Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Experimental Realization of Thermal Reservoirs with Tunable Temperature in a Trapped-Ion Spin-Boson Simulator

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By simultaneously heating and cooling a trapped ion's vibration, this paper creates a thermal reservoir whose temperature and dissipation rate are set independently, and uses it to reveal how temperature reshapes charge- and exciton-transfe

desk verdict Solid experimental step: independent temperature and dissipation control for trapped-ion reservoirs, with the main gap being missing direct thermometry on the non-COM modes used in the applications. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.08689 v2 pith:7ZYDXL7S submitted 2025-11-11 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph

Visal So , Mingjian Zhu , Midhuna Duraisamy Suganthi , Abhishek Menon , George Tomaras , Roman Zhuravel , Han Pu , Guido Pagano This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords trappedionsthermalreservoirengineeringspin-bosonsimulationchargetransferexcitonmotionalmodesLindbladmasterequationtunabletemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates a way to engineer a thermal reservoir for the vibrational motion of trapped ions, with the bath's temperature and its dissipation rate set by two independent knobs. By simultaneously laser-cooling a motional mode at rate γ_c while broadcasting electric-field noise that heats it at rate γ_h, the ion's steady state becomes a thermal state whose mean phonon number is n_ss = γ_h/γ_c; the cooling rate alone sets how fast the system equilibrates. The authors verify the predicted exponential approach to equilibrium and the thermal (geometric) steady-state population distribution. They then apply the reservoir to simulate finite-temperature charge transfer and two-mode vibrationally assisted exciton transfer, observing that higher temperature broadens the transfer-rate spectrum and that local temperature can activate otherwise-suppressed interference pathways.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lindblad master equation for a harmonic oscillator subject to simultaneous cooling and heating, with jump operators a and a†. Cooling contributes a rate γ_c and heating contributes γ_h = γ_c n_ss; detailed balance gives p_n/p_{n−1} = n_ss/(n_ss + 1), the defining ratio of a thermal (geometric) state. In the experiment, the cooling channel is resolved-sideband Raman laser cooling on a 171Yb+ ion (or sympathetic cooling via a 172Yb+ ancilla for the out-of-phase mode), and the heating channel is a radio-frequency noise signal broadcast from an antenna; a blue-sideband probe extracts the full phonon distribution.

What would settle it

Measure the steady-state phonon distribution of the out-of-phase mode for n_ss ≈ 5–10 using an independent thermometer, and check the detailed-balance ratio p_n/p_{n−1} = n_ss/(n_ss+1) for all n, while also monitoring neighboring modes; a deviation from the geometric distribution, or heating of spectator modes, would invalidate the single-mode thermal-bath model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a trapped-ion motional mode coupled to two controlled dissipative channels—resolved-sideband laser cooling and broadcast electric-field noise—relaxes to a true thermal state, not merely a heated or squeezed one, with mean occupation n_ss = γ_h/γ_c. Because γ_c and γ_h can be tuned independently, the temperature and the equilibration (dissipation) rate are independently controllable. The authors prove this by deriving the Lindblad master equation and its detailed-balance steady state, and they confirm it experimentally: the phonon number follows ⟨n(t)⟩ = n_ss + (n_0 − n_ss)e^{−γ_c t} from two different initial temperatures, and the steady-state populations ma

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the broadcast electric-field noise acts as an independent heating Lindblad channel on the targeted motional mode alone, adding linearly to the laser cooling; for the non-center-of-mass modes actually used in the simulations, this required empirical calibration of the near-field antenna profile and roughly a factor of 20 in extra noise amplitude, and if bystander modes heat up or the two drives do not act independently, the engineered temperatu

