Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Extra-dimensional axion patterns

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Extra-dimensional axions cannot produce displaced maxion patterns: only a canonical QCD axion plus a heavy KK plateau survives gravity and astrophysical bounds.

desk verdict Solid new no-go for brane-localized extra-dimensional maxions, but the abstract overstates the scope beyond the analyzed universal-profile subclass. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00179 v2 pith:7TLKCLE7 submitted 2024-11-29 hep-ph hep-th

Arturo de Giorgi , Maria Ramos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords QCDaxionKaluza-KleinaxionsextradimensionsRandall-SundrummaxionsstrongCPproblemfifth-forceconstraintssumrule
topics The Strong CP Problem
open problems The Strong CP Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a QCD axion living in the bulk of one or more extra spacetime dimensions can solve the strong CP problem in a non-canonical way, with several Kaluza-Klein modes mixing into a displaced solution. It shows that in the flat and Randall-Sundrum models considered, such 'maxion' patterns are excluded: the same wavefunctions that couple the axion tower to QCD also couple it to gravity, so fifth-force, astrophysical, and unitarity bounds push the lightest mode back onto the standard QCD axion line. What survives is a single canonical QCD axion, the zero mode, accompanied by a plateau of heavier, weakly coupled KK axions. The analysis rests on a general eigenvalue equation derived for arbitrary numbers of extra dimensions and compactifications, making the conclusion uniform across the class of models considered.

What carries the argument

The central object is the KK axion mass matrix $(M^2)_{ij} = m_{\mathrm{PQ}}^2[\psi_i \psi_j + y^2(\mu_i/\mu_1)^2 \delta_{ij}]$, where $\psi_i$ is the axion wavefunction on the infrared brane and $y = \mu_1/m_{\mathrm{PQ}}$. The argument runs through the eigenvalue equation $\sum_n \psi_n^2/[\lambda^2 - (\mu_n/\mu_1)^2 y^2] = 1$, the resulting $g$-factors $g_\lambda = m_\lambda^2 f_\lambda^2/\chi_{\mathrm{QCD}}$, the QCD axion sum rule $\sum_\lambda 1/g_\lambda = 1$, and the resummed stellar-cooling factor $\aleph(E_c)$. Because the same formalism reproduces the flat, warped, multi-dimensional, and nontrivial-VEV cases, the no-go statement is tied to this single mechanistic structure.

What would settle it

A measurement of a KK axion eigenstate with $g_\lambda > 1$ while the lightest graviton mass sits above the fifth-force bound, for example $\mu_1 \gtrsim 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}$ with the EFT cutoff at $\Lambda \gtrsim 1\,\mathrm{TeV}$, would falsify the no-go and require non-universal bulk wavefunctions. A concrete check is the stellar-cooling factor: at $\mu_1 = 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{eV}$ and $\Lambda = 1\,\mathrm{TeV}$ the paper's flat-space formula gives $\aleph(E_c=30\,\mathrm{MeV}) \sim 10^5$, so a supernova observation matching the single-axion coupling predicted by $g_0 \approx 4.5\times 10^3$ in that parameter region would contradict the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single bulk axion in flat or Randall-Sundrum extra dimensions, with QCD localized on the infrared brane and QCD as the only source of Peccei-Quinn breaking, can realize only one viable pattern: one zero-mode axion on the canonical QCD line plus a plateau of heavier KK modes. The non-canonical patterns, in which several KK modes share the solution to the strong CP problem and sit at $g_i \gg 1$, are in severe tension with the combined constraints from fifth-force searches, astrophysics, and perturbative unitarity. The proof relies on the KK axion wavefunctions being universal and matching the graviton wavefunctions, so that bounds on the lightest massive graviton directly constrain the axion tower; it holds in both flat and warped geometries and, as the paper shows, also when the number of extra dimensions is increased or the bulk VEV profile is changed.

