Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Perspectives on Quantum Friction, Self-Propulsion, and Self-Torque

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A stationary, reciprocal, inhomogeneous chiral body out of thermal equilibrium with the vacuum should experience a spontaneous torque that survives thermalization, with terminal angular velocity about $4\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ for…

desk verdict A readable perspective with a concrete self-torque prediction, but the terminal-velocity numbers rest entirely on a second-order perturbative result that the authors concede conflicts with the nonperturbative calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.17793 v2 pith:7W7PVCE4 submitted 2025-01-29 quant-ph hep-th

Kimball A. Milton , Nima Pourtolami , Gerard Kennedy This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phhep-th
keywords quantumfrictionCasimirself-propulsionself-torquenonequilibriumforcesfluctuation-dissipationtheoremchiralbodythermalrelaxation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that the fluctuating electromagnetic vacuum exerts forces and torques on bodies that are not in thermal equilibrium with it, even when the bodies are at rest and made of ordinary materials. In a weak-susceptibility expansion in $\varepsilon-1$, a stationary nonreciprocal body experiences a vacuum torque at first order, while a reciprocal body must be inhomogeneous to feel a force and both inhomogeneous and chiral to feel a torque. The central quantitative claim is that a micrometer-sized 'dual Allen wrench'—a Drude-metal wire with dielectric tags—initially twice as hot as the room-temperature background should spontaneously rotate as it cools, reaching a terminal angular velocity of about $4\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, which the authors call quite observable. The same mechanism yields a self-propulsive force on a Janus ball, with a terminal velocity of only about $0.1\,\mathrm{nm/s}$, and cooling dynamics convert each nonequilibrium force into an integrated terminal motion.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a second-order fluctuation-dissipation calculation: expand the electric field and polarization through Eq. (4.2), evaluate the correlators with Eqs. (4.3), and keep the parts odd in frequency that survive the difference of Bose-Einstein factors. The load-bearing objects are the geometric integrals $I_{AB}$ and $J_{AB}$, built from the retarded Green dyadic and the function $\phi(\tilde R)$ of Eq. (5.4), together with the material factor $X_{AB}=\Im\chi_A\Re\chi_B-\Re\chi_A\Im\chi_B$, which vanishes for a homogeneous body and requires both a dissipative contrast and an inhomogeneity. For the chiral wrench, $J_{AB}$ is evaluated with the asymptotic forms of Eq. (7.3) to give the torque of Eq. (7.4), and the cooling power $P(T',T)$ of Eq. (6.2) together with the moment of inertia converts the torque into the terminal angular velocity of Eq. (7.6).

What would settle it

Compute the third-order term in the same weak-susceptibility expansion for the dual Allen wrench geometry: if it cancels the second-order torque of Eq. (7.4) or changes its sign, the predicted terminal angular velocity near $4\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ disappears. Experimentally, suspend a roughly one-micrometer dual Allen wrench of gold and dielectric at twice the ambient temperature in vacuum and look for steady rotation; a null result below the predicted rate would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that the second-order (in electric susceptibility) fluctuational torque on a stationary, reciprocal, inhomogeneous chiral body is nonzero when the body temperature differs from the blackbody temperature. For the dual Allen wrench the torque is proportional to $\chi_B \nu^9 \omega_p^2 S_A S_B a^4 b^2 [f_9(\beta\nu)-f_9(\beta'\nu)]$ (Eq. (7.4)), and the adiabatic cooling equation (6.2) turns it into a terminal angular velocity $\omega_T \sim 4\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ for micrometer dimensions when the body starts at twice the ambient temperature. The paper contrasts this with the first-order torque of Eq. (4.6), which requires a nonreciprocal medium such as a body in an external magnetic field, and with the second-order self-propulsive force of Eq. (5.2), which requires inhomogeneity but not chirality. The authors present the chiral-wrench torque as an observable nonequilibrium Casimir effect that survives thermalization.