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Finite-temperature open-system dynamics (thermal-state preparation, heat flow, thermal entanglement) can now be studied in trapped-ion simulators with independent control of temperature and dissipation.
  • For the charge-transfer model, higher bath temperature broadens the transfer-rate spectrum: rates drop at small donor-acceptor gaps and increase at large gaps, a temperature dependence beyond the earlier dissipation-only picture.
  • In the two-mode exciton-transfer model, raising the local temperature of one vibrational mode activates a mixed-mode coherent pathway that is otherwise suppressed, demonstrating thermally activated interference.
  • With multiple addressed modes, each mode can be given its own temperature, allowing local-temperature gradients and multi-bath spin-boson models to be realized.
  • Resonantly driving higher-order sideband processes with noise and cooling tones could extend the scheme to nonlinear and structured (non-Gaussian) reservoirs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relation n_ss = γ_h/γ_c ties temperature to the ratio of two rates; a natural next step is to sweep γ_c and γ_h together along curves of constant n_ss to measure how charge-transfer rates depend on dissipation alone while keeping temperature fixed, separating friction effects from thermal effects.
  • Because the heating channel is a broadcast classical noise field, the method may be transferable to other platforms with laser-coolable harmonic oscillators, such as trapped neutral atoms or optomechanical systems, provided the noise can be shaped to the target mode.
  • The reported difficulty of measuring steady states above n_ss ≈ 3 suggests a practical test: with a more sensitive phonon thermometer (e.g., using multiple sideband probes or ancilla-based measurements), one could check whether the thermal distribution holds at higher temperatures where free-parameter fits failed.
  • The thermally activated mixed-mode resonance points toward a design principle: local temperature differences between vibrational modes can route excitation along specific interference-enabled channels, which could be exploited to control energy flow in multi-mode simulators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and experimentally demonstrates a scheme to engineer thermal reservoirs for trapped-ion motional modes by combining continuous resolved-sideband cooling at rate γ_c with broadcast RF electric-field noise at rate γ_h. For a single mode, the steady-state mean occupation is n_ss=γ_h/γ_c and the relaxation rate is γ_c, enabling independent control of temperature and dissipation. On a COM mode of a single 171Yb+ ion, the authors verify exponential phonon dynamics consistent with Eq. (2) for multiple initial temperatures and heating rates, and find steady-state phonon distributions consistent with thermal states. They then apply the method to a dual-species chain to simulate finite-temperature charge transfer and two-mode vibrationally assisted exciton transfer, observing a broadening of the charge-transfer rate spectrum at higher temperature and a thermally activated mixed-mode resonance in the two-mode system.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides a practical and versatile tool for trapped-ion quantum simulation of open systems at finite temperature, extending earlier cooling-only or noise-only reservoir-engineering methods. The COM-mode benchmark is convincing: independent γ_h and γ_c control, dynamics following Eq. (2), and thermal steady-state distributions are demonstrated with quantitative agreement. The applications to charge-transfer and two-mode exciton-transfer models illustrate the method's relevance to chemical dynamics, and the temperature-dependent transfer-rate spectra in Fig. 3 are consistent with numerical simulations. The paper also includes a self-contained analytic derivation of the thermal steady state and an alternative all-laser protocol, though the latter is not experimentally demonstrated. The main weakness is the lack of direct thermometry for the non-COM modes used in the simulations, which tempers the strength of the local-temperature claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Supplemental 'Controlled heating of non-COM motional mode'; Figs. 3-4 and Eq. (6)] The central reservoir demonstration (Fig. 2) is performed on a COM mode of a single ion, with direct phonon-number thermometry. However, the finite-temperature LVC simulations in Figs. 3-4 are performed on the out-of-phase mode at 3.776 MHz (and the ω1,ω2 modes in Fig. 4). The Supplemental states that broadcast RF noise couples predominantly to the COM mode and that heating non-COM modes requires ~20× amplitude and an empirically measured antenna profile, but no direct blue-sideband thermometry is reported for these modes under simultaneous cooling+heating. The values (nbar1,nbar2)=(0.10,0.80) in Fig. 4 and nbar=0.15,0.80 in Fig. 3 thus appear to be nominal settings rather than independently calibrated temperatures. Since the theory curves are numerical simulations of the same master-equation model, agreement with data tests self-consistency of the model, not the local-temperature claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The dissipator is introduced as D_c[ρ] but then used as D_a and D_{a†}; please clarify the notation by defining D_c for a general operator c and then applying it to a and a†.
  2. [End Matter, 'Finite-temperature vibrationally assisted exciton transfer'] The statement that a single-phonon excitation rate is 'proportional to p_ni(ni+1)' is ambiguous: the rates for absorption and emission involve p_ni(n_i+1) and p_{ni+1}(n_i+1) respectively. Please specify the two cases.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] Unlike Fig. 3A, no error bars are mentioned for the experimental data points in Fig. 4A. If error bars were omitted for clarity, state this and point to the Supplemental; if not available, the significance of the thermally activated resonance near 0.30ω1 is hard to assess.
  4. [Supplemental, 'Numerical calculations for finite-temperature excitation transfer'] The dephasing rates γ_z and γ_m are extracted by comparing simulations to the same experimental data used in Figs. 3-4. Please state whether the engineered nbar and γ values were held fixed during this extraction, and provide a brief sensitivity analysis or uncertainty estimate for the plotted theoretical curves.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the thermal steady state is derived from the master equation and validated against independent heating/cooling calibrations and phonon-number measurements.