Load-bearing premise

The exclusion depends on the axion KK wavefunctions being exactly the same as the graviton wavefunctions, so that fifth-force limits on the lightest massive graviton directly constrain the axion tower; if that universality breaks, or if QCD lives in the bulk, the maxion patterns can reappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A future detection of a plateau of KK axions together with a single canonical zero mode would point to a bulk Peccei-Quinn field and would locate the zero mode inside the standard QCD axion band.
  • In these models, the heavy KK plateau is collectively visible in broadband axion searches, with an effective photon coupling enhanced roughly by the square root of the number of modes.
  • The exotic displaced QCD axion signals that motivate searches outside the canonical band cannot be produced by the simple bulk-axion setups considered here.
  • Adding extra spacetime dimensions or giving the bulk PQ field a nontrivial VEV profile makes the maxion patterns even less viable rather than rescuing them.
  • The generalized eigenvalue and eigenvector equations can be reused for other bulk fields whose wavefunctions factorize across an arbitrary number of orbifolded dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If an experiment found several displaced axion-like resonances with nearly equal $g$-factors, that would be evidence for non-universal bulk wavefunctions or for QCD propagating in the bulk, because the single-bulk-axion models studied here cannot generate such a pattern.
  • The no-go can be read as a model-building constraint: any successful maxion construction must decouple the axion KK wavefunctions from the graviton wavefunctions, so its signatures should include a modified relation between axion couplings and gravitational tower bounds.
  • The argument could be inverted as a diagnostic: null results from fifth-force searches at $\mu_1 \sim 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{eV}$, together with null searches for a heavy KK plateau, would shrink the allowed parameter space even for the canonical KK axion pattern.
  • The paper's multi-dimensional result suggests a sharper test: in six or more spacetime dimensions the dependence on $\mu_1$ drops out of the maxion $g$-factor, so one could look for a universal suppression that is insensitive to the lightest graviton mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a bulk axion in flat and Randall-Sundrum extra dimensions, with QCD localized on the IR brane. It constructs the KK axion mass matrix, derives analytic expressions for the eigenvalues and the g-factors gλ=mλ^2fλ^2/χ_QCD, and shows that the parameter space yields either a canonical QCD axion plus a decoupled tower or a set of 'QCD maxions' with gλ≫1. It then applies perturbative unitarity, fifth-force bounds on the lightest KK graviton, and supernova cooling via the resummed KK axion coupling to argue that the maxion patterns are in severe tension with data. Generalizations to multiple extra dimensions and to a non-constant bulk VEV profile are discussed, and a list of possible escape hatches is given.

Significance. If the no-go is correct, it substantially narrows the phenomenologically acceptable axion patterns from extra-dimensional models, which is relevant for axion searches and model building. The paper's analytic derivation of the eigenvalue equation (III.5) and the g-factor formulas (IV.11) and (IV.26) is a useful technical contribution, and the explicit re-derivation of the QCD axion sum rule in App. B for the KK system is a clean cross-check. The constraints are order-of-magnitude, but the margins appear robust to O(1) factors. The main weakness is that the advertised central claim is broader than the proven subclass, and some generality claims in Sec. VII are not fully supported by the analysis presented.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. VII] The paper's advertised central claim—'only KK canonical patterns (with the zero-mode close to the standard QCD line) can emerge from a bulk axion in one or more extra spacetime dimensions'—is broader than the analysis. The no-go is proven for models with brane-localized QCD (Eq. (II.4)) and universal KK wavefunctions matching the graviton profiles (assumption (III.4)). Sec. VII itself lists, as open possibilities, scenarios with bulk QCD and with non-universal/disentangled axion-graviton profiles; in the bulk-QCD case the coupling would be an overlap integral rather than ψ_n(πR), and the fifth-force bound on the lightest graviton would not constrain the same combination of couplings. The abstract and the concluding paragraph should either state these conditions explicitly or the authors should extend the analysis to at least the bulk-QCD case.
  2. [Sec. VI.B; Sec. VII] The claim in Sec. VII that the conclusion holds 'independently of the number of (universal) spacetime dimensions and the VEV profile of the PQ field in the bulk' is not fully supported. The VEV-profile analysis in Sec. VI.B is performed only for a flat background, in the limits m→0 and m→∞, with the warped case relegated to Ref. [45]. Since the warped case is one of the two main settings of the paper, the independence claim should be moderated or the warped VEV-profile case should be analyzed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I, second paragraph] The word 'representated' should be 'represented'.
  2. [Eq. (V.11)] The subscript 'i' in 'g_{aiγγ}' appears spurious; the standard notation is 'g_{aγγ}'.
  3. [Eq. (V.2)] The displayed expression for 1/F appears corrupted in the text; please check the typeset formula.
  4. [Sec. VI.A, Eq. (VI.4)] The notation f(n) for the summand conflicts with the decay constants f_d, f_4, f_5 used elsewhere; consider renaming the function, e.g., h(n).
  5. [Sec. IV.B] The phrase 'the distance of the maxions to the QCD axion canonical line' is unclear; it presumably refers to the deviation of g_λ from unity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the KK axion mass-matrix analysis is self-contained and the no-go is anchored to external fifth-force and supernova constraints; the abstract's broader phrasing is a scope issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The mass matrix in Eq. (III.1) is constructed from the explicit 5D action (II.4) and KK decomposition, rather than assumed. The eigenvalue equation (III.5), the eigenvectors (IV.5)-(IV.6), and the g-factors (IV.7) are derived in App. A from this matrix. The QCD axion sum rule (I.1), originally introduced in Ref. [5] with overlapping authorship, is re-derived for the KK mass matrix in App. B, so the paper does not rest on an unverified imported result. The phenomenological constraints are external: fifth-force bounds on the lightest graviton (Fig. 3, Refs. [30-37]) and supernova cooling constraints entering through the rescaling factor ℵ(Ec) in Eqs. (V.12)-(V.15). The conclusion that maxion patterns are in tension with combined gravity and astrophysical bounds follows from substituting these external limits into the algebraically derived expressions for g0 and ℵ, not from fitting any parameter to the target claim. The self-citations to Ref. [5] (maxion concept and sum rule) and Ref. [28] (graviton unitarity scale) are not load-bearing: App. B proves the sum rule independently, and the axion perturbative-unitarity cutoff used for the central constraint is derived in App. C. The only defensible concern is a scope mismatch, not circularity: the abstract's unconditional statement that 'only KK canonical patterns ... can emerge' is broader than the analyzed setup, which assumes brane-localized QCD and universal KK wavefunctions (Eqs. II.4 and III.4). The paper itself lists this limitation in Sec. VII (items 1 and 2), so the gap is acknowledged rather than concealed. No step of the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or fields are introduced; the analysis uses a known bulk-axion setup. The model parameters (y, psi_1, mu_1, f_4) are inputs of the underlying theory, not ad hoc additions; the benchmark choices are illustrative. The main assumptions are the brane-localization of QCD and the universal KK wavefunctions.

