pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06485 · v1 · pith:7Z42WUJCnew · submitted 2019-07-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

CMB constraints on ultra-light primordial black holes with extended mass distributions

Harry Poulter , Yacine Ali-Ha\"imoud , Jan Hamann , Martin White , Anthony G. Williams This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords primordial black holesCMB anisotropiesHawking radiationrecombination historyextended mass functionsdark matter constraintsenergy deposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultra-light primordial black holes with masses spread from 10^15 to 10^17 grams are limited to less than 1.6 times 10 to the minus 5 of the dark matter density by CMB data when cosmological parameters are allowed to vary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models how ultra-light primordial black holes emit Hawking radiation that deposits energy into the early universe plasma, altering the timing of hydrogen recombination. This injection damps small-scale temperature and polarization fluctuations in the CMB while boosting large-scale polarization. For extended mass distributions the authors recompute the energy deposition using species-dependent efficiencies and let the standard cosmological parameters float along with the PBH fraction. They obtain exclusion limits on the PBH dark-matter fraction that are up to an order of magnitude weaker than those derived under fixed cosmology. The tightest quoted bound is f_PBH less than 1.6 times 10 to the minus 5 for a uniform distribution across 10^15 to 10^17 grams.

Core claim

Hawking radiation from ultra-light PBHs modifies the recombination history through energy injection whose efficiency depends on the particle species produced; when the resulting changes to the CMB power spectra are confronted with data while simultaneously varying the six Lambda-CDM parameters, the 95-percent upper limit on the PBH fraction for a uniform mass distribution between 10^15 and 10^17 g becomes f_PBH less than 1.6 times 10 to the minus 5.

What carries the argument

Ground-up calculation of species-dependent energy deposition efficiencies from Hawking radiation that is folded into the recombination history to predict shifts in CMB temperature and polarization spectra.

If this is right

  • Bounds on f_PBH relax by up to a factor of ten once Lambda-CDM parameters are varied jointly with the PBH abundance.
  • The same modeling produces 95-percent exclusion regions for several other extended mass distributions beyond the uniform case.
  • Large-scale polarization is enhanced while small-scale temperature and polarization are damped, producing a characteristic signature in the CMB spectra.
  • The approach can be applied to any mass function once the Hawking spectrum and deposition efficiencies are specified.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bound holds, ultra-light PBHs in that mass window cannot account for any appreciable fraction of dark matter even under the most conservative cosmological assumptions.
  • The relaxation of limits when parameters vary suggests that joint analyses with other probes (such as baryon acoustic oscillations) could tighten the constraint again.
  • Missing energy channels in the deposition model would systematically weaken the derived upper limits on f_PBH.

Load-bearing premise

The calculated efficiencies for energy deposition from each Hawking-radiation species fully determine the net change in the ionization history with no important missing channels or unaccounted systematics.

What would settle it

A future CMB experiment measuring the damping tail of the temperature power spectrum at multipoles above 2000 that matches the standard recombination prediction even when the PBH fraction is set to 1.6 times 10 to the minus 5 for the uniform mass range.

read the original abstract

We examine the effects ultra-light primordial black holes (PBHs) have on the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). PBHs in the mass range of $10^{15}$ to $10^{17}$ g emit Hawking radiation in the early Universe, modifying the standard recombination history. This leads to a damping of small-scale temperature and polarisation anisotropies and enhances large-scale polarisation fluctuations. As some models of inflation predict PBHs with a range of masses, we investigate the impacts of extended mass distributions on PBH abundance constraints. We model PBH energy injection using a ground-up approach incorporating species-dependent deposition efficiencies. By allowing the $\Lambda$CDM parameters to vary simultaneously with the PBH fraction and mass, we show that exclusion bounds on the PBH fraction of DM $f_\text{PBH}$ are relaxed by up to an order of magnitude, compared to the case of fixed $\Lambda$CDM parameters. We also give 95% exclusion regions for $f_\text{PBH}$ for a variety of mass distributions. In particular, for a uniform mass distribution between $10^{15}$ and $10^{17}$ g, we find $f_\text{PBH} < 1.6 \times 10^{-5}$ when allowing $\Lambda$CDM parameters to vary.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper examines how ultra-light PBHs (masses 10^{15}–10^{17} g) emitting Hawking radiation modify the recombination history and thereby damp small-scale CMB anisotropies while enhancing large-scale polarization. It employs a ground-up energy-injection calculation with species-dependent deposition efficiencies, considers extended mass distributions, and performs joint MCMC fits of f_PBH together with ΛCDM parameters, reporting relaxed 95% bounds such as f_PBH < 1.6 × 10^{-5} for a uniform distribution over that mass range.

