REVIEW 1 cited by
Decomposing Complex Questions Makes Multi-Hop QA Easier and More Interpretable
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Decomposing Complex Questions Makes Multi-Hop QA Easier and More Interpretable
read the original abstract
Multi-hop QA requires the machine to answer complex questions through finding multiple clues and reasoning, and provide explanatory evidence to demonstrate the machine reasoning process. We propose Relation Extractor-Reader and Comparator (RERC), a three-stage framework based on complex question decomposition, which is the first work that the RERC model has been proposed and applied in solving the multi-hop QA challenges. The Relation Extractor decomposes the complex question, and then the Reader answers the sub-questions in turn, and finally the Comparator performs numerical comparison and summarizes all to get the final answer, where the entire process itself constitutes a complete reasoning evidence path. In the 2WikiMultiHopQA dataset, our RERC model has achieved the most advanced performance, with a winning joint F1 score of 53.58 on the leaderboard. All indicators of our RERC are close to human performance, with only 1.95 behind the human level in F1 score of support fact. At the same time, the evidence path provided by our RERC framework has excellent readability and faithfulness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Leveraging Spreading Activation for Improved Document Retrieval in Knowledge-Graph-Based RAG Systems
A spreading-activation retrieval module over an automatically constructed knowledge graph improves multi-hop QA in RAG systems, with up to 39 percentage points gain when combined with chain-of-thought retrieval.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.