Load-bearing premise

The whole prediction rests on the assumption that second-order perturbation theory in the electric susceptibility gives the leading torque and that the omitted third-order terms do not cancel it; the paper itself notes that a nonperturbative calculation disagrees and says the discrepancy is to be resolved by third-order effects that are not worked out here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No external magnetic field or nonreciprocal material is needed: a hot or cold chiral shape made of ordinary metal and dielectric should spontaneously rotate in vacuum.
  • The predicted spin rate for a micrometer dual Allen wrench, roughly $4\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, should be visible in a tabletop experiment, and replacing the tags by flags is said to add another factor of ten.
  • Linear self-propulsion is much weaker: the Janus ball example gives a terminal velocity near $0.1\,\mathrm{nm/s}$, so rotational self-torque is the more promising signature.
  • All these forces and torques vanish in equilibrium because they are proportional to differences of thermal factors, which makes them clean markers of a temperature imbalance rather than static Casimir attraction.
  • Because the terminal motion is the time integral of the force over the cooling history, the observable carries information about thermal relaxation and material dissipation, not just the instantaneous force.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: mirroring the dual Allen wrench should reverse the handedness and hence the direction of the terminal spin, giving a simple control experiment to distinguish the effect from spurious torques.
  • Editorial extension: the stated $\nu^9 \omega_p^2 a^4 b^2$ scaling is a sharp parameter test; changing the Drude damping or the lever-arm dimensions should change the terminal angular velocity by orders of magnitude in a way that competing mechanical effects are unlikely to mimic.
  • Editorial extension: because the nonperturbative calculation cited as Ref. [36] gives different results, the second-order torque may be only part of the story; unless the promised third-order terms cancel the discrepancy, the predicted observable spin could be an artifact of the expansion.
  • Editorial extension: the general recipe of a temperature difference plus a chiral shape suggests a generic way to convert isotropic blackbody radiation into directed rotation for microscopic rotors, though the paper itself does not discuss applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a perspectives/review article on nonequilibrium fluctuational electromagnetic forces and torques. It reviews Casimir friction between a moving particle and a surface, Einstein-Hopf quantum vacuum friction, the quantum vacuum torque on nonreciprocal bodies, the second-order self-propulsive force on inhomogeneous reciprocal bodies, and a newly emphasized second-order spontaneous torque on inhomogeneous chiral bodies. The central new quantitative claim is that a stationary, reciprocal, inhomogeneous chiral body initially out of thermal equilibrium with the blackbody vacuum will experience a spontaneous torque that produces a terminal angular velocity, estimated in Sec. VII as ω_T ∼ 4×10^-3 s^-1 for a micrometer-sized dual Allen wrench, and described there as "quite observable."