full rationale

The main theoretical result, Eq. (1), is a standard Lindblad master equation for a thermal reservoir. The Supplemental derivation (Eqs. S.1-S.3) obtains the detailed-balance ratio p_n/p_{n-1}=n_ss/(n_ss+1) directly from that equation, so the thermal steady state is not assumed or imported from a self-citation. The experimental validation in Fig. 2 is also non-circular: gamma_h is extracted from heating-only dynamics and gamma_c from cooling-only dynamics, and then Eq. (2) is checked against independent combined heating+cooling traces starting from two different initial temperatures. The steady-state phonon distributions are free fits compared with thermal distributions bounded by the separately measured gamma_h/gamma_c. The finite-temperature charge-transfer and two-mode simulations integrate the same master equation with independently calibrated parameters; the only data-extracted quantities are small imperfection rates gamma_z and gamma_m, which are nuisance corrections and are not the source of the reported temperature effects. Self-citations to Refs. [40,41] supply the LVC Hamiltonian and experimental protocol, not the thermal-reservoir result, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The Supplemental caveat about non-COM mode heating being less efficient and requiring empirical antenna-profile calibration is a validation limitation, not a circular reduction. Overall, no circular step meeting the required evidence standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The main load-bearing assumptions are the independent-dissipator model for cooling/heating and the faithful realization of the LVC Hamiltonians. The only fitted parameters are small auxiliary dephasing rates used to improve agreement between numerical simulations and experiment.

free parameters (2)
  • γ_z (spin dephasing rate) = 2π × 7 Hz
    Extracted by comparing numerical simulations with experimental data (Supplemental 'Numerical calculations for finite-temperature excitation transfer'); used in theory curves for Figs. 3 and 4.
  • γ_m (motional dephasing rate) = 2π × 80 Hz
    Extracted by comparing numerical simulations with experimental data; used in theory curves for Figs. 3 and 4.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Markovian Lindblad master equation with independent cooling and heating dissipators (Eq. 1)
    The whole reservoir-engineering scheme assumes the combined effect of laser cooling and electric-field noise is accurately captured by two independent Lindblad terms with rates γ_c and γ_h.
  • standard math Detailed balance yields a thermal steady state with n_ss = γ_h/γ_c (Supplemental Eq. S.3)
    The proof that the steady state is a thermal distribution relies on standard detailed-balance recurrence relations for a harmonic oscillator coupled to a thermal bath.
  • domain assumption Fock-state populations are extracted from blue-sideband spin dynamics via the fit model in Eq. (3)
    The phonon-number measurements assume the anti-Jaynes-Cummings probe with an empirical decay constant γ_d faithfully reflects the true phonon distribution.
  • domain assumption The LVC Hamiltonians of Eqs. (4) and (5) are faithfully realized by the trapped-ion Raman and sympathetic-cooling controls
    The transfer-rate experiments rest on the established mapping from spin-phonon interactions to the donor-acceptor-vibration model, following Refs. [40,41].
  • domain assumption Broadcast RF noise couples to the intended motional mode without significant unintended heating
    For non-COM modes this requires a noise-field gradient; the authors note the antenna profile is empirically measured and required ~20× higher amplitude (Supplemental 'Controlled heating of non-COM motional mode').