free parameters (4)
  • y = mu1/m_PQ = scanned; maxions require y <= 1
    The dimensionless ratio of the lightest KK mass to the QCD-induced PQ mass controls whether the mass matrix is diagonal (y >> 1, canonical) or off-diagonal (y <= 1, maxion). It is a model input, not fitted.
  • k (EFT cutoff) = >= 1 TeV
    Required by LHC bounds on colored fermions and by the eta-prime mass correction; the supernova bound depends on k through k^{-6}, so this choice is load-bearing.
  • E_c (supernova characteristic energy) = 30 MeV
    Typical SN core temperature for axion production, following Ref. [20]; the resummed production factor N(E_c) scales as E_c^3.
  • psi_1 (brane value of first massive KK wavefunction) = sqrt(2) in flat; up to 10^4 in RS
    The warp factor enhances the axion couplings to the IR brane; the RS maxion g-factors scale like psi_1^2/y^2.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The SM and QCD are localized on the IR brane at y = pi R with a delta-function coupling to the bulk axion.
    Eq. (II.4); all KK modes inherit the same brane coupling. Bulk-QCD scenarios (Sec. VII.1) are outside the analysis.
  • domain assumption The extra dimensions are (S^1/Z_2)^delta of universal radius R, and the axion propagates in all delta of them; KK wavefunctions are orthonormal with psi_i = psi_j for all massive modes in the limits used.
    Eqs. (II.6), (II.14), (II.27), (III.4); the equal-massive-WF assumption holds exactly in flat and in the large-warp RS limit.
  • domain assumption The only source of PQ breaking is the QCD anomaly; there is no explicit PQ-violating potential in the bulk.
    Action (II.4) and Sec. I; if other instanton scales contribute (e.g., string axiverse), the mass matrix changes.
  • standard math Bessel function summation identities (Eq. IV.23) and the large-warp approximation e^{mu pi} >> 1 are valid for the RS spectrum.
    Used in Eqs. (IV.24)-(IV.26); standard for RS KK decompositions.
  • ad hoc to paper The KK axion EFT is perturbatively unitary up to k >= 1 TeV; amplitudes for a_i g -> a_j g violate unitarity at k as in Eq. (V.4).
    App. C; the precise numerical coefficient (36 pi) depends on alpha_s(1 TeV) ~ 0.08; O(1) corrections would not change the qualitative no-go.
  • domain assumption Fifth-force constraints from the lightest KK graviton dominate over heavier-mode contributions.
    Sec. V; heavier gravitons have Yukawa-suppressed forces (and RS), and the authors note this is conservative for the axion no-go.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extra-dimensional axion patterns." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7TLKCLE7