Significance. If the central claim were established, it would be a striking and experimentally accessible prediction of nonequilibrium Casimir physics, and the paper would serve as a useful overview of a fragmented literature. The manuscript has genuine strengths: it gives explicit formulas for several force/torque mechanisms, benchmarks the first-order nonreciprocal torque against Refs. [28,29], and includes a specific, falsifiable numerical prediction for a proposed experiment. However, the paper itself acknowledges in Sec. VIII that its second-order self-propulsion/self-torque results contradict the nonperturbative calculation of Ref. [36], and it defers the resolution to an unspecified third-order calculation "in progress." Because the observable terminal angular velocity is computed entirely from the disputed second-order torque, the central quantitative prediction rests on an openly unresolved point. This prevents the paper from being accepted as an established result, although the review portions remain informative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VIII] The paper concedes that its second-order self-propulsion/self-torque results disagree with the nonperturbative integral-equation calculation of Ref. [36], and states without any derivation, citation, or estimate that "this discrepancy is resolved by considering third-order effects (work in progress)." Since Eq. (7.1) and its Drude-limit consequence Eq. (7.4) are the sole basis for the terminal angular velocity ω_T ∼ 4×10^-3 s^-1 in Eq. (7.6), the central observable prediction is not currently supported. The authors must either provide the third-order calculation, show that it does not cancel or dominate the second-order result, or explicitly soften the quantitative claim until the discrepancy is resolved.
  2. [Sec. VII, Eq. (7.1)] The perturbative expansion in (ε−1) is the load-bearing approximation for the self-torque, but no convergence or smallness condition is given. For the Drude model of Eq. (5.6), the susceptibility is χ(ω) = −ω_p^2/[ω(ω+iν)], so |χ| can exceed unity at low frequencies when ν is small; the torque in Eq. (7.4) is proportional to ν^9 ω_p^2 and therefore receives contributions from the low-frequency regime where the expansion parameter is not small. The paper should specify the regime of validity of the second-order result and justify that the leading nonvanishing order controls the effect.
  3. [Sec. VI and abstract] The abstract claims that a self-propulsive force or torque can result in a terminal velocity "even after thermalization," but the derivation in Sec. VI, especially Eqs. (6.1) and (6.3), shows that the terminal velocity is accumulated during the transient cooling/heating phase and that the effect ceases once the body reaches the background temperature. The wording should be corrected to state that the terminal velocity is the result of the thermalization process, not an effect that persists after equilibrium is reached.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 2] The caption of Fig. 2 is hard to parse, particularly the fragment "v r−1 γ" and the statement that the temperature ratio "is exactly 1/γ = sqrt(1−v^2) for n = −6"; please rewrite for clarity.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (4.4)] The notation Γ(r−r′;ω) for the coincident-point limit is confusing because the left side depends on the difference variable while the right side shows a 1/R term; please state explicitly that a rotationally averaged coincidence limit is intended.
  3. [Sec. II, Sec. III] Several references to the authors' own work are used for central formulas without a full derivation in this paper (e.g., Eqs. (5.2), (7.1), and (7.2)). For a perspectives article this is acceptable, but adding a sentence at each point explaining the derivation method would make the review more self-contained.
  4. [References] There are minor typographical errors in the reference list: Ref. [24] has "relativistuc" and Ref. [25] has "edtion"; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Self-torque prediction is imported from an unresolved self-citation; force results have independent benchmarks but the central torque claim is load-bearing.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. VII, Eq. (7.1); Sec. VIII]
    "In second order, a torque can arise for an ordinary (reciprocal) body, but again only if the body is inhomogeneous. It must further be chiral... the external torque (4.1) yields [39] τ = ... This is in contrast to the nonperturbative findings of Ref. [36], which discrepancy is resolved by considering third-order effects (work in progress)."