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental Realization of Thermal Reservoirs with Tunable Temperature in a Trapped-Ion Spin-Boson Simulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7ZYDXL7S

@misc{pith2026251108689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental Realization of Thermal Reservoirs with Tunable Temperature in a Trapped-Ion Spin-Boson Simulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7ZYDXL7S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.08689}
}
read the original abstract

We propose and demonstrate an experimental scheme to engineer thermal baths with independently tunable temperatures and dissipation rates for the motional modes of a trapped-ion system. This approach enables robust thermal-state preparation and quantum simulations of open-system dynamics in bosonic and spin-boson models at well-controlled finite temperatures. We benchmark our protocol by experimentally realizing out-of-equilibrium dynamics of a charge-transfer model at different temperatures. We observe that, when the process occurs at a higher temperature, the transfer rate spectrum broadens, with reduced rates at small donor-acceptor energy gaps and enhanced rates at large gaps. We then employ our scheme to study local-temperature effects in a two-mode vibrationally assisted exciton transfer system, where we observe thermally activated interference pathways for excitation transfer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.08689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. B). We emphasize that our proposed scheme is not limited to this temperature range. For example, higher heating rates or reduced cooling rates could be applied to achieve more elevated temperatures. However, due to limitations in extracting phonon-population distribu￾tions from blue-sideband dynamics fits, we can reliably characterize only up to nss ≈ 3 (see Supplemental Ma￾terial [54]). Importantly, we also show th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ), near 0.54ω1 and 0.97ω1, each corresponding to single-phonon exchange between the electronic system and one of the two vibrational modes. As shown by the red curve and data, raising the local temperature of the ω2 mode selectively reduces the transfer rates asso￾ciat…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao. Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Wineland, C

    D. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. King, and D. Meekhof.Experimental Issues in Co- herent Quantum-State Manipulation of Trapped Atomic Ions. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology103(1997)

    1997

  3. [3]

    C. J. Myatt, B. E. King, Q. A. Turchette, C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland.Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs. Nature403, 269–273 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Brownnutt, M

    M. Brownnutt, M. Kumph, P. Rabl, and R. Blatt.Ion- trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces. Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1419–1482 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    W. Chen, J. Gan, J.-N. Zhang, D. Matuskevich, and K. Kim.Quantum computation and simulation with vi- brational modes of trapped ions. Chinese Physics B30, 060311 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Pagano, W

    G. Pagano, W. Adamczyk, and V. So.Fundamentals of Trapped Ions and Quantum Simulation of Chemical Dynamics. arXiv:2505.20412 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevit- sky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home.Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator. Nature566, 513–517 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    V. G. Matsos, C. H. Valahu, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, X. C. Kolesnikow, M. J. Biercuk, and T. R. Tan.Robust and Deterministic Preparation of Bosonic Logical States in a Trapped Ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 050602 (2024)

    2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Rojkov, M

    I. Rojkov, M. Simoni, E. Zapusek, F. Reiter, and J. Home.Stabilization of cat-state manifolds using non- linear reservoir engineering. arXiv:2407.18087 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill.Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V. V. Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin.New Class of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes for a Bosonic Mode. Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola.Quan- tum Computing with Rotation-Symmetric Bosonic Codes. Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Toyoda, R

    K. Toyoda, R. Hiji, A. Noguchi, and S. Urabe.Hong– Ou–Mandel interference of two phonons in trapped ions. Nature527, 74–77 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Debnath, N

    S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, S.-T. Wang, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe.Observation of Hopping and Blockade of Bosons in a Trapped Ion Spin Chain. Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 073001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Zhang, M

    J. Zhang, M. Um, D. Lv, J.-N. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and K. Kim.NOON States of Nine Quantized Vibrations in Two Radial Modes of a Trapped Ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 160502 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    S. Ding, G. Maslennikov, R. Habl¨ utzel, and D. Matsuke- vich.Quantum Simulation with a Trilinear Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 130502 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Katz and C