@misc{pith2026241200179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extra-dimensional axion patterns},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7TLKCLE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00179}
}
abstract

We study the $\textit{complete}$ parameter space of a bulk axion in flat and warped extra spacetime dimensions. We characterize in detail the regimes where no single KK mode is produced along the canonical QCD axion line, and instead, it is maximally deviated along with several other axions that constitute a multiple solution to the strong CP problem. In both flat and Randall-Sundrum scenarios, and assuming that all Peccei-Quinn breaking comes from QCD, we find that these solutions are however subject to tight phenomenological constraints. In light of these results, we expect that only KK canonical patterns (with the zero-mode close to the standard QCD line) can emerge from a bulk axion in one or more extra spacetime dimensions. As a byproduct, we generalize the axions eigenvalue and eigenvector equations for an arbitrary number of spacetime dimensions and compactifications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Current axion bounds [4] and schematic representation of possible KK axion patterns arising from extra-dimensions. The dashed lines highlight gaps in the mass spectrum. that preserve a PQ symmetry at the classical level. Finding a compelling UV framework where such large deviations are realized could radically change the axion phenomenology by redefining the target of many axion experiments, without the need to exte… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative patterns of KK axions in flat (left) and RS (right) models. The solid black line and the black star represent, respectively, the single QCD axion mass-scale relation and the benchmark point of mPQ = 1 eV. with Eq. (IV.24), this expression can be further simplified, leading to the RS g-factors: g RS λ = γ 2 1 4y 2 ψ 2 1 + 2λ 2 − ψ 2 0 λ2 + (λ 2 − ψ 2 0 ) 2 λ2 1 ψ 2 1 . (IV.26) Let us now study the limi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Collection of bounds on massive gravitons as a function of the lightest KK graviton mass, µ1. The red, green and purple regions are excluded by fifth force experiments [30–37], astrophysics [38, 39] and collider searches [28, 40, 41], respectively. The black dashed line corresponds to the threshold mass value below which KK maxions can be generated; see Eq. (V.8). This assumes that the KK tower remains perturbative … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The “rescaling factor” ℵ(Ec), defined in Eq. (V.13), as a function of the PQ mass. The different lines correspond to different benchmark values for µ1 and ψ1 that allow for maxion regimes interpolating the RS and flat scenarios. The characteristic energy was taken to b…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Feynman diagrams contributing to aig → aj g. where in the last step we approximated again the number of available axions as N ≈ √ s/µ1. The re￾sult matches the naive result of Eq (V.3) corrected by a numerical factor of 5/(24π) ≈ 1/(5π). We can therefore identify the c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Suppressing Extra-Dimensional Axion Isocurvature Dynamically

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Radion dynamics in warped 5D models enhance the axion decay constant during inflation, satisfying CMB isocurvature bounds at higher Hubble scales while restoring the QCD window afterward.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [45]

    Jod lowski, Probing some photon portals to new physics at intensity frontier experiments , Phys

    K. Jod lowski, Probing some photon portals to new physics at intensity frontier experiments , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 11 115017, [arXiv:2305.05710]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Scenarios where QCD also propagates in the bulk of the extra dimensions δ [13, 49], en- hancing a δ⋆-axion mass and therefore that of the 4D KK modes

    work page

  3. [2]

    (IV.13) Hence, for the zero mode, we have: λ0 ≈ y 2 , (IV.14) g0 ≈ π2 2y2 , (IV.15) f0 ≈ f4× √ 2 π2 y2

    y[1− y2 π2 + O(y4)] . (IV.13) Hence, for the zero mode, we have: λ0 ≈ y 2 , (IV.14) g0 ≈ π2 2y2 , (IV.15) f0 ≈ f4× √ 2 π2 y2 . (IV.16) Indeed, in this limit, the third term in Eq. (IV.11) dominates over the mass term: this is not only true for the zero mode but for several of the KK axions in the tower. We, therefore, expect to find n⋆ ∼ g0 QCD maxions wi...

    work page

  4. [3]

    rescaling fac- tor

    y , (IV.17) gn>0 ≈ π2 2y2 , (IV.18) fn>0 ≈ f4× √ 2 1+ 2n π2 y2 . (IV.19) These results confirm our expectations and agree with previous studies of the mass spectrum of this theory [18]. The tower of QCD maxions is always accompa- nied by a plateau of heavier modes that decouple from the sum rule. Since the QCD contribution to the mass is negligible for th...

