REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-Programming Language Sandbox for LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We introduce MPLSandbox, an out-of-the-box multi-programming language sandbox designed to provide unified and comprehensive feedback from compiler and analysis tools for Large Language Models (LLMs). It can automatically identify the programming language of the code, compiling and executing it within an isolated sub-sandbox to ensure safety and stability. In addition, MPLSandbox also integrates both traditional and LLM-based code analysis tools, providing a comprehensive analysis of generated code. MPLSandbox can be effortlessly integrated into the training and deployment of LLMs to improve the quality and correctness of their generated code. It also helps researchers streamline their workflows for various LLM-based code-related tasks, reducing the development cost. To validate the effectiveness of MPLSandbox, we integrate it into training and deployment approaches, and also employ it to optimize workflows for a wide range of real-world code-related tasks. Our goal is to enhance researcher productivity on LLM-based code-related tasks by simplifying and automating workflows through delegation to MPLSandbox.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FullStack Bench: Evaluating LLMs as Full Stack Coders
FullStack Bench and SandboxFusion offer a broader, execution-based benchmark for code LLMs with 3,374 problems in 16 languages and 11 domains.
-
Reinforcement Learning Optimization for Large-Scale Learning: An Efficient and User-Friendly Scaling Library
ROLL is a distributed RL training library for LLMs with sample-level rollout scheduling and flexible device mapping, demonstrated on RLVR and agentic tasks but without baseline or scaling measurements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.