    O. Katz and C. Monroe.Programmable Quantum Sim- ulations of Bosonic Systems with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033604 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    P.-Y. Hou, J. J. Wu, S. D. Erickson, D. C. Cole, G. Zaran- tonello, A. D. Brandt, S. Geller, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Glancy, E. Knill, A. C. Wilson, D. H. Slichter, and D. Leibfried.Coherent coupling and non-destructive mea- surement of trapped-ion mechanical oscillators. Nature Ph...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Davoudi, N

    Z. Davoudi, N. M. Linke, and G. Pagano.Toward simu- lating quantum field theories with controlled phonon-ion dynamics: A hybrid analog-digital approach. Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043072 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    A. T. Than, S. V. Kadam, V. Vikramaditya, N. H. Nguyen, X. Liu, Z. Davoudi, A. M. Green, and N. M. Linke.Observation of quantum-field-theory dynamics on a spin-phonon quantum computer. arXiv:2509.11477 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Z¨ ahringer, G

    F. Z¨ ahringer, G. Kirchmair, R. Gerritsma, E. Solano, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos.Realization of a Quantum Walk with One and Two Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100503 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    G. Clos, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz.Time- Resolved Observation of Thermalization in an Isolated Quantum System. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 170401 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    D. Lv, S. An, Z. Liu, J.-N. Zhang, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and K. Kim.Quantum Simula- tion of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion. Phys. Rev. X8, 021027 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Cai, Z.-D

    M.-L. Cai, Z.-D. Liu, W.-D. Zhao, Y.-K. Wu, Q. Mei, Y. Jiang, L. He, X. Zhang, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan. Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quan- tum Rabi model with a single trapped ion. Nature Com- munications12(2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Mei, B.-W

    Q.-X. Mei, B.-W. Li, Y.-K. Wu, M.-L. Cai, Y. Wang, L. Yao, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan.Experimental Re- alization of the Rabi-Hubbard Model with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 160504 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Muralidharan and K

    S. Muralidharan and K. Toyoda.Site-dependent control of polaritons in the Jaynes–Cummings–Hubbard model with trapped ions. Applied Physics B129, 115 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    D. J. Gorman, B. Hemmerling, E. Megidish, S. A. Moeller, P. Schindler, M. Sarovar, and H. Haeffner.En- gineering Vibrationally Assisted Energy Transfer in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator. Phys. Rev. X8, 011038 7 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya-Agudelo, R. J. MacDonell, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, J. B. P´ erez- S´ anchez, J. Yuen-Zhou, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, T. R. Tan, and I. Kassal.Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection. ...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Whitlow, Z

    J. Whitlow, Z. Jia, Y. Wang, C. Fang, J. Kim, and K. R. Brown.Quantum simulation of conical intersec- tions using trapped ions. Nature Chemistry15, 1509– 1514 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    MacDonell, T

    R. MacDonell, T. Navickas, T. Wohlers-Reichel, C. Valahu, A. Rao, M. Millican, M. Currington, M. Bier- cuk, T. Tan, C. Hempel, and I. Kassal.Predicting molec- ular vibronic spectra using time-domain analog quantum simulation. Chemical Science14(2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    M. Kang, H. Nuomin, S. N. Chowdhury, J. L. Yuly, K. Sun, J. Whitlow, J. Valdiviezo, Z. Zhang, P. Zhang, D. N. Beratan, and K. R. Brown.Seeking a quan- tum advantage with trapped-ion quantum simulations of condensed-phase chemical dynamics. Nature Reviews Chemistry8, 340–358 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    V. C. Olaya-Agudelo, B. Stewart, C. H. Valahu, R. J. MacDonell, M. J. Millican, V. G. Matsos, F. Scuccimarra, T. R. Tan, and I. Kassal.Simulating open-system molec- ular dynamics on analog quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023215 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    K. J. Laidler.Chemical Kinetics. Harper & Row, New York, 3 edition (1987). ISBN 0060438623

    1987

  26. [34]

    D. G. Truhlar, B. C. Garrett, and S. J. Klippenstein. Current Status of Transition-State Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry100, 12771–12800 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press (2007). ISBN 9780199213900

    2007

  28. [36]

