Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Domain Adaptation in Intent Classification Systems: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14415 v1 pith:7VWIHODC submitted 2024-03-26 cs.CL

Domain Adaptation in Intent Classification Systems: A Review

classification cs.CL
keywords classificationintentsystemsreviewdomainresearcherstasksadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dialogue agents, which perform specific tasks, are part of the long-term goal of NLP researchers to build intelligent agents that communicate with humans in natural language. Such systems should adapt easily from one domain to another to assist users in completing tasks. Researchers have developed a broad range of techniques, objectives, and datasets for intent classification to achieve such systems. Despite the progress in developing intent classification systems (ICS), a systematic review of the progress from a technical perspective is yet to be conducted. In effect, important implementation details of intent classification remain restricted and unclear, making it hard for natural language processing (NLP) researchers to develop new methods. To fill this gap, we review contemporary works in intent classification. Specifically, we conduct a thorough technical review of the datasets, domains, tasks, and methods needed to train the intent classification part of dialogue systems. Our structured analysis describes why intent classification is difficult and studies the limitations to domain adaptation while presenting opportunities for future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning for Intent-Aware Personalized Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    IAP uses RL to train LLMs to explicitly infer and apply implicit user intent in single-turn personalized QA, achieving ~7.5% average macro-score gains over baselines on LaMP-QA.