Significance. If the deposition modeling holds, the work supplies updated, distribution-aware CMB limits on ultra-light PBHs that properly marginalize over cosmological parameters; this is relevant for inflationary scenarios that predict broad PBH mass functions and for assessing whether such PBHs can constitute a non-negligible DM fraction.

major comments (1)
  1. [Energy-injection and deposition modeling (implicit in abstract and methods description)] The headline numerical bound (f_PBH < 1.6 × 10^{-5} for the uniform 10^{15}–10^{17} g case) rests directly on the computed ionization and heating rates that alter the recombination history. The manuscript presents a ground-up species-dependent deposition model but supplies no cross-check against independent energy-injection codes benchmarked on DM annihilation/decay, nor any sensitivity study for missing channels, secondary-particle treatment, or redshift-dependent approximations in the z ≈ 600–2000 window; a 30–50% systematic shift in effective efficiencies would move the quoted limit by a comparable factor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's thorough assessment of our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the energy-injection and deposition modeling below, and we plan to incorporate additional analysis to strengthen this aspect of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline numerical bound (f_PBH < 1.6 × 10^{-5} for the uniform 10^{15}–10^{17} g case) rests directly on the computed ionization and heating rates that alter the recombination history. The manuscript presents a ground-up species-dependent deposition model but supplies no cross-check against independent energy-injection codes benchmarked on DM annihilation/decay, nor any sensitivity study for missing channels, secondary-particle treatment, or redshift-dependent approximations in the z ≈ 600–2000 window; a 30–50% systematic shift in effective efficiencies would move the quoted limit by a comparable factor.

    Authors: We thank the referee for raising this valid concern about the validation of our deposition model. Our calculation of energy injection from ultra-light PBHs is performed from first principles, starting with the Hawking radiation spectra for electrons, positrons, and photons, followed by the computation of deposition efficiencies into ionization, heating, and Lyman-alpha photons using established atomic physics. This methodology is analogous to that used in DM annihilation studies. While the manuscript does not include explicit cross-checks with independent codes, we agree that demonstrating robustness is important. In the revised manuscript, we will add a sensitivity analysis by varying the deposition efficiencies by up to 50% and reporting the corresponding changes to the f_PBH bounds. This will provide a quantitative assessment of the systematic uncertainty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external CMB data and independent modeling

full rationale

The paper constructs PBH energy-injection rates from Hawking radiation via a ground-up species-dependent deposition model, then computes the resulting recombination history and CMB anisotropies, and finally performs MCMC fits against Planck data while varying both f_PBH and ΛCDM parameters. None of these steps reduces by the paper's own equations to a quantity already fitted or defined within the same work; the bounds are outputs of the fit, not inputs renamed as predictions. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz source, and the central result (f_PBH < 1.6 × 10^{-5} for the uniform distribution) is obtained by direct comparison to external observations rather than internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of the energy-deposition model and the validity of simultaneously varying standard cosmological parameters; no new invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • f_PBH
    The PBH dark-matter fraction is the primary parameter being constrained via the fit.
  • mass-distribution parameters
    The functional form and range of the PBH mass distribution are chosen for each case examined.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Hawking radiation from ultra-light PBHs modifies the standard recombination history through energy injection.
    This premise underpins the entire calculation of CMB anisotropy changes.
  • domain assumption ΛCDM parameters may be varied jointly with PBH parameters without introducing uncontrolled degeneracies.
    The fitting procedure assumes the expanded parameter space still yields meaningful upper limits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1256 out tokens · 29365 ms · 2026-05-24T21:23:08.109350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  2. 5D Rotating Black Holes as dark matter in Dark Dimension Scenario: Hawking Radiation versus the Memory Burden Effect

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Five-dimensional rotating primordial black holes with initial masses above 10^10 grams survive to today and can account for all dark matter due to suppressed Hawking radiation and memory burden effects in the micron-s...