    The paper's observable self-torque and terminal angular velocity (Eqs. 7.1, 7.4, 7.6) are not derived in the present text; Eq. (7.1) is imported from Ref. [39], a prior paper by the same three authors. The only independent nonperturbative calculation cited, Ref. [36], is stated by the authors themselves to be 'in contrast' to this result, and the promised third-order resolution is only 'work in progress.' The central claim is therefore carried by a self-citation that is explicitly unverified against the independent benchmark, making the self-citation load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is not generally circular: no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the perturbative formalism is grounded in the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. The nonreciprocal torque (Eq. 4.6) is cross-checked against independent Refs. [28,29], and the self-propulsive force (Eq. 5.2) is compared with the independent nonperturbative calculation Ref. [36]. Those parts have genuine external content. The self-torque section, however, rests on Eq. (7.1), which is delegated by citation to Ref. [39] (same authors) rather than derived in this paper. The paper itself acknowledges the only independent nonperturbative benchmark disagrees and offers only an unshown 'third-order effects, work in progress' as resolution. This is a load-bearing self-citation, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity, hence the score is 4 rather than 0 or 6. The unresolved contradiction with Ref. [36] is ultimately also a correctness risk, but in the derivation chain it functions as an unverified self-referential support for the central torque prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central estimates are parameter evaluations of formulas derived elsewhere; no new fitting constants are introduced, but the observability claim is sensitive to hand-chosen geometric and thermal parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • geometric dimensions of the dual Allen wrench (a, b and wire cross-sectional radius) = a, b of order 1 µm; cross-sectional radius about 50 nm
    Hand-chosen to make the predicted terminal angular velocity observable while satisfying the thin-wire and skin-depth approximations; the Eq. (7.6) estimate scales sensitively with these lengths.
  • initial object-to-environment temperature ratio = T'/T = 2
    Chosen to illustrate; the terminal angular velocity value of ~4×10^-3 s^-1 is computed for this starting ratio.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fluctuation-dissipation theorem applies separately to the body and the vacuum at their respective temperatures.
    Used in Eq. (4.3) to evaluate field and polarization fluctuations; assumes each subsystem is in local thermal equilibrium.
  • ad hoc to paper The perturbative expansion in electric susceptibility is valid and the leading nonvanishing order controls the effect.
    The self-propulsion and self-torque are computed at second order in χ; the paper acknowledges Ref. [36] disagrees nonperturbatively and defers the resolution to third-order effects (Section VIII).
  • domain assumption The Drude model with constant plasma frequency and damping describes the metal parts at the relevant frequencies.
    Used in Eqs. (5.6)-(5.7) for gold; assumes the object is thinner than the skin depth.
  • domain assumption Thermal relaxation can be treated adiabatically with a temperature-independent specific heat (T >> Debye temperature).
    Used in Eqs. (6.2)-(6.4) to integrate the cooling trajectory and derive terminal velocity; stated to be well-satisfied at T = 300 K.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perspectives on Quantum Friction, Self-Propulsion, and Self-Torque." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7W7PVCE4

@misc{pith2026250117793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perspectives on Quantum Friction, Self-Propulsion, and Self-Torque},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7W7PVCE4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.17793}
}
read the original abstract

This paper provides an overview of the nonequilibrium fluctuational forces and torques acting on a body either in motion or at rest relative to another body or to the thermal vacuum blackbody radiation. We consider forces and torques beyond the usual static Casimir-Polder and Casimir forces and torques. For a moving body, a retarding force emerges, called quantum or Casimir friction, which in vacuum was first predicted by Einstein and Hopf in 1910. Nonreciprocity may allow a stationary body, out of thermal equilibrium with its environment, to experience a torque. Moreover, if a stationary reciprocal body is not in thermal equilibrium with the blackbody vacuum, a self-propulsive force or torque can appear, resulting in a potentially observable linear or angular terminal velocity, even after thermalization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.17793 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The ratio r˜ = T˜ T , versus velocity v, where T is the temperature of the blackbody radiation background, and T˜ is the temperature of the particle in NESS, where the particle neither gains nor loses energy. (The dynamic version of thermal equilibrium.) If the temperature ratio could be measured, that would be a signal of quantum friction. Note that n = 3 is the pure radiation reaction model (3.2), with α0 constant… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Generic object with two parts. Axial symmetry is shown for simplicity, so the force is in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Force on Janus ball. Results are comparable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dimensionless torque on a small Allen wrench, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    K. A. Milton, N. Pourtolami, and G. Kennedy, Quantum self-propulsion of an inhomogeneous object out of thermal equilibrium, [arXiv:2405.15061], Phys. Rev. A110, 042814 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    E. V. Teodorovich, Contribution of macroscopic van der Waals interactions to frictional force. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A362, 71–77 (1978)

    work page 1978

  3. [2]

    Perspectives on Quantum Friction, Self-Propulsion, and Self-Torque

    that a moving body experiences friction even in vacuum! Even more remarkably, in the last decade it has been shown that a stationary body out of thermal equilibrium with the background blackbody radiation will experience a force and a torque, if it is suitably asymmetric. Here we will discuss such phenomena, which are on the verge of observability, in a p...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [3]

