Text

    Halterman, A. (2018). “Linking Events and Locations in Political Text. ” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2018 -21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3267476 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267476

    2018 doi

  9. [16]

    (2018, August)

    Makarov, P. (2018, August). Automated acquisition of patterns for coding political event data: two case studies. In Proceedin gs of the second joint SIGHUM workshop on computational linguistics for cultural heritage, social sciences, humanities and literature (pp. 103-112)

    2018

  10. [17]

    (2018, July)

    Liang, Y., Jabr, K., Grant, C., Irvine, J., & Halterman, A. (2018, July). New techniques for coding political events across languages. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) (pp. 88-93). IEEE

    2018

  11. [18]

    & Della Rocca, L

    Tanev, H., Stefanovitch, N., Halterman, A., Uca, O., Zavarella, V., Hürriyetoğlu, A., ... & Della Rocca, L. (2023, September). Detecting and geocoding battle events from social media messages on the russo -ukrainian war: Shared task 2, case 2023. In Proceedings of the 6th Work...

    2023

  12. [19]

    & Mei, H

    Shi, X., Xue, S., Wang, K., Zhou, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., ... & Mei, H. (2024). Language models can improve event prediction by few-shot abductive reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36

    2024

  13. [20]

    Singh, J., Pandey, D., & Singh, A. K. (2023). Event detection from real -time twitter streaming data using community detection algorithm. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-28

    2023

  14. [21]

    F., Kumar, R., & Ratan, S

    Hürriyetoğlu, A., Mutlu, O., Yörük, E., Liza, F. F., Kumar, R., & Ratan, S. (2021). Multilingual protest news detection -shared task 1, case

    2021

  15. [22]

    Suri, M., Chopra, K., & Arora, A. (2022). NSUT-NLP at CASE 2022 Task 1: Multilingual Protest Event Detection using Transformer-based Models. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio -political Events from Text (CASE) (p...

    2022

  16. [23]

    Hettiarachchi, H., Adedoyin-Olowe, M., Bhogal, J., & Gaber, M. M. (2021). DAAI at CASE 2021 task 1: Transformer -based multilingual socio-political and crisis event detection. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extracti on of Socio-p...

    2021

  17. [24]

    Delucia, A., Dredze, M., & Buczak, A. L. (2023). A multi -instance learning approach to civil unrest event detection on twitter. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (pp. 18-33)

    2023

  18. [25]

    C., & Joo, J

    Won, D., Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., & Joo, J. (2017). Protest activity detection and perceived violence estimation from social media images. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 786-794)

    2017

  19. [26]

    Tanev, H. (2024). Leveraging approximate pattern matching with bert for event detection. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop o n Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE 2024) (pp. 32-39)

    2024

  20. [27]

    Steinwart, I., & Christmann, A. (2008). Support vector machines. Springer Science & Business Media

    2008

  21. [28]

    M., Ng, A

    Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan), 993-1022

    2003

  22. [29]

    Grossberg, S. (2013). Recurrent neural networks. Scholarpedia, 8(2), 1888. Arslan et al. / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2024) 000–000 9

    2013

  23. [30]

    Openagi: When llm meets domain experts

    Ge Y, Hua W, Mei K, Tan J, Xu S, Li Z, Zhang Y. (2024) “Openagi: When llm meets domain experts. ” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13;36

    2024

  24. [31]

    Improving Assessment of Tutoring Practices using Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    Han, Z. FeiFei, Lin, J., Gurung, A., Thomas, D. R., Chen, E., Borchers, C., Gupta, S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2024). “Improving Assessment of Tutoring Practices using Retrieval-Augmented Generation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14594

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Enhancing Textbook Question Answering Task with Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation

    Alawwad, H. A., Alhothali, A., Naseem, U., Alkhathlan, A., & Jamal, A. (2024). “Enhancing Textbook Question Answering Task with Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05128

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Exploring Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Form Filling

    Bucur, M. (2023). “Exploring Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Form Filling” (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Enhancing financial sentiment analysis via retrieval augmented large language models

    Zhang B, Yang H, Zhou T, Ali Babar M, Liu XY. (2023) “Enhancing financial sentiment analysis via retrieval augmented large language models.” InProceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on AI in Finance: 349-356

    2023

  28. [35]

    Transforming healthcare education: Harnessing large language models for frontline health worker capacity building using retrieval-augmented generation

    Al Ghadban, Y., Lu, H. Y., Adavi, U., Sharma, A., Gara, S., Das, N., ... & Hirst, J. E. (2023). “Transforming healthcare education: Harnessing large language models for frontline health worker capacity building using retrieval-augmented generation.” medRxiv, 2023-12

    2023

  29. [36]

    Improving Medical Reasoning through Retrieval and Self -Reflection with Retrieval - Augmented Large Language Models

    Jeong, M., Sohn, J., Sung, M., & Kang, J. (2024). “Improving Medical Reasoning through Retrieval and Self -Reflection with Retrieval - Augmented Large Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15269

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hybrid retrieval-augmented generation for real -time composition assistance

    Xia, M., Zhang, X., Couturier, C., Zheng, G., Rajmohan, S., & Ruhle, V. (2023). “Hybrid retrieval-augmented generation for real -time composition assistance.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04215

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    RAG-Fusion: a New Take on Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    Rackauckas, Z. (2024). “RAG-Fusion: a New Take on Retrieval-Augmented Generation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03367

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    RACE: Retrieval -Augmented Commit Message Generation

    Shi, E., Wang, Y., Tao, W., Du, L., Zhang, H., Han, S., ... & Sun, H. (2022). “RACE: Retrieval -Augmented Commit Message Generation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02700

    2022 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Views to a kill: Exploring the implications of source selection in the case of Guatemalan state terror, 1977 - 1995

    Davenport C, Ball P. (2002) “Views to a kill: Exploring the implications of source selection in the case of Guatemalan state terror, 1977 - 1995.” Journal of conflict resolution 46(3):427-50

    2002

  34. [42]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., ... & McGrew, B. (2023). “Gpt-4 technical report.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models

    Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., ... & Scialom, T. (2023). “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    News category dataset

    Misra, R. (2022). “News category dataset.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11429

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    & Rush, A

    Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., ... & Rush, A. M. (2020, October). Transformers: State -of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: syste m demonstrations...

    2020

  38. [2021]

    In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio -political Events from Text (CASE 2021) (pp. 79-91)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.