  3. Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    astro-ph.CO 2020-02 accept novelty 4.0

    Updated compilation shows PBHs are tightly constrained across 55 orders of magnitude in mass, ruling out dominant dark matter contributions except in narrow windows, with many limits carrying observational uncertainties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G. F. Chapline,Cosmological effects of primordial black holes, Nature 253 (Jan., 1975) 251–252

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152 (1971) 75

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    B. Carr, F. Kühnel and M. Sandstad,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D94 (2016) 083504, [1607.06077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with the Subaru/HSC Andromeda observation

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, N. Yasuda, R. H. Lupton, T. Sumi, S. More et al.,Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with the Subaru/HSC Andromeda observation, 1701.02151

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars

    F. Capela, M. Pshirkov and P. Tinyakov,Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars, Phys. Rev.D87 (2013) 123524, [1301.4984]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald and D. N. Spergel,Primordial black holes as dark matter: The Power spectrum and evaporation of early structures, Astrophys. J.594 (2003) L71–L74, [astro-ph/0302035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Effect of Primordial Black Holes on the Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmological Parameter Estimates

    M. Ricotti, J. P. Ostriker and K. J. Mack,Effect of Primordial Black Holes on the Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmological Parameter Estimates, Astrophys. J.680 (June, 2008) 829–845, [0709.0524]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes, Phys. Rev.D81 (2010) 104019, [0912.5297]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Cosmological implications of Primordial Black Holes

    J. Luis Bernal, N. Bellomo, A. Raccanelli and L. Verde,Cosmological implications of Primordial Black Holes, JCAP 1710 (2017) 052, [1709.07465]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes, Phys. Rev.95 (Feb., 2017) 043534, [1612.05644]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    CMB bounds on disk-accreting massive Primordial Black Holes

    V. Poulin, P. D. Serpico, F. Calore, S. Clesse and K. Kohri,CMB bounds on disk-accreting massive primordial black holes, Phys. Rev.96 (Oct., 2017) 083524, [1707.04206]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Q. Zhu, E. Vasiliev, Y. Li and Y. Jing,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Constraints From Compact Ultra-Faint Dwarfs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476 (2018) 2–11, [1710.05032]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    The merger rate of primordial-black-hole binaries

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud, E. D. Kovetz and M. Kamionkowski,Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries, "Phys. Rev."96 (Dec., 2017) 123523, [1709.06576]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov and W. Xue,Femtolensing by Dark Matter Revisited, JCAP 1812 (2018) 005, [1807.11495]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes from the Galactic gamma-ray background, Phys. Rev.D94 (2016) 044029, [1604.05349]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from Local Primordial Black Holes with the Fermi Large Area Telescope

    Fermi-LATcollaboration, M. Ackermann et al.,Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from Local Primordial Black Holes with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Astrophys. J.857 (2018) 49, [1802.00100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    New constraints on primordial black holes abundance from femtolensing of gamma-ray bursts

    A. Barnacka, J. F. Glicenstein and R. Moderski,New constraints on primordial black holes abundance from femtolensing of gamma-ray bursts, Phys. Rev.D86 (2012) 043001, [1204.2056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues and P. D. Serpico,Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy, JCAP 1703 (2017) 043, [1610.10051]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Scalaron from $R^2$-gravity as a Heavy Field

    S. Pi, Y.-L. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang and M. Sasaki,Scalaron fromR2-gravity as a heavy field, JCAP 1805 (2018) 042, [1712.09896]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies

    S. Clesse and J. García-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies, Phys. Rev.D92 (2015) 023524, [1501.07565]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    B. Carr, M. Raidal, T. Tenkanen, V. Vaskonen and H. Veermäe,Primordial black hole constraints for extended mass functions, Phys. Rev.D96 (2017) 023514, [1705.05567]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with Extended Mass Functions

    F. Kühnel and K. Freese,Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with Extended Mass Functions, Phys. Rev.D95 (2017) 083508, [1701.07223]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Converting Constraints from Monochromatic to Extended Mass Distributions