    Einstein and L

    A. Einstein and L. Hopf, Statistische Untersuchung der Bewegung eines Resonators in einem Strahlungsfeld, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 338, 1105 (1910)

    work page 1910

  5. [4]

    K. A. Milton, J. S. Høye, and I Brevik, The reality of Casimir friction, [arXiv:1508.00626], Symmetry8 (5), 29 (2016), doi:10.3390/sym8050029

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Reiche, F

    D. Reiche, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Wading through the void: Exploring quantum friction and nonequilibrium fluctua- tions, APL Photonics,7, 030903 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    Intravaia, R

    F. Intravaia, R. O. Behunin, and D. A. R. Dalvit, Quantum friction and fluctuation theorems, Phys. Rev. A89, 050101(R) (2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.050101

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.050101 2014

  8. [7]

    J. S. Høye, I. Brevik and K. A. Milton, Casimir friction between polarizable particle and half-space with radiation damping at zero temperature, [arXiv:1506.03937], J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.48, 365004 (2015)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Intravaia, R

    F. Intravaia, R. O. Behunin, C. Henkel, K. Busch, and D. A. R. Dalvit, Non-Markovianity in atom-surface dispersion forces, Phys. Rev. A94, 0421114 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    X. Guo, K. A. Milton, G. Kennedy, W. P. McNulty, N. Pourtolami, and Y. Li, Energetics of quantum vacuum friction: Field fluctuations, [arXiv:2108.01539], Phys. Rev. D104, 116006 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    X. Guo, K. A. Milton, G. Kennedy, W. P. McNulty, N. Pourtolami, and Y. Li, Energetics of quantum vacuum friction. II: Dipole fluctuations and field fluctuations, [arXiv:2204.10886], Phys. Rev. D106, 016008 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    M. G. Silveirinha, Theory of quantum friction, New J. Phys.16, 063011 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Pieplow and C

    G. Pieplow and C. Henkel, Cherenkov friction on a neutral particle moving parallel to a dielectric, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 214001 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    G. V. Dedkov and A. A. Kyasov, Nonlocal friction forces in the particle-plate and plate-plate configurations: Nonretarded approximation, Surface Sci.700, 121681 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Brevik, B

    I. Brevik, B. Shapiro, and M. G. Silveirinha, Fluctuational electrodynamics in and out of equilibrium, inThe State of the Quantum Vacuum: Casimir Physics in the 2020s , ed. K. A. Milton (World Scientific, Singapore, 2023), p. 223

    2023

  8. [15]

    R. Zhao, A. Manjavacas, F. J. García de Abajo, and J. B. Pendry, Rotational quantum friction, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 123604 (2012)

    2012

  9. [16]

    T.-B. Wang, Y. Zhou, H.-Q. Mu, K. Shehzad, D.-J. Zhang, W.-X. Liu, T.-B. Yu, and Q.-H. Liao, Enthancement of lateral Casimir force on a rotating body near a hyperbolic material, Nanotechnology33, 245001 (2022)

    2022

  10. [17]

    Reiche, F

    D. Reiche, F. Intravaia, J.-T. Hsiang, K. Busch, and B.-L. Hu, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of quantum friction, Phys. Rev. A102, 050203(R) (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Intravaia and K

    F. Intravaia and K. Busch, The power-spectrum tensor in steady-state systems and its role in quantum friction, arXiv:2402.15777

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Pieplow and C

    G. Pieplow and C. Henkel, Fully covariant radiation force on a polarizable particle, New J. Phys.15, 023027 (2013)

    2013

  13. [20]

    Oelschläger, Fluctuation-induced phenomena in nanophotonic systems, Ph.D

    M. Oelschläger, Fluctuation-induced phenomena in nanophotonic systems, Ph.D. thesis, Institut für Physik, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, 2020

    2020

  14. [21]