    work page

  5. [4]

    due to the combination of ad- ditional bulk fields and more involved com- pactifications

    More exotic constructions where the WFs of the axion are disentangled from gravity bounds, e.g. due to the combination of ad- ditional bulk fields and more involved com- pactifications

    work page

  6. [5]

    The string axiverse, which provides extra mass sources for the KK modes of higher di- mensional fields, in setups where the PQ sym- metry remains essentially unbroken at low en- ergies. Under the assumption that the differ- ent instanton scales are highly hierarchical, it has been found that the mixing of light ALPs with the axion gluonic combination is v...

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Witten, Some properties of o(32) superstrings , Physics Letters B 149 (1984), no

    E. Witten, Some properties of o(32) superstrings , Physics Letters B 149 (1984), no. 4 351–356

    work page 1984

  8. [7]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    Heidenreich, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them , JHEP 11 (2021) 053, [arXiv:2012.00009]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020

    2020

  3. [10]

    Gavela, P

    B. Gavela, P. Qu ´ ılez, and M. Ramos,The QCD axion sum rule , arXiv:2305.15465

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Kaluza, Zum Unit¨ atsproblem der Physik, Sitzungsber

    T. Kaluza, Zum Unit¨ atsproblem der Physik, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1921 (1921) 966–972, [arXiv:1803.08616]

    1921 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Klein, Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity

    O. Klein, Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity. (In German and English) , Z. Phys. 37 (1926) 895–906

    1926

  6. [13]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, Invisible axions and large radius compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 105023, [hep-ph/9912455]

    2000 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Di Lella, A

    L. Di Lella, A. Pilaftsis, G. Raffelt, and K. Zioutas, Search for solar Kaluza-Klein axions in theories of low scale quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 125011, [ hep-ph/0006327]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Flacke, B

    T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell, and D. Maybury, Warped axions, JHEP 01 (2007) 061, [hep-ph/0611278]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Anastasopoulos, P

    P. Anastasopoulos, P. Betzios, M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, and E. Kiritsis, Emergent/Composite axions, JHEP 10 (2019) 113, [arXiv:1811.05940]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta, and M. D. Nguyen, A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem, JHEP 01 (2020) 188, [arXiv:1911.09385]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol, and Y. Shirman, The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons, JHEP 03 (2020) 063, [arXiv:2001.05610]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Bonnefoy, P

    Q. Bonnefoy, P. Cox, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, 21 and M. D. Nguyen, Flavoured Warped Axion, JHEP 04 (2021) 084, [ arXiv:2012.09728]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gendler and C

    N. Gendler and C. Vafa, Axions in the Dark Dimension, arXiv:2404.15414

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion Couplings in Heterotic String Theory , arXiv:2410.03820

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Craig and M

    N. Craig and M. Kongsore, High-Quality Axions from Higher-Form Symmetries in Extra Dimensions, arXiv:2408.10295

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: I. Theoretical Overview , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 083523, [ arXiv:1106.4546]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [24]

    K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: II. An Explicit Model , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 083524, [ arXiv:1107.0721]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [25]

    K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Phenomenological Constraints on Axion Models of Dynamical Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055013, [arXiv:1203.1923]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    1999 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    1999 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Gendler, D

    N. Gendler, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, Glimmers from the axiverse , JCAP 09 (2024) 071, [ arXiv:2309.13145]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in grand unified theories , JHEP 10 (2022) 141, [ arXiv:2206.07053]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [30]

    D. S. Grebenkov, A physicist’s guide to explicit summation formulas involving zeros of bessel functions and related spectral sums , Reviews in Mathematical Physics 33 (nov, 2020) 2130002

    2020

  24. [31]

    Flacke and D

    T. Flacke and D. Maybury, Aspects of Axion Phenomenology in a slice of AdS(5) , JHEP 03 (2007) 007, [ hep-ph/0612126]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Buyukdag, K

    Y. Buyukdag, K. R. Dienes, T. Gherghetta, and B. Thomas, Partially Composite Dynamical Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 7 075054, [arXiv:1912.10588]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [33]

    de Giorgi and S

    A. de Giorgi and S. Vogl, Dark matter interacting via a massive spin-2 mediator in warped extra-dimensions, JHEP 11 (2021) 036, [arXiv:2105.06794]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Callin and F