    N. Bellomo, J. L. Bernal, A. Raccanelli and L. Verde,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Converting Constraints from Monochromatic to Extended Mass Distributions, JCAP 1801 (2018) 004, [1709.07467]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    K. M. Belotsky and A. A. Kirillov,Primordial black holes with mass1016− 1017 g and reionization of the Universe, JCAP 1501 (2015) 041, [1409.8601]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Planck Constraint on Relic Primordial Black Holes

    S. Clark, B. Dutta, Y. Gao, L. E. Strigari and S. Watson,Planck Constraint on Relic Primordial Black Holes, Phys. Rev.D95 (2017) 083006, [1612.07738]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    D. N. Page,Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. 2. Massless Particles from a Rotating Hole, Phys. Rev.D14 (1976) 3260–3273

    work page 1976

  27. [27]

    S. W. Hawking,Black hole explosions, Nature 248 (1974) 30–31

    work page 1974

  28. [28]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43 (1975) 199–220

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    J. H. MacGibbon and B. R. Webber,Quark and gluon jet emission from primordial black holes: The instantaneous spectra, Phys. Rev.D41 (1990) 3052–3079

    work page 1990

  30. [30]

    J. H. MacGibbon,Quark and gluon jet emission from primordial black holes. 2. The Lifetime emission, Phys. Rev.D44 (1991) 376–392

    work page 1991

  31. [31]

    Green's function of the cosmological thermalization problem

    J. Chluba,Green’s function of the cosmological thermalization problem, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.434 (Sept., 2013) 352–357, [1304.6120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    P. J. E. Peebles,Recombination of the Primeval Plasma, Astrophys. J.153 (1968) 1

    work page 1968

  33. [33]

    Ya. B. Zeldovich, V. G. Kurt and R. A. Sunyaev,Recombination of hydrogen in the hot model of the universe, Sov. Phys. JETP28 (1969) 146

    work page 1969

  34. [34]

    Particle decays during the cosmic dark ages

    X.-L. Chen and M. Kamionkowski,Particle decays during the cosmic dark ages, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 043502, [astro-ph/0310473]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    T. R. Slatyer,Indirect Dark Matter Signatures in the Cosmic Dark Ages II. Ionization, Heating and Photon Production from Arbitrary Energy Injections, Phys. Rev.D93 (2016) 023521, [1506.03812]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    A. M. Green,Microlensing and dynamical constraints on primordial black hole dark matter with an extended mass function, Phys. Rev.D94 (2016) 063530, [1609.01143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Single Field Double Inflation and Primordial Black Holes

    K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal and H. Veermäe,Single Field Double Inflation and Primordial Black Holes, JCAP 1709 (2017) 020, [1705.06225]. – 23 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, JCAP 1107 (2011) 034, [1104.2933]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    A New Calculation of the Recombination Epoch

    S. Seager, D. D. Sasselov and D. Scott,A new calculation of the recombination epoch, Astrophys. J.523 (1999) L1–L5, [astro-ph/9909275]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    HyRec: A fast and highly accurate primordial hydrogen and helium recombination code

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud and C. M. Hirata,HyRec: A fast and highly accurate primordial hydrogen and helium recombination code, Phys. Rev.D83 (2011) 043513, [1011.3758]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Ultrafast effective multi-level atom method for primordial hydrogen recombination

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud and C. M. Hirata,Ultrafast effective multi-level atom method for primordial hydrogen recombination, Phys. Rev.D82 (2010) 063521, [1006.1355]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    CMB photons shedding light on dark matter

    G. Giesen, J. Lesgourgues, B. Audren and Y. Ali-Haïmoud,CMB photons shedding light on dark matter, JCAP 12 (Dec., 2012) 008, [1209.0247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters

    Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594 (2016) A11, [1507.02704]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm

    F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, E. Cameron and A. N. Pettitt,Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm, 1306.2144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis

    F. Feroz and M. P. Hobson,Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.384 (2008) 449, [0704.3704]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics

    F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson and M. Bridges,MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.398 (2009) 1601–1614, [0809.3437]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    A. G. Riess et al.,A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J. 826 (2016) 56, [1604.01424]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, 1807.06209. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018