Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00138 v1 pith:7W4MHX7M submitted 2024-06-28 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords modelsbiasimagesgenerategenerativeperformancesocialtext-to-image
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in generative models have led to significant interest in image synthesis, demonstrating the ability to generate high-quality images for a diverse range of text prompts. Despite this progress, most studies ignore the presence of bias. In this paper, we examine several text-to-image models not only by qualitatively assessing their performance in generating accurate images of human faces, groups, and specified numbers of objects but also by presenting a social bias analysis. As expected, models with larger capacity generate higher-quality images. However, we also document the inherent gender or social biases these models possess, offering a more complete understanding of their impact and limitations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hidden Bias in the Machine: Stereotypes in Text-to-Image Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Text-to-image models reproduce and amplify stereotypes about gender, race, age, and body type across a broad set of everyday prompt categories.

Pith tools