REVIEW 2 cited by
Minimax Robust Detection: Classic Results and Recent Advances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Minimax Robust Detection: Classic Results and Recent Advances
read the original abstract
This paper provides an overview of results and concepts in minimax robust hypothesis testing for two and multiple hypotheses. It starts with an introduction to the subject, highlighting its connection to other areas of robust statistics and giving a brief recount of the most prominent developments. Subsequently, the minimax principle is introduced and its strengths and limitations are discussed. The first part of the paper focuses on the two-hypothesis case. After briefly reviewing the basics of statistical hypothesis testing, uncertainty sets are introduced as a generic way of modeling distributional uncertainty. The design of minimax detectors is then shown to reduce to the problem of determining a pair of least favorable distributions, and different criteria for their characterization are discussed. Explicit expressions are given for least favorable distributions under three types of uncertainty: $\varepsilon$-contamination, probability density bands, and $f$-divergence balls. Using examples, it is shown how the properties of these least favorable distributions translate to properties of the corresponding minimax detectors. The second part of the paper deals with the problem of robustly testing multiple hypotheses, starting with a discussion of why this is fundamentally different from the binary problem. Sequential detection is then introduced as a technique that enables the design of strictly minimax optimal tests in the multi-hypothesis case. Finally, the usefulness of robust detectors in practice is showcased using the example of ground penetrating radar. The paper concludes with an outlook on robust detection beyond the minimax principle and a brief summary of the presented material.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency
A deliberately narrow specialist can profitably keep a defect only when the detector that triggers compensation sits outside the defect; inside, the miss rate equals the capture rate.
-
Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency
A competence defect is profitably removable exactly when a detector outside the defect can separate fatal cases and an advantage condition holds, with premium equal to the ROC support function at economic prices.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.