    M. B. Farías, F. C. Lombardo, A. Soba, P. L. Villar, and R. Decca, Towards detecting traces of non-contact quantum friction in the corrections of the accumulated geometric phase, npj Quantum Information 6, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-0252-x

    2020 doi

  15. [22]

    Z. Xu, P. Ju, K. Shen, Y. Jin, Z. Jacob, and T. Li, Observation of non-contact Casimir friction, arXiv:2403.06051

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    A. I. Volokitin, Friction force at the motion of a small relativistic neutral particle with respect to blackbody radiation, JETP Letters,101, 427–433 (2015)

    2015

  17. [24]

    G. V. Dedkov and A. A. Kyasov, Tangential force and heating rate of a neutral relativistuc particle mediated by equilibrium background radiation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B268, 599 (2010)

    2010

  18. [25]

    A. I. Volokitin and B. N. J. Persson,Electromagnetic Fluctuations at the Nanoscale (Springer, Berlin, 2017)

    2017

  19. [26]

    Milton and J

    K. Milton and J. Schwinger,Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edtion (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    K. A. Milton, X. Guo, G. Kennedy, N. Pourtolami, and D. M. DelCol, Vacuum torque, propulsive forces, and anomalous tangential forces: Effects of nonreciprocal media out of thermal equilibrium, [arXiv:2306.02197], Phys. Rev. A,108, 022809 (2023), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022809

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Kennedy, Quantum torque on a non-reciprocal body out of thermal equilibrium and induced by a magnetic field of arbitrary strength, Eur

    G. Kennedy, Quantum torque on a non-reciprocal body out of thermal equilibrium and induced by a magnetic field of arbitrary strength, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.232, 3197 (2023). 9

    2023

  22. [29]

    Guo and S

    Y. Guo and S. Fan, A single gyrotropic particle as a heat engine, [arXiv:2007.11234], ACS Photonics8, 1623–1629 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Strekha, S

    B. Strekha, S. Molesky, P. Chao, M. Krüger, and A. Rodriguez, Trace expressions and associated limits for non-equilibrium Casimir torque, [arXiv:2207.13646], Phys. Rev. A106, 042222 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  24. [31]

    D. Pan, H. Xu, and F. J. García de Abajo, Magnetically activated rotational vacuum friction, Phys. Rev. A99, 062509 (2019)

    2019

  25. [32]

    M. F. Maghrebi, A. V. Gorshkov, and J. D. Sou, Fluctuation-induced torque on a topological insulator out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 055901 (2019)

    2019

  26. [33]

    A. Ott, P. Ben-Abdallah, and S. A. Biehs, Circular heat and momentum flux radiated by magneto-optical nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B97, 205414 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    Khandekar, S

    C. Khandekar, S. Buddhiraju, P. R. Wilkinson, J. K. Gimzewski, A. W. Rodriguez, C. Chase, S. Fan, Nonequilibrium lateral force and torque by thermally excited nonreciprocal surface electromagnetic waves, Phys. Rev. B104, 245433 (2021)

    2021

  28. [35]

    Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, N

    D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, N. Graham, M. Kardar, and M. Krüger, Near field propulsion forces from nonreciprocal media, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170401 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    M.T.H.Reid, O.D.Miller, A.G.Polimeridis, A.W.Rodriguez, E.M.Tomlinson, andS.G.Johnson, Photontorpedoesand Rytov pinwheels: Integral-equation modeling of non-equilibrium fluctuation-induced forces and torques on nanoparticles, arXiv:1708.01985 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Müller and M

    B. Müller and M. Krüger, Anisotropic particles near surfaces: Propulsive force and friction, Phys. Rev. A93. 032511 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    J. R. Deop-Ruano, F. J. García de Abajo, and A. Manjavacas, Thermal radiation forces on planar structures with asym- metric optical response, Nanophotonics13, 4569 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0121

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    K. A. Milton, N. Pourtolami, and G. Kennedy, Spontaneous torque on an inhomogeneous chiral body out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. A111, 022815 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.