Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.01118 v3 pith:7VRNKJBH submitted 2023-08-02 cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords biasitemspopularitysystemsrecommendationsrecommenderapproachescomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems help people find relevant content in a personalized way. One main promise of such systems is that they are able to increase the visibility of items in the long tail, i.e., the lesser-known items in a catalogue. Existing research, however, suggests that in many situations todays recommendation algorithms instead exhibit a popularity bias, meaning that they often focus on rather popular items in their recommendations. Such a bias may not only lead to the limited value of the recommendations for consumers and providers in the short run, but it may also cause undesired reinforcement effects over time. In this paper, we discuss the potential reasons for popularity bias and review existing approaches to detect, quantify and mitigate popularity bias in recommender systems. Our survey, therefore, includes both an overview of the computational metrics used in the literature as well as a review of the main technical approaches to reduce the bias. Furthermore, we critically discuss todays literature, where we observe that the research is almost entirely based on computational experiments and on certain assumptions regarding the practical effects of including long-tail items in the recommendations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prominence-Stratified Failure Modes in Retrieval-Augmented Commercial Recommendation: A 37,000-Run Audit

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A large-scale audit of AI commercial recommendations reveals tier-specific failure modes: L1 brands reach recommendations but convert at 25-41%, L2 convert highest at 37-52%, L3 is an inflection point, and L4/L5 brand...

  2. Isotonic Layer: A Unified Framework for Recommendation Calibration and Debiasing

    cs.IR 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Isotonic Layer unifies calibration and debiasing in recommendation models as a single end-to-end trainable component using learnable context embeddings for piecewise linear adjustments.

  3. OneRec-V2 Technical Report

    cs.IR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    OneRec-V2 scales generative recommendation to 8B parameters via decoder-only design and real-world preference alignment, improving user engagement metrics in production A/B tests.

Pith tools