    Fedortchenko, A

    S. Fedortchenko, A. Keller, T. Coudreau, and P. Mil- man.Finite-temperature reservoir engineering and en- tanglement dynamics. Phys. Rev. A90, 042103 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Wu and J.-B

    W. Wu and J.-B. Xu.Quantum coherence of spin-boson model at finite temperature. Annals of Physics377, 48–61 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Lin and L.-M

    G.-D. Lin and L.-M. Duan.Equilibration and temperature distribution in a driven ion chain. New Journal of Physics 13, 075015 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller.Quantum Reser- voir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4728–4731 (1996)

    1996

  32. [40]

    V. So, M. D. Suganthi, A. Menon, M. Zhu, R. Zhu- ravel, H. Pu, P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and G. Pagano.Trapped-ion quantum simulation of electron transfer models with tunable dissipation. Science Ad- vances10, eads8011 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    V. So, M. D. Suganthi, M. Zhu, A. Menon, G. Tomaras, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and G. Pagano.Quantum Simulation of Charge and Exciton Transfer in Multi-mode Models using Engineered Reser- voirs. arXiv:2505.22729 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kienzler.Quantum Harmonic Oscillator State Synthe- sis by Reservoir Engineering

    D. Kienzler.Quantum Harmonic Oscillator State Synthe- sis by Reservoir Engineering. PhD thesis, ETH Z¨ urich (2015). Diss. ETH No. 22622

    2015

  35. [43]

    Cetina, L

    M. Cetina, L. Egan, C. Noel, M. Goldman, D. Biswas, A. Risinger, D. Zhu, and C. Monroe.Control of Trans- verse Motion for Quantum Gates on Individually Ad- dressed Atomic Qubits. PRX Quantum3, 010334 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Monroe, D

    C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, S. R. Jefferts, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and P. Gould.Resolved- Sideband Raman Cooling of a Bound Atom to the 3D Zero-Point Energy. Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4011–4014 (1995)

    1995

  37. [45]

    Kienzler, H.-Y

    D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Le- upold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home.Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering. Science347, 53–56 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    M. Zhu, V. So, G. Pagano, and H. Pu.Dissipation- assisted steady-state entanglement engineering based on electron transfer models. Phys. Rev. A112, 012617 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Y. Li, Y. Li, X. Cheng, L. Wang, X. Zhao, W. Hou, K. Rehan, M. Zhu, L. Yan, X. Qin, X. Peng, H. Yuan, Y. Lin, and J. Du.Programmable multi-mode entangle- ment via dissipative engineering in vibrating trapped ions. Science Advances11, eadv7838 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Navickas, R

    T. Navickas, R. J. MacDonell, C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya- Agudelo, F. Scuccimarra, M. J. Millican, V. G. Matsos, H. L. Nourse, A. D. Rao, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, I. Kassal, and T. R. Tan.Experimental Quantum Simu- lation of Chemical Dynamics. Journal of the American Chemical ...

    2025

  41. [49]

    K. Sun, M. Kang, H. Nuomin, G. Schwartz, D. N. Be- ratan, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim.Quantum simulation of spin-boson models with structured bath. Nature Commu- nications16, 4042 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    J. M. Mayer.Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: A Reac- tion Chemist’s View. Annual Review of Physical Chem- istry55, 363–390 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Fassioli, R

    F. Fassioli, R. Dinshaw, P. C. Arpin, and G. D. Scholes. Photosynthetic light harvesting: excitons and coherence. Journal of The Royal Society Interface11, 20130901 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Jarmola, V

    A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker.Temperature- and Magnetic-Field-Dependent Longitudinal Spin Relaxation in Nitrogen-Vacancy En- sembles in Diamond. Physical Review Letters108, 197601 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    H. J. Carmichael.Statistical methods in quantum op- tics 1: master equations and Fokker-Planck equations. Springer Science & Business Media (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Experimental realization of thermal reservoirs with tunable temperature for trapped-ion spin-boson sim- ulators

    V. So, M. Zhu, M. D. Suganthi, A. Menon, G. Tomaras, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, and G. Pagano.Supplemental Ma- terial for “Experimental realization of thermal reservoirs with tunable temperature for trapped-ion spin-boson sim- ulators”(2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Schlawin, M