    P. Callin and F. Ravndal, Higher order corrections to the Newtonian potential in the Randall-Sundrum model, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 104009, [hep-ph/0403302]

    2004 arXiv

  28. [35]

    J. K. Hoskins, R. D. Newman, R. Spero, and J. Schultz, Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse square law for mass separations from 2-cm to 105-cm , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3084–3095

    1985

  29. [36]

    Bordag, U

    M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, New developments in the Casimir effect, Phys. Rept. 353 (2001) 1–205, [quant-ph/0106045]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [37]

    V. M. Mostepanenko and M. Novello, Constraints on nonNewtonian gravity from the Casimir force measurements between two crossed cylinders , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 115003, [hep-ph/0101306]

    2001 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Chiaverini, S

    J. Chiaverini, S. J. Smullin, A. A. Geraci, D. M. Weld, and A. Kapitulnik, New experimental constraints on nonNewtonian forces below 100 microns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 151101, [hep-ph/0209325]

    2003 arXiv

  32. [39]

    J. C. Long, H. W. Chan, A. B. Churnside, E. A. Gulbis, M. C. M. Varney, and J. C. Price, Upper limits to submillimeter-range forces from extra space-time dimensions, Nature 421 (2003) 922–925, [hep-ph/0210004]

    2003 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Y. J. Chen, W. K. Tham, D. E. Krause, D. Lopez, E. Fischbach, and R. S. Decca, Stronger Limits on Hypothetical Yukawa Interactions in the 30–8000 nm Range , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 22 221102, [ arXiv:1410.7267]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Tan, S.-Q

    W.-H. Tan, S.-Q. Yang, C.-G. Shao, J. Li, A.-B. Du, B.-F. Zhan, Q.-L. Wang, P.-S. Luo, L.-C. Tu, and J. Luo, New Test of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range with Dual Modulation and Compensation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 13 131101

    2016

  35. [42]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer, and B. R. Heckel, New Test of the Gravitational 1/r2 Law at Separations down to 52 µm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 10 101101, [arXiv:2002.11761]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Hannestad and G

    S. Hannestad and G. G. Raffelt, Supernova and neutron star limits on large extra dimensions reexamined, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 125008, [hep-ph/0304029]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 69, 029901 (2004)]

    2003 arXiv

  37. [44]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, A. L. Maroto, and H. Villarrubia-Rojo, Constraints on hidden gravitons from fifth-force experiments and stellar energy loss, JHEP 09 (2017) 104, [arXiv:1706.07818]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    d’Enterria, M

    D. d’Enterria, M. A. Tamlihat, L. Schoeffel, H.-S. Shao, and Y. Tayalati, Collider constraints on massive gravitons coupling to photons , Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138237, [ arXiv:2306.15558]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Di Luzio, F

    L. Di Luzio, F. Mescia, E. Nardi, P. Panci, and R. Ziegler, Astrophobic Axions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 26 261803, [ arXiv:1712.04940]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    G. F. Giudice and M. McCullough, A Clockwork Theory, JHEP 02 (2017) 036, [arXiv:1610.07962]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Brion and M

    M. Brion and M. Vergne, Lattice points in simple polytopes, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 10 (1997), no. 2 371–392

    1997

  42. [50]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Bulk fields in the Randall-Sundrum compactification scenario , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 107505, [hep-ph/9907218]. 22

    1999 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Horvat, M

    R. Horvat, M. Krcmar, and B. Lakic, CERN Axion Solar Telescope as a probe of large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 125011, [astro-ph/0312030]

    2004 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bastero-Gil, C

    M. Bastero-Gil, C. Beaufort, and D. Santos, Solar axions in large extra dimensions , JCAP 10 (2021) 048, [arXiv:2107.13337]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Arnaud et

    NEWS-G Collaboration, Q. Arnaud et. al. , Solar Kaluza-Klein axion search with NEWS-G , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 1 012002, [arXiv:2109.03562]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    R. Bedi, T. Gherghetta, C. Grojean, G. Guedes, J. Kley, and P. N. H. Vuong, Small instanton-induced flavor invariants and the axion potential, JHEP 06 (2024) 156, [arXiv:2402.09361]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, Weak Interactions of Ultraheavy Fermions, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 285

    1978

  48. [56]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et. al. , Determination of the strong coupling constant from transverse energy−energy correlations in multijet events at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2023) 085, [arXiv:2301.09351]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.