    F. Schlawin, M. Gessner, A. Buchleitner, T. Sch¨ atz, and S. S. Skourtis.Continuously Parametrized Quantum Sim- ulation of Molecular Electron-Transfer Reactions. PRX Quantum2, 010314 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Lemmer, C

    A. Lemmer, C. Cormick, D. Tamascelli, T. Schaetz, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio.A trapped-ion simulator for spin-boson models with structured environments. New Journal of Physics20, 073002 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    S. S. Skourtis, A. J. R. Da Silva, W. Bialek, and J. N. Onuchic.New look at the primary charge separation in bacterial photosynthesis. The Journal of Physical Chem- istry96, 8034–8041 (1992)

    1992

  50. [58]

    Fallas Padilla, V

    D. Fallas Padilla, V. So, A. Menon, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, and G. Pagano.Delocalized Excitation Transfer in Open Quantum Systems with Long-Range Interactions. PRX Quantum6, 040301 (2025). 8

    2025

  51. [59]

    R. A. Marcus.Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment. Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 599–610 (1993)

    1993

  52. [60]

    A. A. Valido, D. Alonso, and S. Kohler.Gaussian en- tanglement induced by an extended thermal environment. Phys. Rev. A88, 042303 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    Chanda, T

    T. Chanda, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, A. K. Pal, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen.Emergence of entanglement with temperature and time in factorization-surface states. Phys. Rev. A97, 012316 (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    Roßnagel, S

    J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer.A single-atom heat engine. Science352, 325–329 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Maslennikov, S

    G. Maslennikov, S. Ding, R. Habl¨ utzel, J. Gan, A. Roulet, S. Nimmrichter, J. Dai, V. Scarani, and D. Matsukevich.Quantum absorption refrigerator with trapped ions. Nature Communications10, 202 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Roy and M

    D. Roy and M. Di Ventra.Thermoelectric phenomena in disordered open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. B81, 193101 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    Tejero, R

    A. Tejero, R. S´ anchez, L. E. Kaoutit, D. Manzano, and A. Lasanta.Asymmetries of thermal processes in open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023020 (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    P. F. Barbara, T. J. Meyer, and M. A. Ratner.Contem- porary Issues in Electron Transfer Research. The Journal of Physical Chemistry100, 13148–13168 (1996)

    1996

  59. [67]

    A. J. Shah, P. Kirton, S. Felicetti, and H. Alaeian.Dis- sipative phase transition in the two-photon dicke model. arXiv:2412.14271 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    V. Y. Mylnikov, S. O. Potashin, G. S. Sokolovskii, and N. S. Averkiev.Emergent equilibrium and quantum crit- icality in a two-photon dissipative oscillator. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013061 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    J. Liu, Q. Wu, J. E. Moore, H. Haeffner, and C. W. W¨ achtler.Observation of synchronization between two quantum van der Pol oscillators in trapped ions. arXiv:2509.18423 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    V. So, M. Zhu, M. D. Suganthi, A. Menon, G. Tomaras, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, and G. Pagano.Experimental real- ization of thermal reservoirs with tunable temperature for trapped-ion spin-boson simulators(2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    James.Quantum Computation with Hot and Cold Ions: An Assessment of Proposed Schemes

    D. James.Quantum Computation with Hot and Cold Ions: An Assessment of Proposed Schemes. Fortschritte der Physik48, 823–837 (2000)

    2000

  64. [72]

    Chenu, M

    A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo.Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynam- ics Using Classical Noise. Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 140403 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori.QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum sys- tems. Computer Physics Communications184, 1234– 1240 (2013). END MA TTER Steady-state phonon-number distributions We show in Fig. 5 that the phonon-population distri- butions...

    2013

  66. [74]

    withH→H unc. Without electronic coupling, the spin state initially prepared in the donor state does not evolve, while the motional state evolves to equilibrate with the bath, reaching a thermal displaced steady state |D⟩ ⟨D| ⊗ρ−, whereρ − = P n e−nω/kB T |n−⟩ ⟨n−|is a thermal ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.